Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:14:47.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relativity, uncertainty and electrodynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

A. H. Klotz
Affiliation:
University of Western AustraliaPerth, W.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is known that the Unified Field Theories of Weyl [14] and of Einstein [4] give no indication of how Relativity and Quantum Theories should be connected into a comprehensive field theory of physics. Indeed, the only determined attempt to establish such a theory, due to Eddington [3] and [6], failed through lack of contact with the contemporary developments, especially in quantum electrodynamics and elementary particles. Its author tried to explain curvature of the space-time in terms of statistical fluctuations partly of a physical origin defined within a mechanical system, and partly of a geometrical origin of coordinates superimposed on the latter. It is clear however that both the fluctuations of Eddington refer to purely mathematical frames. The probabilistic nature of his theory takes no account of physical objects, such as particles or energy distributions. It is the author's belief that this is the cause of difficulties associated with the otherwise admirable work of Eddington.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1967

References

[1]Born, M., Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré, 7 (1937), 155.Google Scholar
[2]Dirac, P. A. M., Proc. Roy. Soc. A257 (1960).Google Scholar
[3]Eddington, A. S., Fundamental Theory, (Cambridge, 1946).Google Scholar
[4]Einstein, A., Meaning of Relativity, App. II, (London, 1954).Google Scholar
[5]Infeld, L. and Plebanski, J., Proc. Roy. Soc., A224 (1954), 222.Google Scholar
[6]Kilmister, C. W. and Tupper, B. O. J., Eddington's Statistical Theory, (Oxford, 1962).Google Scholar
[7]Klotz, A. H., Nuovo Cim., 14 (1959), 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Klotz, A. H., Nuovo Cim., 23 (1962), 697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Klotz, A. H., Thesis, (1963, London).Google Scholar
[10]Klotz, A. H., Journ. Maths. ± Mech., 14 (1965), 365.Google Scholar
[11]Mie, G., Ann. d. Phys. 37, 39, 40 (1912, 1913).Google Scholar
[12]Stephenson, G. and Kilmister, C. W., Nuovo Cim., 10 (1953), 230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Synge, J. L., Theory of Relativity (General Theory), (Amsterdam, 1960).Google Scholar
[14]Weyl, H., Space Time Matter, (London, 1922).Google Scholar
[15]Yano, K., Theory of Lie Derivatives, (Amsterdam, 1955).Google Scholar