Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:56:23.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Proteoglycans in host–pathogen interactions: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2010

Allison H. Bartlett
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Pyong Woo Park*
Affiliation:
Division of Respiratory Diseases, Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: Pyong Woo Park, Division of Respiratory Diseases, Children's Hospital, 320 Longwood Avenue, Enders-461, Boston, MA 02115, USA. E-mail: pyong.park@childrens.harvard.edu

Abstract

Many microbial pathogens subvert proteoglycans for their adhesion to host tissues, invasion of host cells, infection of neighbouring cells, dissemination into the systemic circulation, and evasion of host defence mechanisms. Where studied, specific virulence factors mediate these proteoglycan–pathogen interactions, which are thus thought to affect the onset, progression and outcome of infection. Proteoglycans are composites of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) chains attached covalently to specific core proteins. Proteoglycans are expressed ubiquitously on the cell surface, in intracellular compartments, and in the extracellular matrix. GAGs mediate the majority of ligand-binding activities of proteoglycans, and many microbial pathogens elaborate cell-surface and secreted factors that interact with GAGs. Some pathogens also modulate the expression and function of proteoglycans through known virulence factors. Several GAG-binding pathogens can no longer attach to and invade host cells whose GAG expression has been reduced by mutagenesis or enzymatic treatment. Furthermore, GAG antagonists have been shown to inhibit microbial attachment and host cell entry in vitro and reduce virulence in vivo. Together, these observations underscore the biological significance of proteoglycan–pathogen interactions in infectious diseases.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

1Bernfield, M. et al. (1999) Functions of cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Annual Review of Biochemistry 68, 729-777CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Filmus, J. and Selleck, S.B. (2001) Glypicans: proteoglycans with a surprise. Journal of Clinical Investigation 108, 497-501CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Hartmann, U. and Maurer, P. (2001) Proteoglycans in the nervous system–the quest for functional roles in vivo. Matrix Biology 20, 23-35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Park, P.W., Reizes, O. and Bernfield, M. (2000) Cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans: selective regulators of ligand-receptor encounters. Journal of Biological Chemistry 275, 29923-29926CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Taylor, K.R. and Gallo, R.L. (2006) Glycosaminoglycans and their proteoglycans: host-associated molecular patterns for initiation and modulation of inflammation. FASEB Journal 20, 9-22Google Scholar
6Schaefer, L. and Iozzo, R.V. (2008) Biological functions of the small leucine-rich proteoglycans: from genetics to signal transduction. Journal of Biological Chemistry 283, 21305-21309Google Scholar
7Wight, T.N. (2002) Versican: a versatile extracellular matrix proteoglycan in cell biology. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 14, 617-623CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Kolset, S.O. and Tveit, H. (2008) Serglycin–structure and biology. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 65, 1073-1085Google Scholar
9Kreuger, J. et al. (2006) Interactions between heparan sulfate and proteins: the concept of specificity. Journal of Cell Biology 174, 323-327CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Rostand, K.S. and Esko, J.D. (1997) Microbial adherence to and invasion through proteoglycans. Infection and Immunity 65, 1-8Google Scholar
11Shukla, D. and Spear, P.G. (2001) Herpesviruses and heparan sulfate: an intimate relationship in aid of viral entry. Journal of Clinical Investigation 108, 503-510Google Scholar
12Spillmann, D. (2001) Heparan sulfate: anchor for viral intruders? Biochimie 83, 811-817CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Feyzi, E. et al. (1997) Structural requirement of heparan sulfate for interaction with herpes simplex virus type I virions and isolated glycoprotein C. Journal of Biological Chemistry 272, 24850-24857Google Scholar
14Laquerre, S. et al. (1998) Heparan sulfate proteoglycan binding by herpes simplex virus type 1 glycoproteins B and C, which differ in their contributions to virus attachment, penetration, and cell-to-cell spread. Journal of Virology 72, 6119-6130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Spear, P.G. et al. (1992) Heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycans as primary cell surface receptors for herpes simplex virus. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 313, 341-353CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16O'Donnell, C.D. et al. (2006) A role for heparan sulfate 3-O-sulfotransferase isoform 2 in herpes simplex virus type 1 entry and spread. Virology 346, 452-459Google Scholar
17Shukla, D. et al. (1999) A novel role for 3-O-sulfated heparan sulfate in herpes simplex virus 1 entry. Cell 99, 13-22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Argyris, E.G. et al. (2003) Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 enters primary human brain microvascular endothelial cells by a mechanism involving cell surface proteoglycans independent of lipid rafts. Journal of Virology 77, 12140-12151CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Bobardt, M.D. et al. (2003) Syndecan captures, protects, and transmits HIV to T lymphocytes. Immunity 18, 27-39Google Scholar
20de Witte, L. et al. (2007) Syndecan-3 is a dendritic cell-specific attachment receptor for HIV-1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, 19464-19469CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Saphire, A.C. et al. (2001) Syndecans serve as attachment receptors for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 on macrophages. Journal of Virology 75, 9187-9200Google Scholar
22Alfsen, A. et al. (2005) HIV-1-infected blood mononuclear cells form an integrin- and agrin-dependent viral synapse to induce efficient HIV-1 transcytosis across epithelial cell monolayer. Molecular Biology of the Cell 16, 4267-4279Google Scholar
23Joyce, J.G. et al. (1999) The L1 major capsid protein of human papillomavirus type 11 recombinant virus-like particles interacts with heparin and cell-surface glycosaminoglycans on human keratinocytes. Journal of Biological Chemistry 274, 5810-5822Google Scholar
24Giroglou, T. et al. (2001) Human papillomavirus infection requires cell surface heparan sulfate. Journal of Virology 75, 1565-1570CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Roden, R.B. et al. (2001) Positively charged termini of the L2 minor capsid protein are necessary for papillomavirus infection. Journal of Virology 75, 10493-10497CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Unckell, F., Streeck, R.E. and Sapp, M. (1997) Generation and neutralization of pseudovirions of human papillomavirus type 33. Journal of Virology 71, 2934-2939Google Scholar
27Yeager, M.D. et al. (2000) Neutralization of human papillomavirus (HPV) pseudovirions: a novel and efficient approach to detect and characterize HPV neutralizing antibodies. Virology 278, 570-577CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28Roden, R.B. et al. (1995) Papillomavirus L1 capsids agglutinate mouse erythrocytes through a proteinaceous receptor. Journal of Virology 69, 5147-5151CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Roden, R.B. et al. (1994) Interaction of papillomaviruses with the cell surface. Journal of Virology 68, 7260-7266CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30Roden, R.B. et al. (1994) Neutralization of bovine papillomavirus by antibodies to L1 and L2 capsid proteins. Journal of Virology 68, 7570-7574Google Scholar
31Yang, R. et al. (2003) Cell surface-binding motifs of L2 that facilitate papillomavirus infection. Journal of Virology 77, 3531-3541Google Scholar
32Kawana, K. et al. (1998) A surface immunodeterminant of human papillomavirus type 16 minor capsid protein L2. Virology 245, 353-359Google Scholar
33Kawana, K. et al. (1999) Common neutralization epitope in minor capsid protein L2 of human papillomavirus types 16 and 6. Journal of Virology 73, 6188-6190CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34Bienkowska-Haba, M., Patel, H.D. and Sapp, M. (2009) Target cell cyclophilins facilitate human papillomavirus type 16 infection. PLoS Pathogens 5, e1000524CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35Chung, C.S. et al. (1998) A27L protein mediates vaccinia virus interaction with cell surface heparan sulfate. Journal of Virology 72, 1577-1585CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36Hsiao, J.C., Chung, C.S. and Chang, W. (1998) Cell surface proteoglycans are necessary for A27L protein-mediated cell fusion: identification of the N-terminal region of A27L protein as the glycosaminoglycan-binding domain. Journal of Virology 72, 8374-8379CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37Law, M. et al. (2006) Ligand-induced and nonfusogenic dissolution of a viral membrane. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103, 5989-5994Google Scholar
38Hsiao, J.C., Chung, C.S. and Chang, W. (1999) Vaccinia virus envelope D8L protein binds to cell surface chondroitin sulfate and mediates the adsorption of intracellular mature virions to cells. Journal of Virology 73, 8750-8761Google Scholar
39Mohan, K.V., Zhang, C.X. and Atreya, C.D. (2009) The proteoglycan bamacan is a host cellular ligand of vaccinia virus neurovirulence factor N1L. Journal of Neurovirology 15, 229-237CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40Ghiselli, G., Siracusa, L.D. and Iozzo, R.V. (1999) Complete cDNA cloning, genomic organization, chromosomal assignment, functional characterization of the promoter, and expression of the murine Bamacan gene. Journal of Biological Chemistry 274, 17384-17393CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41Zhang, Z. et al. (2005) The vaccinia virus N1L protein influences cytokine secretion in vitro after infection. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1056, 69-86Google Scholar
42Abrahams, M.R. et al. (2005) The vaccinia virus N1L ORF may encode a multifunctional protein possibly targeting different kinases, one of which influences ATP levels in vivo. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1056, 87-99Google Scholar
43DiPerna, G. et al. (2004) Poxvirus protein N1L targets the I-kappaB kinase complex, inhibits signaling to NF-kappaB by the tumor necrosis factor superfamily of receptors, and inhibits NF-kappaB and IRF3 signaling by toll-like receptors. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279, 36570-36578Google Scholar
44Mengaud, J. et al. (1996) E-cadherin is the receptor for internalin, a surface protein required for entry of L. monocytogenes into epithelial cells. Cell 84, 923-932CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45Bonazzi, M. et al. (2008) Successive post-translational modifications of E-cadherin are required for InlA-mediated internalization of Listeria monocytogenes. Cellular Microbiology 10, 2208-2222CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46Braun, L., Ghebrehiwet, B. and Cossart, P. (2000) gC1q-R/p32, a C1q-binding protein, is a receptor for the InlB invasion protein of Listeria monocytogenes. EMBO Journal 19, 1458-1466Google Scholar
47Veiga, E. and Cossart, P. (2005) Listeria hijacks the clathrin-dependent endocytic machinery to invade mammalian cells. Nature Cell Biology 7, 894-900CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48Jonquieres, R., Pizarro-Cerda, J. and Cossart, P. (2001) Synergy between the N- and C-terminal domains of InlB for efficient invasion of non-phagocytic cells by Listeria monocytogenes. Molecular Microbiology 42, 955-965Google Scholar
49Banerjee, M. et al. (2004) GW domains of the Listeria monocytogenes invasion protein InlB are required for potentiation of Met activation. Molecular Microbiology 52, 257-271CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50Freissler, E. et al. (2000) Syndecan-1 and syndecan-4 can mediate the invasion of OpaHSPG-expressing Neisseria gonorrhoeae into epithelial cells. Cellular Microbiology 2, 69-82Google Scholar
51Grassmé, H. et al. (1997) Acidic sphingomyelinase mediates entry of N. gonorrhoeae into nonphagocytic cells. Cell 91, 605-615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52van Putten, J.P., Duensing, T.D. and Cole, R.L. (1998) Entry of OpaA+ gonococci into HEp-2 cells requires concerted action of glycosaminoglycans, fibronectin and integrin receptors. Molecular Microbiology 29, 369-379Google Scholar
53Guo, B.P. et al. (1998) Decorin-binding adhesins from Borrelia burgdorferi. Molecular Microbiology 30, 711-723Google Scholar
54Brown, E.L. et al. (2001) Resistance to Lyme disease in decorin-deficient mice. Journal of Clinical Investigation 107, 845-852CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55Liang, F.T. et al. (2004) Protective niche for Borrelia burgdorferi to evade humoral immunity. American Journal of Pathology 165, 977-985Google Scholar
56Pancake, S.J. et al. (1992) Malaria sporozoites and circumsporozoite proteins bind specifically to sulfated glycoconjugates. Journal of Cell Biology 117, 1351-1357CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57Love, D.C., Esko, J.D. and Mosser, D.M. (1993) A heparin-binding activity on Leishmania amastigotes which mediates adhesion to cellular proteoglycans. Journal of Cell Biology 123, 759-766Google Scholar
58Ortega-Barria, E. and Pereira, M.E. (1991) A novel T. cruzi heparin-binding protein promotes fibroblast adhesion and penetration of engineered bacteria and trypanosomes into mammalian cells. Cell 67, 411-421CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
59Sherman, I.W., Eda, S. and Winograd, E. (2003) Cytoadherence and sequestration in Plasmodium falciparum: defining the ties that bind. Microbes and Infection 5, 897-909Google Scholar
60Muthusamy, A. et al. (2007) Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan but not hyaluronic acid is the receptor for the adherence of Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes in human placenta, and infected red blood cell adherence up-regulates the receptor expression. American Journal of Pathology 170, 1989-2000Google Scholar
61Fried, M. and Duffy, P.E. (1996) Adherence of Plasmodium falciparum to chondroitin sulfate A in the human placenta. Science 272, 1502-1504CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
62Muthusamy, A. et al. (2004) Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes adhere both in the intervillous space and on the villous surface of human placenta by binding to the low-sulfated chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan receptor. American Journal of Pathology 164, 2013-2025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
63Noonan, D. and Albini, A. (2000) From the outside in: extracellular activities of HIV Tat. Advances in Pharmacology 48, 229-250Google Scholar
64Dewhurst, S., Gelbard, H.A. and Fine, S.M. (1996) Neuropathogenesis of AIDS. Molecular Medicine Today 2, 16-23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
65Zeng, Y. et al. (2007) Intracellular Tat of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 activates lytic cycle replication of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus: role of JAK/STAT signaling. Journal of Virology 81, 2401-2417CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
66Urbinati, C. et al. (2005) alpha(v)beta3-integrin-dependent activation of focal adhesion kinase mediates NF-kappaB activation and motogenic activity by HIV-1 Tat in endothelial cells. Journal of Cell Science 118, 3949-3958Google Scholar
67Albini, A. et al. (1996) The angiogenesis induced by HIV-1 tat protein is mediated by the Flk-1/KDR receptor on vascular endothelial cells. Nature Medicine 2, 1371-1375Google Scholar
68Albini, A. et al. (1998) HIV-1 Tat protein mimicry of chemokines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95, 13153-13158Google Scholar
69Xiao, H. et al. (2000) Selective CXCR4 antagonism by Tat: implications for in vivo expansion of coreceptor use by HIV-1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97, 11466-11471CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
70Rusnati, M. and Presta, M. (2002) HIV-1 Tat protein: a target for the development of anti-AIDS therapies. Drugs of the Future 27, 481-493Google Scholar
71Tyagi, M. et al. (2001) Internalization of HIV-1 tat requires cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Journal of Biological Chemistry 276, 3254-3261CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
72Rusnati, M. et al. (1997) Interaction of HIV-1 Tat protein with heparin. Role of the backbone structure, sulfation, and size. Journal of Biological Chemistry 272, 11313-11320Google Scholar
73Rusnati, M. et al. (1999) Multiple interactions of HIV-1 Tat protein with size-defined heparin oligosaccharides. Journal of Biological Chemistry 274, 28198-28205CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
74Chang, H.C. et al. (1997) HIV-1 Tat protein exits from cells via a leaderless secretory pathway and binds to extracellular matrix-associated heparan sulfate proteoglycans through its basic region. AIDS 11, 1421-1431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
75Argyris, E.G. et al. (2004) The perlecan heparan sulfate proteoglycan mediates cellular uptake of HIV-1 Tat through a pathway responsible for biological activity. Virology 330, 481-486Google Scholar
76Avirutnan, P. et al. (2007) Secreted NS1 of dengue virus attaches to the surface of cells via interactions with heparan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate E. PLoS Pathogens 3, 1798-1812Google Scholar
77Patterson, B.K. et al. (2002) Susceptibility to human immunodeficiency virus-1 infection of human foreskin and cervical tissue grown in explant culture. American Journal of Pathology 161, 867-873CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
78Trumpfheller, C. et al. (2003) Cell type-dependent retention and transmission of HIV-1 by DC-SIGN. International Immunology 15, 289-298CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
79Cameron, P.U. et al. (1992) Dendritic cells exposed to human immunodeficiency virus type-1 transmit a vigorous cytopathic infection to CD4+ T cells. Science 257, 383-387Google Scholar
80Urbinati, C. et al. (2009) HIV-1 Tat and heparan sulfate proteoglycan interaction: a novel mechanism of lymphocyte adhesion and migration across the endothelium. Blood 114, 3335-3342Google Scholar
81Menozzi, F.D. et al. (1998) Molecular characterization of the mycobacterial heparin-binding hemagglutinin, a mycobacterial adhesin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95, 12625-12630Google Scholar
82Pethe, K. et al. (2001) The heparin-binding haemagglutinin of M. tuberculosis is required for extrapulmonary dissemination. Nature 412, 190-194Google Scholar
83Menozzi, F.D. et al. (2006) Mycobacterium tuberculosis heparin-binding haemagglutinin adhesin (HBHA) triggers receptor-mediated transcytosis without altering the integrity of tight junctions. Microbes and Infection 8, 1-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
84Alvarez-Dominguez, C. et al. (1997) Host cell heparan sulfate proteoglycans mediate attachment and entry of Listeria monocytogenes, and the listerial surface protein ActA is involved in heparan sulfate receptor recognition. Infection and Immunity 65, 78-88Google Scholar
85Lasa, I. and Cossart, P. (1996) Actin-based bacterial motility: towards a definition of the minimal requirements. Trends in Cell Biology 6, 109-114CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
86Portnoy, D.A. et al. (1992) Molecular determinants of Listeria monocytogenes pathogenesis. Infection and Immunity 60, 1263-1267Google Scholar
87Sheehan, B. et al. (1994) Molecular and genetic determinants of the Listeria monocytogenes infectious process. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology 192, 187-216Google Scholar
88Suarez, M. et al. (2001) A role for ActA in epithelial cell invasion by Listeria monocytogenes. Cellular Microbiology 3, 853-864Google Scholar
89Henry-Stanley, M.J. et al. (2003) Role of heparan sulfate in interactions of Listeria monocytogenes with enterocytes. Medical Microbiology and Immunology 192, 107-115Google Scholar
90Coppi, A. et al. (2007) Heparan sulfate proteoglycans provide a signal to Plasmodium sporozoites to stop migrating and productively invade host cells. Cell Host and Microbe 2, 316-327CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
91Lai, Y. and Gallo, R.L. (2009) AMPed up immunity: how antimicrobial peptides have multiple roles in immune defense. Trends in Immunology 30, 131-141Google Scholar
92Schmidtchen, A., Frick, I. and Björck, L. (2001) Dermatan sulfate is released by proteinases of common pathogenic bacteria and inactivates antibacterial alpha-defensin. Molecular Microbiology 39, 708-713CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
93Chen, Y. et al. (2007) Streptococcus pneumoniae sheds syndecan-1 ectodomains through ZmpC, a metalloproteinase virulence factor. Journal of Biological Chemistry 282, 159-167Google Scholar
94Park, P.W. et al. (2004) Activation of syndecan-1 ectodomain shedding by Staphylococcus aureus alpha-toxin and beta-toxin. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279, 251-258CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
95Park, P.W. et al. (2001) Exploitation of syndecan-1 shedding by Pseudomonas aeruginosa enhances virulence. Nature 411, 98-102CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
96Park, P.W. et al. (2000) Syndecan-1 shedding is enhanced by LasA, a secreted virulence factor of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Journal of Biological Chemistry 275, 3057-3064Google Scholar
97Haynes, A. 3rd et al. (2005) Syndecan-1 shedding contributes to Pseudomonas aeruginosa sepsis. Infection and Immunity 73, 7914-7921CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
98Cover, T.L. and Blaser, M.J. (2009) Helicobacter pylori in health and disease. Gastroenterology 136, 1863-1873Google Scholar
99Ascencio, F., Fransson, L. and Wadström, T. (1993) Affinity of the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori for the N-sulphated glycosaminoglycan heparan sulfate. Journal of Medical Microbiology 38, 240-244Google Scholar
100Chmiela, M. et al. (1995) The role of heparan sulphate-binding activity of Helicobacter pylori bacteria in their adhesion to murine macrophages. APMIS: Acta Pathologica Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica 103, 469-474Google Scholar
101Dubreuil, J.D. et al. (2004) Effect of heparin binding on Helicobacter pylori resistance to serum. Journal of Medical Microbiology 53, 9-12Google Scholar
102Chmiela, M., Lelwala-Guruge, J. and Wadstrom, T. (1994) Interaction of cells of Helicobacter pylori with human polymorphonuclear leucocytes: possible role of haemagglutinins. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology 9, 41-48Google Scholar
103Schulze, A., Gripon, P. and Urban, S. (2007) Hepatitis B virus infection initiates with a large surface protein-dependent binding to heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Hepatology 46, 1759-1768Google Scholar
104Leistner, C.M., Gruen-Bernhard, S. and Glebe, D. (2008) Role of glycosaminoglycans for binding and infection of hepatitis B virus. Cellular Microbiology 10, 122-133Google Scholar
105Henry-Stanley, M.J. et al. (2005) Ability of the heparan sulfate proteoglycan syndecan-1 to participate in bacterial translocation across the intestinal epithelial barrier. Shock 24, 571-576CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
106Davis, C.H. and Wyrick, P.B. (1997) Differences in the association of Chlamydia trachomatis serovar E and serovar L2 with epithelial cells in vitro may reflect biological differences in vivo. Infection and Immunity 65, 2914-2924CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
107Taraktchoglou, M. et al. (2001) Infectivity of Chlamydia trachomatis serovar LGV but not E is dependent on host cell heparan sulfate. Infection and Immunity 69, 968-976Google Scholar
108Yan, Y. et al. (2006) Inhibitory effect of heparan sulfate-like glycosaminoglycans on the infectivity of Chlamydia pneumoniae in HL cells varies between strains. Microbes and Infection 8, 866-872Google Scholar
109Xia, G. et al. (2002) Heparan sulfate 3-O-sulfotransferase isoform 5 generates both an antithrombin-binding site and an entry receptor for herpes simplex virus, type 1. Journal of Biological Chemistry 277, 37912-37919Google Scholar
110Xu, D. et al. (2005) Characterization of heparan sulphate 3-O-sulphotransferase isoform 6 and its role in assisting the entry of herpes simplex virus type 1. Biochemical Journal 385, 451-459CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
111Tiwari, V. et al. (2006) Role for 3-O-sulfated heparan sulfate as the receptor for herpes simplex virus type 1 entry into primary human corneal fibroblasts. Journal of Virology 80, 8970-8980Google Scholar
112Copeland, R. et al. (2008) Using a 3-O-sulfated heparin octasaccharide to inhibit the entry of herpes simplex virus type 1. Biochemistry 47, 5774-5783Google Scholar
113Vann, W.F. et al. (1981) The structure of the capsular polysaccharide (K5 antigen) of urinary-tract-infective Escherichia coli 010:K5:H4. A polymer similar to desulfo-heparin. European Journal of Biochemistry 116, 359-364CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
114Rusnati, M. et al. (2009) Sulfated K5 Escherichia coli polysaccharide derivatives: A novel class of candidate antiviral microbicides. Pharmacology and Therapeutics 123, 310-322CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
115Cicala, C. et al. (2006) R5 and X4 HIV envelopes induce distinct gene expression profiles in primary peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103, 3746-3751Google Scholar
116Pacciarini, F. et al. (2004) Sulfated K5 Escherichia coli polysaccharide derivatives inhibit human immunodeficiency type-1 (HIV-1) infection: candidate microbicides to prevent sexual HIV transmission. New Microbiologica 27, 5-9Google Scholar
117Urbinati, C. et al. (2004) Chemically sulfated Escherichia coli K5 polysaccharide derivatives as extracellular HIV-1 Tat protein antagonists. FEBS Letters 568, 171-177CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
118Pinna, D. et al. (2008) Inhibition of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 in vitro infection by sulfated derivatives of Escherichia coli K5 polysaccharide. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 52, 3078-3084Google Scholar
119Lembo, D. et al. (2008) Sulfated K5 Escherichia coli polysaccharide derivatives as wide-range inhibitors of genital types of human papillomavirus. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 52, 1374-1381Google Scholar
120Baba, M. et al. (1988) Sulfated polysaccharides are potent and selective inhibitors of various enveloped viruses, including herpes simplex virus, cytomegalovirus, vesicular stomatitis virus, and human immunodeficiency virus. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 32, 1742-1745CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
121Buck, C.B. et al. (2006) Carrageenan is a potent inhibitor of papillomavirus infection. PLoS Pathogens 2, e69Google Scholar
122Talarico, L.B. and Damonte, E.B. (2007) Interference in dengue virus adsorption and uncoating by carrageenans. Virology 363, 473-485Google Scholar
123Utt, M. and Wadstrom, T. (1997) Identification of heparan sulphate binding surface proteins of Helicobacter pylori: inhibition of heparan sulphate binding with sulphated carbohydrate polymers. Journal of Medical Microbiology 46, 541-546Google Scholar
124Adams, Y. et al. (2005) Carrageenans inhibit the in vitro growth of Plasmodium falciparum and cytoadhesion to CD36. Parasitology Research 97, 290-294Google Scholar
125Romanos, M.T. et al. (2002) A sulphated fucan from the Laminaria abyssalis inhibits the human T cell lymphotropic virus type 1-induced syncytium formation in HeLa cells. Antiviral Chemistry and Chemotherapy 13, 219-221Google Scholar
126Fallgren, C., Andersson, A. and Ljungh, A. (2001) The role of glycosaminoglycan binding of staphylococci in attachment to eukaryotic host cells. Current Microbiology 43, 57-63Google Scholar
127Ortega-Barria, E. and Boothroyd, J.C. (1999) A Toxoplasma lectin-like activity specific for sulfated polysaccharides is involved in host cell infection. Journal of Biological Chemistry 274, 1267-1276Google Scholar
128Ying, C. et al. (2002) Sulphated and sulphonated polymers inhibit the initial interaction of hepatitis B virus with hepatocytes. Antiviral Chemistry and Chemotherapy 13, 157-164Google Scholar
129Christensen, N.D. et al. (2001) Papillomavirus microbicidal activities of high-molecular-weight cellulose sulfate, dextran sulfate, and polystyrene sulfonate. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 45, 3427-3432Google Scholar
130Adams, Y. et al. (2006) Inhibition of Plasmodium falciparum growth in vitro and adhesion to chondroitin-4-sulfate by the heparan sulfate mimetic PI-88 and other sulfated oligosaccharides. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 50, 2850-2852Google Scholar
131Nyberg, K. et al. (2004) The low molecular weight heparan sulfate-mimetic, PI-88, inhibits cell-to-cell spread of herpes simplex virus. Antiviral Research 63, 15-24Google Scholar
132Lee, E. et al. (2006) Antiviral effect of the heparan sulfate mimetic, PI-88, against dengue and encephalitic flaviviruses. Antiviral Research 69, 31-38Google Scholar
133Aguilar, J.S., Rice, M. and Wagner, E.K. (1999) The polysulfonated compound suramin blocks adsorption and lateral difusion of herpes simplex virus type-1 in vero cells. Virology 258, 141-151Google Scholar
134Clanton, D.J. et al. (1995) Novel sulfonated and phosphonated analogs of distamycin which inhibit the replication of HIV. Antiviral Research 27, 335-354CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
135Fleck, S.L. et al. (2003) Suramin and suramin analogues inhibit merozoite surface protein-1 secondary processing and erythrocyte invasion by the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Journal of Biological Chemistry 278, 47670-47677Google Scholar
136Cheshenko, N. et al. (2004) Candidate topical microbicides bind herpes simplex virus glycoprotein B and prevent viral entry and cell-to-cell spread. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 48, 2025-2036Google Scholar
137Taylor, D.L. et al. (1995) Potent inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus by MDL 101028, a novel sulphonic acid polymer. Antiviral Research 28, 159-173Google Scholar
138Herold, B.C. et al. (2000) Poly(sodium 4-styrene sulfonate): an effective candidate topical antimicrobial for the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases. Journal of Infectious Diseases 181, 770-773Google Scholar
139Vaheri, A. (2007) Heparin and related polyionic substances as virus inhibitors. 1964. APMIS: Acta Pathologica Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica 115, 565-570; discussion 571–562Google Scholar
