Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T21:48:17.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relative importance of cluster size, sowing depth, time of seedling emergence and between-plant spacing on variation in plant size in red beet (Beta vulgaris L.) crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

L. R. Benjamin
L. R. Benjamin
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick, CV35 9EF
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Beets with a coefficient of variation (c.v.) of weight of only 36–46% were produced by reducing the variation in cluster size, sowing depth, time of seedling emergence, proximity and size of neighbours to as low a value as practicable. The relative importance of these different sources of variation in plant size was examined in two experiments sown in contrasting conditions.

Variation in time of seedling emergence was a major source of variation in plant size and was partially caused by variation in the environment around the clusters. Variation in true seed size and between-plant spacing was achieved by use of clusters of different sizes, but these factors were associated with only a negligible variation in root size. Similarly, local interactions between plants, brought about by variation in plant-to-plant spacing, accounted for only a small proportion of the variation in root weight.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 108 , Issue 1 , February 1987 , pp. 221 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akeson, W. R., Henson, M. A., Freytag, A. H. & Westfall, D. G. (1980). Sugarbeet fruit germination and emergence under moisture and temperature stress. Crop Science 20, 735–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, R. B. & Longden, P. C. (1964). Factors affecting seedling performance. Report of National Vegetable Research Station for 1963, 43–45.Google Scholar
Benjamin, L. R. (1984a). The relative importance of some sources of root-weight variation in a carrot crop. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102, 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, L. R. (1984b). The relative importance of some different sources of plant-weight variation in drilled and transplanted leeks. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 103, 527–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, L. R. & Bell, N. (1985). The influence of seed type and plant density on variation in size of red beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 105, 563–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, L. R., Sutherland, R. A. & Senior, D. (1985). The influence of sowing rate and row spacing on the plant density and yield of red beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 104, 615–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breeze, V. G. & Milbourn, G. M. (1981). Inter-plant variation in temperate crops of maize. Annals of Applied Biology 99, 335–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. J. (1980). Variation in germination and seedling emergence of sugar beet at sub-optimal temperatures. Annals of Applied Biology 95, 143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, H. L. & Brewbaker, H. E. (1946). Size of seed-ball in relation to yield of sugar beets. Proceedings of the American Society of Sugar Beet Technologists 4, 270–272.Google Scholar
Gray, D., Steckel, J. R. A., Jones, S. R. & Senior, D. (1986). Correlations between variability in carrot (Daucus carota L.) plant weight and variability in embryo length. Journal of Horticultural Science 61, 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammerton, J. L. (1961). Studies of the effects of soil aggregate size on the emergence and growth of beet (Beta vulgaris L.). I. Seedling emergence. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 56, 213–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegarty, T. W. (1976). Field establishment of some vegetable crops: response to a range of soil conditions. Journal of Horticultural Science 51, 133–146.Google Scholar
Hegarty, T. W. & Roylk, S. M. (1978). Soil impedance as a factor reducing crop seedling emergence, and its relation to soil conditions at sowing, and to applied water. Journal of Applied Ecology 15, 897–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegarty, T. W. & Thompson, R. (1974). Red beet: production for processing. Scottish Horticultural Research Institute Annual Report 1973, pp. 26–27.Google Scholar
Longden, P. C., Scott, R. K. & Wood, D. W. (1974). Grading monogerm sugar-beet and its influence on performance. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 83, 125–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLachlan, J. B. (1972). Effect of seed size on yield of monogerm sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 11, 233–236.Google Scholar
Pielou, E. C. (1962). The use of plant-to-neighbour distances for the detection of competition. Journal of Ecology 50, 357–367.Google Scholar
Price, C. & Carsner, E. (1946). Seed size in relation to development and yield of sugar beets. Proceedings of the American Society of Sugar Beet Technologists 4, 263–268.Google Scholar
Ross, H. A. & Hegarty, T. W. (1979). Sensitivity of seed germination and seedling radicle growth to moisture stress in some vegetable crop species. Annals of Botany 43, 241–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savitsky, V. F. (1954). Relation between the weight of fruit and weight of germ in mono- and multigerm beets. Proceedings of the American Society of Sugar Beet Technologists 8, 16–22.Google Scholar
Scott, R. K., Harper, F., Wood, D. W. & Jaggard, K. W. (1974). Effects of seed size on growth, development and yield of monogerm sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 82, 517–530.Google Scholar
Snyder, F. W. & Filban, C. (1970). Relation of sugar beet seedling emergence to fruit size. Journal of the American Society of Sugar Beet Technologists 15, 703–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solbrig, O. T. (1981). Studies on the population biology of the genus Viola. II. The effect of plant size on fitness in Viola sororia. Evolution 35, 1080–1093.Google Scholar
Thorne, G. N. & Evans, A. F. (1964). Influence of tops and roots on net assimilation rate of sugar-beet and spinach beet and grafts between them. Annals of Botany 28, 499–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waller, D. M. (1985). The genesis of size hierarchies in seedling populations of Impatiens capensis Meerb. New Phytologist 100, 243–260.Google Scholar
Wurr, D. C. E. & Fellows, J. R. (1983). The effect of the time of seedling emergence of crisp lettuce on the time of maturity and head weight at maturity. Journal of Horticultural Science 58, 561–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar