Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T14:11:06.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performance of seed mixtures and multilines of Upland cotton in Uganda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

N. L. Innes  and
G. B. Jones
N. L. Innes
Affiliation:
Namulonge Research Station, Kampala, Uganda
G. B. Jones
Affiliation:
Severe Research Station, Soroti, Uganda
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In five experiments with binary mixtures of a wide range of Upland cotton varieties grown at three sites in Uganda in 1969–70 and 1970–1 there was no evidence to indicate that components interacted to give better yields than would be expected from their yield in pure stand. Moreover, in district variety trials over three seasons there was no evidence that mixtures of several lines of closely related material were more stable than the individual component lines. Problems related to a breeding programme based on the development of multiline varieties are discussed. Although the variable ecological conditions in Uganda should provide an excellent opportunity of developing multilines with a high degree of population buffering, it is concluded that pure lines tested in a wide range of environments are as good as, and are less costly to produce, than mixed populations that have been specially bred and tested. Multilines with components that differ little in yielding ability or stability do, however, provide an opportunity of more rapid seed multiplication, and there is also the possibility that multiline seed issues may show progressive increases in yield with each year of growing. Present practice in Uganda of releasing as seed issues multilines with closely related components that have been adequately tested as individual lines should therefore be continued.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 88 , Issue 1 , February 1977 , pp. 47 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, M. H. (1970). Cotton. The origins and characteristics of Uganda varieties. In Agriculture in Uganda. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, M. H. & Innes, N. L. (1976). Cotton breeding. In Agricultural Eesearchfor Development. The Namulonge Contribution. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Borlaug, N. E. (1969). The use of multilineal or composite varieties to control airborne epidemic diseases of self-pollinated crop plants. Proceedings of the First International Wheat Genctics Symposium, PP. 12–26.Google Scholar
Freeman, G. H. & Dowker, B. D. (1973). The analysis of variation between and within genotypes and environments. Heredity 30, 97–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Innes, N. L. (1969). Breeding for increased cotton yields in Uganda. Seminar on Cotton Production Research, Kampala, Uganda, 05 1969, pp. 19–37. Washington, D.C.: International Cotton Advisory Committee.Google Scholar
Innes, N. L. (1973). Cotton Research Reports, Uganda, 1971-72. London: Cotton Research Corporation.Google Scholar
Leonard, K. J. (1969). Factors affecting rates of stem rust increase in mixed plantings of resistant and susceptible oat varieties. Phytopathology 89, 1845–50.Google Scholar
Marshall, D. R. & Allard, R. W. (1974). Performance and stability of mixtures of grain sorghum. 1. Relationship between level of genetic diversity and performance. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 44, 145–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, D. R. & Brown, A. H. D. (1973). Stability of performances of mixtures and multilines. Euphytica 22, 405–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peat, J. E. & Brown, K. J. (1961). A record of cotton breeding for the Lake Province of Tanganyika: Seasons 1939–40 to 1957–58. Empire Journal of Experimental Agriculture 29, 119–35.Google Scholar
Riggs, T. J. (1970). Trials of cotton seed mixtures in Uganda. Cotton Growing Review 47, 100–11.Google Scholar
Rodinson, R. A. (1971). Vertical resistance. Review of Plant Pathology 50, 233–9.Google Scholar
Simmonds, N. W. (1962). Variability in crop plants, its use and conservation. Biological Review 37, 422–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suneson, C. A. (1960). Genetic diversity - a protection against plant diseases and insects. Agronomy Journal 52, 319–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trenbath, B. R. (1974). Biomass productivity of mixtures. Advances in Agronomy 26, 177–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Der Plank, J. E. (1968). Disease Resistance in Plants. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Walker, J. T. (1963). Multiline concept and intravarietal heterosis. Cotton Growing Review 40, 190–215.Google Scholar
Yates, F. & Cochran, W. G. (1938). The analysis of groups of experiments. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 28, 556–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar