Hostname: page-component-669899f699-cf6xr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T05:09:07.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Civic Consciousness and Civil Disobedience on Support for and Participation in Contentious Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2017

CHING-HSING WANG  and
DENNIS LU-CHUNG WENG
CHING-HSING WANG
Affiliation:
Hobby School of Public Affairs at the University of Houstoncwang3@central.uh.edu
DENNIS LU-CHUNG WENG
Affiliation:
State University of New York at Cortlanddennis.weng@cortland.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines the effects of civic consciousness and civil disobedience on individual attitudes toward, and participation in, contentious politics. Using the newly collected survey data on civic consciousness and civil disobedience in Taiwan in 2015, this study finds that both civic consciousness and civil disobedience are significantly associated with individual support for and engagement in contentious politics. Specifically, people with strong civic consciousness and civil disobedience are more likely to support the Sunflower Movement and take part in contentious political activities such as rallies, marches, and strikes. The findings imply that as the ideas of civic consciousness and civil disobedience prevail in a democracy, the public will be more likely to choose to use contentious political activities to express their opinions instead of institutional and legal approaches when the government is unable to respond to public needs in a timely manner.

Type
Research Article
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , June 2017 , pp. 313 - 335
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

The authors appreciate the assistance in providing data by Fu-Kien Chang and Chia-hung Tsai and the Election Study Center at National Chengchi University. An earlier version of this article was presented at the conference on ‘A New Era in Taiwan: Domestic and International Implications’ at the University of Texas at Austin on 31 October 2015. The authors would like to thank the conference organizer, Tse-min Lin, the discussants, Wei-chin Lee and Philip Paolino, and other participants for their support and feedback. Also the authors are grateful to anonymous reviewers for their comments. The authors are alone responsible for views expressed herein.

