Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T08:51:46.455Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reconsidering ‘Tokens’: The Neolithic Origins of Accounting or Multifunctional, Utilitarian Tools?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2018

Lucy E. Bennison-Chapman
Lucy E. Bennison-Chapman*
Affiliation:
Independent scholar Email: bennisonchapman@aol.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The origin of record keeping is a key question in the development of social complexity and specialized economies, representing the first step towards the emergence of written communication. Yet the precursors of the world's earliest writing and its initial stages of development remain little understood. Small, geometric clay objects (‘tokens’) appear in the tenth millennium cal. bc, the start of the Neolithic in West Asia, prevailing into the first millennium. It is largely assumed that from their inception clay objects played a crucial role in record keeping, directly evolving into the world's earliest known writing. Utilizing new and previously unpublished Neolithic data comprising almost individually studied 3000 objects, accompanied by information from 56 further Neolithic sites, this article investigates the meaning of Neolithic ‘tokens’. Analysis proves the basis of their predominant interpretation to be incorrect; clay objects appear earlier than previously recognized and are not a necessary component of Neolithic agro-pastoral villages. ‘Tokens’ were multi-functional artefacts; even within a single site clay objects performed multiple roles. Though likely used in simple counting activities, this was not limited to the accounting of agricultural produce. Nor was counting the sole function of clay objects in the Neolithic. Clay objects were not created to administer agricultural produce and there is no evidence to suggest that in the Neolithic they formed part of a unified symbolic system.

Type
Research Article
Information
Cambridge Archaeological Journal , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , May 2019 , pp. 233 - 259
Copyright
Copyright © McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akkermans, P.M.M.G. (ed.), 1989. Excavations at Tell Sabi Abyad: Prehistoric investigations in the Balikh Valley, northern Syria. (BAR International series S468.) Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
Akkermans, P.M.M.G., 1993. The Excavations in the Balikh Valley, in Villages in the Steppe: Later Neolithic settlement and subsistence in the Balikh Valley, northern Syria. Ann Arbor (MI): International Monographs in Prehistory, 26–109.Google Scholar
Akkermans, P.M.M.G. (ed.), 1996a. Tell Sabi Abyad, The Late Neolithic Settlement: Report on the excavations of the University of Amsterdam (1988) and the National Museum of Antiquities Leiden (1991–1993) in Syria, Volume I. Istanbul: Nederlands Historisch-Archaeologisch Instituut te Istanbul.Google Scholar
Akkermans, P.M.M.G. (ed.), 1996b. Tell Sabi Abyad, the Late Neolithic Settlement: Report on the excavations of the University of Amsterdam (1988) and the National Museum of Antiquities Leiden (1991–1993) in Syria, Volume II. Istanbul: Nederlands Historisch-Archaeologisch Instituut te Istanbul.Google Scholar
Akkermans, P.M.M.G., Cappers, R., Cavallo, C., Nieuwenhuyse, O., Nilhamn, B. & Otte, I.N., 2006. Investigating the Early Pottery Neolithic of northern Syria: new evidence from Tell Sabi Abyad. American Journal of Archaeology 110(1), 23–56.10.3764/aja.110.1.123Google Scholar
Akkermans, P.M.M.G., Brüning, M., Hammers, N., et al. , 2012. Burning down the house: the burnt building V6 at Late Neolithic Tell Sabi Abyad, Syria. Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 43(44), 307–24.Google Scholar
Akkermans, P.M.M.G., Brüning, M.L., Huigens, H.O. & Nieuwenhuyse, O.P. (eds.), 2014. Excavations at Late Neolithic Tell Sabi Abyad: The 1994–1999 field seasons. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Akkermans, P.M.M.G. & Duistermaat, K., 1996. Of storage and nomads. The sealings from Late Neolithic, Sabi Abyad, Syria [with comments and reply]. Paléorient 22(2), 17–44.10.3406/paleo.1996.4635Google Scholar
Akkermans, P.M.M.G. & Duistermaat, K., 2004. More seals and sealings from Neolithic Tell Sabi Abyad, Syria. Levant 36, 1–11.10.1179/lev.2004.36.1.1Google Scholar
Akkermans, P., van der Plicht, J., Nieuwenhuyse, O., Russell, A., Kaneda, A. & Buitenhuis, H., 2010. Weathering climate change in the Near East: dating and Neolithic adaptations 8200 years ago. Antiquity 84(325), Project Gallery.Google Scholar
Akkermans, P.M.M.G. & Verhoeven, M., 1995. An image of complexity: the burnt village at Late Neolithic Sabi Abyad, Syria. American Journal of Archaeology 99(1), 5–32.Google Scholar
Amiet, P., 1966. Elam. Auvers-Sur-Oise: Archée.Google Scholar
Atalay, S., 2012. Analysis of clay balls from the BACH Area, in Last House on the Hill: BACH Area reports from Çatalhöyük, Turkey, eds. Tringham, R. & Stevanovic, M.. (Monumenta Archaeologica 27.) Los Angeles (CA): Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at UCLA, 14/1–14/9.Google Scholar
Baird, D., 2002. Early Holocene settlement in Central Anatolia: problems and prospects as seen from the Konya Plain, in The Neolithic of Central Anatolia: Internal developments and external relations during the ninth-sixth millennia CAL BC. Proceedings of the International CANeW Table Ronde, Istanbul, 23–24 November 2001, eds. Gérard, F. & Thissen, L.. Istanbul: Ege Yayinlari, 139–60.Google Scholar
Baird, D., 2006. The Boncuklu Project: the origins of sedentism, cultivation and herding in Central Anatolia. Anatolian Archaeology 12, 13–16.Google Scholar
Baird, D., 2007. The Boncuklu project: the origins of sedentism, cultivation and herding in central Anatolia. Anatolian Archaeology 13, 14–17.Google Scholar
Baird, D., 2009. The Boncuklu Project: investigating the beginnings of agriculture, sedentism and herding in central Anatolia. Anatolian Archaeology 15, 9–10.Google Scholar
Baird, D., 2010. The Boncuklu Project: investigating the beginnings of agriculture, sedentism and herding in central Anatolia. Anatolian Archaeology 16, 9–11.Google Scholar
Baird, D., 2012a. The Late Epipalaeolithic, Neolithic and Chalcolithic of the Anatolian Plateau, 13,000–4000 BC, in A Companion to the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East, ed. Potts, D.T.. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 431–65.Google Scholar
Baird, D., 2012b. The Boncuklu Project. Heritage Turkey 2, 16–18.10.18866/biaa2015.038Google Scholar
Baird, D. (ed.), forthcoming. Boncuklu Höyük volume I: A: preliminary report 2004–2010 seasons.Google Scholar
Baird, D., Fairbairn, A., Martin, L. & Middleton, C., 2012. The Boncuklu Project; the origins of sedentism, cultivation and herding in central Anatolia, in The Neolithic in Turkey: New excavations and new research. Vol. 3: Central Anatolia, eds. Özdoğan, M., Başgelen, N. & Kuniholm, P.. Istanbul: Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayinlar, 219–44.Google Scholar
Baird, D., Bar-Yosef, O., Baysal, A. & Fairbairn, A., 2011. The Boncuklu Project: the origins of sedentism, cultivation and herding in central Anatolia. Heritage Turkey 1, 15–16.Google Scholar
Bartl, K., Ramadan, J. & Al-Hafian, W., 2011. Shir/West Syria. Results of the sixth and seventh seasons of excavations in 2009. Chronique Archéologique en Syrie 5, 51–60.Google Scholar
Bender, B., 1978. Gatherer-hunter to farmer: a social perspective. World Archaeology 10(2), 204–22.Google Scholar
Bennison-Chapman, L.E., 2013. Geometric clay objects, in Substantive Technologies at Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2000–2008 seasons, ed. Hodder, I.. (Çatalhöyük Research Project 9.) London/Los Angeles: British Institute at Ankara/Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at UCLA, 253–76.Google Scholar
Bennison-Chapman, L.E., 2014. The Role and Function of Tokens and Sealing Practices in the Neolithic of the Near East: The Question of Early Recording Systems, Symbolic Storage, Precursors to Writing, Gaming, or Monitoring Devices in the World's First Villages. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Liverpool.Google Scholar
Binford, L.R., 1968. Post-Pleistocene adaptations, in New Perspectives in Archaeology, eds. Binford, S. & Binford, L.. Chicago (IL): Aldine, 331–41.Google Scholar
Bottéro, J., Herrenschmidt, C. & Vernant, J.P., 2000. Ancestor of the West: Writing, reasoning, and religion in Mesopotamia, Elam, and Greece. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Braidwood, R.J., 1960. The agricultural revolution. Scientific American 203, 130–48.10.1038/scientificamerican0960-130Google Scholar
Broman, V., 1958. Jarmo Figurines. Unpublished Masters dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Morales, Broman, V., 1990. Figurines and Other Clay Objects from Sarab and Çayönü. Chicago (IL): Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Brown, S., 1996. Review of Schmandt-Besserat, D. Before Writing, Volumes I & II, 1992. Canadian Society for Mesopotamian Studies Bulletin 31, 35–43.Google Scholar
Byrd, B.F., 2005. Reassessing the emergence of village life in the Near East. Journal of Archaeological Research 13(3), 231–90.Google Scholar
Çambel, H. & Braidwood, R.J., 1979. An early farming village in Turkey, in Readings from Scientific American. Hunters, farmers, and civilizations: Old World archaeology with introductions by C.C. Lamberg-Karlovsky. San Francisco (CA): W.H. Freeman, 145–51. [Originally published in Scientific American, March 1970.]Google Scholar
Carter, E., 2010. The Glyptic of the Middle-Late Halaf Period at Domuztepe, Turkey (ca 5755-5450 BC). Paléorient 36(1), 159–77.Google Scholar
Cauvin, J., 1994. Naissance des divinités, naissance de l'agriculture: la révolution des symboles au Néolithique. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Cauvin, J., 2000. The Birth of the Gods and the Origins of Agriculture (trans. Watkins, T.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cessford, C., 2005. Absolute dating at Çatalhöyük, in Changing Materialities at Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 1995–99 seasons, ed. Hodder, I.. (Çatalhöyük Research Project 5.) Cambridge/London: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research/British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara, 65–99.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1928. The Most Ancient Near East. New York (NY): Grove Press.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1936. Man Makes Himself. London: Watts.Google Scholar
Çilingiroğlu, A., Derin, Z., Abay, E., Sağlamtimur, H. & Kayan, I., 2004. Ulucak Höyük: Excavations conducted between 1995 and 2002. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Clarke, D.L., 1973. Archaeology: the loss of innocence. Antiquity 47, 6–18.Google Scholar
Cole, G., Matthews, R. & Richardson, A., 2013. Material networks of the Neolithic at Sheikh-e Abad: objects of bone, stone and clay, in The Earliest Neolithic of Iran: 2008 excavations at Sheikh-e Abad and Jani, eds. Matthews, R., Mohammadifar, Y. & Matthews, W.. (CZAP Reports Vol. 1.) Oxford: Oxbow, 135–45.Google Scholar
Coolidge, L. & Overmann, K., 2012. Numerosity, abstraction, and the emergence of symbolic thinking. Current Anthropology 53(2), 204–25.10.1086/664818Google Scholar
Cooper, J. S., 2004. Babylonian beginnings: the origin of the cuneiform writing system, in comparative perspective, in The First Writing: Script invention as history and process, ed. Houston, S.D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 71–99.Google Scholar
Costello, S.K., 2000. Memory tools in early Mesopotamia. Antiquity 74, 475–6.Google Scholar
Costello, S.K., 2002. Tools of Memory: Investigation of the Context of Information. Storage in the Halaf Period. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Binghamton University.Google Scholar
Coulmas, F., 2003. Writing Systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
d'Errico, F., Henshilwood, C., Lawson, G., et al. , 2003. Archaeological evidence for the emergence of language, symbolism, and music – an alternative multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of World Prehistory 17(1), 1–70.10.1023/A:1023980201043Google Scholar
Damerow, P., 1988. Individual development and historical evolution of arithmetical thinking, in Ontogeny, Phylogeny, and Historical Development, ed. Strauss, S.. Northwood (NJ): Ablex, 125–52.Google Scholar
Damerow, P., 1993. Bookkeepers invented scripture: review of Schmandt-Besserat's Before Writing 1992. Rechtshistorisches Journal 12(6), 9–35.Google Scholar
Damerow, P., 2006. The origins of writing as a problem of historical epistemology. Cuneiform Digital Library Journal 2006(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
Damerow, P. & Englund, R.K., 1987. Die Zahlzeichensysteme der Archaischen Texte aus Uruk, in Zeichenliste der Archaischen Texte aus Uruk, eds. Nissen, H.J. & Green, M.W.. Berlin: Mann, 117–66.Google Scholar
de Morgan, J., Jéquier, G., de Mecquenem, R., Haussoulier, B. & Graat van Roggen, D.-L., 1905. Mémoires 7: Recherches archéologiques, deuxième série. (Délégation en Perse.) Paris: Editions Ernest Le Roux.Google Scholar
Doyle, S. 2017. Chipped stone from the North and South Areas, in Çatalhöyük Archive Report 2017, 195–206. Available at: http://www.catalhoyuk.com/archive_reports/2017 (accessed 5 October 2018).Google Scholar
Duistermaat, K., 1996. The seals and sealings, in Tell Sabi Abyad, The Late Neolithic Settlement: Report on the excavations of the University of Amsterdam (1988) and the National Museum of Antiquities Leiden (1991–1993) in Syria vol II, ed. Akkermans, P.M.M.G.. Istanbul: Nederlands Historisch-Archaeologisch Instituut te Istanbul, 339–402.Google Scholar
Duistermaat, K. & Schneider, G., 1998. Chemical analyses of sealing clays and the use of administrative artefacts at Late Neolithic Tell Sabi Abyad (Syria). Paléorient 24(1), 89–106.10.3406/paleo.1998.4672Google Scholar
Duru, R. & Umurtak, G., 2005. Höyücek. 1989–1992 Yillari Arasinda Yapilan Kazilarin Sonuçlari 2005 [Höyücek. Results of the Excavations 1988–1992]. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayinlari.Google Scholar
Englund, R.K., 1993. The origins of script. Review of Before Writing by Denise Schmandt-Besserat. Science 260(5114), 1670–71.Google Scholar
Englund, R.K., 1998. Review of D. Schmandt-Besserat, How Writing Came About. Written Language and Literacy 1, 257–61.Google Scholar
Englund, R.K., 2004. The state of decipherment of Proto-Elamite, in The First Writing: Script invention as history and process, ed. Houston, S.D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 100–149.Google Scholar
Eslick, C. & Voigt, M.M., 2017. Some clay finds from PPNB Gritille: stamps, sealings and tokens in questions, approaches, and dialogues, in Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology Studies in honor of Marie Henriette and Charles Gates, eds. Kozal, E., Akar, M., Heffron, Y., et al. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 77–96.Google Scholar
Fischer, S.R., 2001. A History of Writing. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Forouzan, F., Glover, J.B., Williams, F. & Deocampo, D., 2012. Portable XRF analysis of zoomorphic figurines, ‘tokens,’ and sling bullets from Chogha Gavaneh, Iran. Journal of Archaeological Science 39(12), 3534–41.10.1016/j.jas.2012.04.010Google Scholar
Friberg, J., 1994. Preliterate counting and accounting in the Middle East: a constructively critical review of Schmandt-Besserat's. Before Writing. Orientalistische Literaturzeitung 89(5–6), 477–502.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Y., 1995. Human and Animal Figurines of Munhata. (Les Cahiers des Missions Archéologiques Francaises en Israel 8.) Paris: Association Paléorient.Google Scholar
Hayden, B., 1990. Nimrods, piscators, pluckers, and planters: the emergence of food production. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 9(1), 31–69.Google Scholar
Henshilwood, C.S., d'Errico, F. & Watts, I., 2009. Engraved ochres from the Middle Stone Age levels at Blombos Cave, South Africa. Journal of Human Evolution 57, 27–47.Google Scholar
Herskovits, M.J., 1932: Population statistics in the Kingdom of Dahomey. Human Biology 4(2), 252–61.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1995. Çatalhöyük. Anatolian Archaeology 1, 3–5.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. (ed.), 1996a. On the Surface: Çatalhöyük 1993–95 (Çatalhöyük Research Project 1). Cambridge/London: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research/British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1996b. Çatalhöyük. Anatolian Archaeology 2, 6–7.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1997. Çatalhöyük. Anatolian Archaeology 3, 4–5.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1998. Çatalhöyük: The 1990's seasons, in Ancient Anatolia: Fifty years’ work by the British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara, ed. Matthews, R.. London: British Institute at Ankara, 43–52.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1999a. Renewed work at Çatalhöyük, in Neolithic in Turkey: The cradle of civilization (Vol. 1), eds. Özdoğan, M. & Basgelen, N.. Istanbul: Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayinlari, 157–64.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1999b. Renewed Work at Çatalhöyük, in Neolithic in Turkey: The cradle of civilization (Vol. 2), eds. Özdoğan, M. & Basgelen, N.. Istanbul: Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayinlari, 129–35.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 2000. Towards a Reflexive Method in Archaeology: The example at Çatalhöyük. (Çatalhöyük Research Project 2.) Cambridge/London: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research/British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 2001. Çatalhöyük. Anatolian Archaeology 7, 2–4.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 2002. Çatalhöyük. Anatolian Archaeology 8, 5–7.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 2004. A season of great finds and new faces at Çatalhöyük. Anatolian Archaeology 10, 8–10.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 2005a. New finds and new interpretations at Çatalhöyük. Anatolian Archaeology 11, 20–22.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 2005b. Yearly reports continue in Anatolian Archaeology 12–16 (2006–2010) and its replacement publication Heritage Turkey 1 (2011–ongoing).Google Scholar
Hodder, I. (ed.), 2005c. Inhabiting Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 1995–99 seasons. (Çatalhöyük Research Project 4.). Cambridge/London: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research/British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. (ed.), 2005d. Changing Materialities at Çatalhöyük: reports from the 1995–99 seasons (Çatalhöyük Research Project 5.) Cambridge/London: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research/British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. (ed.), 2005e. Çatalhöyük perspectives: reports from the 1995–99 seasons (Çatalhöyük Research Project 6.) Cambridge/London: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research/British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 2006a. Çatalhöyük. The Leopard's Tale: Revealing the mysteries of Turkey's ancient ‘town'. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 2006b. Excavating Çatalhöyük: South, North and KOPAL Area reports from the 1995–99 seasons (Çatalhöyük Research Project 3.) Cambridge/London: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research/British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 2010. Religion in the Emergence of Civilisation: Çatalhöyük as a case study. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. (ed.), 2013a. Humans and Landscapes of Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2000–2008 seasons. (Çatalhöyük Research Project 8.) London/Los Angeles: British Institute at Ankara/Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at UCLA.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. (ed.), 2013b. Substantive Technologies at Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2000–2008 seasons. (Çatalhöyük Research Project 9.) London/Los Angeles: British Institute at Ankara/Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at UCLA.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. (ed.), 2014a. Çatalhöyük Excavations, the 2000–2008 seasons. (Çatalhöyük Research Project 7.) London/Los Angeles: British Institute at Ankara/Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at UCLA.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. (ed.), 2014b. Integrating Çatalhöyük: Themes from the 2000–2008 seasons. (Çatalhöyük Research Project 10.) London/Los Angeles: British Institute at Ankara/Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at UCLA.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., Cessford, C. & Farid, S., 2006. Introduction to methods and approach, in Excavating Çatalhöyük: South, North and KOPAL Area reports from the 1995–99 seasons, ed. Hodder, I.. (Çatalhöyük Research Project 3.) Cambridge/London: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research/British Institute at Ankara, 3–24.Google Scholar
Hole, F., 2000. Is size important? Function and hierarchy in Neolithic settlements, in Life in Neolithic Farming Communities: Social organization, identity, and differentiation, ed. Kuijt, I.. New York/London: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, 192–209.Google Scholar
Houston, S., 2004. Overture to the first writing, in The First Writing: Script invention as history and process, ed. Houston, S.D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–15.Google Scholar
Iceland, H. 2010a. Chapter 1: Token finds at Pre-Pottery Neolithic ‘Ain Ghazal, Jordan: a formal and technological analysis, in 'Ain Ghazal Excavation Reports Volume 2: Symbols at ‘Ain Ghazal ed. Schmandt-Besserat, D.. Published under the direction of G.O. Rollefson & Z. Kafafi. Available at: http://www.laits.utexas.edu/ghazal/Chap1/chapter1.html (accessed 14 April 2012).Google Scholar
Iceland, H. 2010b. Appendix to Chapter 1: Catalogue, in 'Ain Ghazal Excavation Reports Volume 2: Symbols at ‘Ain Ghazal, ed. Schmandt-Besserat, D.. Published under the direction of G.O. Rollefson & Z. Kafafi. Available at: http://www.laits.utexas.edu/ghazal/Chap1/chapter1.html (accessed 14 April 2012).Google Scholar
Jasim, S.A. & Oates, J., 1986. Early tokens and tablets in Mesopotamia: new information from Tell Abada and Tell Brak. World Archaeology 17(3), 348–62.Google Scholar
Jenkinson, H. & Ellis, R.H., 2003. Medieval tallies, public and private, in Selected Writings of Sir Hilary Jenkinson, eds. Ellis, R.H. & Walne, P.. Society of American Archivists, 289–351. [Originally published in Archaeologica, 2nd series, XXIV, 1925.]Google Scholar
Jørgensen, L.B. & Rast-Eicher, A., 2017. Cordage, basketry, textiles and hides, in Çatalhöyük Archive Report 2017, 181–3. Available at: http://www.catalhoyuk.com/archive_reports/2017 (accessed 5 October 2018).Google Scholar
Kenyon, K.M. & Holland, T.A., 1983. Excavations at Jericho Volume 5: The pottery phases of the Tell and other finds. London: British School of Archaeology in Jerusalem/British Academy.Google Scholar
Kuijt, I. & Chesson, M.S., 2005. Lumps of clay and pieces of stone: ambiguity, bodies, and identity as portrayed in Neolithic figurines, in Archaeologies of the Middle East: critical perspectives, eds. Pollock, S. & Bernbeck, R.. Oxford: Blackwell, 152–83.Google Scholar
Lee, R.B. & DeVore, I., 1968. Man the Hunter. Chicago (IL): Aldine.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Leo, A., 1959. On an operational device in Mesopotamian bureaucracy. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 18(2), 121–8.Google Scholar
Lingle, A. & Seifert, J., 2017. Conservation, in Çatalhöyük Archive Report 2017, 261–8. Available at: http://www.catalhoyuk.com/archive_reports/2017 (accessed 5 October 2018).Google Scholar
MacGinnis, J. 2013. Tablets and Tokens on the Border of Assyria. Paper presented at the British Association of Near Eastern Archaeologists (BANEA) Annual Conference, University of Cambridge, 5 January 2013.Google Scholar
Mahasneh, H.M. & Gebel, H.G., 1998. Geometric objects from LPPNB Es-Sifiya, Wadi Mujib, Jordan. Paléorient 24(2), 105–10.Google Scholar
Malafouris, L., 2010. Grasping the concept of number: how did the sapient mind move beyond approximation?, in The Archaeology of Measurement: Comprehending heaven, earth and time in ancient societies, eds. Renfrew, C. & Morley, I.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 35–42.Google Scholar
Malafouris, L., 2013. How Things Shape the Mind: A theory of material engagement. Cambridge/London: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9476.001.0001Google Scholar
Marshack, A. 1991. The Taï plaque and calendrical notation in the Upper Palaeolithic. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 1(1), 25–61.10.1017/S095977430000024XGoogle Scholar
Matthews, R., Matthews, W. & Mohammadifar, Y. (eds.), 2013. The Earliest Neolithic of Iran: 2008 excavations at Sheikh-E Abad and Jani. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J., 1962. Excavations at Çatal Hüyük, 1961: first preliminary report. Anatolian Studies 12, 41–65.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J., 1963. Excavations at Çatal Hüyük, 1962: second preliminary report. Anatolian Studies 13, 43–103.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J., 1964a. Excavations at Çatal Hüyük, 1963: third preliminary report. Anatolian Studies 14, 39–119.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J., 1964b. A Neolithic city in Turkey. Scientific American 1964, 94–104.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J., 1965a. Çatal Hüyük, in Earliest Civilizations of the Near East, by Mellaart, J.. London: Thames & Hudson, 81–101.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J., 1965b. Çatal Hüyük: a Neolithic city in Anatolia. Proceedings of the British Academy 51, 201–13.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J., 1966. Excavations at Çatal Hüyük, 1965: fourth preliminary report. Anatolian Studies 16, 165–91.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J., 1967. Çatal Hüyük: A Neolithic town in Anatolia. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J., 1975. Anatolia and Cyprus, in The Neolithic of the Near East, by J. Mellaart. London: Thames & Hudson, 91–134.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J., 1978. Çatal Hüyük: the Neolithic revolution, in The Archaeology of Ancient Turkey, by Mellaart, J.. London/Sydney/Toronto: The Bodley Head, 9–22.Google Scholar
Michalowski, P., 1990. Early Mesopotamia communicative systems: art, literature, and writing, in Investigating Artistic Environments in the Ancient Near East, ed. Gunter, A.C.. Washington/Madison: Arthur M. Sackler Gallery, 53–69.Google Scholar
Michalowski, P. 1993., Review: Tokenism: Before Writing, Volume 1: From Counting to Cuneiform by Denise Schmandt-Besserat; Before Writing, Volume 2: A Catalog of Near Eastern Tokens by Denise Schmandt-Besserat. American Anthropologist 95(4), 996–99.10.1525/aa.1993.95.4.02a00110Google Scholar
Michalowski, P., 1994. Writing and literacy in early states: a Mesopotamianist perspective, in Literacy: Interdisciplinary conversations, ed. Keller-Cohen, D.. Cresskill (NJ): Hampton Press, 49–70.Google Scholar
Nashli, H.F. & Moghimi, N., 2013. Counting objects: new evidence from Tepe Zagheh, Qazvin plain, Iran. Antiquity 87(336), Project Gallery.Google Scholar
Netz, R., 2002. Counter culture: towards a history of Greek numeracy. History of Science 40(3), 321–52.Google Scholar
Nieuwenhuyse, O.P., Akkermans, P.M.M.G. & van der Plicht, J., 2010. Not so coarse, nor always plain – the earliest pottery of Syria. Antiquity 84, 71–85.Google Scholar
Nissen, H.J., 1986. The archaic texts from Uruk. World Archaeology 17(3), 319–33.Google Scholar
Nissen, H.J., Damerow, P. & Englund, R.K., 1993. Archaic Bookkeeping: Early writing and techniques of economic administration in the ancient Near East. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Overmann, K., 2013. Material scaffolds in numbers and time. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 23(1), 19–39.Google Scholar
Overmann, K., 2015. Numerosity structures the expression of quantity in lexical numbers and grammatical number. Current Anthropology 56(5), 638–53.Google Scholar
Overmann, K., 2016. Beyond writing: the development of literacy in the Ancient Near East. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 26(2), 285–303.Google Scholar
Overmann, K., Wynn, T. & Coolidge, F.L., 2011. The prehistory of number concept. Behavioural Sciences 34, 142–4.Google Scholar
Özbal, R., Gerritsen, F., Diebold, B., et al. , 2004. Tell Kurdu excavations 2001. Anatolica 30, 37–107.Google Scholar
Pim, J.E., Yatsenko, S.A. & Perrin, O.T., 2010. Traditional Marking Systems: A preliminary survey. Dover: Dunkling Books.Google Scholar
Pollock, S., 1999. Ancient Mesopotamia: The Eden that never was. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Price, T.D. & Gebauer, A.B. (eds.), 1995. Last Hunters, First Farmers: New perspectives on the prehistoric transition to agriculture. Santa Fe (NM): School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Quilter, J. & Urton, G., 2002. Narrative Threads: Accounting and recounting in Andean khipu. Austin (TX): University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Redman, C., 1977. Man, domestication, and culture in southwestern Asia, in Origins of Agriculture, ed. Reed, C.A.. The Hague/Paris: Mouton, 523–42.Google Scholar
Richardson, A. 2014. Early clay technologies: studies in Early Neolithic clay usage from the Central Zagros, in Proceedings of the 8th ICAANE, 30th April– 4th May 2012, University of Warsaw, Vol. 1. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 41–53.Google Scholar
Robinson, A., 2007. The Story of Writing: Alphabets, hieroglyphs and pictograms. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Rollefson, G., Simmons, A.H. & Kafafi, Z., 1992. Neolithic Cultures at ‘Ain Ghazal, Jordan. Journal of Field Archaeology 19(4), 443–70.Google Scholar
Schmandt-Besserat, D., 1977. An Archaic Recording System and the Origin of Writing. Malibu (CA): Undena Publications.Google Scholar
Schmandt-Besserat, D., 1978a. The earliest precursor of writing. Scientific American 238(6), 50–59.Google Scholar
Schmandt-Besserat, D., 1978b. Reckoning before writing. Archaeology 32(3), 22–31.Google Scholar
Schmandt-Besserat, D., 1979. An archaic recording system in the Uruk-Jemdet Nasr period. American Journal of Archaeology 83(1), 19–48.Google Scholar
Schmandt-Besserat, D., 1980. The envelopes that bear the first writing. Technology and Culture 21(3), 357–85.Google Scholar
Schmandt-Besserat, D., 1981. From tokens to tablets: a re-evaluation of the so-called numerical tablets. Visible Language 15(4), 321–44.Google Scholar
