Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:43:05.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does it pay to be SMarT?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2008

T. SCOTT FINDLEY  and
FRANK N. CALIENDO
T. SCOTT FINDLEY
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USAe-mail: tfindley@unm.edu
FRANK N. CALIENDO
Affiliation:
Department of Economics and Finance, Utah State University, UT, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Save More Tomorrow™ (or SMarT) plan has proven effective in raising employee saving rates and appears to be popular among participants and the media. An important question has remained on the minds of economists despite this success: just how close does the prescriptive SMarT plan come to approximating the normative life-cycle/permanent-income consumption rule? That is, does it pay (in a lifetime utility sense) to participate in a SMarT plan? We attempt to provide some rigorous answers to this question by employing a quantitative-theoretic model to perform dynamic welfare analysis, and our results tend to support the SMarT plan as a decent first approximation to the life-cycle/permanent-income rule. We also consider the problem of an altruistic employer seeking to maximize the lifetime utility of employees by appropriately choosing the default SMarT parameters in the face of employee heterogeneity in saving rates and uncertainty about whether they will actually stick with the plan. The employer's problem is augmented to include employee heterogeneity concerning risk taking, and we also consider the possibility that SMarT saving may be met with increased borrowing.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Pension Economics & Finance , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , July 2010 , pp. 321 - 344
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Attanasio, O. P. (1999) Consumption. In Taylor, J. B. and Woodford, M. (eds) Handbook of Macroeconomics, Volume 1B. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 741–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attanasio, O. P., Banks, J., Meghir, C. and Weber, G. (1999) Humps and bumps in lifetime consumption. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 17(1): 22–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullard, J. and Feigenbaum, J. (2007) A leisurely reading of the life-cycle consumption data. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54(8): 2305–2320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. Y. (2001) Forecasting U.S. equity returns in the 21st century. In Campbell, J. Y., Diamond, P. A. and Shoven, J. B. (eds) Estimating the Real Rate of Return on Stocks Over the Long Term, Washington DC: Social Security Advisory Board, 3–10.Google Scholar
Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B. C. and Metrick, A. (2006) Saving for retirement on the path of least resistance. In McCaffery, E. J. and Slemrod, J. (eds) Behavioral Public Finance, New York: Russell Sage Foundation Publications, 304–352.Google Scholar
Feigenbaum, J. (2007) Can mortality risk explain the consumption hump? Journal of Macroeconomics, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Feldstein, M. (1985) The optimal level of social security benefits. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 100(2): 303–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findley, T. S. and Caliendo, F. (2007) OutSMarTing the social security crisis. Public Finance Review, 35(6): 647–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goss, S. C. (2005/2006) The financial outlook for the Social Security Disability Insurance Program. Social Security Bulletin, 66(3): 47–52.Google ScholarPubMed
Gourinchas, P. O. and Parker, J. A. (2002) Consumption over the life cycle. Econometrica, 70(1): 47–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haliassos, M. and Reiter, M. (2005) Credit card debt puzzles. Center for Financial Studies Working Paper, No. 2005/26.Google Scholar
Helman, R., Copeland, C. and VanDerhei, J. (2006) Will more of us be working forever? EBRI Issue Brief, No. 292.Google Scholar
Kotlikoff, L. J. (1979) Testing the theory of social security and life cycle accumulation. American Economic Review, 69(3): 396–410.Google Scholar
Laibson, D. I., Repetto, A. and Tobacman, J. (1998) Self control and saving for retirement. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1: 91–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, M. (2006) Automatic 401(k)s: A win for workers. National Center for Policy Analysis, Brief Analysis No. 567.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. and Benartzi, S. (2004) Save More Tomorrow™: using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. Journal of Political Economy, 112(1): 164–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Congress (2006) Pension Protection Act of 2006, HR4, 109th Cong., 2nd sess. Washington, DC: GPO.Google Scholar