Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:10:57.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Energy transfer mechanism of the instability of an axisymmetric swirling flow in a finite-length pipe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2011

S. WANG  and
Z. RUSAK
S. WANG*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Auckland, 38 Princes Street, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
Z. RUSAK
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Nuclear Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180-3590, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: wang@math.auckland.ac.nz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The rate of change of the perturbation's kinetic energy E of a perturbed inviscid, incompressible, axisymmetric, columnar and near-critical swirling flow in a finite-length, straight, circular pipe with periodic and non-periodic inlet–outlet conditions is studied using the Reynolds–Orr equation. The perturbation's mode shape and growth rate are computed from the linear-stability eigenvalue problem using a novel asymptotic solution in the case of a flow in a long pipe. This solution technique is general and can be applied to any vortex flow profile, in a range of swirl levels around the critical level, and for various boundary conditions. The solutions are used to analytically estimate the production (or loss) of E at the pipe boundaries and inside the domain and to shed new light on the Wang–Rusak mechanism of exchange of global stability around the critical swirl, that is leading to the vortex breakdown process. It is shown that the production of E inside the domain is modulated by the base flow strain-rate tensor. For the special case of a solid-body rotating flow, this term vanishes and the stability is determined only by the asymmetric transfer of E at the boundaries. For a general base flow, the dominant perturbation's mode shape develops deviations in response to the non-periodic inlet–outlet conditions. These deviations couple with the base flow strain-rate tensor to generate production or loss of E in the bulk. Together with the asymmetric transfer of E at the boundaries, they form a critical balance of production of E and determine the flow stability around the critical state. This behaviour is demonstrated for the Lamb–Oseen and Q vortex models. This analysis reveals a more complicated, as well more realistic, interaction between the perturbed flow in the domain and at the boundaries that dominates vortex flow dynamics.

JFM classification

Vortex Flows: Vortex breakdown Vortex Flows: Vortex instability
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 679 , 25 July 2011 , pp. 505 - 543
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Antkowiak, A. & Brancher, P. 2004 Transient growth for the Lamb–Oseen vortex. Phys. Fluids 16, L1–L4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, V. I. 1989 Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, 2nd Edn. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 60. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ash, R. L. & Khorrami, M. R. 1995 Vortex stability. In Fluid Vortices, chap. 8 (ed. Green, S. I.), pp. 317–372. Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1962 Theory of the vortex breakdown phenomenon. J. Fluid Mech. 14, 593–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drazin, P. G. 2002 Introduction to Hydrodynamic Stability. Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabre, D., Sipp, D. & Jacquin, L. 2006 Kelvin waves and the singular modes of the Lamb–Oseen vortex. J. Fluid Mech. 551, 235–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallaire, F. & Chomaz, J.-M. 2004 The role of boundary conditions in a simple model of incipient vortex breakdown. Phys. Fluids 16 (2), 274–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallaire, F., Chomaz, J.-M. & Huerre, P. 2004 Closed-loop control of vortex breakdown: a model study. J. Fluid Mech. 511, 67–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heaton, C. J. & Peake, N. 2007 Transient growth in vortices with axial flow. J. Fluid Mech. 587, 271–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, L. N. & Gupta, A. S. 1962 On the hydrodynamics and hydromagnetic stability of swirling flows. J. Fluid Mech. 14, 463–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leclaire, B. & Sipp, D. 2010 A sensitivity study of vortex breakdown onset to upstream boundary conditions. J. Fluid Mech. 645, 81–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibovich, S. & Stewartson, K. 1983 A sufficient condition for the instability of columnar vortices. J. Fluid Mech. 126, 335–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibovich, S. 1984 Vortex stability and breakdown: survey and extension. AIAA J. 22, 1192–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessen, M., Singh, P. J. & Paillet, F. 1974 The stability of a trailing line vortex. Part 1. Inviscid theory. J. Fluid Mech. 63, 753–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, E. W. & Powell, K. G. 1992 Viscous and inviscid instability of a trailing vortex. J. Fluid Mech. 245, 91–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pradeep, D. S. & Hussain, F. 2006 Transient growth of perturbations in a vortex column. J. Fluid Mech. 550, 251–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayleigh, Lord 1916 On the dynamics of revolving fluids. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 93, 148–154.Google Scholar
Rusak, Z. 1998 The interaction of near-critical swirling flows in a pipe with inlet vorticity perturbations. Phys. Fluids 10 (7), 1672–1684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusak, Z., Choi, J. J. & Lee, J. H. 2007 Bifurcation and stability of near-critical compressible swirling flows. Phys. Fluids 19, 114107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusak, Z. & Judd, K. P. 2001 The stability of non-columnar swirling flows in diverging streamtubes. Phys. Fluids 13 (10), 2835–2844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusak, Z., Kapila, A. P. & Choi, J. J. 2002 Effect of combustion on near-critical swirling flow. Combust. Theor. Model. 6, 625–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusak, Z. & Lee, J.-H. 2002 The effect of compressibility on the critical swirl of vortex flows in a pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 461, 301–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusak, Z. & Lee, J.-H. 2004 On the stability of a compressible axisymmetric rotating flow in a pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 501, 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusak, Z., Wang, S. & Whiting, C. H. 1998 The evolution of a perturbed vortex in a pipe to axisymmetric vortex breakdown. J. Fluid Mech. 366, 211–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, P. & D. Henningson, D. 2001 Stability and Transition in Shear Flows. Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol 142. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, H. B. 1960 Analysis of the vortex breakdown phenomenon. In Miszallaneen der Angewandten Mechanik, pp. 306–312. Berlin: Akademie.Google Scholar
Synge, J. L. 1933 The stability of heterogeneous liquids. Trans. R. Soc. Canada 27, 1–18.Google Scholar
Szeri, A. & Holmes, P. 1988 Nonlinear stability of axisymmetric swirling flows. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 326, 327–354.Google Scholar
Wang, S. 2009 On the nonlinear stability of inviscid axisymmetric swirling flows in a pipe of finite length. Phys. Fluids 21, 084104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, S. & Rusak, Z. 1996 On the stability of an axisymmetric rotating flow in a pipe. Phys. Fluids 8 (4), 1007–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, S. & Rusak, Z. 1997 a The dynamics of a swirling flow in a pipe and transition to axisymmetric vortex breakdown. J. Fluid Mech. 340, 177–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, S. & Rusak, Z. 1997 b The effect of slight viscosity on near-critical swirling flows. Phys. Fluids 9 (7), 1914–1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, S., Taylor, S. & Ku Akil, K. 2010 The linear stability analysis of Lamb–Oseen vortex in a finite-length pipe. Trans. ASME: J. Fluids Engng 132 (3), 1–12.Google Scholar
Wu, J. Z., Ma, H. Y. & Zhou, M. D. 2006 Vorticity and Vortex Dynamics. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar