Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:19:15.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

6. Differential Nongravitational Forces in the Motions of the Split Comets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Z. Sekanina

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The new model, which has recently been proposed for the motions of fragments of the split comets, is critically examined through a comparison with the traditional approach. It is concluded that the new model, based on the premise that the rate of separation of any two fragments of a split comet is determined primarily by the differential nongravitational forces in their motions, is preferable in many a respect to the traditional hypothesis, built on the assumption that significant impulses are exerted on the fragments at the time of splitting. The new model appears to have interesting implications for the physics of cometary splitting, suggesting that the breakup mechanism may essentially be non-violent or of a low degree of violence, and for estimates of cometary masses.

Type
Part I. Physical Nature of Comets
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 39: Comets, Asteroids, Meteorites: Interrelations, Evolution and Origins , December 1977 , pp. 51 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © A.H. Delsemme 1977

References

Chandler, S. C. 1891, Astron. J., 10, 153.Google Scholar
Guigay, G. 1955, J. Obs., 38, 189.Google Scholar
Harwit, M. 1968, Astrophys. J., 151, 789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffers, H.M. 1922, Lick Obs. Bull., 10, 120.Google Scholar
Kreutz, H. 1891, Publ. Sternw. Kiel., No. 6.Google Scholar
Marsden, B.G. 1974, A. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 12, 1.Google Scholar
Marsden, B.G., and Sekanina, Z. 1971, Astron. J., 76, 1135.Google Scholar
Pittich, E. M. 1971, Bull. Astron. Inst. Czech., 22, 143.Google Scholar
Pohn, H. A. 1966, Sky and Tel., 31, 376.Google Scholar
Roemer, E. 1962, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific, 74, 351.Google Scholar
Roemer, E. 1963, Astron. J., 68, 544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sekanina, Z. 1966, Bull. Astron. Inst. Czech., 17, 207.Google Scholar
Sekanina, Z. 1967, Bull. Astron. Inst. Czech., 18, 296.Google Scholar
Sekanina, Z. 1968, Bull. Astron. Inst. Czech., 19, 153.Google Scholar
Sekanina, Z. 1976a, Icarus, in press.Google Scholar
Sekanina, Z. 1976b, Astrophys. Lett., in press.Google Scholar
Stefanik, R. P. 1966, Mem. Roy. Soc. Sci. Liège (Ser. 5), 12, 29.Google Scholar
Whipple, F. L. 1950, Astrophys. J., 111, 375.Google Scholar