Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Strother, Logan
2016.
BeyondKelo.
Journal of Law and Courts,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 2,
p.
339.
Strother, Logan
2017.
How Expected Political and Legal Impact Drive Media Coverage of Supreme Court Cases.
Political Communication,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 4,
p.
571.
Hume, Robert J.
2019.
Disagreeable Rhetoric, Shaming, and the Strategy of Dissenting on the U.S. Supreme Court.
Justice System Journal,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 1,
p.
3.
Gleason, Shane A.
Jones, Jennifer J.
and
McBean, Jessica Rae
2019.
The Role of Gender Norms in Judicial Decision-Making at the U.S. Supreme Court: The Case of Male and Female Justices.
American Politics Research,
Vol. 47,
Issue. 3,
p.
494.
Krewson, Christopher N.
2019.
Strategic Sensationalism: Why Justices Use Emotional Appeals in Supreme Court Opinions.
Justice System Journal,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 4,
p.
319.
Budziak, Jeffrey
Hitt, Matthew P.
and
Lempert, Daniel
2019.
Determinants of Writing Style on the United States Circuit Courts of Appeals.
Journal of Law and Courts,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Liebman, Benjamin L.
Roberts, Margaret E.
Stern, Rachel E.
and
Wang, Alice Z.
2020.
Mass Digitization of Chinese Court Decisions.
Journal of Law and Courts,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 2,
p.
177.
Gleason, Shane A.
2020.
Beyond Mere Presence: Gender Norms in Oral Arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 73,
Issue. 3,
p.
596.
Fredén, Annika
2020.
Statistical Semantics.
p.
249.
Zilis, Michael
and
Wedeking, Justin
2020.
The Sources and Consequences of Political Rhetoric.
Journal of Law and Courts,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 2,
p.
203.
Crabtree, Charles
Golder, Matt
Gschwend, Thomas
and
Indriđason, Indriđi H.
2020.
It Is Not Only What You Say, It Is Also How You Say It: The Strategic Use of Campaign Sentiment.
The Journal of Politics,
Vol. 82,
Issue. 3,
p.
1044.
Corley, Pamela
and
Ward, Artemus
2020.
Intracourt Dialogue.
Journal of Law and Courts,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 1,
p.
27.
Ballingrud, Gordon
2021.
Ideology and Risk Focus: Conservatism and Opinion‐Writing In the U.S. Supreme Court.
Social Science Quarterly,
Vol. 102,
Issue. 1,
p.
281.
Rice, Douglas R.
and
Zorn, Christopher
2021.
Corpus-based dictionaries for sentiment analysis of specialized vocabularies.
Political Science Research and Methods,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 1,
p.
20.
OSNABRÜGGE, MORITZ
HOBOLT, SARA B.
and
RODON, TONI
2021.
Playing to the Gallery: Emotive Rhetoric in Parliaments.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 115,
Issue. 3,
p.
885.
Gleason, Shane A.
and
Ivy, Diana K.
2021.
As She Was Saying: The Role of Gender and Narratives in Oral Argument Amicus Success.
Justice System Journal,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 3-4,
p.
416.
Sasso, Greg
and
Judd, Gleason
2022.
Case selection and Supreme Court pivots.
Political Science Research and Methods,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 3,
p.
659.
Canelo, Kayla S.
2022.
Citations to Interest Groups and Acceptance of Supreme Court Decisions.
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
189.
Moyer, Laura P.
2022.
“She Blinded Me with Science”: The Use of Science Frames in Abortion Litigation before the Supreme Court.
Justice System Journal,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 2,
p.
153.
Chau, Bao Kham
and
Livermore, Michael A.
2023.
Studying Judicial Behavior with Text Analysis.
SSRN Electronic Journal,