Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T18:44:51.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Motives for Outdoor Recreation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2020

Frederic O. Sargent*
Affiliation:
Department of Resource Economics, Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Vermont
Get access

Extract

More accurate prediction of future demand (or needs) for land for outdoor recreational activities would significantly improve land use planning. Unfortunately, prediction of demand (or projected use) is difficult. Most standard predicting measures have little or questionable relevance to outdoor recreation. Straightline projections of past outdoor activities are of limited use as technology, income, leisure time, mobility, and habits are changing so fast that it is doubtful if the past may be used to predict the future. In fact, all methods of predicting (or projecting) future demand (or needs) on the basis of past trends are inoperative in periods when there is rapid change in all the components influencing the trend, as well as in life styles. Surveys and questionnaires are of some use, but their value is limited by the propensity of respondents to give answers which they think are expected and the fact that they cannot appraise their future attitude towards activities with which they are now unfamiliar.

Type
Natural Resource Economics
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This paper is a product of research projects Hatch 212 and McIntire-Stennis 15.

References

1/ By outdoor recreation activities, reference is to active, extensive land uses which utilizes the natural environment. Not included in this definition are spectator sports and activities on man-made courts, courses, pools, fields, pitches, tracks, and diamonds.Google Scholar

2/ Clawson and Knetsch in Economics of Outdoor Recreation discuss half a dozen methods of projecting future demand for outdoor recreation and also show the limitations of each.Google Scholar

3/ “Hiking on Camels Hump,” by Frederic O. Sargent, Vermont Agricultural Experiment Station, Research Report MP 60, 1969.Google Scholar

4/ “Lakeshore Land Use Controls,” by Frederic O. Sargent and William H. Bingham, Vermont Agricultural Experiment Station, Research Report MP 57, 1969.Google Scholar