Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T22:22:06.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Why Managers Fail to do the Right Thing: An Empirical Study of Unethical and Illegal Conduct

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Abstract:

We combine prior research on ethical decision-making in organizations with a rational choice theory of corporate crime from criminology to develop a model of corporate offending that is tested with a sample of U.S. managers. Despite demands for increased sanctioning of corporate offenders, we find that the threat of legal action does not directly affect the likelihood of misconduct. Managers’ evaluations of the ethics of the act, measured using a multidimensional ethics scale, have a significant effect, as do outcome expectancies that result from being associated with the misconduct but not facing formal sanctions. The threat of formal sanctions appears to operate indirectly, influencing ethical evaluations and outcome expectancies. Obedience to authority also affects illegal intentions, with managers reporting higher prospective offending when they are ordered to engage in misconduct by a supervisor.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Business Ethics Quarterly 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anand, V., Ashforth, B. E., and Joshi, M., M. 2004. “Business as Usual: The Acceptance and Perpetuation of Corruption in Organizations.Academy of Management Executive 18: 3953.Google Scholar
Andenaes, J. 1966. “The General Preventive Effects of Punishment.University of Pennsylvania Law Review 114 (May): 949–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andenaes, J. 1974. Punishment and Deterrence. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. C., and Gerbing, D. W. 1988. “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach.Psychological Bulletin 103: 411–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquino, K., and Reed, II., A. 2002. “The Self-Importance of Moral Identity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83(6): 1423–40.Google Scholar
Ashforth, B. E., and Anand, V. 2003. “The Normalization of Corruption in Organizations.Research in Organizational Behavior 25: 152.Google Scholar
Ayres, I., and Braithwaite, J. 1992. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bachman, R., Paternoster, R., and Ward, S. 1992. “The Rationality of Sexual Offending: Testing a Deterrence/Rational Choice Conception of Sexual Assault.Law & Society Review 26: 343–72.Google Scholar
Bagozzi, R. P., and Phillips, L. W. 1982. “Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Holistic Construct.Administrative Science Quarterly 27: 459–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagozzi, R. P., and Yi, Y. 1988. “On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16: 7494.Google Scholar
Bamberger, P. A., and Sonnenstuhl, W. J. 1998. Research in the Sociology of Organizations: Deviance In and Of Organizations, vol. 15. Stamford, Conn.: JAI Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. 2002. “Selective Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency.Journal of Moral Education 31(2): 101–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Pastorelli, C., and Regalia, C. 2001. “Socio-cognitive Self-Regulatory Mechanisms Governing Transgressive Behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80(1): 125–35.Google Scholar
Beccaria, C. 1963. On crimes and Punishments, trans. Paolucci, H. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. 1968. “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach.Journal of Political Economy 76: 169217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentler, P. M., and Bonett, D. G. 1980. “Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit Tests in the Analysis of Covariance Structures.Psychological Bulletin 88: 588606.Google Scholar
Block, M. K., Nold, F. C., and Sidak, J. G. 1981. “The Deterrent Effects of Antitrust Enforcement.Journal of Political Economy 89: 429–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, J. 1984. Corporate Crime in the Pharmaceutical Industry. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J., and Makkai, T. 1991. “Testing an Expected Utility Model of Corporate Offending.Law & Society Review 25: 739.Google Scholar
Brief, A. P., Dietz, J., Cohen, R. R., Pugh, S. D., and Vaslow, J. B. 2000. “Just Doing Business: Modern Racism and Obedience to Authority as Explanations for Employment Discrimination.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 81(1).Google Scholar
Burkett, S. R., and Ward, D. A. 1993. “A Note on Perceptual Deterrence, Religiously Based Moral Condemnation, and Social Control.Criminology 31: 119–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, R. V., and Felson, M. 1993. “Introduction: Criminology, Routine Activity, and Rational Choice.” In Advances in Criminology Theory: Routine Activity and Rational Choice, ed. Clarke, R. V. and Felson, M., vol. 5. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction, 114.Google Scholar
Clinard, M. 1983. Corporate Ethics and Crime. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Clinard, M. B., and Yeager, P. 1980. Corporate Crime. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., and Aiken, L. S. 2003. Applied Multiple Regression/ Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd ed. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. W. 1990. The Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cornish, D. B., and Clarke, R. V. 1986. The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Economist. 2004a. “The Case against the Prosecution” (February 28): 6768.Google Scholar
Economist. 2004b. “Justice for Bosses” (June 10).Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. 1988. The Moral Dimension. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Ferrell, O. C., and Gresham, L. G. 1985. “A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing.Journal of Marketing 49(3): 8796.Google Scholar
Ferrell, O. C., Gresham, L. G., and Fraedrich, J. 1989. “A Synthesis of Ethical Decision Models for Marketing.Journal of Macromarketing 9(2): 5564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flannery, B. L., and May, D. R. 2000. “Environmental Ethical Decision Making in the U.S. Metal Finishing Industry.Academy of Management Journal 43: 642–62.Google Scholar
Geis, G., and Salinger, L. S. 1998. “Antitrust and Organizational Deviance.” In Bamberger and Sonnenstuhl 1998: 71110.Google Scholar
Gibbs, J. P. 1975. Crime, Punishment, and Deterrence. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Grasmick, H. G., and Bursik, R. J. Jr., 1990. “Conscience, Significant Others and Rational Choice: Extending the Deterrence Model.Law & Society Review 24: 837–62.Google Scholar
Grasmick, H. G., and Green, D. E. 1980. “Legal Punishment, Social Disapproval, and Internalization as Inhibitors of Illegal Behavior.Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 71: 325–35.Google Scholar
Hawkins, G. 1969. “Punishment and Deterrence: The Educative, Moralizing, and Ha-bituative Effects.Wisconsin Law Review 2: 550–65.Google Scholar
Hayduk, L. A. 1987. Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL: Essentials and Advances. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hegarty, W. H., and Sims, H. P. Jr., 1978. “Some Determinants of Unethical Decision Behavior: An Experiment.Journal of Applied Psychology 63: 451–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, S. D., and Vasquez-Parraga, A. Z. 1993. “Organisational Consequences, Marketing Ethics, and Salesforce Supervision.Journal of Marketing Research 30(1): 7890.Google Scholar
Hunt, S. D., and Vitell, S. J. 1986. “A General Theory of Marketing Ethics.Journal of Macromarketing 6 (Spring): 516.Google Scholar
Hunt, S. D., and Vitell, S. J. 1993. “A General Theory of Marketing Ethics: A Retrospective and Revision.” In Ethics in Marketing, ed. Smith, N. C. and Quelch, J. A. Homewood, Ill.: Irwin.Google Scholar
Jackall, R. 1988. Moral Mazes. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jesilow, P., Geis, G., and O'Brien, M. J. 1986. “Experimental Evidence that Publicity Has No Effect in Suppressing Auto Repair Fraud.Sociology and Social Research 70: 222–23.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. 2003. “Panel Boosts Penalties for White-Collar Offenses.Washington Post (January 9): E1.Google Scholar
Jones, T. M. 1991. “Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model.Academy of Management Review 16: 366–95.Google Scholar
Jones, T. M., and Ryan, L. V. 1997. “The Link between Ethical Judgment and Action in Organizations: A Moral Approbation Approach.Organization Science 8(6): 663–80.Google Scholar
Jones, T. M., and Ryan, L. V. 1998. “The Effect of Organizational Forces on Individual Morality: Judgment, Moral Approbation, and Behavior.Business Ethics Quarterly 8(3): 433–46.Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G., and Sörbom, D. 1993. LISREL VIII. Chicago: SPSS.Google Scholar
Kelman, H. C., and Hamilton, V. L. 1989. Crimes of Obedience: Toward a Social Psychology of Authority and Responsibility. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kidder, R. M. 2005. Moral Courage. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Klepper, S., and D. Nagin, D. 1989. “The Deterrent Effect of Perceived Certainty and Severity of Punishment Revisited.Criminology 27: 721–46.Google Scholar
Koford, K. J., and Miller, J. B. 1991. “Habit, Custom, and Norms in Economics.” In Social Norms and Economic Institutions, ed. Koford, K. J. and Miller, J. B. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2138.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, Lawrence. 1969. Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach to Socialization. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Kram, K. F., Yeager, P. C., and Reed, G. E. 1989. “Decisions and Dilemmas: The Ethical Dimension in the Corporate Context.” In Research on Corporate Social Policy and Performance, vol. 11, ed. Post, J. E. Greenwich, Conn.: Jail Press, 5276.Google Scholar
Laufer, W. S. 1999. “Corporate Liability, Risk Shifting, and the Paradox of Compliance.Vanderbilt Law Review 52: 13431420.Google Scholar
Makkai, T., and Braithwaite, J. 1994. “The Dialectics of Corporate Deterrence.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 31: 347–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgram, S. 1963. “Behavioral Study of Obedience.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67: 371–78.Google Scholar
Morris, S. A., Rehbein, K. A., Hosseini, J. C., and Armacost, R. L. 1995. “A Test of Environmental, Situational, and Personal Influences on the Ethical Intentions of CEOs.Business and Society 34(2): 119–46.Google Scholar
Nagin, D. 1978. “General Deterrence: A Review of the Literature.” In Deterrence and Incapacitation: Estimating the Effects of Criminal Sanctions on Crime Rates, ed. Bloomstein, A., Cohen, J., and Nagin, D. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 95139.Google Scholar
Nagin, D. 1998. “Criminal Deterrence Research at the Outset of the Twenty-First Century.” In Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 23, ed. Tonry, M. Chicago: University of Chicago, 142.Google Scholar
Nagin, D., and Paternoster, R. 1991. “Preventive Effects of the Perceived Risk of Arrest: Testing an Expanded Conception of Deterrence.Criminology 29: 561–85.Google Scholar
Nagin, D., and Paternoster, R. 1994. “Personal Capital and Social Control: The Deterrence Implications of a Theory of Individual Differences in Offending.Criminology 32: 581606.Google Scholar
Paternoster, R. 1987. “The Deterrent Effect of the Perceived Certainty and Severity of Punishment: A Review of the Evidence and Issues.Justice Quarterly 4: 173217.Google Scholar
Paternoster, R., and Simpson, S. S. 1993. “A Rational Choice Theory of Corporate Crime.” In Advances in Criminology Theory: Routine Activity and Rational Choice, vol. 5, ed. Clarke, R. V. and Felson, M. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction, 3758.Google Scholar
Paternoster, R., and Simpson, S. S. 1996. “Sanction Threats and Appeals to Morality: Testing a Rational Choice Model of Corporate Crime.Law & Society Review 30: 549–83.Google Scholar
Petty, R. D. 2000. “Teaching Marketing Law: A Business Law Perspective on Integrating Marketing and Law.Journal of Marketing Education 22(2): 129–37.Google Scholar
Piliavin, I., Gartner, R., Thornton, C., and Matsueda, R. 1986. “Crime, Deterrence, and Choice.American Sociological Review 57: 101–19.Google Scholar
Pogarsky, G. 2004. “Projected Offending and Contemporaneous Rule-Violation: Implications for Heterotypic Continuity.Criminology 42: 111–36.Google Scholar
Reed, G. E., and Yeager, P. C. 1996. “Organizational Offending and Neoclassical Criminology: Challenging the Reach of a General Theory of Crime.Criminology 34: 357–82.Google Scholar
Reidenbach, R. E., and Robin, D. P. 1990. “Toward the Development of a Multidimensional Scale for Improving Evaluations of Business Ethics.Journal of Business Ethics 9: 639–53.Google Scholar
Rest, J. R. 1979. Development in Judging Moral Issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M. J., and Thoma, S. J. 1999. Postconventional Moral Thinking: A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rossi, P. H., and Nock, S. L. 1982. Measuring Social Judgments: The Factorial Survey Approach. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W. 1993. “Defiance, Deterrence, and Irrelevance: A Theory of the Criminal Sanction.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 30: 445–73.Google Scholar
Simpson, S. S. 2002. Corporate Crime, Law, and Social Control. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, S. S., and Koper, C. S. 1992. “Deterring Corporate Crime.Criminology 30: 201–29.Google Scholar
Simpson, S. S., Paternoster, R., and Piquero, N. L. 1998. “Exploring the Micro-Macro Link in Corporate Crime Research.” In Bamberger and Sonnenstuhl 1998: 3568.Google Scholar
Simpson, S. S., and Piquero, N. L. 2002. “Low Self-Control, Organizational Theory, and Corporate Crime.Law & Society Review 36: 509–48.Google Scholar
Sorkin, A. R., and Bayot, J. 2005. “Ex-Tyco Officers Get 8 to 25 Years.New York Times (September 20): A1.Google Scholar
Stewart, J. B. 1991. Den of Thieves. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Stone, C. D. 1975. Where the Law Ends. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Stotland, E., Brintnall, M., L'Heureux, A., and Ashmore, E. 1980. “Do Convictions Deter Home Repair Fraud?” In White Collar Crime: Theory and Research, ed. Geis, G. and Stotland, E. Beverly Hills: Sage, 252–65.Google Scholar
Sutherland, E. H. 1940. “White-Collar Criminality.American Sociological Review 5(1): 112.Google Scholar
Sutherland, E. H. 1983 (first published 1949). White-Collar Crime. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Tenbrunsel, A. E. 1998. “Misrepresentation and Expectations of Misrepresentation in an Ethical Dilemma: The Role of Incentives and Temptation.Academy of Management Journal 41(3): 330–39.Google Scholar
Tittle, C. 1980. Sanctions and Social Deviance: The Question of Deterrence. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Treviño, L. K. 1986. “Ethical Decision Making in Irganizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model.Academy of Management Review 11: 601–17.Google Scholar
Treviño, L. K., and Weaver, G. R. 2003. Managing Ethics in Business Organizations. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford Business Books.Google Scholar
Treviño, L. K., and Youngblood, S. A. 1990. Bad Apples in Bad Barrels: A Causal Analysis of Ethical Decision Making Behavior.” Journal of Applied Psychology 75: 378–85.Google Scholar
Vaughan, D. 1998. “Rational Choice, Situated Action, and Social Control.Law & Society Review 32: 2361.Google Scholar
Weaver, G. R., and Treviño, L. K. 1999. “Compliance and Values Oriented Ethics Programs: Influences on Employees’ Attitudes and Behavior.” Business Ethics Quarterly 9: 315–35.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., and Britt, C. 2003. Statistics in Criminal Justice. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Williams, K. R., and Hawkins, R. 1986. “Perceptual Research on General Deterrence: A Critical Overview.Law & Society Review 20: 545–72.Google Scholar
Williams, K. R., and Hawkins, R. 1989. “The Meaning of Arrest for Wife Assault.Criminology 27: 163–81.Google Scholar