Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T15:55:17.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiative Recombination and Carrier Lifetimes in Surface-Free GaAs Homostructures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

L. M. Smith ,
D. J. Wolford ,
R. Venkatasubramanian  and
S.K. Ghandhi
L. M. Smith
Affiliation:
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
D. J. Wolford
Affiliation:
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
R. Venkatasubramanian
Affiliation:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Troy, NY 12180
S.K. Ghandhi
Affiliation:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Troy, NY 12180
Get access

Abstract

We show that the radiative efficiencies and lifetimes of photoexcited carriers in epitaxial GaAs may be enhanced by 3 to 4 orders-of-magnitude by the preparation of n+, doped layers at surface and substrate interfaces. Samples were prepared by Organo-Metallic Vapor Phase Epitaxy (OMVPE), with n-region thicknesses of 3–10 µm, and narrow layers Si-doped to n+ concentrations of 5×1018 cm-3. Time-resolved luminescence in such structures, under both surface and bulk (near-band-edge) excitation conditions, reveal near-edge-excitonic or band-to-band-dominated recombination spectra, with carrier lifetimes ranging from 1.5 nsec at 1.5 K to nearly 1 µsec at room temperature. This is in contrast to the sub-nanosecond lifetimes typical in conventionally prepared bulk GaAs, but is comparable to the best reported for high-purity LPE-prepared GaAs/AlxGa1-xAs double heterostructures. The spatial distributions of photoexcited carriers in these structures are observed to expand by over an order of magnitude during their 1 µsec room temperature lifetime. The expansion is diffusive, with a measured diffusion constant of 14 cm2/sec at 300 K. This corresponds to a room temperature mobility of 525 cm2/Vsec, comparable to previously measured hole mobilities in bulk p-type GaAs of similar purity. These results are clear evidence that the narrow, heavily doped layers effectively “shield” minority carriers from the interfaces, thereby reducing interface recombination.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 163: Symposium G – Impurities, Defects and Diffusion in Semiconductors: Bulk and Layered Structures , 1989 , 95
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Yablonovitch, E., Sandroff, C.J., Bhat, R., and Gmitter, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 439 (1987).Google Scholar
2 Liu, D., Zhang, T., LaRue, R.A., Harris, J.S. Jr. and Sigmon, T.W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 1059 (1988).Google Scholar
3 Parkinson, B.A., Heller, A., and Miller, B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 33, 521 (1978).Google Scholar
4 Nelson, R.J., Williams, J.S., Leamy, H.J., Miller, B., Casey, H.C. Jr., Parkinson, B.A., and Heller, A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 36, 76 (1981).Google Scholar
5 Gmitter, T.J., Yablonovitch, E., and Heller, A., J. Electrochem. Soc. 135, 2391 (1988).Google Scholar
6 Ghandhi, S.K., Tyagi, S., and Venkatasubramanian, R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 1308 (1988).Google Scholar
7 Olson, J.M., Ahrenkiel, R.K., Dunlavy, D.J., Keyes, Brian, and Kibbler, A.E., Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 1208 (1989).Google Scholar
8 Casey, H.C. Jr. and Stern, Frank, J. Appl. Phys. 47, 631 (1976).Google Scholar
9 Nelson, R.J. and Sobers, R.G., J. Appl. Phys. 49, 6103 (1978).Google Scholar
10 Foquet, J.E. and Burnham, R.D., IEEE J. of Quantum Elect., QE–22, 1799 (1986).Google Scholar
11 Dawson, and Woodbridge, Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 1227 (1984).Google Scholar
12 Matsueda, H. and Hara, K. Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 362 (1989).Google Scholar
13 Hariz, A., Daniel Dapkus, P., Lee, H.C., Menu, W.P. and DenBaars, S.D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 635 (1989).Google Scholar
14 Iwata, H., Yokoyama, H., Sigumoto, M., Hamao, N. and Onabe, K., 11th Inter. Semicond. Laser Conf. Aug. 29 – Sept. 1, Boston, SPIE, p. 42 (1988).Google Scholar
15 Yablonovitch, E., Bhat, R. and Harbison, J.P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 1197 (1987).Google Scholar
16 Molenkamp, L.W. and van’t Blik, H.F.J., J. Appl. Phys. 64, 4253 (1988).Google Scholar
17 Lasher, G. and Stern, F., Phys. Rev. 133, A553 (1964).Google Scholar
18 Smith, Leigh M., Wolford, D.J., Venkatasubramanian, R. and Ghandhi, S.K.. Electronic Materials Conference, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, Massachusetts, 1989. Leigh M. Smith, D.J. Wolford, R. Venkatasubramanian and S.K. Ghandhi. Bulletin of the American Physical Society 34, 958 (1989).Google Scholar
19 t’Hooft, G.W., van der Poel, W.A.J.A., Molenkamp, L.W., and Foxon, C.T., in “Excitons in Confined Systems”, Del Sole, R., D’Andrea, A. and Lapiccirella, A., eds., Springer-Verlag, p. 59, 1988.Google Scholar