No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Party leadership, electoral reform, and mandate-divide
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 May 2022
Abstract
Previous studies had no consensus on whether a ‘mandate-divide’ exists between district and party-list legislators under the mixed-member system. I argued that previous studies ignored the role of the party. This article aims to explore the legislative consequences of the 2005 electoral reform and the role of parties in Taiwan. I analyzed the roll-call votes, considering abstention and absence as potential defection, along with interviews. The data cover from the fifth to eighth Legislative Yuan, two periods each before and after the electoral reform. The findings show that district legislators tended to defect from the party line than list proportional representation (PR) members in pre- and post-reform periods. However, district legislators only tended to be absent from the voting than list PR members after the electoral reform. Mandate-divide was present throughout the period, but differences were more salient before the reform. Besides, evidence stressing the influence of parties was revealed in the interviews. Party leaders enforce various punishments to enforce party discipline. The role of party became more important after the electoral reform. District legislators have higher absence rate after the electoral reform because they need to engage more in constituency service or avoid expressing their position on controversial issues. The ruling party tends to sanction the absence when they have majority in parliament.
Keywords
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
André, A, Depauw, S and Martin, S (2016) The classification of electoral systems: bringing legislators back in. Electoral Studies 42, 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.01.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batto, NF (2012) Differing mandates and party loyalty in mixed-member systems: taiwan as a baseline case. Electoral Studies 31, 384–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2012.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bawn, K and Thies, MF (2003) A comparative theory of electoral incentives: representing the unorganized under PR, plurality and mixed-member electoral systems. Journal of Theoretical Politics 15, 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692803151001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becher, M and Sieberer, U (2008) Discipline, electoral rules and defection in the Bundestag, 1983–94. German Politics 17, 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644000802300510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, ME, Shugart, MS and Watt, KA (2013) Patterns of intraparty competition in open-list & SNTV systems. Electoral Studies 32, 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, BE, Ferejohn, JA and Fiorina, MP (1984) The constituency service basis of the personal vote for U.S. representatives and British members of parliament. American Political Science Review 78, 110–125. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, BE, Ferejohn, JA and Fiorina, MP (1987) The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674493285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, JM and Shugart, MS (1995) Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: a rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies 14, 417–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-3794(94)00035-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chi, E (2014) Two-party contests and the politics of electoral reforms: the case of Taiwan. Government and Opposition 49, 658–681. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2013.46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, TD, Martinaitis, Ž and Dilba, R (2008) Electoral mandate and party cohesion: does it matter in Lithuania? Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 24, 317–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523270802267864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colomer, JM (ed.) (2011). Personal Representation: The Neglected Dimension of Electoral Systems. Colchester, UK: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Cox, GW (1987) The Efficient Secret: The Cabinet and the Development of Political Parties in Victorian England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511571473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, GW (1990) Centripetal and centrifugal incentives in electoral systems. American Journal of Political Science 34, 903. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, GW (1997) Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, GW and Niou, E (1994) Seat bonuses under the single nontransferable vote system: evidence from Japan and Taiwan. Comparative Politics 26, 221. https://doi.org/10.2307/422269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, GW and Rosenbluth, F (1993) The electoral fortunes of legislative factions in Japan. American Political Science Review 87, 577–589. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, GW and Thies, MF (1998) The cost of intraparty competition: the single, nontransferable vote and money politics in Japan. Comparative Political Studies 31, 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414098031003001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, KE and Schoppa, LJ (2002) Interaction effects in mixed-member electoral systems: theory and evidence from Germany, Japan, and Italy. Comparative Political Studies 35, 1027–1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/001041402237505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, BF (2007) Incentives in mixed-member electoral systems: general election laws, candidate selection procedures, and cameral rules. Comparative Political Studies 40, 1460–1485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414007301703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, BF, Escobar-Lemmon, MC, Jones, BS, Jones, MP and Taylor-Robinson, MM (2004) Vote-seeking incentives and legislative representation in six presidential democracies. The Journal of Politics 66, 823–846. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2004.00278.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, F (2004 a) Electoral coordination and the strategic desertion of strong parties in compensatory mixed systems with negative vote transfers. Electoral Studies 23, 391–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(03)00028-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, F (2004 b) Frogs, mice and mixed electoral institutions: party discipline in Italy's XIV Chamber of Deputies. The Journal of Legislative Studies 10, 10–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357233042000322454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, F, Herron, ES and Nishikawa, M (2005) Mixed Electoral Systems: Contamination and its Consequences (1st ed). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781403978851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanigan, WH, Cain, B, Ferejohn, J and Fiorina, M (1988) The personal vote: constituency service and electoral independence. Political Science Quarterly 103, 559. https://doi.org/10.2307/2150771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspel, M, Remington, TF and Smith, SS (1998) Electoral institutions and party cohesion in the Russian Duma. The Journal of Politics 60, 417–439.10.2307/2647916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herron, ES (2002) Electoral influences on legislative behavior in mixed-member systems: evidence from Ukraine's Verkhovna Rada. Legislative Studies Quarterly 27, 361. https://doi.org/10.2307/3598568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, S (2017) Who wants issue ownership? Legislators’ initiatives and pursuit of issue ownership in Taiwan. Taiwan Democracy Quarterly 14, 1–51.Google Scholar
Ishiyama, J (2000) Candidate recruitment, party organisation and the communist successor parties: the cases of the. Europe-Asia Studies 52, 875–896. https://doi.org/10.1080/713663097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, MP, Saiegh, S, Spiller, PT and Tommasi, M (2002) Amateur legislators – professional politicians: the consequences of party-centered electoral rules in a federal system. American Journal of Political Science 46, 656. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jun, H-W and Hix, S (2010) Electoral systems, political career paths and legislative behavior: evidence from South Korea's mixed-member system. Japanese Journal of Political Science 11, 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1468109910000058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerevel, Y (2010) The legislative consequences of Mexico's mixed-member electoral system, 2000–2009. Electoral Studies 29, 691–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2010.07.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingemann, H-D and Wessels, B (2001) The political consequences of Germany's mixed-member system: personalization at the grass roots? In Shugart, MS and Wattenberg, MP (eds), Mixed-Member Electoral Systems. The Best of Both Worlds? Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 279–296.Google Scholar
Kulishek, MR and Crisp, BF (2001) The legislative consequences of MMP electoral rules in Venezuela. In Shugart, MS and Wattenberg, MP (eds), Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 404–431.Google Scholar
Kunicova, J and Remington, TF (2008) Mandates, parties and dissent: effect of electoral rules on parliamentary party cohesion in the Russian state Duma, 1994–2003. Party Politics 14, 555–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068808093390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, DL (1986) Electoral structures and pork barrel politics. International Political Science Review 7, 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, TD and Patterson, WD (1990) Comparative pork barrel politics: perceptions from the west German bundestag. Comparative Political Studies 22, 458–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414090022004004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, JL (2015) Female candidates and legislators. Annual Review of Political Science 18, 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-020614-094613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, MY (2013) Local Factions Compete for the Legislative Policies, [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Chengchi University.Google Scholar
Mayhew, DR (1974) Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mayorga, RA (2001) The mixed-member proportional system and its consequences in Bolivia. In Shugart, MS and Wattenberg, MP (eds), Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds? New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 432–446.Google Scholar
Moser, RG and Scheiner, E (2005) Strategic ticket splitting and the personal vote in mixed-member electoral systems. Legislative Studies Quarterly 30, 259–276. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298005X201545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myerson, RB (1993) Incentives to cultivate favored minorities under alternative electoral systems. American Political Science Review 87, 856–869. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemoto, K, Krauss, E and Pekkanen, R (2008) Policy dissension and party discipline: the July 2005 vote on postal privatization in Japan. British Journal of Political Science 38, 1508–1542. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemoto, K, Pekkanen, R and Krauss, E (2014) Over-nominating candidates, undermining the party: the collective action problem under SNTV in Japan. Party Politics 20, 740–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812453369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, P (ed.) (1997) Passages to Power: Legislative Recruitment in Advanced Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, P (2004) Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://site.ebrary.com/id/10124680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pekkanen, R, Nyblade, B and Krauss, ES (2006) Electoral incentives in mixed-member systems: party, posts, and zombie politicians in Japan. American Political Science Review 100, 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055406062095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, SR and Thies, MF (2001) The consequences of electoral reform in Japan. In Shugart, MS and Wattenberg, MP (eds), Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds? Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 380–403.Google Scholar
Rich, TS (2014) Party voting cohesion in mixed member legislative systems: evidence from Korea and Taiwan. Legislative Studies Quarterly 39, 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholl, EL (1986) The electoral system and constituency-oriented activity in the European parliament. International Studies Quarterly 30, 315. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheng, S-Y (2008) Party leadership and cohesion in the LegislativeYuan: before and after the first party turnover in the executive branch. Taiwan Democracy Quarterly 5, 1–46.Google Scholar
Sheng, S-Y (2014) Change and continuity in legislators’ bill-introduction before and after the reform of the electoral system: an exploratory analysis. The Taiwanese Political Science Review 18, 73–127. https://doi.org/10.6683/TPSR.201406.18(1).73-127.Google Scholar
Shugart, MS and Wattenberg, MP (eds) (2001) Mixed-member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shugart, MS, Valdini, ME and Suominen, K (2005) Looking for locals: voter information demands and personal vote-earning attributes of legislators under proportional representation. American Journal of Political Science 49, 437–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00133.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieberer, U (2010) Behavioral consequences of mixed electoral systems: deviating voting behavior of district and list MPs in the German bundestag. Electoral Studies 29, 484–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2010.04.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockton, H (2010) How rules matter: electoral reform in Taiwan. Social Science Quarterly 91, 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00679.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strahan, R (2006) Setting the agenda: responsible party government in the U.S. House of representatives. Perspectives on Politics 4. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592706420478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stratmann, T and Baur, M (2002) Plurality rule, proportional representation, and the German bundestag: how incentives to pork-barrel differ across electoral systems. American Journal of Political Science 46, 506. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taagepera, R and Shugart, MS (1989) Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Thames, FC (2001) Legislative voting behaviour in the Russian Duma: understanding the effect of mandate. Europe-Asia Studies 53, 869–884. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130120078531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thames, FC (2005) A house divided: party strength and the mandate divide in Hungary, Russia, and Ukraine. Comparative Political Studies 38, 282–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414004272526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y (1996) The political consequences of the electoral system: single nontransferable voting in Taiwan. Issues & Studies 32, 85–104.Google Scholar
Wang, C-H (2009) Analysis of legislators’ law-making and constituency service: continuity and change after party turnover in the year 2000. Taiwanese Political Science Review 13, 113–169.Google Scholar
Wu, C (2008) A simple model for predicting the outcome of the 2008 legislative Yuan elections in Taiwan. Issues & Studies 44, 1–28.Google Scholar
Yu, EC, Shoji, K and Batto, NF (2016) Innovations in candidate selection methods. In Batto, NF, Huang, C, Tan, AC and Cox, GW (eds), Mixed-Member Electoral Systems in Constitutional Context Taiwan, Japan, and Beyond. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 135–164.Google Scholar
Liao Dataset
Link
Liao supplementary material
Online Appendix
File
45.6 KB