Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T20:08:46.736Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Self-Imagination Effect: Benefits of a Self-Referential Encoding Strategy on Cued Recall in Memory-Impaired Individuals with Neurological Damage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2011

Matthew D. Grilli*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
Elizabeth L. Glisky
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to: Matthew D. Grilli, Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, 1503 E. University Blvd., P.O. Box 210068, Tucson, AZ 85721. E-mail: mdgrilli@email.arizona.edu

Abstract

Knowledge of oneself is preserved in many memory-impaired individuals with neurological damage. Therefore, cognitive strategies that capitalize on mechanisms related to the self may be particularly effective at enhancing memory in this population. The present study investigated the effect of “self-imagining,” imagining an event from a personal perspective, on short and long delayed cued recall in memory-impaired individuals with neurological damage. Sixteen patients intentionally encoded word pairs under four separate conditions: visual imagery, semantic elaboration, other person imagining, and self-imagining. The results revealed that self-imagining led to better performance than other-imagining, semantic elaboration, and visual imagery. Furthermore, the “self-imagination effect” (SIE) was preserved after a 30-min delay and was independent of memory functioning. These findings indicate that self-imagining provides a mnemonic advantage in brain-injured individuals, even those with relatively poor memory functioning, and suggest that self-imagining may tap into mnemonic mechanisms related to the self. (JINS, 2011, 17, 929–933)

Type
Brief Communications
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cermak, L.S., O'Connor, M. (1983). The anterograde and retrograde retrieval ability of a patient with amnesia due to encephalitis. Neuropsychologia, 21(3), 213234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 33A(4), 497505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delis, D.C., Kramer, J., Kaplan, E., Ober, B.A. (1987). The California Verbal Learning Test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Forster, K.I., Forster, J.C. (2003). DMDX: a window display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(1), 116124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glisky, E.L. (2004). Disorders of memory. In J. Ponsford (Ed.), Cognitive and behavioral rehabilitation: From neurobiology to clinical practice (pp. 100128). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Glisky, E.L., Kong, L.L. (2008). Do young and older adults rely on different processes in source memory tasks? A neuropsychological study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34(4), 809822.Google Scholar
Glisky, E.L., Polster, M.R., Routhieaux, B.C. (1995). Double dissociation between item and source memory. Neuropsychology, 9, 229235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glisky, E.L., Rubin, S.R., Davidson, P.S. (2001). Source memory in older adults: An encoding or retrieval problem? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 11311146.Google ScholarPubMed
Grilli, M.D., Glisky, E.L. (2010). Self-Imagining enhances recognition memory in memory-impaired individuals with neurological damage. Neuropsychology, 24(6), 698710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, R.P., Kwentus, J.A., Wade, J.B., Taylor, J.R. (1988). Modified Wisconsin Cart Sorting Test in elderly normal, depressed, and demented patients. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 2, 4956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, S.B., Gangi, C.E. (2010). The multiplicity of self: neuropsychological evidence and its implications for the self as a construct in psychological research. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1191, 115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marquine, M.J. (2009). Self-knowledge and self-referential processing in memory disorders: Implications for neuropsychological rehabilitation. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 69, 4432.Google Scholar
Rathbone, C.J., Moulin, C.J., Conway, M.A. (2009). Autobiographical memory and amnesia: Using conceptual knowledge to ground the self. Neurocase, 15(5), 405418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogers, T.B., Kuiper, N.A., Kirker, W.S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(9), 677688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spreen, O., Benton, A.L. (1977). Neurosensory Center Comprehensive Examination for Aphasia (NCCEA). Victoria: University of Victoria Neuropsychology Laboratory.Google Scholar
Spreen, O., Strauss, E. (1998). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Second edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Symons, C.S., Johnson, B.T. (1997). The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 121(3), 371394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler memory scale-third edition: Administration and scoring manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Wilson, B.A., Kapur, N. (2008). Memory rehabilitation for people with brain injury. In D.T. Stuss, G. Winocur, & I.H. Robertson (Eds.), Cognitive neurorehabilitation: Evidence and application (2nd ed., pp. 522540). New York, NY: Cambridge Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar