No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
An Analysis of the Impact of Alternative Peanut Marketing Quotas and Support Prices*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 April 2015
Extract
The first significant changes in the peanut program in more than 20 years are contained in the Food and Agricultural Act of 1977. The new program retains the use of acreage allotments, marketing quotas, and support prices but changes the procedure used to establish the size of the allotments and quotas given. The new program provides for two support prices versus one under the old program and no longer relates the support price level to a “parity price” concept.
In anticipation of the changes expected to be forthcoming from the new program during 1978 and future years, an analysis was undertaken to determine the effect of changing peanut marketing quotas and support prices on producer income, peanut consumer surplus, and peanut program costs. The analysis does not focus on changes generated by the new program because specific aspects of the program were not known when the research was conducted. Rather, the effect of a change or combination of changes in marketing quotas and support prices is analyzed in a general manner. Generalizations about the new program can be made on the basis of the analysis.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1978
Footnotes
*
Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station Article J 3477. The author acknowledges the helpful suggestions of Daryll Ray and other colleagues at Oklahoma State University.
References
[1]Badger, D. D., and Plaxico, J. S.. Selected Supply and Demand Relationships in the Peanut Industry, Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station, Series p-338, December 1959.Google Scholar
[2]Box, M. J. “A New Method of Constrained Optimization and a Comparison with Other Methods,” Computer Journal, Volume 8, 1965.Google Scholar
[3]Fleming, F. N. and White, F. C.. “Marketing Quotas as an Alternative to the Present Price Support Program for Peanuts,” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 8, No. 1, July 1975.Google Scholar
[4]Fleming, Frank N. “An Econometrie Model of the United States Peanut Sector, Emphasizing Operation of the Price Support Program,” M.S. thesis, University of Georgia, 1976.Google Scholar
[5]Jellema, B. M. “Analysis of the World Market for Groundnuts and Groundnut Products,” Ph.D. thesis, North Carolina State University, 1972.Google Scholar
[6]Kuester, James L. and Mize, Joe H.. Optimization Techniques with Fortran, New York: McGraw-Hill Company, 1973.Google Scholar
[7]Nieuwoudt, W. L., Bullock, J. B., and Mathia, G. A.. “An Economic Evaluation of Alternative Peanut Policies,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 58, No. 3, August 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Reagan, S. “Peanut Price Support Programs 1933-53 and Their Effect on Farm Income,” Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, 1953.Google Scholar
[9]Song, I., Franzmann, J. R., and Mead, J. F.. “The Impact of the Direct Peanut Price Support Program on Farm Income and Government Cost,” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 7, No. 1, July 1975.Google Scholar
[10]U.S. Congress, Food and Agricultural Act of 1977, Public Law 95-113, 95th Congress, September 1977.Google Scholar
[11]U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Agriculture and Forestry, Costs of Producing Selected Crops in the United States—1975, 1976, and Projections for 1977, by ERS-USDA. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1977.Google Scholar
[12]U.S. Department of Agriculture. Fats and Oils Situation, Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, monthly.Google Scholar