Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T14:19:33.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Melting Simulated High-Level Liquid Waste With Addition of TiN and AIN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Masayoshi Uno
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering, Osaka University, Yamada-oka 2-1, Suita, Osaka 565-0871JAPAN
Hajime Kinoshita
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering, Osaka University, Yamada-oka 2-1, Suita, Osaka 565-0871JAPAN
Shinsuke Yamanaka
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering, Osaka University, Yamada-oka 2-1, Suita, Osaka 565-0871JAPAN
Get access

Abstract

Calcined simulated high level liquid waste (HLLW) with a desired amount of TiN and AIN mixture was heat-treated at 1673-1873 K. It was revealed that the mixture of TiN and AIN (the atomic ratio of Al to Ti is 1:9) caused the melting of the specimen at 1673 K and the separation of the elements into two groups: alloy phase and oxide phase. The analysis of the oxide phase showed that the compounds in it could be divided into four phases, and that all fission product elements formed the complex oxides with Ti and Al. It is considered that Al and Zr dissolution in each phase contribute to the melting of the oxide phase at 1673K. A 30-days Soxhlet leach test showed that the chemical durability of the oxide phase as a waste form was superior to that of glass waste form[l]

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Kawamura, K., and Ohuchi, J. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVIII Part 1, edited by Murakami, T. and Ewing, R. C. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 353, Kyoto, Japan, 1995) pp. 8793.Google Scholar
2 Horie, M., Trans. Amer. Nucl. Soc. 62, 111 (1990).Google Scholar
3 Horie, M. in ENC'90 (Proc. of ENS/ANS-Foratom Conference vol. IV, 1990), p. 2281.Google Scholar
4 Horie, M. and Miyake, C. in RECOD'94 (Proc. of The forth international Conference on Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing and Waste Management vol.II, 1994), Session 9A-4.Google Scholar
5 Uno, M., Kadotani, Y., Miyake, C. and Horie, M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., vol. 353, 1339 (1995).Google Scholar
6 Uno, M., Kadotani, Y., Kinoshita, H., Miyake, C. and Horie, M., J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 33, 973980 (1996).Google Scholar
7 Uno, M., Kinoshita, H., Miyake, C. and Horie, M., J. Nucl. Mater., 274, 191196 (1997).Google Scholar
8 Uno, M., Kadotani, Y., Miyake, C. and Horie, M., J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 33, 879885 (1996).Google Scholar
9 Uno, M., Kinoshita, H., Sakai, E., Ikeda, A., Matsumoto, Y. and Yamanaka, S. in NUCEF'98 (Proc. of the 2nd NUCEF Int. Symp., 1999) pp. 545554.Google Scholar
10 Materials Characterization Center, 9-30-81.Google Scholar
11 Levin, E. M., Robbins, C. R. and McMurdie, H. F., Phase Diagrams for Ceramists, vol. 2 (American Ceramic Society, 1969).Google Scholar
12 Levin, E. M. and McMurdie, H. F., Phase Diagrams for Ceramists, vol. 3 (American Ceramic Society, 1975).Google Scholar
13 Roth, R. S., Dennis, J. R. and McMurdie, H. F., Phase Diagrams for Ceramists, vol. 6 (American Ceramic Society, 1987).Google Scholar
14 Clevinger, M. A., Hill, K. M. and Cedeno, C., Phase Diagrams for Ceramists, vol. 9 (American Ceramic Society, 1991).Google Scholar
15 Uno, M., Kinoshita, H. and Yamanaka, S., presented at the 1999 MRS Fall Meeting, Boston, MA, 1999.Google Scholar