Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-17T23:06:37.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The intricate inflectional relationships underpinning morphological analogy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2022

LOUISE ESHER Open the ORCID record for LOUISE ESHER [Opens in a new window]
LOUISE ESHER*
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (UMR 8135) Llacan: Langage, Langues et Cultures d’Afrique, 7 rue Guy Môquet, 94801 Villejuif, louise.esher@cnrs.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Gévaudan varieties of Occitan (Gallo-Romance), exceptionless syncretism between preterite and imperfect subjunctive forms arises in the first and second person plural (e.g. faguessiám [faɡeˈsjɔn] ‘do.pret/ipf.sbjv.1pl’, faguessiatz [faɡeˈsjat] ‘do.pret/ipf.sbjv.2pl’). Reconstructing the historical emergence of this syncretism pattern reveals that it is crucially dependent on multiple and diverse implicational relationships of form, inferred and productively exploited by speakers: in particular, inherited identity between preterite and imperfect subjunctive stems, and identity between imperfect indicative forms of èstre [ɛsˈtʀe] ‘be’ and preterite or imperfect subjunctive desinences. The observed developments support a view of inflectional analogies as informed by intricate paradigmatic and implicational structure of the type proposed within ‘abstractive’, word-based theories of inflection.

Keywords

abstractive morphologyanalogyimplicational relationshipsinflectional paradigmsOccitanRomancesyncretism
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 60 , Issue 2 , April 2024 , pp. 285 - 323
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Versions of this study were presented, and received constructive discussion, at the workshop ‘Analogical Patterns in Inflectional Morphology’ (Berlin/online, 14 April 2022) on the invitation of Sascha Gaglia, and at the Romance Linguistics Seminar (Oxford, 28 April 2022) on the invitation of Martin Maiden. Erich Round gave invaluable advice on an early draft, and Xavier Bach on a later draft. The recommendations of three anonymous JL reviewers increased the precision, efficacy, and accessibility of the paper and its argument. Any remaining errors are the responsibility of the author alone.

The final version was prepared during a Visiting Fellowship at Trinity College, University of Oxford, supported by a grant from the CNRS Institut des Sciences Humaines et Sociales under the scheme ‘Soutien à la mobilité internationale 2022’.

References

REFERENCES

Ackerman, Farrell, Malouf, James Blevins & Robert. 2009. Parts and wholes: Implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms. In Blevins & Blevins (eds.), 54–81.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Farrell & Malouf, Robert. 2015. The No Blur Principle effects as an emergent property of language systems. In Jurgensen, Anna, Sande, Hannah, Lamoureux, Spencer, Baclawski, Kenny & Zerbe, Alison (eds.), Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1–14. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Farrell & Malouf, Robert. 2016. Word and pattern morphology: An information-theoretic approach. Word Structure 9.2, 125–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albright, Adam. 2009. Modeling analogy as probabilistic grammar. In Blevins & Blevins, 185–213.Google Scholar
Alibèrt, Loís. 1976. Gramàtica occitana segon los parlars lengadocians. Toulouse: Institut d’Estudis Occitans.Google Scholar
Allières, Jacques. 1971. Atlas linguistique de la Gascogne. Vol. 5: Le verbe, fascicule 2, commentaires. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Allières, Jacques. 1988. Quelques énigmes de la conjugaison gasconne ou le verdict de l’aire . In Abry, Christian (ed.), Espaces Romans: Etudes de dialectologie et de linguistique offertes à Gaston Tuaillon, vol. 1, 175–192. Grenoble: Ellug.Google Scholar
Anglade, Joseph. 1921. Grammaire de l’ancien provençal ou ancienne langue d’oc: Phonétique et morphologie. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 2012. Morphological stems: What William of Ockham really said. Word Structure 5.1, 28–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baerman, Matthew, Brown, Dunstan & Corbett, Greville G.. 2005. The syntax–morphology interface: A study of syncretism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beniamine, Sacha, Bonami, Olivier & Sagot, Benoît. 2017. Inferring inflection classes with description length. Journal of Language Modelling 5.3, 465–525.Google Scholar
Blevins, James P. 2006. Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics 42.3, 531–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, James P. 2016. Word and paradigm morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, James P., Ackerman, Farrell & Malouf, Robert. 2019. Word and paradigm morphology. In Audring, Jenny & Masini, Francesca (eds.), The Oxford handbook of morphological theory, 264–284. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blevins, James P. & Blevins, Juliette (eds.), 2009. Analogy in grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boisgontier, Jacques. 1981–1986. Atlas linguistique et ethnographique du Languedoc oriental. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Bonami, Olivier & Beniamine, Sacha. 2016. Joint predictiveness in inflectional paradigms. Word Structure 9.2, 156–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonami, Olivier & Beniamine, Sacha. 2021. Leaving the stem by itself. In Moradi, Sedigheh, Haag, Marcia, Rees-Miller, Janie & Petrovic, Andrija (eds.), All things morphology: Its independence and its interfaces, 81–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunel, Albert [‘Chontoclar’] & Camproux, Charles. 1931. Petite grammaire du dialecte lozérien. Marseille: Las Edicions del Ferre.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Brewer, Mary. 1980. Explanation in morphophonemics: Changes in Provençal and Spanish preterite forms. Lingua 52, 201–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camproux, Charles. 1962. Essai de géographique linguistique du Gévaudan. Montpellier: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Carstairs, Andrew. 1987. Allomorphy in inflexion. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Casagrande, Sylvain. 2011. L’unité et la diversité des systèmes verbaux en langue d’oc et dans les aires limitrophes: Essai de reconstruction. Ph.D. dissertation, Université de Nice.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2012. Features. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowgill, Warren. 1959. The inflection of the Germanic ō-Presents. Language 35.1, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enger, Hans-Olav. 2014. Reinforcement in inflection classes: Two cues may be better than one. Word Structure 7, 153–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esher, Louise. 2015. Morphomes and predictability in the history of Romance perfects. Diachronica 32, 494–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esher, Louise. 2016. Morphomic distribution of augments in varieties of Occitan. Revue Romane 51.2, 271–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esher, Louise. 2017. Morphome death and transfiguration in the history of French. Journal of Linguistics 53, 51–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esher, Louise. 2018. Implicational relationships between desinences in Occitan imperfect and conditional forms. Lexique 23, 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esher, Louise. 2020. Syncretism and metamorphomes in northern Occitan (Lemosin) varieties. In Wolfe & Maiden (eds.), 364–384.Google Scholar
Esher, Louise. 2021a. Hypercorrection and velar-to-labial change in Occitan preterites. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 137.1, 61–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esher, Louise. 2021b. Prospettive comparative e storiche sulla flessione del preterito nelle parlate occitane della Provenza. Vox Romanica 80, 203–238.Google Scholar
Esher, Louise. 2021c. La diachronie du prétérit occitan à la lumière des sources textuelles. Linguistica Pragensia 31.2, 115–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esher, Louise. 2022. Overlapping subjunctive forms in Gallo- and Ibero-Romance verb paradigms. Revue Romane 57.1, 86–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feist, Timothy & Palancar, Enrique L.. 2021. Paradigmatic restructuring and the diachrony of stem alternations in Chichimec. Language 97.1, 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fertig, David. 2016. Mechanisms of paradigm leveling and the role of universal preferences in morphophonological change. Diachronica 33.4, 423–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
François, Alexandre. 2014. Trees, waves and linkages: Models of language diversification. In Bowern, Claire & Evans, Bethwyn (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 161–189. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
François, Alexandre. 2017. Méthode comparative et chaînages linguistiques: Pour un modèle diffusionniste en généalogie des langues. In Léonard, Jean-Léo (ed.), Diffusion: implantation, affinités, convergence (Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris XXIV), 43–82. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Fulk, R. D. 2018. A comparative grammar of the early Germanic languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilliéron, Jules & Edmont, Edmond 1902–1910. Atlas linguistique de la France. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Koschwitz, Eduard. [1894] 1973. Grammaire historique de la langue des Félibres. Genève/Marseille: Slatkine/Lafitte.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam & Maiden, Martin (eds.). 2016. The Oxford guide to the Romance languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam, Maiden, Martin & Smith, John Charles (eds.). 2011. The Cambridge history of the Romance languages . Volume I: Structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 2001. A strange affinity: Perfecto y tiempos afines. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 58, 441–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 2004. Verb augments and meaninglessness in Romance morphology. Studi di grammatica italiana 22, 1–61.Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 2005. Morphological autonomy and diachrony. In Booij, Geert and van Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2004, 137–175. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 2009a. From pure phonology to pure morphology: The reshaping of the Romance verb. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes 38, 45–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 2009b. Un capitolo di morfologia storica del romeno: Preterito i tempi affini. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 125, 273–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 2011a. Morphological persistence. In Ledgeway et al. (eds.), 155–215.Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 2011b. Morphological innovation. In Ledgeway et al. (eds.), 216–267.Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 2016. Morphomes. In Ledgeway & Maiden (eds.), 708–721.Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 2018. The Romance verb: Morphomic structure and diachrony. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 2020. The verbs ‘rain’ and ‘snow’ in Gallo-Romance, and other morphological mismatches in diachrony. In Wolfe & Maiden (eds.), 385–401.Google Scholar
Martin, Guy & Moulin, Bernard. 2007. Grammaire provençale et atlas linguistique. Aix-en-Provence: Comitat Sestian d’Etudes Occitanes/CREO–Provença–IEO.Google Scholar
Milizia, Paulo. 2016. Sincretismo compensativo ed esponenza semiseparata in alcuni paradigmi verbali del dominio italoromanzo centromeridionale. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 51.1, 88–119.Google Scholar
Moulin, Bernard. 2006. Grammaire occitane: Le parler bas-vivarois de la région d’Aubenas. Saint-Étienne de Fontbellon: Section vivaroise de l’Institut d’Études Occitanes.Google Scholar
Nauton, Pierre. 1957–1963. Atlas linguistique et ethnographique du Massif Central. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Oliviéri, Michèle & Sauzet, Patrick. 2016. Southern Gallo-Romance (Occitan). In Ledgeway & Maiden (eds.), 319–349.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Paul. 2011. The Ibero-Romance verb: Allomorphy and the notion of the morphome. D.Phil. dissertation, University of Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, Paul. 2014. The morphome in constructive and abstractive models of morphology. Morphology 24, 25–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pato, Enrique & O’Neill, Paul. 2013. Los gerundios ‘analógicos’ en la Historia del español (e iberorromance). Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica 61.1, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quint, Nicolas. 1999. Le parler occitan ardéchois d’Albon. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Rambier, Prosper & Tichit, Joseph. 2006. Abrégé de grammaire du dialecte occitan-gévaudanais. Montpellier: Les Amis du Païs et L’Escolo Gabalo.Google Scholar
Ronjat, Jules. 1937. Grammaire istorique des parlers provençaux modernes, vol. III. Montpellier: Société des Langues Romanes.Google Scholar
Round, Erich R. 2015. Rhizomorphomes, meromorphomes and metamorphomes. In Corbett, Greville G., Brown, Dunstan & Baerman, Matthew (eds.), Understanding and measuring morphological complexity, 29– 52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skårup, Povl. 1997. Morphologie élémentaire de l’ancien occitan. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
Skousen, Royal. 2009. Expanding analogical modeling into a general theory of language prediction. In Blevins & Blevins (eds.), 164–184.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 2012. Identifying stems. Word Structure 5.1, 88–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Gregory T. 2001. Inflectional morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Gregory T. 2016. Inflectional paradigms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Teissier, Léon. 1964. Grammaire lozérienne. Aumont–Aubrac: Lou Païs.Google Scholar
Toscano, Reinat. 1998. Gramàtica niçarda. Pau: Princi Néguer.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Max. 2011. The evolution of a morphome in Catalan verb inflection . In Maiden, Martin, Smith, John Charles, Goldbach, Maria & Hinzelin, Marc-Olivier (eds.), Morphological autonomy, 183–209. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Max. 2012. Vies d’analogia i d’explicació en l’evolució del pretèrit feble de la conjugació-e romànica. Estudis Romànics 34, 7–36.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Sam & Maiden, Martin (eds.). 2020. Variation and change in Gallo-Romance grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, Walt & Schilling-Estes, Natalie. 2003. Dialectology and linguistic diffusion. In Joseph, Brian D. & Janda, Richard D. (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 713–735. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar