Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T15:24:08.050Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RESEARCH ARTICLE: Citizen Participation, NEPA, and Land-Use Planning in Northern New York, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Robin W. S. Brooks  and
Glenn R. Harris
Robin W. S. Brooks
Affiliation:
Environmental Studies Department, St. Lawrence University, Canton, New York
Glenn R. Harris*
Affiliation:
Environmental Studies Department, St. Lawrence University, Canton, New York
*
Address correspondence to: Glenn R. Harris, Professor and Culpepper Teaching Fellow, Environmental Studies Department, St. Lawrence University, Canton, NY 13617; (fax) 315-229-5802; (email) gharris@stlawu.edu
Get access

Abstract

Citizen participation and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) both have long and storied histories in environmental practice. Arnstein's ladder for citizen participation depicts a continuum of possibilities for public involvement in land-use planning, with nonparticipation at one extreme and full control at the other. This typology was published in 1969, but examples across the full spectrum can still be found in land-use and environmental planning today. The National Environmental Policy Act, enacted one year after publication of Arnstein's article, requires public involvement for environmental assessments of all federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. We employ Arnstein's typology to evaluate citizen participation in decisions about habitat protection in northern New York. This area has been identified as a critical location in the eastern North American flyway for migratory waterfowl. Initiatives to protect habitat reflected little public involvement before the implementation of NEPA, but substantial involvement afterwards. Before NEPA, residents were simply informed of agency actions. After NEPA, citizen participation caused a land acquisition plan to be withdrawn and replaced by a voluntary partnership program. Recently, a second acquisition proposal also was suspended, in part as a consequence of citizen input. These case studies demonstrate how citizens have utilized NEPA to participate in environmental decision making.

Environmental Practice 10:140–151 (2008)

Type
FEATURES
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 140 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © National Association of Environmental Professionals 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, R. W. 2007. In Defense of NEPA: The Case of the Legacy Parkway. Journal of Land, Resources, and Environmental Law 26:297–318.Google Scholar
Arnstein, S. R. 1969. A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35:216–224.Google Scholar
Aubertine, T. 2006. Personal communication. Dairy farmer, Lyme, NY. 16 December.Google Scholar
Bass, R. E., and Herson, A. I.. 1993. Mastering NEPA: A Step-by-Step Approach. Solano Press Books, Canterbury, CA., 233 pp.Google Scholar
Bast, J. 2006. Personal communication. Wildlife technician, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Cortland, NY. 18 September.Google Scholar
Blake, L. C. 1963. Conflict on State Land Non-Taxation Resumes. Watertown Daily Times. 14 October.Google Scholar
Bond, A., Palerm, J., and Haigh, P.. 2004. Public Participation in EIA of Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Projects: A Case Study Analysis. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 24:617–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R., and Harris, G.. 2005. Comanagement of Wildlife Corridors: The Case for Citizen Participation in the Algonquin to Adirondack Proposal. Journal of Environmental Management 74:97–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Busenberg, G. J. 2007. Citizen Participation and Collaborative Environmental Management in the Marine Oil Trade of Coastal Alaska. Coastal Management 35:239–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, L.K. 1998. The National Environmental Policy Act: An Agenda for the Future. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 209 pp.Google Scholar
Cameron, S. 1969. Upper and Lower Lakes Game Management Area Management Plan. New York State Conservation Department, Watertown, NY, 33 pp.Google Scholar
Fellman, G. 1969. Neighborhood Protest of an Urban Highway. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35:118–122.Google Scholar
Hansen, R. P., Wolff, T. A., and Melcher, A. G.. 2007. NEPA and Environmental Streamlining: Benefits and Risks. Environmental Practice 9:83–95.Google Scholar
Harris, G. 1994. Public Acquisition versus Private Stewardship for Wetland Protection: An Evaluation of the St. Lawrence Valley National Wildlife Refuge, USA. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 37:3–19.Google Scholar
Harris, G., and Nelson, L.. 2007. Revisiting a Hazardous Waste Site 25 Years Later. Journal of Environmental Health 69:36–42.Google Scholar
Hunsberger, C. A., Gibson, R. B., and Wismer, S. K.. 2005. Citizen Involvement in Sustainability-Centered Environmental Assessment Follow-up. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25:609–627.Google Scholar
Jasikoff, T. 2007a. Personal communication. Refuge manager, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Cortland, NY. 27 September.Google Scholar
Jasikoff, T. 2007b. Personal communication. Refuge manager, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Cortland, NY. 28 November.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, L. 2000. The Move toward Participatory Democracy on Public Land Management under NEPA: Is It Being Thwarted by the ESA? Journal of Land, Resources, & Environmental Law 20:311–333.Google Scholar
Kidwell, B., and Leahy, A.. 1991. Wildlife Refuge Plan Hits Many Snags at 2 Hearings. Watertown Daily Times. 15 March.Google Scholar
Kidwell, B., and Taylor, C.. 1991. 3,700 Sign Petition on Refuge. Watertown Daily Times. 28 March.Google Scholar
Lamendola, J. 2007. Personal communication. Wildlife biologist, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Watertown, NY. 6 November.Google Scholar
Layzer, J. A. 2002. Citizen Participation and Government Choice in Local Environmental Controversies. Policy Studies Journal 30:193–207.Google Scholar
Leahy, A. 1991. Most at Refuge Hearing Oppose Federal Proposal. Watertown Daily Times. 13 March.Google Scholar
Lindstrom, M. J., and Smith, Z. A.. 2001. The National Environmental Policy Act: Judicial Misconstruction, Legislative Indifference, and Executive Neglect. Texas A&M University Press, College Station, TX, 188 pp.Google Scholar
Mouratiadou, I., and Moran, D.. 2007. Mapping Public Participation in the Water Framework Directive: A Case Study of the Pinios River Basin, Greece. Ecological Economics 62:66–76.Google Scholar
Pierce, H. 2005. Citizen Resistance to Chemical Weapons Incineration: Can NEPA Give Local Communities Leverage Over Military Arms Decommissioning Programs? Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review 32:459–491.Google Scholar
Plater, Z. J. B. 2006. Dealing with Dumb and Dumber: The Continuing Mission of Citizen Environmentalism. Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation 20:9–47.Google Scholar
Poeske, R. 2000. Unprecedented Decision Involving NEPA on Controversial Reservoir Project. In Transactions 65th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 24–28 March 2000, Rosemont, IL. Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, DC, 514–525.Google Scholar
Rauschmayer, F., and Risse, N.. 2005. A Framework for the Selection of Participatory Approaches for SEA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25:650–666.Google Scholar
Robinson, G. 2006. Personal communication. Dairy farmer, Brownville, NY. 16 December.Google Scholar
Schusler, T. M., and Decker, D. J.. 2001. Engaging Local Communities in Wildlife Management Planning: An Evaluation of the Lake Ontario Islands Search Conference. HDRU Series Number 01-5.Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 24 pp.Google Scholar
Seymour, J. 2006. Feds Propose to Protect 8,000 Acres of Land—Fish and Wildlife Service: “Waterfowl Production Areas” Slated. Watertown Daily Times. 22 June.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. 1991. Refuge Plan Called “Unconstitutional”: Pair Fears Loss of Land in Hammond. Watertown Daily Times. 24 February.Google Scholar
US Fish and Wildlife Service. 1991. Environmental Assessment: Proposal to Establish St. Lawrence Valley National Wildlife Refuge, Jefferson and St. Lawrence Counties, NY. Newton Corner, MA, 51 pp.Google Scholar
US Fish and Wildlife Service. 2000. St. Lawrence Wetlands and Grasslands Management District. Cortland, NY, 10 pp.Google Scholar
US Fish and Wildlife Service. 2006. Environmental Assessment for the St. Lawrence Wetland and Grassland Management District. Hadley, MA, 80 pp.Google Scholar
US Government. 1984. CEQ Regulations for Implementing NEPA. NEPAnet.http://www.nepa.gov/nepa/regs/ceq/toc_ceq.htm. 12 September 2007.Google Scholar
Vadney, K. 2006a. Farmers: Retain Old Wildlife Plan. Watertown Daily Times. 16 December.Google Scholar
Vadney, K. 2006b. Municipal Approval of Wetlands Plan in Doubt. Watertown Daily Times. 24 November.Google Scholar
Vadney, K. 2006c. Wetlands Project Debate Continues—8,000-Acre Plan: Farmers Express Concern, Others Show Support. Watertown Daily Times. 19 September.Google Scholar
Väntänen, A., and Marttunen, M.. 2005. Public Involvement in Multi-Objective Water Level Regulation Development Projects—Evaluating the Applicability of Public Involvement Methods. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25:281–304.Google Scholar
Wagner, J. 2006. Personal communication. Field advisor, Jefferson County Farm Bureau, Watertown, NY. 30 October.Google Scholar
Watertown Daily Times. 1963. St. Lawrence Supervisors Lash State Land Gobbling. 14 October.Google Scholar
Watertown Daily Times. 1993. Fish and Wildlife Service Drops Plan for Refuge in St. Lawrence Valley. 13 April.Google Scholar
Webb, S. 1992. Wildlife Refuge Would Harm Agriculture, Boost Tourism, Cornell Impact Study Says. Watertown Daily Times. 11 December.Google Scholar
Zappia, T. 1991. New Chance for Waterfowl. Watertown Daily Times. 3 March.Google Scholar