Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:02:07.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Control of pink boll worm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) (Lepidop-tera: Gelechiidae), in Egypt by mating disruption using an aerially applied microencapsulated pheromone formulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

B. R. Critchley
Affiliation:
Tropical Development and Research Institute, College House, Wrights Lane, London W8 5SJ, UK.
D. G. Campion
Affiliation:
Tropical Development and Research Institute, College House, Wrights Lane, London W8 5SJ, UK.
L. J. McVeigh
Affiliation:
Tropical Development and Research Institute, College House, Wrights Lane, London W8 5SJ, UK.
P. Hunter-Jones
Affiliation:
Tropical Development and Research Institute, College House, Wrights Lane, London W8 5SJ, UK.
D. R. Hall
Affiliation:
Tropical Development and Research Institute, 56-62 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8LU, UK.
A. R. Cork
Affiliation:
Tropical Development and Research Institute, 56-62 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8LU, UK.
B. F. Nesbitt
Affiliation:
Tropical Development and Research Institute, 56-62 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8LU, UK.
G. J. Marrs
Affiliation:
Imperial Chemical Industries PLC, Plant Protection Division, Jealott's Hill Research Station, Bracknell, Berkshire RG12 6EY, UK.
A. R. Jutsum
Affiliation:
Imperial Chemical Industries PLC, Plant Protection Division, Jealott's Hill Research Station, Bracknell, Berkshire RG12 6EY, UK.
M. M. Hosny
Affiliation:
Plant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
El-Sayed A. Nasr
Affiliation:
Plant Protection Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture, Cairo, Egypt.

Abstract

A large–scale mating disruption trial for the control of Pectinophora gossypiella (Saund.) was carried out in the Fayoum Province of Egypt during the 1981 cotton season. Two areas, each of 50 ha, were sprayed with a microencapsulated formulation of the sex pheromone (a 1:1 mixture of (Z, Z)- and (Z, E)-1, 11-hexadecadienyl acetate) as the sole means of controlling this pest. Five applications of 10 g a.i./ha were made during the season using fixed-wing aircraft. The pheromone treatments were compared with conventional insecticide spray treatments in two other 50-ha areas of cotton. From comparisons of treatments in terms of various plant damage criteria including the percentage of rosetted flowers, percentage boll infestation, gross yield of seed cotton and lint quality, it was concluded that the pheromone treatment was equal in effect to the insecticide sprays.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balls, W. L. (1928). Studies of quality in cotton. — 376 pp. London, McMillan.Google Scholar
Brader, L. (1979). Integrated pest control in the developing world. — A. Rev. Ent. 24, 225254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, T. W.Doane, C. C. & Staten, R. T. (1979). Experience with the first commercial pheromone communication disruptive for suppression of an agricultural pest. —pp. 375388in Ritter, F. J.. (Ed.). Chemical ecology:odour communication in animals. — 427 pp. Amsterdam, Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press.Google Scholar
Campion, D. G. (1976). Sex pheromones for the control of lepidopterous pests using microencapsulation and dispenser techniques. — Pestic. Sci. 7, 636641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Critchley, B. R.El-Deib, Y. A. (1981). An improved pheromone trap for the mass-trapping of cotton leafworm moths in Egypt. — Appropriate Technology for Egyptian Agriculture 4, 610.Google Scholar
Doane, C. C. & Brooks, T. W. (1981). Research and development of pheromones for insect control with emphasis on the pink bollworm. —pp. 285303 in Mitchell, E.R. (Ed.). Management of insect pests with semiochemicals: concepts and practice. — 514 pp. New York & London, Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Gubbins, K. E.Campion, D. G. (1982). Economic aspects of pheromone trapping techniques for the control of the Egyptian cotton leafworm. — Outlook on Agriculture 11, 6266.Google Scholar
Hagstrum, D. W.Davis, L. R. Jr., (1982). Mate–seeking behavior and reduced mating by Ephestia cautella (Walker) in a sex pheromone-permeated atmosphere. J. Chem. Ecol 8, 507515.Google Scholar
Hall, D. R., Nesbitt, B. F., Marrs, G. J., Green, A. St. J., Campion, D. G.Critchley, B. R. (1982). Development of microencapsulated pheromone formulations. —pp. 131143in Leonhardt, B. A.Beroza, M.. (Eds.). Insect pheromone technology: chemistry and applications. — 260 pp. Washington, D.C., American Chemical Society (ACS Symposium Series no. 190).Google Scholar
Hosny, M. M. (1980). The control of cotton pests in EgyptOutlook on Agriculture 10, 204205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isa, A. L. (1981). Cotton pest problems in Egypt. — IX Int. Congr. Pl. Prot. 2, 545547.Google Scholar
Johnstone, D. R. (1982). Factors affecting aerial application of a microencapsulated pheromone formulation for the control of Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) by communication disruption on cotton in Egypt. — Misc. Rep. Centre Overseas Pest Res. no. 56, 11 pp.Google Scholar
Kydonieus, A. F.Beroza, M. (1981). The Hercon dispenser formulation and recent test results. — pp. 445453 in Mitchell, E.R.. (Ed.). Management of insect pests with semiochemicals: concepts and practice. — 514 pp. New York & London, Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Pearson, E. O. (1958). The insect pests of cotton in tropical Africa. — 355 pp. London, Emp. Cott. Gr. Corp. & Commonw. Inst. Ent.Google Scholar
Sower, L. L., Turner, W. K.Fish, J. C. (1975). Population-density-dependent mating frequency among Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae) in the presence of synthetic sex pheromone with behavioral observations. — J. Chem. Ecol. 1, 335342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sower, L. L.Whitmer, G. P. (1977). Population growth and mating success of Indian meal moths and almond moths in the presence of synthetic sex pheromone. — Environ. Entomol. 6, 1720.Google Scholar