Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:41:13.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS AND CASE STUDIES: Bringing Unmanned Aerial Systems Closer to the Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2015

Carrick Detweiler ,
John-Paul Ore ,
David Anthony ,
Sebastian Elbaum ,
Amy Burgin  and
Aaron Lorenz
Carrick Detweiler*
Affiliation:
NIMBUS Lab, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska
John-Paul Ore
Affiliation:
NIMBUS Lab, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska
David Anthony
Affiliation:
NIMBUS Lab, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska
Sebastian Elbaum
Affiliation:
Computer Science & Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska
Amy Burgin
Affiliation:
Computer Science & Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska
Aaron Lorenz
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy & Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska
*
*Address correspondence to: Dr. Carrick Detweiler, Assistant Professor, Computer Science & Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 220 Schorr Center, Lincoln, NE 68588; (phone) 402-472-2449; (e-mail) carrick@cse.unl.edu.
Get access

Abstract

Increasingly, Unmanned Aerial Systems (UASs) are changing the way that scientists and practitioners collect environmental data. Current UASs, however, are largely relegated to collecting data while flying remotely, far away in the air. This article examines two case studies where micro-UASs fly in immediate proximity to the environment, enabling them to collect physical samples and capture sensor data that cannot be obtained at a distance. The first case study presents an aerial water sampler that flies to remote locations and dips a pump into the water to collect samples for lab analysis. The second case study examines a UAS that flies within a meter of crops to accurately measure their height. Each requires different sensors and methods specifically tailored to operating and interacting near the environment. This article evaluates the performance of these systems and also presents preliminary validation that they collect datasets that are compatible with those gathered by existing approaches. Futhermore, it distills some common underlying design and operating principles shared by UASs aimed at working close to the environment. Finally, this article concludes that in spite of numerous pending challenges, UASs that directly interact with the environment will transform the way environmental data is collected.

Environmental Practice 17: 188–200 (2015)

Type
Features
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , September 2015 , pp. 188 - 200
Copyright
© National Association of Environmental Professionals 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexis, K., Nikolakopoulos, G., Tzes, A., and Dritsas, L.. 2009. Coordination of Helicopter UAVs for Aerial Forest-Fire Surveillance. In. Applications of Intelligent Control to Engineering Systems, K.P. Valavanis, ed. Springer, Netherlands, 169–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrosia, V.G., Wegener, S., Zajkowski, T., Sullivan, D.V., Buechel, S., Enomoto, F., Lobitz, B., Johan, S., Brass, J., and Hinkley, E.. 2011. The Ikhana Unmanned Airborne System (UAS) Western States Fire Imaging Missions: From Concept to Reality (2006-2010). Geocarto International 26(2):85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anthony, D., Elbaum, S., Lorenz, A., and Detweiler, C.. 2014. On Crop Height Estimation with UAVs. In 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2014), 4805–4812.Google Scholar
Augugliaro, F., Mirjan, A., Gramazio, F., Kohler, M., and D’Andrea, R.. 2013. Building Tensile Structures with Flying Machines. In Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2013. IEEE/RSJ International Conference, 3487–3492.Google Scholar
Aziz, S.A., Steward, B.L., Birrell, S.J., Shrestha, D.S., and Kaspar, T.C.. 2004. Ultrasonic Sensing for Corn Plant Canopy Characterization. ASAE Paper No. 041120. In ASAE Annual International Meeting. St. Joseph, MI.Google Scholar
Berni, J., Zarco-Tejada, P.J., Suárez, L., and Fereres, E.. 2009. Thermal and Narrowband Multispectral Remote Sensing for Vegetation Monitoring from an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on 47(3):722–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, L.E., Sherman, A., and Ryany, J.. 2007. Development of an Active, Large Volume, Discrete Seawater Sampler for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles. In OCEANS 2007, IEEE, 1–5.Google Scholar
Cano, R., Pérez, C., Pruaño, F., Ollero, A., and Heredia, G.. 2013. Mechanical Design of a 6-DOF Aerial Manipulator for Assembling Bar Structures Using UAVS. In 2 ndInternational Federation of Automatic Control Workshop on Research, Education, and Development of Unmanned Aerial Systems 2013. Compiègne, France.Google Scholar
Cruz, N.A., and Matos, A.C.. 2008. The MARES AUV, a Modular Autonomous Robot for Environment Sampling. In OCEANS 2008, IEEE, 1–6.Google Scholar
Dodds, W.K. 2002. Freshwater Ecology: Concepts and Environmental Applications. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 591 pp.Google Scholar
Dunbabin, M., Grinham, A., and Udy, J., J. 2009. An Autonomous Surface Vehicle for Water Quality Monitoring. In Proc. Australasian Conference on Robotics and Automation (ACRA), volume 13. Australian Robotics and Automation Association, 2–4.Google Scholar
Erickson, A.J., Weiss, P.T., and Gulliver, J.S.. 2013. Water Sampling Methods. In. Optimizing Stormwater Treatment Practices. Springer, New York, 163–192.Google Scholar
Göktoğan, A.H., Sukkarieh, S., Bryson, M., Randle, J., Lupton, T., and Hung, C.. 2010. A Rotary-Wing Unmanned Air Vehicle for Aquatic Weed Surveillance and Management. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems 57:467–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heredia, G., Jimenez-Cano, A., Sanchez, I., Llorente, D., Vega, V., Braga, J., Acosta, J., and Ollero, A.. 2014. Control of a Multirotor Outdoor Aerial Manipulator. In Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2014), 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, IEEE, 3417–3422.Google Scholar
Jain, S., Nuske, S., Chambers, A., Yoder, L., Cover, H., Chamberlain, L., Scherer, S., and Singh, S.. 2013. Autonomous River Exploration. In Proc. of the 9th Intl. Conf. on Field and Service Robots (FSR). Brisbane, Australia, volume 5.Google Scholar
Jensen, A.M., Morgan, D., Clemens, S., Chen, Y.Q., and Hardy, T.. 2009. Using Multiple Opensource Low-Cost Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) for 3D Photogrammetry and Distributed Wind Measurement. In ASME/IEEE 2009 International Conference on Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications; 20th Reliability, Stress Analysis, and Failure Prevention Conference, volume 3, 629–634.Google Scholar
Jiang, G., and Voyles, R.. 2014. A Nonparallel Hexrotor UAV with Faster Response to Disturbances for Precision Position Keeping. In Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics (SSRR), 2014 IEEE International Symposium on, IEEE, 1–5.Google Scholar
Korpela, C., Orsag, M., and Oh, P.. 2014. Towards Valve Turning Using a Dual-Arm Aerial Manipulator. In Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2014), 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, IEEE, 3411–3416.Google Scholar
Lelong, C.C.D., Burger, P., Jubelin, G., Roux, B., Labbé, S., and Baret, F.. 2008. Assessment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Imagery for Quantitative Monitoring of Wheat Crop in Small Plots. Sensors 8(5):3557–3585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindsey, Q., Mellinger, D., and Kumar, V.. 2012. Construction with Quadrotor Teams. Autonomous Robots 33(3):323–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lizarraga, M. I., Ilstrup, D.M., Elkaim, G.H., and Davis, J.. 2008. Aerial Photography Using a Nokia n95. In World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, S. I. Ao, Craig Douglas, W. S. Grundfest, Lee Schruben, and Jon Burgstone, eds. San Francisco, CA, 1006–1011.Google Scholar
Maxbotix. 2014. MaxBotix Ultrasonic Sensors. Available at http://www.maxbotix.com (accessed June 15, 2014).Google Scholar
Ore, J.P., Elbaum., S., Burgin, A., Zhao, B., and Detweiler, C.. 2014. Autonomous Aerial Water Sampling. In. Proc. of Field and Service Robotics (FSR 2013), Luis Mejias, Peter Corke and Jonathan Roberts, eds. Brisbane, Australia, 137–151.Google Scholar
Orem, W.H. 2004. Impacts of Sulfate Contamination on the Florida Everglades Ecosystem. Fact Sheet FS 109-03. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.Google Scholar
Rango, A., Laliberte, A., Steele, C., Herrick, J.E., Bestelmeyer, B., Schmugge, T., Roanhorse, A., and Jenkins, V.. 2006. Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Rangelands: Current Applications and Future Potentials. Environmental Practice 8(03):159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwager, M., Julian, B., and Rus, D.. 2009. Optimal Coverage for Multiple Hovering Robots with Downward-Facing Cameras. In Proc. of International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA09), Kobe, Japan, 3515–3522.Google Scholar
Shen, S., Mulgaonkar, Y., Michael, N., and Kumar, V.. 2014. Multi-Sensor Fusion for Robust Autonomous Flight in Indoor and Outdoor Environments with a Rotorcraft MAV. In Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2014 IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, 4974–4981.Google Scholar
Shrestha, D., Steward, B., Kaspar, T., Robert, P.et al. 2002. Determination of Early Stage Corn Plant Height Using Stereo-Vision. In 6th International Conference on Precision Agriculture and Other Precision Resources Management, Minneapolis, MN, 1382–1394.Google Scholar
Shrestha, D.S., and Steward, B.L.. 2005. Size and Shape Analysis of Corn Plant Canopies for Plant Population and Spacing Sensing. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 21(2):295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soria-Ruiz, J., Fernandez-Ordonez, Y., and Woodhouse, I.. 2010. Land-Cover Classification Using Radar and Optical Images: A Case Study in Central Mexico. International Journal of Remote Sensing 31(12):3291–3305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J., Loianno, G., Sreenath, K., and Kumar, V.. 2014. Toward Image Based Visual Servoing for Aerial Grasping and Perching. In Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2014 IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, 2113–2118.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., Polin, J., Sreenath, K., and Kumar, V.. 2013. Avian-Inspired Grasping for Quadrotor Micro UAVs. In ASME 2013 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, V06AT07A014.Google Scholar
Watts, A.C., Perry, J.H., Smith, S.E., Burgess, M.A., Wilkinson, B.E., Szantoi, Z., Ifju, P.G., and Percival, H.F.. 2010. Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems for Low-Altitude Aerial Surveys. The Journal of Wildlife Management 74(7):1614–1619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wegener, S.S., Schoenung, , Totah, J., Sullivan, D., Frank, J., Enomoto, F., Frost, C., and Theodore, C.. 2004. UAV Autonomous Operations for Airborne Science Missions. In Proc. AIAA 3rd “Unmanned Unlimited” Technical Conference, Workshop and Exhibit. Paper no. AIAA-2004-6416, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilde, F.D., and Radtke, D.B.. 1998. National Field Manual for the Collection of Water-quality Data: Field Measurements. US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Wolkowski, R., and Lowery, B.. 2008. Soil Compaction: Causes, Concerns and Cures. University of Wisconsin Extension, UWEX Factsheet A3367. Madison, WI, 1–8.Google Scholar