Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:24:59.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A simple model of Rossby-wave hydraulic behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

P. H. Haynes ,
E. R. Johnson  and
R. G. Hurst
P. H. Haynes
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK
R. G. Hurst
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University College, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper considers hydraulic control and upstream influence in systems where the only wave propagation mechanism arises from the variation of vorticity or potential vorticity. These systems include two-dimensional shear flows as well as many simple paradigms for large-scale geophysical flows. The simplest is a flow in which the vorticity or potential vorticity is piecewise constant. We consider such a flow confined to a rotating channel and disturbed by a topographic perturbation. We analyse the behaviour of the system using steady nonlinear long-wave theory and demonstrate that it exhibits behaviour analogous to open-channel hydraulics, with the possibility of different upstream and downstream states. The manner by which the system achieves such states is examined using time-dependent long-wave theory via integration along characteristics and using full numerical solution via the contour-dynamics technique.

The full integrations agree well with the hydraulic interpretation of the steady-state theory. One aspect of the behaviour of the system that is not seen in open-channel hydraulics is that for strong subcritical flows there is a critical topographic amplitude beyond which information from the control cannot propagate far upstream. Instead flow upstream of the topographic perturbation adjusts until the long-wave speed is zero, the control moves to the leading edge of the obstacle and flow downstream of the control is supercritical, with a transition from one supercritical branch to another on the downstream slope of the obstacle.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 253 , August 1993 , pp. 359 - 384
Copyright
© 1993 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. A. 1964 A Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover.
Baines, P. G. 1987 Upstream blocking and airflow over mountains. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 19, 75–97.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1970 Upstream influence. J. Fluid Mech. 40, 49–79.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1971 A unified theory of conjugate flows. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 269, 587–647.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1981 Steady flows drawn from a stably stratified reservoir. J. Fluid Mech. 106, 245–260.Google Scholar
Davey, M. K. 1978 Recycling flow over bottom topography in a rotating annulus. J. Fluid Mech. 87, 497–520.Google Scholar
Davey, M. K., Hurst, R. G. & Johnson, E. R. 1993 Topographic eddies in multilayer flow. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans (in press).Google Scholar
Deem, G. S. & Zabusky, N. J. 1978 Vortex waves: stationary ‘V-states’, interactions, recurrence, and breaking. Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 859–862.Google Scholar
Dritschel, D. G. 1988 Contour surgery: a topological reconnection scheme for extended integrations using contour dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 77, 240–266.Google Scholar
Gill, A. E. 1977 The hydraulics of rotating-channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 80, 641–671.Google Scholar
Hogg, N. J. 1983 Hydraulic control and flow separation in a multi-layered fluid with application to the Vema Channel. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 13, 695–708.Google Scholar
Hogg, N. J. 1985 Multilayer hydraulic control with application to the Alboran Sea circulation. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 15, 454–466.Google Scholar
Hogg, N. J. 1989 Finite-amplitude effects on deep planetary circulation over topography. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 19, 1697–1706.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. L. 1985a. On inertial currents over a sloping continental shelf. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 9, 49–73.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. L. 1985b. Multiple criticalities in coastal flows. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 9, 321–340.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. L. 1986a. On the role of criticality in coastal flows over irregular bottom topography. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 10, 129–147.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. L. 1986b. On the conjugate behaviour of weak along-shore flows. Tellus 38A, 277–284.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. L. 1987 The role of the higher shelf modes in coastal hydraulics. J. Mar. Res. 45, 33–58.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. L. 1989 The hydraulics of local separation in a coastal current, with application to the Kuriosho meander. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 19, 1809–1820.Google Scholar
Lamb, H. 1932 Hydrodynamics, 6th edn. Cambridge University Press.
Mcintyre, M. E. 1972 On Long's hypothesis of no upstream influence in uniformly stratified or rotating flow. J. Fluid Mech. 52, 209–243.Google Scholar
Pratt, L. J. 1983 A note on nonlinear flow over obstacles. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 24, 63–68.Google Scholar
Pratt, L. J. 1989 Critical control of zonal jets by bottom topography. J. Mar. Res. 47, 111–130.Google Scholar
Pratt, L. J. & Armi, L. 1987 Hydraulic control of flows with nonuniform potential vorticity. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 17, 2016–2029.Google Scholar
Pratt, L. J. & Lundberg, P. A. 1991 Hydraulics of rotating strait and sill flow. Ann. Rev. Fluid. Mech. 23, 81–106.Google Scholar
Rhines, P. B. 1989 Deep planetary circulation and topographys: simple models of mid-ocean flows. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 19, 1449–1470.Google Scholar
Whitehead, J. A., Leetma, A. & Knox, R. A. 1974 Rotating hydraulics of strait and sill flows. Geophys. Fluid Dyn. 6, 101–125.Google Scholar
Woods, A. W. 1993 The topographic control of planetary-scale flow. J. Fluid Mech. 247, 603–621.Google Scholar