Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:18:46.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental characterization of steady two-dimensional vortex couples

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

Jean-Michel Nguyen Duc  and
Joël Sommeria
Jean-Michel Nguyen Duc
Affiliation:
Madylam, I.M.G., BP 95, 38402 Saint Martin D'Hères, France
Joël Sommeria
Affiliation:
Madylam, I.M.G., BP 95, 38402 Saint Martin D'Hères, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study the evolution of unsteady two-dimensional vorticity structures surrounded by fluid at rest. The flow is initiated by a short fluid impulse in a horizontal layer of mercury and is constrained to be two-dimensional by a vertical uniform magnetic field. The impulse is generated by an electric pulse between two electrodes, and a flow circulation can be produced by diverting part of the current through the external frame. The velocity field is measured from the streaks of small particles floating on the free upper surface, and the vorticity is then obtained by means of an analytical interpolation and differentiation. The flow always evolves toward a set of independent steady structures with symmetry which are either circular vortices (monopoles) or couples (dipoles). The latter have a linear or circular steady motion depending on the flow circulation around them. The region of non-zero vorticity is always close to a circle. The steadiness is confirmed by plotting the vorticity versus the stream function in the frame of reference moving with the couple. We obtain a curve, as appropriate for a steady solution of the Euler equation. The slope of this curve is either constant or has no maximum. We suggest that this result could correspond to a general stability condition. The interaction between two symmetric couples at various angles of incidence yields two new couples by exchange of their vortices. Oscillations of the resulting couples are often damped by releasing a circular vortex.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 192 , July 1988 , pp. 175 - 192
Copyright
© 1988 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnol'd V. I. 1966 Sur un principe variationnel pour les écoulements stationnaires des liquides parfaits et ses applications aux problèmes de stabilité non-linéaire. J. Méc. 5, 29–41.Google Scholar
Basdevant C., Legras B., Sadourny, R. & Beland M. 1981 A study of barotropic model flows:intermittency, waves and predictability. J. Atmos. Sci. 38, 2305–2326.Google Scholar
Batchelor G. K. 1967 An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics, section 7.3. Cambridge University Press.
Couder Y. 1984 Solitary vortex couples in two-dimensional wakes. J. Phys. Lett. Paris 45, 353–360.Google Scholar
Couder, Y. & Basdevant C. 1986 Experimental and numerical study of vortex couples in two-dimensional flows. J. Fluid Mech. 173, 225–251.Google Scholar
Deem, G. S. & Zabusky N. J. 1978 Vortex waves: Stationary V-states, interactions, recurrence and breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 859–862.Google Scholar
Flierl G. R., Stern, M. E. & Whitehead J. A. 1983 The physical significance of modons: laboratory experiments and general integral constraints. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 7, 233–263.Google Scholar
Lamb H. 1945 Hydrodynamics, p. 245. Dover.
Legras B., Santangelo, P. & Benzi R. 1988 High resolution numerical experiments for forced two-dimensional turbulence. Europhys. Lett. 5, 37–42.Google Scholar
Leith C. E. 1984 Minimum enstrophy vortices. Phys. Fluids 27, 1388–1395.Google Scholar
McWilliams J. C. 1983 Interaction of isolated vortices II. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 24, 1–22.Google Scholar
McWilliams J. C. 1984 The emergence of isolated coherent vortices in turbulent flow. J. Fluid Mech. 146, 21–43.Google Scholar
McWilliams J. C. 1985 Submesoscale, coherent vortices in the ocean. Rev. Geophys. 23, 165–182.Google Scholar
McWilliams, J. C. & Zabusky J. N. 1982 Interactions of isolated vortices I. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 19, 207–227.Google Scholar
Makino M., Kamimura, T. & Taniuti T. 1981 Dynamics of two-dimensional solitary vortices in a low plasma with convective motion. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 50, 980–989.Google Scholar
Nguyen Due, T. & Sommeria, J. 1985 Etude de Tourbillons bidimensionnels à partir devisualisations. In Visualisation et Traitement d'Images (ed. G. Cognet & J. Mallet), pp. 85–91 INPL, Nancy, France.
Overman, E. A. & Zabusky N. J. 1982 Coaxial scattering of Euler equation translating V-states via contour dynamics. J. Fluid Mech. 125, 187–202.Google Scholar
Paihua Montes L. 1978 Methodes numériques pour le calcul de fonctions-spline à une ou plusieurs variables. Thèse de 3e cycle, Université de Grenoble, France.
Papaliou D. D. 1985 Magneto-fluid mechanic turbulent vortex street. 4th Beer-Sheva Seminar on MHD flows and turbulence, AIAA Progress series, vol. 100, pp. 152–173.
Pierrehumbert R. T. 1980 A family of steady translating vortex pairs with distributed vorticity. J. Fluid Mech. 99, 129–144.Google Scholar
Sommeria J. 1986 Experimental study of the two-dimensional inverse energy cascade in a square box. J. Fluid Mech. 170, 139–168.Google Scholar
Sommeria J. 1988 Electrically driven vortices in a strong magnetic field. J. Fluid Mech. 189, 553–569.Google Scholar
Sommeria, J. & Moreau R. 1982 Why, how, and when, MHD turbulence becomes two-dimensional. J. Fluid Mech. 118, 507–518.Google Scholar
Verron, J. & Sommeria J. 1987 Numerical simulation of a two-dimensional turbulence experiment in magnetohydrodynamic. Phys. Fluids 30, 732–739.Google Scholar
Williamson, C. H. K. & Roshko A. 1986 Vortex dynamics in the wake of an oscillating cylinder. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. II 31, 1690.Google Scholar