Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T19:25:21.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A NOTE ON PROGRESSIVE TAXATION, NOMINAL-WAGE RIGIDITY, AND BUSINESS CYCLE DESTABILIZATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2019

Miroslav Gabrovski  and
Jang-Ting Guo
Miroslav Gabrovski
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii
Jang-Ting Guo*
Affiliation:
University of California
*
Address correspondence to: Jang-Ting Guo, Department of Economics, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA. e-mail: guojt@ucr.edu. Phone: 1-951-827-1588. Fax: 1-951-827-5685.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the context of a prototypical New Keynesian model, this paper examines the theoretical interrelations between two tractable formulations of progressive taxation on labor income versus (i) the equilibrium degree of nominal-wage rigidity as well as (ii) the resulting volatilities of hours worked and output in response to a monetary shock. In sharp contrast to the traditional stabilization view, we analytically show that linearly progressive taxation always operates like an automatic destabilizer which leads to higher cyclical fluctuations within the macroeconomy. We also obtain the same business cycle destabilization result under continuously progressive taxation if the initial degree of tax progressivity is sufficiently low.

Keywords

Progressive TaxationNominal-Wage RigidityAutomatic StabilizerBusiness Cycles
Type
Notes
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , June 2021 , pp. 1112 - 1125
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We thank Nicolas Caramp, Juin-Jen Chang, Yi Mao, Victor Ortego-Marti, Chong-Kee Yip, and seminar participants at Academia Sinica, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Chinese University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen, Asian Meeting of the Econometric Society, and North American Meeting of the Econometric Society for helpful comments and suggestions. Part of this research was conducted while Guo was a visiting research fellow at the Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, whose hospitality is greatly appreciated. Of course, all remaining errors are own own.

References

REFERENCES

Agell, J. and Dillén, M. (1994) Macroeconomic externalities. are Pigouvian taxes the answer? Journal of Public Economics 53, 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, L. M. and Romer, D. H. (1989) Are prices too sticky? Quarterly Journal of Economics 104, 507–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, L. M. and Romer, D. H. (1990) Real rigidities and the nonneutrality of money. Review of Economic Studies 57, 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, L. M. and Romer, D. H. (1991) Sticky prices as coordination failure. American Economic Review 81, 539–552.Google Scholar
Benhabib, J. and Farmer, R. E. A. (1994) Indeterminacy and increasing returns. Journal of Economic Theory 63, 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, O. J. and Kiyotaki, N. (1987) Monopolistic competition and the effects of aggregate demand. American Economic Review 77, 647–666.Google Scholar
Dromel, N. L. and Pintus, P. A. (2007) Linearly progressive income taxes and stabilization. Research in Economics 61, 25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, J. and Huffman, G. W. (1991) Tax analysis in a real-business-cycle model. Journal of Monetary Economics 27, 167–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, J.-T. and Lansing, K. J. (1998) Indeterminacy and stabilization policy. Journal of Economic Theory 82, 481–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, R. G., Plosser, C. I. and Rebelo, S. T. (1988) Production, growth and business cycles II. New direction. Journal of Monetary Economics 21, 309–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleven, H. J. and Kreiner, C. T. (2003) The role of taxes as automatic destabilizers in New Keynesian economics. Journal of Public Economics 87, 1123–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattesini, F. and Rossi, L. (2012) Monetary policy and automatic stabilizers: the role of progressive taxation. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 44, 825–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musgrave, R. A. and Thin, T. (1948) Income tax progression, 1929-48. Journal of Political Economy 56, 498–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt-Grohé, S. and Martin Uribe, M. (1997) Balanced-budget rules, distortionary taxes, and aggregate instability. Journal of Political Economy 105, 976–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar