Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:33:20.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Historical Phonology of Intrusive Stops: A Non-Linear Description

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

W. Leo Wetzels
W. Leo Wetzels*
Affiliation:
University of Nijmegen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Intrusive stops are traditionally understood as sounds emerging at the phonetic surface as the result of specific coarticulation effects, generally involving the manner of articulation features “nasal”, “continuant” and “lateral” as in French chambre (< Lat. cam(e)ra), être (< Lat. ess(e)re) and OF moldre (< Lat. mol(e)re).

In this paper I will discuss some recent proposals concerning the formal description of this phenomenon. In doing so, I will show that two types of intrusive-stop formations have to be distinguished: one type involves the appearance of an epenthetic consonant inside liquidfinal clusters; the second type concerns intrusive stops which originate inside sequences of consonants which do not have liquids as their second member. More specifically, it will be argued that these two types correlate systematically with a difference in segmental status of the intrusive stop involved: the former type requires the insertion of a consonant, whereas the intrusive element which appears in the latter type does not acquire segmental status.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , Fall 1985 , pp. 285 - 333
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Stephen R. 1976 Nasal Consonants and the Internal Structure of Segments. Language 52:326–344.Google Scholar
Barnitz, John G. 1974 Bloom-p-field, Chom-p-sky, and Phonetic Epen-t-thesis. Studies in the Linguistics Sciences 4.Google Scholar
Bell, Alan 1971 Some Patterns of Occurrence and Formation of Syllable Structures. Working Papers on Language Universals 6:23–137.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard 1933 Language. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. and Keyser, Samuel Jay 1983 CV Phonology: A Generative Theory of the Syllable. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. and Sezer, Engin 1982 Vowel and Consonant Disharmony in Turkish. Pp. 213–255 in The Structure of Phonological Representation, Part II. Hulst, Harry van der and Smith, Norval, eds. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. 1986 Compensatory Lengthening and Consonant Gemination in Luganda. In Studies in Compensatory Lengthening. Wetzels, W. Leo and Sezer, Engin, eds. Dordrecht: Foris (in press).Google Scholar
Dinnsen, Daniel A. 1980 Phonological Rules and Phonetic Explanation. Linguistics 16:171–191.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos and Broeders, Ton 1981 English Pronunciation for Student Teachers. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff-Longman.Google Scholar
Hankamer, Jorge and Aissen, Judith 1974 The Sonority Hierarchy. Pp. 131–145 in Papers from the Parasession on Natural Phonology. Bruck, A. et al, eds. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan 1976 Introduction to Natural Generative Phonology New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Khan, Daniel 1976 Syllable-based Generalizations in English Phonology. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul 1979 Metrical Structure Assignment is Cyclic. Linguistic Inquiry 10:421–441.Google Scholar
Montreuil, Jean-Pierre 1983 /s/-extrameticality in Romance. Paper read at the 1st C.I.L.T.L.R. Sitges, June 16–18, 1983.Google Scholar
Morin, Yves-Charles 1980 Morphologisation de l’épenthèse en ancien français. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 25:204–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Robert W. 1982 Consonant Cluster Developments in Pāli. Folia Linguistica Historica 3:163–184.Google Scholar
Murray, Robert W. and Vennemann, Theo 1982 Syllable-Contact change in Germanic, Greek and Sidamo. Klagenfurter Beitrāge zur Sprachwissenschaft 8:321–349.Google Scholar
Murray, Robert W. and Vennemann, Theo 1983 Sound Change and Syllable Structure in Germanic Phonology. Language 59:514–528.Google Scholar
Pokorny, Julius 1959 Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Pope, Mildred 1952 From Latin to Modern French Manchester: The University Press.Google Scholar
Schwan, Eduard and Behrens, Dietrich 1913 Grammaire de l’ancien français. Leipzig: Riesland.Google Scholar
Singh, Rajendra 1980 Old French Epenthesis and Syllable Structure. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 25:226–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steriade, Donca 1982 Greek Prosodies and the Nature of Syllabification. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT.Google Scholar
van Lessen Kloeke, W.U.S. 1982 Deutsche Phonologie und Morphologie: Merkmale und Markiertheit. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Walker, Douglas C. 1978 Epenthesis in Old French. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 23:66–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetzels, W. Leo 1986 Phonological Timing in Ancient Greek. In Studies in Compensatory Lengthening. Wetzels, W. Leo and Sezer, Engin, eds. Dordrecht: Foris (in press).Google Scholar
Wetzels, W. Leo and Hermans, Ben 1985 Aspirated Geminates in Pāli. Pp. 213–223 in Linguistics in the Netherlands 1985. Bennis, Hans and Beukema, Frits, eds. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Weijnen, Anton 1965 Zeventiende-eeuwse Taal. Zutphen: Thieme.Google Scholar