Schmandt-Besserat, D., 1982a. How writing came about. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 47, 1–5.Google Scholar
Schmandt-Besserat, D., 1982b. The emergence of recording. American Anthropologist 84(4), 871–8.Google Scholar
Schmandt-Besserat, D., 1988. From accounting to written language: the role of abstract counting in the invention of writing, in The Social Construction of Written Communication (Writing Research), eds. Raforth, B.A. & Rubin, D.L.. New York (NY): Ablex Publishing, 119–30.Google Scholar
Schmandt-Besserat, D., 1992a. Before Writing, Volume I: From counting to cuneiform. Austin (TX): University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Schmandt-Besserat, D., 1992b. Before Writing, Volume II: A catalogue of Near Eastern tokens. Austin (TX): University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Schmandt-Besserat, D., 1996. How Writing Came About. Austin (TX): University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, A.H. & Najjar, M., 2006. Ghwair I: a small, complex Neolithic community in southern Jordan. Journal of Field Archaeology 31(1), 77–95.Google Scholar
Simpson, S.J., 2007. Homo ludens: the earliest board games in the Near East, in Ancient Board Games in Perspective: Papers from the 1990 British Museum colloquium, with additional contributions, ed. Finkel, I.L.. London: British Museum Press, 5–10.Google Scholar
Sy, A. & Tinker, T., 2006. Bury Pacioli in Africa: a bookkeeper's reification of accountancy. Abacus 42(1), 105–27.Google Scholar
Tringham, R. & Stevanovic, M. (ed.), 2012. Last House on the Hill: BACH Area Reports from Çatalhöyük, Turkey. (Monumenta Archaeologica 27.) Los Angeles (CA): Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at UCLA.10.2307/j.ctvdmwx1jGoogle Scholar
Vallat, F., 1986. The most ancient scripts of Iran: the current situation. World Archaeology 17(3), 335–47.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, M., 1999. An Archaeological Ethnography of a Neolithic Community: Space, place and social relationships in the burnt village at Tell Sabi Abyad, Syria. Istanbul: Nederlands Historisch-Archaeologisch Instituut te Istanbul.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, M., 2000. Death, fire and abandonment. Ritual practice at Late Neolithic Tell Sabi Abyad, Syria. Archaeological Dialogues 7(1), 46–65.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, M., 2011. The birth of a concept and the origins of the Neolithic: a history of prehistoric farmers in the Near East. Paléorient 37(1), 75–87.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, M. & Akkermans, P.M.M.G. (eds.), 2000. Tell Sabi Abyad II: The Pre-Pottery Neolithic B settlement. Istanbul: Nederlands Historisch-Archaeologisch Instituut te Istanbul.Google Scholar
Viteles, M.S., 1947. Charles Samuel Myers, 1873–1946. Psychological Review 54(4), 177–81.Google Scholar
Voigt, M.M. 1983. Hajji Firuz Tepe, Iran: The Neolithic settlement. Philadelphia (PA): University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology & Anthropology.Google Scholar
Watkins, T., 2010. New light on Neolithic Revolution in South-west Asia. Antiquity 84, 621–34.Google Scholar
Woods, C., 2010. The earliest Mesopotamian writing, in Visible Language: Inventions of writing in the ancient Middle East, ed. Woods, C.. Chicago (IL): Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, 33–84.Google Scholar
Woods, C., 2014. New Light on an Administrative Device from the Dawn of Writing in the Ancient Near East. Keynote speech, British Association of Near Eastern Archaeologists (BANEA) Annual Conference 2014, University of Reading, 9 January 2014.Google Scholar
Zimansky, P., 1993. Review of D. Schmandt-Besserat, ‘Before Writing, Vol. I’. Journal of Field Archaeology 20, 513–17.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Bennison-Chapman supplementary material

Bennison-Chapman supplementary material 1

Download Bennison-Chapman supplementary material(File)
File 20.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Bennison-Chapman supplementary material

Bennison-Chapman supplementary material 2

Download Bennison-Chapman supplementary material(File)
File 19.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Bennison-Chapman supplementary material

Bennison-Chapman supplementary material 3

Download Bennison-Chapman supplementary material(File)
File 97.7 KB