Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T20:45:56.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

1.2.1 Ground-Based Observations of the Zodiacal Light

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

René Dumont
René Dumont*
Affiliation:
Observatoire de Bordeaux, 33270 FLOIRAC(France)

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

At the present time, when spaoe experiments bring us more and more information of increasing quality, it might appear questionable whether ground-based zodiacal light observations are still of interest. Nevertheless, any detailed examination of the available data (see, for example, the review paper of Leinert 1975) shows that a considerable part of our present optical knowledge of interplanetary dust has been contributed by ground-based programmes. Moreover, new available parameters arising from spaoe data, mainly in the field of heliocentric dependence of brightness, open new important abilities for a better interpretation of ground-based observations.

Type
1 Zodiacal Light
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 31: Interplanetary Dust and Zodiacal Light , 1976 , pp. 85 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © Springer-Verlag 1976

References

Bandermann, L.W., Wolstencroft, R.D. 1969, Nature, 221, 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandermann, L.W., Wolstencroft, R.D. 1974, Nature 252, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumont, R. 1965 (thesis), Ann. Astrophys. 28, 265.Google Scholar
Dumont, R. 1967, in “The zodiacal light and the interplanetary medium”, Honolulu Symposium, ed. Weinberg, J.L., NASA Sp-150, 63.Google Scholar
Dumont, R. 1972, C.R. Acad. Soi. Paris 275 B-765.Google Scholar
Dumont, R. 1973, Planet. Space Sci. 21, 2149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumont, R. 1976, this Volume.Google Scholar
Dumont, R., Sánchez, F. 1966, Ann. Astrophys. 29, 113.Google Scholar
Dumont, R., Sánchez, F. 1968, Ann. Astrophys. 31, 293.Google Scholar
Dumont, R., Sánchez, F. 1973, Astron. & Astrophys. 22, 321.Google Scholar
Dumont, R., Sánchez, F. 1975a, Astron. & Astrophys. 38, 397.Google Scholar
Dumont, R., Sánchez, F. 1975b, Astron. & Astrophys. 38, 405.Google Scholar
Frey, A., Hofmann, W., Lemke, D., Thum, C. 1974, Astron. & Astrophys. 36, 447.Google Scholar
Giese, R.H. 1970, “Tahellen von Mie-Streufunktionen I” (Max Planck Institut, München, MPI-PAE extraterr. 40).Google Scholar
Giese, R.H. 1971, “Tahellen von Mie-Streufunktionen II” (Max Planok Institut, München, MPI-PAE extraterr. 58.).Google Scholar
Giese, R.H., Sehwehm, G., Zerull, R. 1974, “Grundlagenuntersuohungen zur Interpretation extraterrestrischer Zodiakallichtmessungen und Lichtstreuung ron Staubpartikeln verschiedener Formen”, Bochum, BMFT-FB W 74–10.Google Scholar
Hanner, M.S., Weinberg, J.L. 1973a, Sky & Telese. 45, 217.Google Scholar
Hanner, M.S., Weinherg, J.L. 1973b, paper C 3.8 presented at XVI. COSPAR Meeting, Konstanz, Germany.Google Scholar
Hanner, M.S., Weinberg, J.L., DeShields, L.M., Green, B.A., Toller, G.N. 1974, J. Geophys. Res. 79, 3671.Google Scholar
Hicks, T.R., May, B.H., Reay, N.K. 1974, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 166, 439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, M.F. 1969, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 142, 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, M.F., Smeethe, M.J. 1970, Nature 227, 588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leinert, C. 1975, “Zodiacal Light – a measure of the interplanetary environment” Space Sci. Rev. (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leinert, C., Link, H., Pitz, E. 1974, Astron. & Astrophys. 30, 411.Google Scholar
Link, H., Leinert, C., Pitz, E. and Salm, N. 1976, this Volume.Google Scholar
Levasseur, A-C., Blamont, J.E. 1974, paper IIIC-1.5 presented at XVII. COSPAR Meeting, Sao Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
Reay, N.K., Ring, J. 1968, Nature 219, 710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roach, F.E. 1972, Astronom. J. 77, 887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohley, R. 1973, Ann. Geophys. 29, 321.Google Scholar
Sánohez, F. 1967, in “The zodiacal light and the interplanetary medium”, Honolulu Symposium, ed. Weinherg, J.L., NASA Sp-150, 71.Google Scholar
Sánchez, F. 1969 (thesis) Urania 269–270.Google Scholar
Soherman, R.K., Neste, L.S., Liohtenfeld, K. 1974, J. Geophys. Res. 79, 3685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparrow, J.G., Weinherg, J.L. 1975 Astron. & Astrophys. (in press).Google Scholar
Vanysek, V., Harwit, M. 1970, Nature 225, 1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinherg, J.L. 1963 (thesis), Univ. of Colorado.Google Scholar
Weinherg, J.L. 1964, Ann. Astrophys. 27, 718.Google Scholar
Weinherg, J.L., Hahn, R.C. 1975, “Multicolor photometry of low light level phenomena from Skylah” (proc. AIAA/AGU Conference on scientific experiments of Skylab, Huntsville, Alahama, in press).Google Scholar
Wiokramasinghe, N.C. 1973, “Light scattering functions for small particles”, ed. Hilger, London.Google Scholar
Wolstencroft, R.D., Brandt, J.C. 1972, “Planets, stars and Nehulae studied with photopolarimetry” ($Tucson Symposium, ed. Gehrels, T.), 768.Google Scholar