Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T08:47:11.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Hydrostatic Pressure Cycles on the Activity of Young Plaice Pleuronectes Platessa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

R. N. Gibson
R. N. Gibson
Affiliation:
Scottish Marine Biological Association, Dunstaffnage Marine Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 3, Oban, Argyll, Scotland, PA34 4AD
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The responses of marine animals to changes in hydrostatic pressure have been widely studied (see reviews by Knight-Jones & Morgan, 1966; Fliigel, 1972; Nay lor & Atkinson, 1972). Most of these studies, however, have been concerned with invertebrates, particularly Crustacea, and few deal with fish (Gordon, 1970). Blaxter's (1978) review of baroreception summarizes recent work in this field and points out that a limitation of many experiments has been the use of sudden, rather than gradual, pressure changes. The limitation is especially true with respect to fish. This paper describes the results of experiments in which young plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.) were subjected to hydrostatic pressure cycles of varying amplitude and frequency in order to describe the response to such pressure cycles, to determine the threshold of the response and to relate the response to the fish's behaviour in the sea.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 62 , Issue 3 , August 1982 , pp. 621 - 635
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blaxter, J. H. S., 1978. Baroreception. In Sensory Ecology (ed. Ali, M. A.), pp. 375–409. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, J. H. S. & Tytler, P., 1972. Pressure discrimination in teleost fish. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, no. 26, 417–443.Google Scholar
Fontaine, M., 1929. De l'augmentation de la consommation d'oxygène des animaux marins sous Pinfluence des fortes pressions. Ses variations en fonction de la durée de la compression. Compte rendu hebdomadaire des seances de l'Académie des sciences, 188, 662–663.Google Scholar
Flügel, H., 1972. Pressure – animals. In Marine Ecology, vol. 1, part 3 (ed. Kinne, O.), pp. 1407–1450. Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. N., 1971. Factors affecting the rhythmic activity of Blennius pholis L. (Teleostei). Animal Behaviour, 19, 336–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, R. N., 1973. Tidal and circadian rhythms in juvenile plaice Pleuronectes platessa. Marine Biology, 22, 379–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, R. N., 1975. A comparison of field and laboratory activity patterns of juvenile plaice. In Proceedings of the Ninth European Marine Biology Symposium, Oban, Scotland, 1974 (ed. Barnes, H.), pp. 13–28. Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. N., 1976. Comparative studies on the rhythms of juvenile flatfish. In Biological Rhythms in the Marine Environment (ed. De Coursey, P. J.), pp. 199–213. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. N., 1980. A quantitative description of the behaviour of wild juvenile plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.). Animal Behaviour, 28, 1202–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, R. N., Blaxter, J. H. S. & Groot, S. J. De, 1978. Developmental changes in the activity rhythms of the plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.). In Rhythmic Activity of Fishes (ed. Thorpe, J. E.), pp. 169–186. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. S., 1970. Hydrostatic pressure. In Fish Physiology, vol. 4 (ed. Hoar, W. H. and Randall, D. J.), pp. 445–464. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hewlett, P. S. & Plackett, R. L., 1979. The Interpretation of Quantal Responses in Biology. 82 pp. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Knight-Jones, E. W. & Morgan, E., 1966. Responses of marine animals to changes in hydrostatic pressure. Oceanography and Marine Biology, an Annual Review, 4, 267–299.Google Scholar
McCutcheon, F. H., 1966. Pressure sensitivity, reflexes and buoyancy responses of teleosts. Animal Behaviour, 14, 204–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naroska, V., 1968. Vergleichende Untersuchungen über den Einfluss des hydrostatischen Druckes auf Uberlebensfahigkeit und Stoffwechselintensitat mariner Evertebraten und Teleosteer. Kieler Meeresforschungen, 24, 95–123.Google Scholar
Naylor, E. & Atkinson, R. J. A., 1972. Pressure and the rhythmic behaviour of inshore marine animals. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, no. 26, 395–415.Google ScholarPubMed
Qasim, S. Z., Rice, A. L. & Knight-Jones, E. W., 1963. Sensitivity to pressure changes in teleosts lacking swim-bladders. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India, 5, 289–293.Google Scholar
Qutob, Z., 1962. The swimbladder of fishes as a pressure receptor. Archives neerlandaises de zoologie, 15, 1–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roper, D. S., 1979. The Role of Sheltered Inlets in the Lives of Locally Occurring Flatfish. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Otago, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Sokolove, P. G. & Bushell, W. N., 1978. The chi-square periodogram: its utility for analysis of circadian rhythms. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 72, 131–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed