Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T20:10:01.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Council House Sales and Residualization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

N.J. Williams ,
J. Sewel  and
F. Twine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It has been argued that council house sales will contribute towards a more general process of residualization of public sector housing. Empirical evidence is presented in this context derived from surveys of purchasers and non-purchasers of council dwellings in the city of Aberdeen. This evidence confirms that purchasers and non-purchasers exhibit different socio-economic characteristics and after only four years of the Right to Buy legislation significant numbers of households in social classes I, II and III have left the public sector via the mechanism of sales. The small number of sales relative to the stock as a whole, however, has meant that the overall contribution of sales towards residualization has been small. This evidence from Aberdeen is compared to evidence from elsewhere and related to the varying pattern of sales across the country as a whole.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , July 1986 , pp. 273 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Boleat, M. (1983), ‘The prospect for council house sales’, Housing Review, 32, 147–48.Google Scholar
Clapham, D. and Maclennan, D. (1983), ‘Residualization of public housing: a non-issue’, Housing Review, 32, 9–10.Google Scholar
English, J. (1976), ‘Housing allocation and a deprived Scottish estate’, Urban Studies, 13, 319–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
English, J. (1982), ‘Must council housing become welfare housing?’ Housing Review, 31, 154–5 and 212–13.Google Scholar
Forrest, R. and Murie, A. (1983), ‘Residualization and council housing: aspects of the changing social relations of housing tenure’, Journal of Social Policy, 12: 4, 453–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrest, R. and Murie, A. (1984a), Right to Buy? Issues of need, equity and polarisation in the sale of council houses, Working Paper 39, University of Bristol School for Advanced Urban Studies.Google Scholar
Forrest, R. and Murie, A. (1984b), ‘Monitoring the right to buy 1980–82’. University of Bristol School for Advanced Urban Studies, Working Paper 40.Google Scholar
Foulis, M. B. (1985), Council House Sales in Scotland 1979–83, Scottish Office Central Research Unit, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Malpass, P. (1983), ‘Residualization and the restructuring of housing tenure’. Housing Review, 32, 44–5.Google Scholar
Murie, A. (1975), ‘The sale of council houses’. University of Birmingham Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, Occasional Paper No. 35.Google Scholar
Robinson, R. and O'Sullivan, T. (1983), ‘Housing tenure polarisation: some empirical evidence’, Housing Review, 32, 116–17.Google Scholar
Shelter, (1979). Facts on Council House Sales, Shelter, London.Google Scholar
Sewel, J., Twine, F. and Williams, N. J. (1984), ‘The sale of council houses — some empirical evidence’, Urban Studies, 21, 439–50.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. J. (1979), ‘Difficult to let estates’, Environment and Planning A, 11, 1305–20.Google Scholar
Twine, F. and Williams, N. J. (1983), ‘Social segregation in public sector housing: a case study’, Transactions, Institute of British Geographers, 8, 253–66.Google Scholar
Wrigley, N. (1985), Categorical Data Analysis for Geographers and Environmental Scientists, London, Longman.Google Scholar