Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T05:51:53.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stirring by squirmers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

ZHI LIN
Affiliation:
Institute for Mathematics and Applications, University of Minnesota – Twin Cities, 207 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
JEAN-LUC THIFFEAULT*
Affiliation:
Institute for Mathematics and Applications, University of Minnesota – Twin Cities, 207 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA Department of Mathematics, University of Wisconsin – Madison, 480 Lincoln Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA
STEPHEN CHILDRESS
Affiliation:
Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, 251 Mercer Street, New York, NY 10012, USA
*
Email address for correspondence: jeanluc@mailaps.org

Abstract

We analyse a simple ‘Stokesian squirmer’ model for the enhanced mixing due to swimming micro-organisms. The model is based on a calculation of Thiffeault & Childress (Phys. Lett. A, vol. 374, 2010, p. 3487), where fluid particle displacements due to inviscid swimmers are added to produce an effective diffusivity. Here we show that, for the viscous case, the swimmers cannot be assumed to swim an infinite distance, even though their total mass displacement is finite. Instead, the largest contributions to particle displacement, and hence to mixing, arise from random changes of direction of swimming and are dominated by the far-field stresslet term in our simple model. We validate the results by numerical simulation. We also calculate non-zero Reynolds number corrections to the effective diffusivity. Finally, we show that displacements due to randomly swimming squirmers exhibit probability distribution functions with exponential tails and a short-time superdiffusive regime, as found previously by several authors. In our case, the exponential tails are due to ‘sticking’ near the stagnation points on the squirmer's surface.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blake, J. R. 1971 A spherical envelope approach to ciliary propulsion. J. Fluid Mech. 46, 199208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. G. 1953 Note on hydrodynamics. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 49 (2), 342354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewar, W. K., Bingham, R. J., Iverson, R. L., Nowacek, D. P., St. Laurent, L. C. & Wiebe, P. H. 2006 Does the marine biosphere mix the ocean? J. Mar. Res. 64, 541561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dombrowski, C., Cisneros, L., Chatkaew, S., Goldstein, R. E. & Kessler, J. O. 2004 Self-concentration and large-scale coherence in bacterial dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (9), 098103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drescher, K., Leptos, K., Tuval, I., Ishikawa, T., Pedley, T. J. & Goldstein, R. E. 2009 Dancing volvox: hydrodynamic bound states of swimming algae. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 168101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drescher, K. D., Goldstein, R. E., Michel, N., Polin, M. & Tuval, I. 2010 Direct measurement of the flow field around swimming microorganisms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 168101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunkel, J., Putz, V. B., Zaid, I. M. & Yeomans, J. M. 2010 Swimmer-tracer scattering at low Reynolds number. Soft Matt. 6, 42684276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, A. 1956 Investigations on the Theory of the Brownian Movement. Dover.Google Scholar
Guasto, J. S., Johnson, K. A. & Gollub, J. P. 2010 Oscillatory flows induced by microorganisms swimming in two-dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 168102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hernandez-Ortiz, J. P., Dtolz, C. G. & Graham, M. D. 2006 Transport and collective dynamics in suspensions of confined swimming particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 204501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishikawa, T. & Pedley, T. J. 2007 Diffusion of swimming model micro-organisms in a semi-dilute suspension. J. Fluid Mech. 588, 437462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishikawa, T., Simmonds, M. P. & Pedley, T. J. 2006 Hydrodynamic interaction of two swimming model micro-organisms. J. Fluid Mech. 568, 119160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katija, K. & Dabiri, J. O. 2009 A viscosity-enhanced mechanism for biogenic ocean mixing. Nature 460, 624627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leptos, K. C., Guasto, J. S., Gollub, J. P., Pesci, A. I. & Goldstein, R. E. 2009 Dynamics of enhanced tracer diffusion in suspensions of swimming eukaryotic microorganisms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 198103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lighthill, M. J. 1952 On the squirming motion of nearly spherical deformable bodies through liquids at very small Reynolds numbers. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 5, 109118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, J. C. 1869 On the displacement in a case of fluid motion. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. s1–3 (1), 8287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oseen, C. W. 1910 Über die Stokessche formel und über eine verwandte aufgabe in der hydrodynamik. Ark. Mat. Astron. Fys. 6 (29), 120.Google Scholar
Saintillian, D. & Shelley, M. J. 2007 Orientational order and instabilities in suspensions of self-locomoting rods. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 058102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiffeault, J.-L. & Childress, S. 2010 Stirring by swimming bodies. Phys. Lett. A 374, 34873490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underhill, P. T., Hernandez-Ortiz, J. P. & Graham, M. D. 2008 Diffusion and spatial correlations in suspensions of swimming particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 248101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, X.-L. & Libchaber, A. 2000 Particle diffusion in a quasi-two-dimensional bacterial bath. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 30173020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar