Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T07:20:58.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Aspects of Settlement in the Oasis of Bukhara, Uzbekistan: An Archaeo-Economic Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2021

Rocco Rante Open the ORCID record for Rocco Rante [Opens in a new window]  and
Federico Trionfetti
Rocco Rante
Affiliation:
Louvre Museum 75058 Paris Cedex 01 ArScAn, équipe Asie CentraleFrance Email: rocco.rante@louvre.fr
Federico Trionfetti
Affiliation:
Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, EHESS, Centrale Marseille, AMSE Maison de l'économie et de la gestion d'Aix 424 chemin du viaduct 13080 Aix-en-Provence France Email: federico.trionfetti@univ-amu.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper focuses on the new approach studying variations in city size and the impact that the Silk Road had on the structure of cities, demonstrated through the study of economic aspects of the Bukhara oasis. We use archaeological data, compare the ancient economy to modern ones, use modern economic theory and methods to understand ancient society, and use what we have learned about the ancient economy to understand modern economies better. In sum, we explore the past through the present and the latter through the former. Our main finding is the generation of models able to answer to the city-size distribution in different territories, comparing them between the past and the present. This study first revealed that, through Zipf's Law, we found similarities between modern post-Industrial Revolution and medieval economics. Secondly, we also found that in ancient times the structure of the city was linked with the local economic demand. We have demonstrated this through the study of cities along the Silk Road.

Type
Research Article
Information
Cambridge Archaeological Journal , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , November 2021 , pp. 581 - 596
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ames, K., 2007. The archaeology of rank, in Handbook of Archaeological Theories, eds Bentley, R.A., Maschner, H.D.G. & Chippindale, C.. Lanham (MD): AltaMira, 487–513.Google Scholar
Arnold, J.E., 1996. The archaeology of complex hunter-gatherers. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 3(1), 77–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, F., 1913. Das Gesetz der Belvolkerungskoncentration [The law of population concentration]. Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen 59, 74–6.Google Scholar
Beckmann, M.J., 1958, City hierarchies and the distribution of city sizes. Economic Development and Cultural Change 6, 243–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettencourt, M.A.L., 2013. The origins of scaling in sities. Science 340, 1438–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevan, A. & Wilson, A., 2013. Models of settlement hierarchy based on partial evidence. Journal of Archaeological Science 40(5), 2415–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brülhart, M., Carrère, C. & Trionfetti, F., 2012. How wages and employment adjust to improved market access: evidence from Austria. Journal of International Economics 86, 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, D.L., 1973. Archaeology: the loss of innocence. Antiquity 47, 6–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, J.E. & Blake, M., 1994. The power of prestige: competitive generosity and the emergence of rank societies in lowland Mesoamerica, in Factional Competition and Political Development in the New World, eds Brumfiel, E. & Fox, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, R.D. & Weinstein, D.E., 2002. Bones, bombs, and break points: the geography of economic activity. American Economic Review 95(5), 1269–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, T., Fry, H., Wilson, A., Palmisano, A., Altaweel, M. & Radner, K., 2014. Application of an entropy maximizing and dynamics model for understanding settlement structure: the Khabur Triangle in the Middle Bronze and Iron Ages. Journal of Archaeological Science 43, 141–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dornan, J.L., 2002. Agency and archaeology: past, present, and future directions. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 9(4), 303–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eeckhout, J., 2004. Gibrat's Law for (all) cities. American Economic Review 94(5), 1429–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fouache, E., Rante, R., Dupays, M., et al. , 2016. Paleochannels of the Zerafshan river (Ouzbekistan) and human occupation since Neolithic in the oasis of Bukhara and Qaraqol: preliminary results. International Journal of Geohazards and Environment 2(3), 150–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frye, R.N., 2007. The History of Bukhara. Princeton (NJ): Markus Wiener.Google Scholar
Fujita, M., Krugman, P.R. & Venables, A.J., 1999. The Spatial Economy: Cities, regions, and international trade. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabaix, X., 1999. Zipf's law for cities: an explanation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(3), 739–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabaix, X. & Ioannides, Y., 2004. The evolution of city sizes’ distribution, in Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, vol. 4, Cities and Geography, eds Henderson, J.V. & Thisse, J.-F.. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2341–76.Google Scholar
Hayden, B., 1998. Practical and prestige technologies: the evolution of material systems. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 5(1), 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirzaakhmedov, D.J., Adilov, Š., Pardaev, M.K. & Maksydov, R., 2002. Kiziltepa kadimijatidan lavkhalar [Kiziltepa in the framework of antiquity]. Samarkand.Google Scholar
Pumain, D., 1997. Settlement size dynamics in history, in Modelling Space and Networks, ed. Holm, E.. Stockholm: GERUM, 3–32.Google Scholar
Rante, R., Fouache, E. & Mirzaakhmedov, D., 2016. Dynamics of human settlements ensuing from river transformation and changes in commercial behaviour: the birth of the ‘North-eastern Silk Road’. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 9, 437–47.Google Scholar
Rante, R. & Mirzaakhmedov, D.K., 2019. The Bukhara Oasis 1. Population, depopulation and settlement evolution. Leiden/Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redding, S.J. & Sturm, D.M., 2008. The costs of remoteness: evidence from German division and reunification. American Economic Review 98(5), 1766–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosing, K.E. 1966. A rejection of the Zipf model (Rank Size Rule) in relation to city size. Professional Geographer 18(2), 75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozenfeld, H.D., Rybski, D., Gabaix, X. & Makse, H.A., 2011. The area and population of cities: new insights from a different perspective on cities. American Economic Review 101, 2205–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvi Antonini, C. & Mirzaachmedov, D., 2009. Gli scavi di Uch Kulakh (Oasi di Bukhara). Rapporto preliminare, 1997–2007, Pisa/Rome: Fabrizio Serra Editore.Google Scholar
Simon, H., 1955. On a class of skew distribution functions. Biometrika 44, 425–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šiškin, V.A., 1940. Archeologičeskie raboty 1937 g. v zapadnoj časti Bucharskogo oazisa [Archaeological works in 1937 of the western side of the Oasis of Bukhara]. Tashkent.Google Scholar
Wason, P.K., 1994. The Archaeology of Rank. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, A.G., 1967. A statistical theory of spatial distribution models. Transportation Research 1, 253–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, A.G., 1969. The use of entropy maximising models, in the theory of trip distribution, mode split and route split. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 3(1), 108–26.Google Scholar
Wilson, A.G., [1970] 2011. Entropy in Urban and Regional Modelling. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wilson, A.G., 2000. Complex Spatial Systems. The modelling foundations of urban and regional analysis. Harlow: Prentice-Hall/Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Wilson, A.G., 2008. Boltzmann, Lotka and Volterra and spatial structural evolution: an integrated methodology for some dynamical systems. Journal of the Royal Society. Interface 5: 865–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, A.G., 2010. Entropy in urban and regional modelling: retrospect and prospect. Geographical Analysis 42, 364–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, A.G., 2012a. The Science of Cities and Regions: Lectures on mathematical model design. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, A.G., 2012b. Geographical modeling for archaeology and history: two case studies. Advances in Complex Systems 15, 1150008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zipf, K.G., 1941. National Unity and Disunity: The nation as a bio-social organism. Bloomington (IN): Principia Press.Google Scholar
Zipf, K.G., 1949. Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort. Cambridge (MA): Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar