Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:34:32.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An in vivo fluorescence response in the Bay of Biscay in June

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

R. D. Pingree  and
R. P. Harris
R. D. Pingree
Affiliation:
N.E.R.C. Institute of Oceanographic Sciences, Brook Road, Wormley, Godalming, Surrey GU8 5UB
R. P. Harris
Affiliation:
The Laboratory, Marine Biological Association, Citadel Hill, Plymouth PL1 2PB
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Conclusion and summary

Surface fluorescence measurements in June in the Bay of Biscay showed little correlation with chlorophyll a measurements due to the presence of a marked diurnal fluorescence rhythm although satisfactory correlations have been obtained at other times of year in the same region (see Fig. 10 of Pingree et al. 1982). By contrast, the beam attenuation coefficient values showed a good correlation with the chlorophyll a measurements and can be used to map the sea surface distribution of chlorophyll a when the diurnal rhythm is present, particularly when the phytoplankton is dominated by a single species. This conclusion may be of considerable practical significance when contemplating synoptic surveys in such situations. As Prezlin & Ley (1980) have observed there is growing awareness that fluorescence per unit chlorophyll a is not a constant that can be used reliably in mixed phytoplankton biomass estimates based on in vivo chlorophyll a fluorescence, and the problem is clearly compounded if some species exhibit a marked diurnal fluorescence rhythm. Furthermore, the present observations support the caveats of Falkowski & Kiefer (1985), that in situ moored fluorometers, the use of air-borne laser-induced fluorescence, or satellite-received passive, solar-induced fluorescence, only measure fluorescence, not chlorophyll per se.

The fluorescence response near the shelf-break over a 24 h period following a drogued dahn buoy showed a variation of about a factor of 5 between the day and night fluorescence levels. Beam attenuation coefficient measurements and Coulter Counter analyses showed that these results could not be attributed to the migration of the phytoplankton.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 68 , Issue 3 , August 1988 , pp. 519 - 529
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Falkowski, P. & Kiefer, D. A., 1985. Chlorophyll a fluorescence in phytoplankton: relationship to photosynthesis and biomass. Journal of Plankton Research, 7, 715–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holligan, P. M., Turner, S. M. & Liss, P. S., 1987. Measurements of dimethyl sulphide in frontal regions. Continental Shelf Research, 7, 213–224.Google Scholar
Kiefer, D. A., 1973. Fluorescence properties of natural phytoplankton populations. Marine Biology, 22, 263–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Fevre, J., 1986. Aspects of the biology of frontal systems. Advances in Marine Biology, 23, 163–299.Google Scholar
Loftus, M. E. & Seliger, H. H., 1975. Some limitations of the in vivo fluorescence technique. Chesapeake Science, 16, 79–92.Google Scholar
Lorenzen, C. J., 1966. A method for the continuous measurement of in vivo chlorophyll concentration. Deep-Sea Research, 13, 223–227.Google Scholar
Lorenzen, C. J., 1967. Determination of chlorophyll and phaeophytin: spectrophotometric equations. Limnology and Oceanography, 12, 343–346.Google Scholar
Owens, T. G., Falkowski, P. G. & Whitledge, T. E., 1980. Diel periodicity of chlorophyll in marine phytoplankton. Marine Biology, 59, 71–77.Google Scholar
Pingree, R. D., 1981. Slope turbulence, internal waves and phytoplankton growth at the Celtic Sea shelf-break. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (A), 302, 663–682.Google Scholar
Pingree, R. D., 1984. Some applications of remote sensing to studies in the Bay of Biscay, Celtic Sea and English Channel. In Remote Sensing of Shelf Sea Hydrodynamics. Proceedings of the 15th International Liège Colloquium on Ocean Hydrodynamics (ed. Nihoul, J. C. J.), pp. 287–315. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Pingree, R. D., 1988. Internal tidal oscillations and water column instability in the upper slope region of the Bay of Biscay. In Small-Scale Turbulence and Mixing in the Ocean. Proceedings of the 19th Liège Colloquium on Ocean Hydrodynamics (ed. Nihoul, J. C. J. and Tamart, B. M.), pp. 387–104. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Pingree, R. D., Mardell, G. T., Holligan, P. M., Griffiths, D. K. & Smithers, J., 1982. Celtic Sea and Armorican current structure and the vertical distributions of temperature and chlorophyll. Continental Shelf Research, 1, 99–116.Google Scholar
Prezlin, B. B. & Ley, A. C., 1980. Photosynthesis and chlorophyll a fluorescence rhythms of marine phytoplankton. Marine Biology, 55, 295–307.Google Scholar
Navy, U. S., 1952. Natural Illumination Charts. Washington, D.C.: Department of the Navy Bureau of Ships. [Report no. 374–1.]Google Scholar