References

Almond, Gabriel Abraham and Verba, Sidney (1963), The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin R. (1984), Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Samuel H., Kaase, Max, Allerback, Klaus R., et al. (1979), Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Bedford, Olwen and Kwang-Kuo, Hwang (2006), Taiwanese Identity and Democracy: The Social Psychology of Taiwan's 2004 Elections, New York, NY: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance (2012), ‘The Personalization of Politics: Political Identity, Social Media, and Changing Patterns of Participation’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644 (1): 20–39.Google Scholar
Blais, André (2010), ‘Political Participation’, in LeDuc, Lawrence, Niemi, Richard G., and Norris, Pippa (eds.), Comparing Democracies 3: Elections and Voting in the 21st Century, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 165–83.Google Scholar
Blais, André, Gidengil, Elisabeth, and Nevitte, Neil (2004), ‘Where Does Turnout Decline Come From?’, European Journal of Political Research, 43 (2): 221–36.Google Scholar
Blais, André and Rubenson, Daniel (2013), ‘The Source of Turnout Decline: New Values or New Contexts?’ Comparative Political Studies, 46 (1): 95–117.Google Scholar
Bowler, Shaun and Donovan, Todd (2013), ‘Civic Duty and Turnout in the UK Referendum on AV: What Shapes the Duty to Vote?’, Electoral Studies, 32 (2): 265–73.Google Scholar
Brady, Henry E. (1999), ‘Political Participation’, in Robinson, John P., Shaver, Philip R., and Wrightsman, Lawrence S. (eds.), Measures of Political Attitudes: Volume 2 of Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 737–801.Google Scholar
Brownlee, Kimberley (2012), Conscience and Conviction: The Case for Civil Disobedience, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chu, Yun-han (1989), ‘Authoritarianism and economic oligopoly in Taiwan’, in Chung-Chi, Wu (ed.), Monopoly and Exploitation: The Political Economy of Authoritarianism, Taipei: Taiwan Research Fund (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., Sanders, David, Stewart, Marianne C., and Whiteley, Paul (2004), Political Choice in Britain, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., Sanders, David, Stewart, Marianne C., and Whiteley, Paul (2009), Performance Politics and the British Voter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corrigall-Brown, Catherine (2011), Patterns of Protest: Trajectories of Participation in Social Movements, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. (2002), Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies, New York, NY: Chatham House Publishers/Seven Bridges Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. and Wattenberg, Martin P. (eds.) (2000), Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J., Shin, Doh C. and Jou, Willy (2007), ‘Understanding Democracy: Data from Unlikely Places’, Journal of Democracy, 18 (4): 142–56.Google Scholar
Fan, Yun (2004), ‘Taiwan: No Civil Society, No Democracy’, in Alagappa, Muthiah (ed.), Civil Society and Political Change in Asia, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 164–90.Google Scholar
Finkel, Steven E. and Karl-Dieter, Opp (1991), ‘Party Identification and Participation in Collective Political Action’, Journal of Politics, 53 (2): 339–71.Google Scholar
Franklin, Mark N. (2004), Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies since 1945, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Held, David (1996), Models of Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Ho, Karl, Clarke, Harold D, Chen, Li-Khan, and Lu-Chung Weng, Dennis (2013), ‘Valence Politics and Electoral Choice in a New Democracy: The Case of Taiwan’, Electoral Studies, 32 (3): 476–81.Google Scholar
Ho, Karl, Lu-Chung Weng, Dennis, and Clarke, Harold D. (2015), ‘Using Repeated Cross-Sectional Surveys to Study Political Attitudes and Behavior in a New Democracy: HAPC Models for Taiwan’, Electoral Studies, 39: 256–63.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, Lawrence (1987), Child Psychology and Childhood Education: A Cognitive-Developmental View, New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Kornberg, Allan and Clarke, Harold D. (1992), Citizens and Community: Political Support in a Representative Democracy, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kornberg, Allan and Clarke, Harold D. (1994), ‘Beliefs about Democracy and Satisfaction with Democratic Government: The Canadian Case’, Political Research Quarterly, 47 (3): 537–63.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., Jacoby, William G., Norpoth, Helmut, and Weisburg, Herbert F (2008), The American Voter Revisited, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. (1977), The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, Michael P. (2010), ‘American Voter Turnout in Historical Perspective’, in Leighley, Jan E. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of American Elections and Political Behavior, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 125–43.Google Scholar
Morreall, John (1991), ‘The Justifiability of Violent Civil Disobedience’, in Bedau, Hugo A. (ed.), Civil Disobedience in Focus, London: Routledge, pp. 130–43.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa (ed.) (1999), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa (2002), Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa (2009), ‘The Globalization of Comparative Public Opinion Research’, in Robinson, Neil and Landman, Todd (eds.), The Handbook of Comparative Politics, London: Sage Publications, pp. 522–40.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa (2011), Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parry, Geraint, George Moyser, and Neil Day (1992), Political Participation and Democracy in Britain, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole (1970), Participation and Democratic Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1971), A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph (2009), The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality, 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scales, Peter C., Blyth, Dale A., Berkas, Thomas H., and Kielsmeier, James C. (2000), ‘The Effects of Service-Learning on Middle School Students’ Social Responsibility and Academic Success’, The Journal of Early Adolescence, 20 (3): 332–58.Google Scholar
Schudson, Michael (1998), The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life, New York, NY: Martin Kessler Books.Google Scholar
Schudson, Michael (2000), ‘Good Citizens and Bad History: Today's Political Ideals in Historical Perspective’, The Communication Review, 4 (1): 1–19.Google Scholar
Shyu, Huo-Yan (2001), ‘Voting Behaviors in the Second Taipei Mayoral Elections: An Analysis of Partisan Vote-Choices and the Split-Ticket Voting’, The Soochow Journal of Political Science, 13, 77–127.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter (1973), Democracy and Disobedience, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Smith, William (2013), Civil Disobedience and Deliberative Democracy, New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Snarey, John and Pavkov, Thomas (1991), ‘Beyond Socialization versus Development: Kohlberg's Approach to Moral Education’, Sociological Focus, 24 (2): 105–16.Google Scholar
Stewart, Marianne C. and Clarke, Harold D. (1992), ‘The (Un)Importance of Party Leaders: Leader Images and Party Choice in the 1987 British Election’, The Journal of Politics, 54 (2): 447–70.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney (2013), ‘Contentious Politics’, The Wiley–Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements.Google Scholar
Van Biezen, Ingrid, Mair, Peter, and Poguntke, Thomas (2012), ‘Going, Going . . . Gone? The Decline of Party Membership in Contemporary Europe’, European Journal of Political Research, 51 (1): 24–56.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney and Nie, Norman H. (1972), Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality, New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry (1995), Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, T. Y. and Liu, I-Chou (2004), ‘Contending Identities in Taiwan: Implications for Cross-Strait Relations’, Asian Survey, 44 (4): 568–90.Google Scholar
Wattenberg, Martin P. (2012), Is Voting for Young People? 3rd edn, New York, NY: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Whiteley, Paul F. (2011), ‘Is the Party Over? The Decline of Party Activism and Membership across the Democratic World’, Party Politics, 17 (1): 21–44.Google Scholar
Yu, Ching-hsin and Hsiao, Yi-ching (2007), ‘New Voters’ Political Attitudes and the Future of Taiwan's Democracy’, Taiwan Democracy Quarterly, 4 (3): 109–51.Google Scholar