140Basche, M. et al. (2006) A phase I biological and pharmacologic study of the heparanase inhibitor PI-88 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clinical Cancer Research 12, 5471-5480Google Scholar
141Metz-Boutigue, M.H. et al. (1984) Human lactotransferrin: amino acid sequence and structural comparisons with other transferrins. European Journal of Biochemistry 145, 659-676Google Scholar
142Wu, H., Monroe, D.M. and Church, F.C. (1995) Characterization of the glycosaminoglycan-binding region of lactoferrin. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 317, 85-92Google Scholar
143Tomita, M. et al. (1991) Potent antibacterial peptides generated by pepsin digestion of bovine lactoferrin. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 4137-4142Google Scholar
144Andersen, J.H. et al. (2004) Anti-HSV activity of lactoferrin and lactoferricin is dependent on the presence of heparan sulphate at the cell surface. Journal of Medical Virology 74, 262-271Google Scholar
145Iwasa, M. et al. (2002) Lactoferrin inhibits hepatitis C virus viremia in chronic hepatitis C patients with high viral loads and HCV genotype 1b. American Journal of Gastroenterology 97, 766-767Google Scholar
146Hirashima, N. et al. (2004) A randomized controlled trial of consensus interferon with or without lactoferrin for chronic hepatitis C patients with genotype 1b and high viral load. Hepatology Research 29, 9-12Google Scholar
147Ishibashi, Y. et al. (2005) Randomized placebo-controlled trial of interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin with and without lactoferrin for chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology Research 32, 218-223Google Scholar
148Guidry, J.R., Raschke, R.A. and Morkunas, A.R. (1991) Toxic effects of drugs used in the ICU. Anticoagulants and thrombolytics. Risks and benefits. Critical Care Clinics 7, 533-554Google Scholar
149Schuksz, M. et al. (2008) Surfen, a small molecule antagonist of heparan sulfate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105, 13075-13080Google Scholar
150Schmidtke, M. et al. (2003) Binding of a N,N'-bisheteryl derivative of dispirotripiperazine to heparan sulfate residues on the cell surface specifically prevents infection of viruses from different families. Virology 311, 134-143Google Scholar
151Selinka, H.C. et al. (2007) Inhibition of transfer to secondary receptors by heparan sulfate-binding drug or antibody induces noninfectious uptake of human papillomavirus. Journal of Virology 81, 10970-10980Google Scholar
152Kanwar, Y.S. et al. (1984) Effect of beta-D-xyloside on the glomerular proteoglycans. I. Biochemical studies. Journal of Cell Biology 99, 715-722CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
153Galligani, L. et al. (1975) Stimulation of synthesis of free chondroitin sulfate chains by beta-D-xylosides in cultured cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry 250, 5400-5406Google Scholar
154Sobue, M. et al. (1987) beta-D-xylosides and their analogues as artificial initiators of glycosaminoglycan chain synthesis. Aglycone-related variation in their effectiveness in vitro and in ovo. Biochemical Journal 241, 591-601Google Scholar
155Gibson, K.D., Segen, B.J. and Audhya, T.K. (1977) The effect of beta-D-xylosides on chondroitin sulphate biosynthesis in embryonic chicken cartilage in the absence of protein synthesis inhibitors. Biochemical Journal 162, 217-233Google Scholar
156Rada, J.A. et al. (2002) Inhibition of scleral proteoglycan synthesis blocks deprivation-induced axial elongation in chicks. Experimental Eye Research 74, 205-215Google Scholar
157Victor, X.V. et al. (2009) Investigating the elusive mechanism of glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis. Journal of Biological Chemistry 284, 25842-25853Google Scholar
158Barth, H. et al. (2003) Cellular binding of hepatitis C virus envelope glycoprotein E2 requires cell surface heparan sulfate. Journal of Biological Chemistry 278, 41003-41012Google Scholar
159Baron, M.J. et al. (2004) Alpha C protein of group B Streptococcus binds host cell surface glycosaminoglycan and enters cells by an actin-dependent mechanism. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279, 24714-24723Google Scholar
160Oliveira, F.O. Jr et al. (2008) Trypanosoma cruzi heparin-binding proteins and the nature of the host cell heparan sulfate-binding domain. Microbial Pathogenesis 44, 329-338Google Scholar
161Steffen, C. and Wetzel, E. (1993) Chlorate poisoning: mechanism of toxicity. Toxicology 84, 217-231Google Scholar
162Ten Dam, G.B. et al. (2006) 3-O-sulfated oligosaccharide structures are recognized by anti-heparan sulfate antibody HS4C3. Journal of Biological Chemistry 281, 4654-4662Google ScholarPubMed
163van Kuppevelt, T.H. et al. (1998) Generation and application of type-specific anti-heparan sulfate antibodies using phage display technology. Further evidence for heparan sulfate heterogeneity in the kidney. Journal of Biological Chemistry 273, 12960-12966Google Scholar
164Liu, D. et al. (2002) Tumor cell surface heparan sulfate as cryptic promoters or inhibitors of tumor growth and metastasis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99, 568-573Google Scholar
165de Vries, F.P. et al. (1998) Neisseria meningitidis producing the Opc adhesin binds epithelial cell proteoglycan receptors. Molecular Microbiology 27, 1203-1212Google Scholar
166Moelleken, K. and Hegemann, J.H. (2008) The Chlamydia outer membrane protein OmcB is required for adhesion and exhibits biovar-specific differences in glycosaminoglycan binding. Molecular Microbiology 67, 403-419Google Scholar
167Rathore, D. et al. (2003) Molecular mechanism of host specificity in Plasmodium falciparum infection: role of circumsporozoite protein. Journal of Biological Chemistry 278, 40905-40910CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
168Johnson, K.M. et al. (2009) Role of heparan sulfate in attachment to and infection of the murine female genital tract by human papillomavirus. Journal of Virology 83, 2067-2074CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
169Reiland, J. et al. (2004) Heparanase degrades syndecan-1 and perlecan heparan sulfate: functional implications for tumor cell invasion. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279, 8047-8055CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
170van den Hoven, M.J. et al. (2007) Heparanase in glomerular diseases. Kidney International 72, 543-548Google Scholar
171Yang, Y. et al. (2007) Heparanase enhances syndecan-1 shedding: a novel mechanism for stimulation of tumor growth and metastasis. Journal of Biological Chemistry 282, 13326-13333Google Scholar
172Ai, X. et al. (2006) Substrate specificity and domain functions of extracellular heparan sulfate 6-O-endosulfatases, QSulf1 and QSulf2. Journal of Biological Chemistry 281, 4969-4976Google Scholar
173Morimoto-Tomita, M. et al. (2002) Cloning and characterization of two extracellular heparin-degrading endosulfatases in mice and humans. Journal of Biological Chemistry 277, 49175-49185CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
174Wang, S. et al. (2004) QSulf1, a heparan sulfate 6-O-endosulfatase, inhibits fibroblast growth factor signaling in mesoderm induction and angiogenesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101, 4833-4838Google Scholar
175Lai, J. et al. (2003) Loss of HSulf-1 up-regulates heparin-binding growth factor signaling in cancer. Journal of Biological Chemistry 278, 23107-23117Google Scholar
176Vogt, A.M. et al. (2006) Release of sequestered malaria parasites upon injection of a glycosaminoglycan. PLoS Pathogens 2, e100Google Scholar
177Carlucci, M.J., Scolaro, L.A. and Damonte, E.B. (1999) Inhibitory action of natural carrageenans on Herpes simplex virus infection of mouse astrocytes. Chemotherapy 45, 429-436CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
178Lee, J.B. et al. (1999) Antiviral activities against HSV-1, HCMV, and HIV-1 of rhamnan sulfate from Monostroma latissimum. Planta Medica 65, 439-441CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
179Kyriacou, H.M. et al. (2007) In vitro inhibition of Plasmodium falciparum rosette formation by Curdlan sulfate. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 51, 1321-1326Google Scholar
180Havlik, I., Rovelli, S. and Kaneko, Y. (1994) The effect of curdlan sulphate on in vitro growth of Plasmodium falciparum. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 88, 686-687Google Scholar
181Garson, J.A. et al. (1999) Suramin blocks hepatitis C binding to human hepatoma cells in vitro. Journal of Medical Virology 57, 238-242Google Scholar
182Keller, M.J. et al. (2006) PRO 2000 gel inhibits HIV and herpes simplex virus infection following vaginal application: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Journal of Infectious Diseases 193, 27-35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
183Vzorov, A.N. et al. (2002) Inactivation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by porphyrins. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 46, 3917-3925Google Scholar
184Vzorov, A.N. et al. (2007) Parameters of inhibition of HIV-1 infection by small anionic microbicides. Antiviral Research 73, 60-68Google Scholar
185Vzorov, A.N. et al. (2003) Prevention of HIV-1 infection by phthalocyanines. Antiviral Research 59, 99-109CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
186Dixon, D.W. et al. (2005) Sulfonated naphthyl porphyrins as agents against HIV-1. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry 99, 813-821Google Scholar
187Marchetti, M. et al. (2004) Inhibition of herpes simplex virus infection by lactoferrin is dependent on interference with the virus binding to glycosaminoglycans. Virology 318, 405-413Google Scholar

Further reading, resources and contacts

Shukla, D. et al. (1999) A novel role for 3-O-sulfated heparan sulfate in herpes simplex virus 1 entry. Cell 99, 13-22Google Scholar
Reeves, E.P. et al. (2002) Killing activity of neutrophils is mediated through activation of proteases by K+ flux. Nature 416, 291-297Google Scholar
Hayashida, A. et al. (2009) Staphylococcus aureus beta-toxin induces acute lung injury through syndecan-1. American Journal of Pathology 174, 509-518Google Scholar
Baleux, F. et al. (2009) A synthetic CD4-heparan sulfate glycoconjugate inhibits CCR5 and CXCR4 HIV-1 attachment and entry. Nature Chemical Biology 5, 743-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vivès, R.R., Lortat-Jacob, H. and Fender, P. (2006) Heparan sulphate proteoglycans and viral vectors: ally or foe? Current Gene Therapy 6, 35-44Google Scholar