Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T20:12:08.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Constitutive equations in suspension mechanics. Part 1. General formulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

E. J. Hinch
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge
L. G. Leal
Affiliation:
Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena

Abstract

Neither the phenomenological nor the structural approach to the determination of constitutive equations has yet shown itself to be capable of producing useful and predictive descriptions of the majority of technologically important complex fluids. In the present paper we explore the suggestion that significant progress can be made when these two complementary approaches to rheology are combined. For this initial study we restrict our attention to materials which can be modelled as a suspension of particles in a Newtonian fluid, thereby including most polymer solutions while excluding polymer melts. By applying phenomenological techniques to the basic formulation of suspension mechanics we are able to deduce a common simplified constitutive model for all suspension-like materials and to reveal its physical origin. The present analysis demonstrates that the constitutive model of Hand (1962), involving a single second-order tensor, is not sufficiently general for a rigorous description of the majority of suspension-like materials. Consideration of the constitutive forms for the limiting cases of near-equilibrium and strongly non-equilibrium microstructure suggests, however, that Hand's model may provide a reasonable approximation to the exact constitutive behaviour which is useful over the whole range of flow strengths.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1975 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barthès-Biesel, D. & Acrivos, A. 1973a Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 1, 1.
Barthès-Biesel, D. & Acrivos, A. 1973b J. Fluid Mech. 61, 1.
Batchelor, G. K. & Green, J. T. 1972 J. Fluid Mech. 56, 401.
Bird, R. B., Warner, H. R. & Evans, D. C. 1971 Adv. Polymer Sci. 8, 1.
Cerf, R. 1951 J. Chim. Phys. 48, 59.
Ericksen, J. L. 1960 Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 4, 231.
Ferry, J. D. 1970 Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers. Wiley.
Frankel, N. A. & Acrivos, A. 1970 J. Fluid Mech. 44, 65.
Goddard, J. D. & Miller, C. 1967 J. Fluid Mech. 28, 657.
Hall, W. F. & Busenberg, S. N. 1969 J. Chem. Phys. 51, 137.
Hand, G. L. 1962 J. Fluid Mech. 54, 423.
Hinch, E. J. 1972a J. Fluid Mech. 54, 423.
Hinch, E. J. 1972b Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University.
Hinch, E. J. & Leal, L. G. 1972 J. Fluid Mech. 52, 683.
Leal, L. G. 1971 J. Fluid Mech. 46, 395.
Leal, L. G. & Hinch, E. J. 1972 J. Fluid Mech. 55, 745.
Lin, C. J., Peery, J. H. & Schowalter, W. R. 1970 J. Fluid Mech. 44, 1.
Roscoe, R. 1967 J. Fluid Mech. 28, 273.
Taylor, G. I. 1932 Proc. Roy. Soc. A138, 41.