Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T08:18:37.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysing host location in Uscana lariophaga (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae), an egg parasitoid of bruchids (Coleoptera: Bruchidae), using Cox's proportional hazards model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

G.J. Ormel ,
G. Gort  and
F.A.N. van Alebeek
G.J. Ormel
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands
G. Gort
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands
F.A.N. van Alebeek*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands
*
F.A.N. van Alebeek, Department of Entomology, Wageningen Agricultural University, PO Box 8031, 6700 EH Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Uscana lariophaga Steffan is an egg parasitoid of the bruchid species Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius) and Bruchidius atrolineatus Pic in West Africa, which cause damage in stored cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (Leguminosae)). In a no-choice situation, the attractiveness of some odour sources to the parasitoid was studied in a simple diffusion olfactometer. Cox's proportional hazards model was used for data analysis. The results showed that cowpea beans were more attractive to naive U. lariophaga females than glass beads. Baits with host eggs were more attractive than baits without eggs. Experienced females did not perform any better than naive ones. The relationship between the inclination to fly of the parasitoids, and the baits used, was difficult to interpret. Changes in searching activity between the different weeks of experimentation were observed. Only a small part of this variation could be explained by (absolute) changes in barometric pressure.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 85 , Issue 1 , March 1995 , pp. 113 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitkin, M., Anderson, D., Francis, B. & Hinde, J. (1990) Statistical Modelling in GLIM. 374pp. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Appiah, O. (1991) Uscana lariophaga Steffan (Hymn.: Trichogrammatidae), egg parasitoid of Callosobruchus maculatus (Col.: Bruchidae): diurnal rhythm and eclosion. 38 pp. MSc thesis. Wageningen Agricultural University, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Biémont, J.C., Chauvin, G. & Germain, J.F. (1982) L'oeuf de Bruchidius atrolineatus (Pic) et son système de fixation. Canadian Journal of Zoology 60, 2610–2615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bin, F., Vinson, S.B., Strand, M.R., Colazza, S. & Jones, W.A. (1993) Source of an egg kairomone for Trissokus basalis, a parasitoid of Nezara viridula. Physiological Entomology 18, 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourarach, J. & Hawlitzky, N. (1984) Attractivité des oeufs de Spodoptera littoralis (Bsd) et Helicoverpa armigera (Hb) (Lep.: Noctuidae) pour Trichogrammatoidea lutea (G) et Trichogramma rhenana Voegelé et Russo (Hym.: Trichogrammatidae). Actes de l′Institut Agronomique et Vétérinaire 4, 137–141.Google Scholar
Bressers, M., Meelis, E., Haccou, P. & Kruk, M. (1991) When did it really start or stop: the impact of censored observations on the analysis of duration. Behavioural Processes 23, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brower, J.H. (1991) Influence of light on dispersal of Trichogramma pretiosum in a warehouse. Trichogramma and other egg parasitoids. Proceedings 3rd international symposium (23–27 September 1990). San Antonio (Tx, USA). Les Colloaues de l′INRA 56, 55–58.Google Scholar
Cork, A., Hall, D.R., Blaney, W.M. & Simmonds, M.S.J. (1991) Identification of a component of the female sex pheromone of Callosobruchus analis (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Tetrahedron Letters 32, 129–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, D.R. (1972) Regression models and life tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 34, 187–220.Google Scholar
Credland, P.P. & Wright, A.W. (1990) Oviposition deterrents of Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Physiological Entomology 15, 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, L., Pintureau, B. & Voegele, J. (1979) Un nouveau type d'olfactomètre. Application à la mesure de la capacité de recherche et à la localisation des substances attractives de l'hôte chez les Trichogrammes [Hym. Trichogrammatidae]. Annales de Zoologie et Ecologie Animale 11 (4), 271–279.Google Scholar
Gardner, S.M. & Lenteren, J.C. van (1986) Characterisation of the arrestment responses of Trichogramma evanescens. Oecologia 68, 265–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, H.R., Lewis, W.J. & Nordlund, D.A. (1981) Trichogramma pretiosum: effect of pre-release parasitization experience on retention in release areas and efficiency. Environmental Entomology 10, 554–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haccou, P. & Hemerik, L. (1985) The influence of larval dispersal in the Cinnabar Moth (Tyria Jacobaeae) on predation by the red wood ant (Formica Polyctena): an analysis based on the proportional hazards model. Journal of Animal Ecology 54, 755–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haccou, P., Vlas, S.J. de, Alphen, J.J.M. van & Visser, M.E. (1991) Information processing by foragers: effects of intra patch experiences on the leaving tendency of Leptopilina heterotoma. Journal of Animal Ecology 60, 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemerik, L., Driesen, G. & Haccou, P. (1993) Effects of intrapatch experiences on patch time, search time and searching efficiency of the parasitoid Leptopilina clavipes. Journal of Animal Ecology 62, 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huis, A. vanKaashoek, N.K. & Maes, H.M. (1991a) Biological control of bruchids (Col.: Bruchidae) in stored pulses by using egg parasitoids of the genus Uscana (Hymn.: Trichogrammatidae): a review. pp. 99–108in Fleurat-Lessard, E. & Ducom, P. (Eds) Proceedings of the 5th International Working Conference on Stored-Product Protection. I. (9–14 September 1990), Bordeaux. Paris, INRA.Google Scholar
Huis, A. Van, Wijkamp, M.G.Lammers, P.M., Klein, Goldewijk C.G.M., Seeters, J.H. & Kaashoek, N.K. (1991b) Uscana lariophaga (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae), an egg parasitoid of bruchid beetle (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) storage pests in West Africa: host-age and host-species selection. Bulletin of Entomological Research 81, 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackai, L.E.N. & Daoust, R.A. (1986) Insect pests of cowpeas. Annual Review of Entomology 31, 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, O., Pham-Delegue, M.H., Hawlitzky, N. & Masson, C. (1987) Comportement de recherche et d'oviposition de Trichogramma maidis Pint, et Voeg. (Hymn.: Trichogrammatidae): analyse quantitative en conditions contrôlées. Compte Rendu de l′Academie des Sciences, Paris. Série III. 305, 95–99.Google Scholar
Kaiser, L., Pham-Delegue, M.H., Backchine, E. & Masson, C. (1989) Olfactory responses of Trichogramma maidis Pint, et Voeg.: effects of chemical cues and behavioral plasticity. Journal of Insect Behavior 2, 701–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalbfleisch, J.D. & Prentice, R.L. (1980) The statistical analysis of failure time data. 321 pp. New York, Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Laing, J. (1937) Host finding by insect parasites. I. Observations on the finding of hosts by Alysia mandicator, Mormoniella vitripennis and Trichogramma evanescens. Journal of Animal Ecology 6, 298–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendel, Z., Dunkelbaum, E. & Robison, D. (1990) Sexual behavior of Masucoccus josephi (Homoptera: Margarodidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 16, 2341–2352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Messina, F.J., Kemp, J.L. & Dickson, J.A. (1992) Plasticity in the egg-spacing behavior of a seed beetle: effects of host deprivation and seed patchiness (Coleoptera: bruchidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 5, 609–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noldus, L.P.J.J. & van Lenteren, J.C. (1985) Kairomones for the egg parasite Trichogramma evanescens Westwood. II. Effects of contact chemicals produced by two of its hosts, Pieris brassica L. and Pieris rapae L. Journal of Chemical Ecology 11, 793–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noldus, L.P.J.J., van Lenteren, J.C. & Lewis, W. J. (1991) How trichogramma parasitoids use moth sex pheromones as kairomones: orientation behaviour in a windtunnel. Physiological Entomology 16, 313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordlund, D.A., Chalfant, R.B., Lewis, W.J. (1985) Response of Trichogramma pretiosum to volatile synonomes from tomato plants. Journal of Entomological Science 20, 372–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pajni, H.R. & Gupta, S. (1990) Role of antennal sensillae in perception of sex pheromone in bruchids, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) and C. chinensis (L.). Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 28, 174–178.Google Scholar
Pak, G.A., Berkhout, H. & Klapwijk, J. (1991) Do Trichogramma look for hosts? Trichogramma and other egg parasitoids. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium (23–27 September, 1990) San Antonio (Tx, USA). Les Colloaues de l′INRA 56, 77–80.Google Scholar
Prentice, R.L. & Kalbfleisch, J.D. (1978) The analysis of failure times in the presence of competing risks. Biometrics 34, 541–554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renou, M., Hawlitzky, N., Berthier, A., Malosse, C. & Ramiandrasoa, F. (1989) Mise en évidence d'une activité kairomonale des oeufs de la pyrale du mai's sur les femelles de Trichogramma maidis. Entomophaga 34, 569–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. (1991) SAS technical report P-217, SAS/STAT Software: the PHREG Procedure version 6. 59 pp. Cary, SAS Institute Incorporation.Google Scholar
Shu, S. & Jones, R.L. (1989) Kinetic effects of a kairomone in moth scales of European corn borer on Trichogramma nubilale Ertle & Davies (Hym.: Trichogrammatidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 2, 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G.W. & Cochran, W.G. (1989) Statistical methods. 503 pp. Ames, Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Steinberg, S., Dicke, M., Vet, L.E.M. & Wanningen, R. (1992) Response of the braconid parasitoid Cotesia (=Apanteles) glomerata to volatile infochemicals: effects of bioassay set-up, parasitoid age and experience and barometric flux. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 63, 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strand, M.R., Williams, H.J., Vinson, S.B. & Mudd, A. (1989) Kairomonal activities of 2-acylcyclohexane-1,3 diones produced by Ephestia kuehniella Zeller in eliciting searching behavior by the parasitoid Bracon hebetor (Say). Journal of Chemical Ecology 15, 1491–1600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, K., Ohsawa, K., Honda, H. & Yamamoto, I. (1981) Copulation release pheromone, erectin, from the azuki bean weevil (Callosobruchus chinensis L.). Journal of Pesticide Science 6, 75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teal, P.E.A., Tumlinson, J.H. & Heath, R.R. (1986) Chemical and behavioral analyses of volatile sex pheromone components released by calling Heliothis virescens (F.) females (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 12, 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vet, L.E.M. & Dicke, M. (1992) Ecology of infochemical use by natural enemies in a tritrophic context. Annual Review of Entomology 37, 141–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vet, L.E.M. & Papaj, D.R. (1992) Effects of experience on parasitoid movement in odour plumes. Physiological Entomology 17, 90–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vet, L.E.M., Lewis, W.J., Papaj, D.R. & van Lenteren, J.C. (1990) A variable-response model for parasitoid foraging behaviour. Journal of Insect Behavior 3, 471–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinson, S.B. (1984a) Parasitoid-host relationships, pp. 205–233 in Bell, W.J. & Cardé, R.T. (Eds) Chemical ecology of insects. London, Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinson, S.B. (1984b) How parasitoids locate their hosts: a case of insect espionage, pp. 325–348in Lewis, T. (Ed.) Insect communication. London, Academic Press (Proceedings of the 12th Symposium of the Royal Entomological Society of London, 7–9 September 1983).Google Scholar
Wysoki, M. & De Jong, M. (1989) Attraction of Trichogramma platneri to eggs of some lepidopterous pests of avocado. Phytoparasitica 17, 315–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar