Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T05:56:55.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sublittoral hard-substratum communities off Orkney and St Abbs (Scotland)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

M. J. De Kluijver
Affiliation:
Institute of Taxonomic Zoology, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94766, NL-1090 GT Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Extract

During the summer of 1990 the sublittoral communities on hard substrata were investigated at 32 localities off Orkney and St Abbs (Scotland). The environment in both places has an open coast character, with small seasonal fluctuations in temperature and salinity and a high transparency of the water. The major governing environmental factors are the available amount of daylight and the degree of exposure to water movement. For the photic zone two different communities, dominated by foliose algae, are described. Under exposed conditions a widespread community is found, dominated by red algae in the middle structural layer and characterized by a dense canopy of Laminaria hyperborea. Under more sheltered conditions a community occurs in which brown and green algae become more abundant in the middle structural layer, while the top layer is formed by Laminaria saccharina and Saccorhiza polyschides. In the aphotic zone, under exposed conditions, a community is found which consists of a number of variants, with a dominance of the suspension feeders Pomatoceros triqueter and Alcyonium digitatum or bryozoans and hydrozoans. These variants are found in different regions, depths and angles of inclination of the substrata. Comparable variants have also been found off Helgoland (German Bight). Under sheltered conditions the suspension feeders become of minor importance and the community is dominated by encrusting red algae. In a surge tunnel in the photic zone off St Abbs Head, a community dominated by Dendrodoa grossularia and Clathrina coriacea is present.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baxter, J.M., Jones, A.M. & Simpson, J. A., 1985. A study of long-term changes in some rocky shore communities in Orkney. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. B, 87, 4763.Google Scholar
Berry, J.R., 1985. The natural history of Orkney. London: Collins New Naturalist.Google Scholar
Davies, I.M., 1985. Marine pollution in Orkney. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. B, 87, 105112.Google Scholar
Durance, J.A., 1981. Maximum tidal current speed during mean spring tides. In Atlas of the seas around the British Isles (ed. A.J., Lee and W.J., Ramster), section 2.10. Lowestoft: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.Google Scholar
Earll, R.C., 1981. The sublittoral ecology of the St Abbs area, Berwickshire. Nature Conservancy Council/Underwater Conservation Society.Google Scholar
Earll, R.C., 1982. A sublittoral survey of St. Abbs Head and adjacent areas. Underwater Conservation Society/Nature Conservancy Council.Google Scholar
Eisma, D., 1990. Fysische geografie. In De Noordzee (ed. P., De Wolf), pp. 1120. Zutphen: Terra.Google Scholar
Fowler, J.A., ed., 1982. Ecological studies in the maritime approaches to the Shetland oil terminal. Leicester: Leicester Polytechnic.Google Scholar
Gislén, T., 1930. Epibioses of the Gullmar Fjord. II. Marine Sociology. Kristinebergs Zoologiska Station 1877–1927. Skriftserie utgiven av K. svenska Vetenskapsakademien, 4, 1380.Google Scholar
Hagen, N.T., 1983. Destructive grazing of kelp beds by sea urchins in Vestfjorden, northern Norway. Sarsia, 68, 177190.Google Scholar
Hiscock, K., 1985. Aspects of the ecology of rocky sublittoral areas. In The ecology of rocky coasts (ed. P.G., Moore and R., Seed), pp. 290328. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Hiscock, K. & Mitchell, R., 1980. The description and classification of sublittoral epibenthic ecosystems. In The shore environment. Vol. 2. Ecosystems (ed. J.H., Priceet al.), pp. 323370. London: Academic Press. [Systematics Association, special volume 17b.]Google Scholar
Jones, A.M., 1975. The marine environment of Orkney. In The natural environment of Orkney (ed. R., Goodier), pp. 8594. Edinburgh: Nature Conservancy Council.Google Scholar
Jones, N.S. & Kain, J.M., 1967. Subtidal algal colonization following the removal of Echinus. Helgoländer Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen, 15, 460466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaandorp, J.A., 1986. Rocky substrate communities of the infralittoral fringe of the Boulonnais coast, NW France: a quantitative survey. Marine Biology, 92, 255265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kluijver, M.J. De, 1989. Sublittoral hard substrate communities of the southern Delta area, SW Netherlands. Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde, 59, 141158.Google Scholar
Kluijver, M.J. De, 1991. Sublittoral hard substrate communities off Helgoland. Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen, 45, 317344.Google Scholar
Kluijver, M.J. De & Leewis, R.J., 1993. Changes in the sublittoral hard substrate communities in the Oosterschelde estuary (SW Netherlands), caused by changes in the environmental parameters. Hydrobiologia. In press.Google Scholar
Leewis, R.J. & Waardenburg, H. W., 1989. The flora and fauna of the sublittoral part of the artificial rocky shores in the south-west Netherlands. Progress in Underwater Science, 14, 109122.Google Scholar
Leewis, R.J. & Waardenburg, H.W., 1990. Flora and fauna of the sublittoral hard substrata in the Oosterschelde (The Netherlands)- interactions with the North Sea and the influence of a storm surge barrier. Hydrobiologia, 195, 189200.Google Scholar
Mather, A.S., Ritchie, W. & Smith, J.S., 1975. An introduction to the morphology of the Orkney coastline. In The natural environment of Orkney (ed. R., Goodier), pp. 1018. Edinburgh: Nature Conservancy Council.Google Scholar
Moore, P.G., 1983. Biological interactions. In The ecology of the shallow sublittoral benthos (ed. R., Earll and D.G., Erwin), pp. 125143. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Muus, B.J., 1968. A field method for measuring ‘exposure’ by means of plaster balls. A preliminary account. Sarsia, 34, 6168.Google Scholar
Mykura, W., 1975. The geological basis of the Orkney environment. In The natural environment of Orkney (ed. R., Goodier), pp. 19. Edinburgh: Nature Conservancy Council.Google Scholar
Pagett, R.M., 1983. The sublittoral ecology of the St. Abbs area, Berwickshire (III). Marine Conservation Society/Nature Conservancy Council.Google Scholar
Sokal, R.R. & Michener, C.D., 1958. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Kansas University Science Bulletin, 38, 14091438.Google Scholar
Thomas, M.L.H., 1986. A physically derived exposure index for marine shorelines. Ophelia, 25, 113.Google Scholar
Thompson, T.E. & Brown, G.H., 1984. Biology ofopisthobranch molluscs. Vol. II. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Weinberg, S., 1978. The minimal area problem in invertebrate communities of Mediterranean rocky substrata. Marine Biology, 49, 3340.Google Scholar
Weinberg, S., 1979. Mediterranean shallow-water Octocorallia. I. Ecology. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Whittick, A., 1969. The kelp forest ecosystem at Petticowick Bay: an ecological study. PhD thesis, University of Durham.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, M., 1975. The marine algae of Orkney. British Phycological Journal, 10, 387397.Google Scholar
Wishart, D., 1978. CLUSTAN user manual. Edinburgh: Programme Library Unit, Edinburgh University.Google Scholar