Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T20:17:35.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Decentering as a Common Link among Mindfulness, Cognitive Reappraisal, and Social Anxiety

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2012

Sarah Hayes-Skelton  and
Jessica Graham
Sarah Hayes-Skelton*
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts Boston, USA
Jessica Graham
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts Boston, USA
*
Reprint requests to Sarah Hayes-Skelton, University of Massachusetts Boston – Psychology, 100 Morrissey Blvd., Boston, Massachusetts 02125, USA. E-mail: sarah.hayes@umb.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: The tendency to employ both cognitive reappraisal and mindfulness are associated with reduced trait social anxiety; however, it is unclear whether reappraisal and mindfulness are associated with social anxiety through the same mechanisms. It has been proposed that decentering, or the process of seeing thoughts or feelings as objective events in the mind rather than personally identifying with them, may be a key mechanism underlying both cognitive reappraisal and mindfulness. Aims: To examine the relationships between reappraisal, mindfulness, decentering, and social anxiety. Method: This study utilized structural equation modeling to examine the relationships among cognitive reappraisal, mindfulness, decentering, and social anxiety in a large cross-sectional study. Results: Results indicate that the relationship between mindfulness and social anxiety is partially accounted for by decentering, whereas the relationship between cognitive reappraisal and social anxiety is more fully accounted for by decentering. Conclusions: These results imply that decentering may be a common mechanism underlying both cognitive reappraisal and mindfulness, although mindfulness may also affect social anxiety through additional mechanisms. However, given the cross-sectional nature of these findings, results should be considered preliminary, with future research being needed to further elucidate these relationships.

Keywords

Social anxietymindfulnesscognitive appraisals
Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , May 2013 , pp. 317 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. and Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.Google Scholar
Arch, J. J. and Craske, M. G. (2008). Acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders: different treatments, similar mechanisms? Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 15, 263–279.Google Scholar
Arch, J. J. and Craske, M. G. (2010). Laboratory stressors in clinically anxious and nonanxious individuals: the moderating role of mindfulness. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 494–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J. and Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, A. (1970). Cognitive therapy: nature and relation to behavior therapy. Behavior Therapy, 1, 184–200.Google Scholar
Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., et al. (2004). Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 230–241.Google Scholar
Blackledge, J. (2007). Disrupting verbal processes: cognitive defusion in acceptance and commitment therapy and other mindfulness-based psychotherapies. The Psychological Record, 57, 555–576.Google Scholar
Burnham, K. and Anderson, D. R. (2002). Model Selection and Multimodel Inference. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Carmody, J., Baer, R., Lykins, E. and Olendzki, N. (2009). An empirical study of the mechanisms of mindfulness in a mindfulness-based stress reduction program. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65, 613–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, D. M. and Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. In Heimberg, R. G., Liebowitz, M. R., Hope, D. A. and Schneier, F. R. (Eds.), Social Phobia: diagnosis, assessment and treatment (pp. 69–93). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Erisman, S. M. and Roemer, L. (2010). A preliminary investigation of the effects of experimentally induced mindfulness on emotional responding to film clips. Emotion, 10, 72–82.Google Scholar
Feldman, G., Greeson, J. and Senville, J. (2010). Differential effects of mindful breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, and loving kindness meditation on decentering and negative reactions to repetitive thoughts. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 1002–1011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fresco, D., Coles, M., Heimberg, R., Liebowitz, M., Hami, S., Stein, M., et al. (2001). The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale: a comparison of the psychometric properties of self-report and clinician-administered formats. Psychological Medicine, 31, 1025–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fresco, D., Moore, M., Van Dulman, M., Segal, Z., Ma, S., Teasdale, J., et al. (2007). Initial psychometric properties of the experiences questionnaire: validation of a self-report measure of decentering. Behavior Therapy, 38, 234–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fresco, D. M., Segal, Z. V., Buis, T. and Kennedy, S. (2007). Relationship of posttreatment decentering and cognitive reactivity to relapse in major depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 447–455.Google Scholar
Goldin, P. and Gross, J. (2010). Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) on emotion regulation in social anxiety disorder. Emotion, 10, 83–91.Google Scholar
Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: an integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2, 271–299.Google Scholar
Gross, J. and John, O. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348–362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D. and Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: an experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., Gifford, E. V, Follette, V. M. and Strosahl, K. (1996). Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: a functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1152–1168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heimberg, R. G. and Becker, R. E. (2002). Cognitive-Behavioral Group Treatment for Social Phobia: basic mechanisms and clinical applications. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Herbert, J. and Cardaciotto, L. (2005). An acceptance and mindfulness-based perspective on social anxiety disorder. In Orsillo, S. and Roemer, L. (Eds.), Acceptance and Mindfulness-Based Approaches to Anxiety: conceptualization and treatment (pp. 189–212) New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Hofmann, S., Heering, S., Sawyer, A. and Asnaani, A. (2009). How to handle anxiety: the effects of reappraisal, acceptance, and suppression strategies on anxious arousal. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 389–394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, L. and Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.Google Scholar
Ingram, R. E. and Hollon, S. D. (1986). Cognitive therapy for depression from an information processing perspective. In Ingram, R. E. (Ed.), Information Processing Approaches to Clinical Psychology (pp. 259–281). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Leung, A. W. and Heimberg, R. H. (1996). Homework compliance, perceptions of control, and outcome of cognitive-behavioral treatment of social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 423–432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liebowitz, M. R. (1987). Social phobia. Modern Problems in Pharmacopsychiatry, 22, 141–173.Google Scholar
Muthén, L. K. and Muthén, B. O. (2005). Mplus User's Guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén and Muthén.Google Scholar
Rachman, S., Gruter-Andrew, J. and Shafran, R. (2000). Post-event processing in social anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 611–617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rapee, R. M. and Heimberg, R. G. (1997). A cognitive-behavioral model of anxiety in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 741–756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, D. W., Kahn, J. H., Spoth, R. and Altmaier, E. M. (1998). Analyzing data from experimental studies: a latent variable structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rytwinski, N. K., Fresco, D. M., Heimberg, R. G., Coles, M. E., Liebowitz, M. R., Cissell, S., et al. (2009). Screening for social anxiety disorder with the self-report version of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale. Depression and Anxiety, 26, 34–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Safran, J. D. and Segal, Z. V. (1990). Interpersonal Process in Cognitive Therapy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Astin, J. and Freedman, B. (2006). Mechanisms of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 373–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teasdale, J. D., Moore, R. G., Hayhurst, H., Pope, M., Williams, S. and Segal, Z. V. (2002). Metacognitive awareness and prevention of relapse in depression: empirical evidence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 275–287.Google Scholar
Van Dam, N. T., Sheppard, S. C., Forsyth, J. P. and Earleywine, M. (2011). Self-compassion is a better predictor than mindfulness of symptom severity and quality of life in mixed anxiety and depression. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25, 123–130.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.