Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:08:20.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fermentation kinetics of the carbohydrate fraction of fresh forage, silage and hay of Avena sativa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

S. Calabrò
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione degli alimenti, University of Naples “Federico II” Via F. Delpino, 1 – 80137, Napoli, Italy
F. Bovera
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione degli alimenti, University of Naples “Federico II” Via F. Delpino, 1 – 80137, Napoli, Italy
F. Zicarelli
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione degli alimenti, University of Naples “Federico II” Via F. Delpino, 1 – 80137, Napoli, Italy
R. Tudisco
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione degli alimenti, University of Naples “Federico II” Via F. Delpino, 1 – 80137, Napoli, Italy
M.I. Cutrignelli
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione degli alimenti, University of Naples “Federico II” Via F. Delpino, 1 – 80137, Napoli, Italy
G. Piccolo
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione degli alimenti, University of Naples “Federico II” Via F. Delpino, 1 – 80137, Napoli, Italy
F. Infascelli
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche e Ispezione degli alimenti, University of Naples “Federico II” Via F. Delpino, 1 – 80137, Napoli, Italy
Get access

Summary

The aim of the present paper was to study the fermentation characteristics and kinetics of the carbohydrate fractions of fresh, ensiled and hay of oats (Avena sativa) using the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System (CNCPS) and the in vitro gas production technique (GPT). The whole forage and its NDF and EIR (ethanol insoluble residue) fractions were incubated in order to estimate the fermentation kinetics of carbohydrate fractions (A, B1 and B2) with the curve subtraction method. The carbohydrates fermentation kinetics estimated with the GPT agree with the three CNCPS carbohydrate fractions and explain some modification due to forage preservation methods. For all forages, the fermentation rate of the three CNCPS carbohydrate fractions showed the same ranking A > B1 > B2. Fermentation rate value (RM: 0.163, 0.057, 0.032 h-1 A, B1, B2 fraction for fresh oats; 0.106, 0.032, 0.016 h-1 for A, B1, B2 fractions of ensiled oats; 0.165, 0.051, 0.022 h-1 A, B1, B2 fraction for oats hay) could be used as kd in the CNCPS.

Resumen

Resumen

El objetivo del presente trabajo fue estudiar las características de fermentación y la cinética de las fracciones de carbohidratos de la avena (Avena sativa) fresca, ensilada y heno empleando el sistema de proteína y carbohidratos netos de Cornell “Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System (CNCPS)” y la técnica de producción de gas in vitro (IV). El forraje completo y sus fracciones FDN y RIE (residuo insoluble en etanol) fueron incubadas para estimar la cinética de fermentación de las fracciones de carbohidratos (A, B1 y B2) con el método de substracción de curva. La cinética de fermentación de los carbohidratos estimada IV concuerda con la estimada por las tres fracciones del CNCPS y ayuda a explicar algunas de las modificaciones en el forraje debidas a los métodos de conservación. En todos los forrajes, la tasa de fermentación de las tres fracciones de carbohidratos del CNCPS mostraron el mismo orden A > B1 > B2. El valor de la tasa de fermentación (RM: 0.163, 0.057, 0.032 h-1 Fracciones A, B1, B2 de la avena fresca; 0.106, 0.032, 0.016 h-1 para A, B1, B2 en avena ensilada, y; 0.165, 0.051, 0.022 h-1 para A, B1, B2 en el heno de avena) podrían ser empleadas como kd en el sistema CNCPS.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AOAC, Official methods of analysis. (1990). Vol. II.Google Scholar
Davies, Z.S., Mason, D., Brooks, A.E., Griffith, G.W., Merry, R.J. and Theodoou, M.K. (2000). Animal Feed Science and Technology 83: 205211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doane, P.H., Schofield, P. and Pell, A.N. (1998). Ensiling effects on the ethanol fractionation of forages using gas production. Journal of Animal Science 76: 888895 Google Scholar
Doane, P.H., Schofield, P. and Pell, A.N. (1997). The effects of preservation method on the neutral detergent soluble fraction of forages. Journal of Animal Science 75: 11401148 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Groot, J.C.J., Cone, J.W., Williams, B.A. and Debersaques, F.M.A. (1996). Multiphasic analysis of gas production kinetics for in vitro fermentation of ruminant feedstuff. Animal Feed Science and Technology 64: 7789 Google Scholar
Pell, A. N., Pitt, R.E., Doane, P.H. and Schofield, P. (1998). The Development, use and application of gas production techniques at Cornell University, USA. In: In vitro techniques for measuring nutrient supply to ruminants. British Society of Animal Science, Occasional Publication No.22 pp 4553 Google Scholar
Schofield, P. and Pell, A.N. (1995). Measurement and kinetics analysis of the neutral detergent – soluble carbohydrate fraction of legumes and grasses. Journal of Animal Science 73: 34553463 Google Scholar
Sniffen, C.J., O’Connor, J.D., Van Soest, P.J., Fox, D.G. and Russel, J.B. (1992). A Net carbohydrate and Protein System for Evaluating Cattle Diets: II. Carbohydrate and Protein Availability. Journal of Animal Science 70: 35623577 Google Scholar
Theodorou, M.K., Williams, B.A., Dhanoa, M.S., McAllan, A.B. and France, J. (1994). A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminal feeds. Animal Feed Science Technology 48: 185197 Google Scholar
Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B. and Lewis, B.A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-strarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 35833595 Google Scholar