Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T16:53:42.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Randomized study comparing the impact of a simulator with CT option to diagnostic CT on workload and patients comfort

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 August 2006

P. Bijdekerke
Affiliation:
Department of Radiotherapy, Oncologic Center, Academic Hospital, Free University Brussels, Belgium
V. Vinh-Hung
Affiliation:
Department of Radiotherapy, Oncologic Center, Academic Hospital, Free University Brussels, Belgium
F. Nys
Affiliation:
Department of Radiotherapy, Oncologic Center, Academic Hospital, Free University Brussels, Belgium
E. Vandepoele
Affiliation:
Department of Radiotherapy, Oncologic Center, Academic Hospital, Free University Brussels, Belgium
J. Van de Steene
Affiliation:
Department of Radiotherapy, Oncologic Center, Academic Hospital, Free University Brussels, Belgium
S. D'Haese
Affiliation:
Department of Radiotherapy, Oncologic Center, Academic Hospital, Free University Brussels, Belgium
D. Verellen
Affiliation:
Department of Radiotherapy, Oncologic Center, Academic Hospital, Free University Brussels, Belgium
G. Storme
Affiliation:
Department of Radiotherapy, Oncologic Center, Academic Hospital, Free University Brussels, Belgium

Abstract

Purpose: A randomized study to investigate the routine use of a simulator-based CT (Sim-CT) for planning purposes.

Materials and methods: 24 patients accepted for pelvic radiotherapy were randomized to receive either a Sim-CT or a DCT planning CT scan. The execution time was measured for different steps in both procedures. A questionnaire was developed to gain information about the psychological status and physical comfort.

Results: The set-up (of hardware, software and patient) took significantly longer for the Sim-CT procedure (p<0.05). An average of 5.7 min was found in comparison with 3.2 min for the DCT group. A similar result (p<0.0005) was observed for the scan time (resp. 15.9 versus 5.1 min). However the total time of the procedure (including patient preparation) was significantly lower (p<0.005) for the Sim-CT group (resp. 21.6 versus 31.7 min). Physical comfort score showed that some patients experienced more discomfort during the Sim-CT procedure than during DCT.

Conclusions: The scan acquisition time and set-up time of Sim-CT procedure was significantly higher than DCT however the total time was less for Sim-CT group. The overall reduction in time with Sim-CT is counterbalanced by increased patient discomfort.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)