Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T15:28:54.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Are the Pathways Linking the Disclosure of a Degenerative Eye Condition in the Workplace and Wellbeing? A Mixed Methods Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2016

Tali Spiegel ,
Rafael Wittek  and
Nardi Steverink
Tali Spiegel*
Affiliation:
Utrecht University, the Netherlands
Rafael Wittek
Affiliation:
University of Groningen, the Netherlands
Nardi Steverink
Affiliation:
University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Tali Spiegel, Utrecht University, Padualaan 14, 3584CH Utrecht, the Netherlands. E-mail: Spiegeltali@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While much is known about the pathways linking workplace disclosure of a stigmatised identity and negative wellbeing outcomes, little is known about the pathways to positive wellbeing outcomes. Using survey and interview data three pathways were investigated among the population of individuals with degenerative eye conditions: the alleviation of inhibition (psychological), social support (social), and the use of assistive technology (physical). The findings suggest that the psychological pathway is most prominent. The alternative pathways are only partially exhibited in the interview data. These findings can assist policymakers nuance policy aimed at enhancing labour market participation of individuals with disabilities.

Keywords

degenerative eye conditionsworkplacedisclosurestigmatised identitywellbeing
Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Disability Management , Volume 11 , 2016 , e3
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Badgett, M.L. (1996). Employment and sexual orientation: Disclosure and discrimination in the workplace. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 4 (4), 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beals, K.P., Peplau, L.A., & Gable, S.L. (2009). Stigma management and well-being: The role of perceived social support, emotional processing, and suppression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35 (7), 867–879.Google Scholar
Bell, E.C. & Mino, N.M. (2013). Blind and Visually Impaired Adult Rehabilitation and Employment Survey: Final Results. Journal of Blindness Innovation & Research, 1 (1). Retrieved from http://www.nfb-jbir.org/index.php/JBIR/article/view/35 Google Scholar
Bodner, T.E. (2008). What improves with increased missing data imputations? Structural Equation Modeling, 15 (4), 651–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudoir, S.R. & Fisher, J.D. (2010). The disclosure processes model: understanding disclosure decision making and post disclosure outcomes among people living with a concealable stigmatized identity. Psychological Bulletin, 136 (2), 236–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clair, J.A., Beatty, J.E., & MacLean, T.L. (2005). Out of sight but not out of mind: Managing invisible social identities in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 30 (1), 78–95.Google Scholar
Coleman, A.L. (2002). Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Evidence-Based Ophthalmology, 3 (1), 58–59.Google Scholar
Corrigan, P. & Matthews, A. (2003). Stigma and disclosure: Implications for coming out of the closet. Journal of Mental Health, 12 (3), 235–248.Google Scholar
DeLeire, T. (2000). The wage and employment effects of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Journal of Human Resources, 35 (4), 693–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derlega, V.J., Metts, S., Petronio, S., & Margulis, S.T. (1993). Sage Series on Close Relationships. Self-disclosure. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Dickerson, L.R., Smith, P.B., & Moore, J.E. (1997). An overview of blindness and visual impairments. In Moore, J.E., Graves, W.H., & Patterson, J.B. (Eds.). Foundations of rehabilitation counseling with persons who are blind or visually impaired (pp. 2–23) AFB. New York, NY: American Foundation for the Blind Press.Google Scholar
Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49 (1), 71–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dovidio, J., Major, B., & Crocker, J. (2000). Stigma: Introduction and overview. In Heatherton, T., Kleck, R., Hebl, M., & Hull, J. (Eds.), The social psychology of stigma (pp.1–30). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Erickson, W., Lee, C.G., & von Schrader, S. (2010). 2008 Disability Status Reports: United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Demographics and Statistics.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on a spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Gouvier, W.D., Steiner, D.D., Jackson, W.T., Schlater, D., & Rain, J.S. (1991). Employment discrimination against handicapped job candidates: An analog study of the effects of neurological causation, visibility of handicap, and public contact. Rehabilitation Psychology, 36 (2), 121–129.Google Scholar
Greene, K., Derlega, V.J., & Mathews, A. (2006). Self-disclosure in personal relationships. In Vangelisti, A.L. & Perlman, D. (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships (pp. 409–427). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hayeems, R.Z., Geller, G., Finkelstein, D., & Faden, R.R. (2005). How patients experience progressive loss of visual function: a model of adjustment using qualitative methods. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 89 (5), 615–620.Google Scholar
Herek, G.M. (2009). Hate crimes and stigma-related experiences among sexual minority adults in the United States prevalence estimates from a national probability sample. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24 (1), 54–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindenberg, S. (1996). Continuities in the theory of social production functions. In Ganzeboom, H.G.B. & Lindenberg, S.M. (Eds.), Verklarende sociologie: opstellen voor Reinhard Wippler (pp.169–184). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Thesis Publishers.Google Scholar
Link, B.G. & Phelan, J.C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 363–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Link, B.G. & Phelan, J.C. (2013). Labeling and stigma. In Handbook of the sociology of mental health (pp. 525–541). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Miller, C.T. & Major, B. (2000). Coping with stigma and prejudice. In Heatherton, T., Kleck, R., Hebl, M., & Hull, J. (Eds.), The social psychology of stigma (pp. 243–272). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Ormel, J., Lindenberg, S., Steverink, N., & Verbrugge, L.M. (1999). Subjective well-being and social production functions. Social Indicators Research, 46 (1), 61–90.Google Scholar
Pascoe, E.A. & Smart Richman, L. (2009). Perceived discrimination and health: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135 (4), 531–554.Google Scholar
Pavot, W. & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the Satisfaction With Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172.Google Scholar
Ragins, B.R. (2008). Disclosure disconnects: Antecedents and consequences of disclosing invisible stigmas across life domains. Academy of Management Review, 33 (1), 194–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, J.P. (2001). Effects of positive and negative support received and provided on adaptation to chronic visual impairment. Applied Developmental Science, 5 (2), 76–85.Google Scholar
Ryan, R.M. & Deci, E.L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25 (1), 54–67.Google Scholar
Schwartz, J.E., Pieper, C.F., & Karasek, R.A. (1988). A procedure for linking psychosocial job characteristics data to health surveys. American Journal of Public Health, 78 (8), 904–909.Google Scholar
Spiegel, T., De Bel, V., & Steverink, N. (2016). Keeping up appearances: the role of identity concealment in the workplace among adults with degenerative eye conditions and its relationship with wellbeing and career outcomes. Disability and Rehabilitation, 38 (7), 627–636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, R.L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J.B., & Löwe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166 (10), 1092–1097.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steverink, N. & Lindenberg, S. (2006). Which social needs are important for subjective well-being? What happens to them with aging? Psychology and Aging, 21, 281–290.Google Scholar
Thompson, E.R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 38 (2), 227–242.Google Scholar
White, I.R., Royston, P., & Wood, A.M. (2011). Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Statistics in Medicine, 30 (4), 377–399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yeager, P., Kaye, H.S., Reed, M., & Doe, T.M. (2006). Assistive technology and employment: Experiences of Californians with disabilities. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 27 (4), 333–344.Google Scholar