Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T09:18:01.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Side effects of solvents, especially acetone, used for the application of juvenile hormone mimics and chemosterilants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

B. R. Critchley  and
A. A. Almeida
B. R. Critchley
Affiliation:
Centre for Overseas Pest Research, College House, Wrights Lane, London W8 5SJ
A. A. Almeida
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Applied Entomology, Imperial College, London SW 7
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Acetone at a dose of 1 μl was one of the least toxic of 11 solvents applied topically to fifth-instar nymphs of Dysdercus fasciatus Sign., while ctronellal, n-dodecane and n-tridecane at a dose of 0.5 μl were the most toxic. Acetone applied at 0.3 μl to third- and fourth-instar numphs caused negligible mortalities but about 60% of the treated nymphs gave rise to abnormal adults which, although capable of mating, laid eggs which were significantly less fertile than those from treated individuals which emerged as normal adults. These abnormalities could be attributed to a hormonal imbalance. Apparently normal adults arising from nymphs treated at the third instar with 0.6 μl acetone had 35% fertile matings (controls 70%) due to interference in the production and transference of motile sperm. The effects of acetone as a solvent in laboratory experiments could therefore be confounded with those attributed to juvenile hormones.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 63 , Issue 1 , August 1973 , pp. 1 - 6
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ascher, K.R.S. (1965). Oviposition inhibiting agents: a screening for simple model substances. –Int. Pest Control 7 (1), 8–11.Google Scholar
Bonnemaison, L. (1969). Action stérilisante du tepa et du D.M.S.O. sur divers insectes. –Phytiat.–Phytopharm. 17, 105–117.Google Scholar
Carlisle, D.B. & Ellis, P.E. (1968). Insect hormones: olive oil is not an inert vehicle for hormone injections into locusts. – Science, N.Y. 162, 1393–1394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, R.F. (1969). The insects: structure and function. – 819 pp. London, English Universities Press.Google Scholar
Critchley, B.R. & Campion, D.G. (1971). Effects of a juvenile hormone analogue on growth and reproduction in the cotton stainer Dysdercus fasciatus Say. – Bull. ent. Res. 61, 49–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdman, H. E. (1966). Effects of dimethylsulfoxide on productivity of X-irradiated flour beetles. – Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 130, 157–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodjat, S.H. (1969). The effects of crowding on the survival, rate of development, size, colour and fecundity of Dysdercus fasciatus Sign. (Hem., Pyrrhocoridae) in the laboratory. – Bull. ent. Res. 58, 487–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homberger, E., Benz, G. & Thommen, H. (1971). Investigations with dichlorofarnesenic acid ethyl ester on the cotton stainer Dysdercus cingulatus Fabr. – Mitt, schweiz. ent. Ges. 44, 193–196.Google Scholar
Kreasky, J.B. & Mazuranich, P.C. (1971). Effects of sublethal doses of naled, carbaryl, malathion, and acetone on the migratory grasshopper. – J. econ. Ent. 64, 1300–1301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wigglesworth, V.B. (1970). Insect hormones. – 159 pp. Edinburgh, Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar