Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T08:40:25.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moving beyond the priming of single-language sentences: A proposal for a comprehensive model to account for linguistic representation in bilinguals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2017

Gerrit Jan Kootstra  and
Eleonora Rossi
Gerrit Jan Kootstra
Affiliation:
Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, 8000 GB Zwolle, Netherlands. g.kootstra.work@gmail.comgerritjankootstra.wordpress.com
Eleonora Rossi
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Sociology, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona CA 91768. erossi@cpp.edusites.google.com/site/eleonorarossishomepage/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In their target article, Branigan & Pickering (B&P) briefly discuss bilingual language representation, focusing primarily on cross-language priming between single-language sentences. We follow up on this discussion by showing how structural priming drives real-life phenomena of bilingual language use beyond the priming of unilingual sentences and by arguing that B&P's account should be extended with a representation for language membership.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 40 , 2017 , e297
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernolet, S. & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2010) Does verb bias modulate syntacticpriming? Cognition 114:455–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, J. K. (1986) Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology 18(3):355–87. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6 Google Scholar
Chang, F., Dell, G. S. & Bock, K. (2006) Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review 113(2):234–72. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Bot, K. (2004) The multilingual lexicon: Modelling selection and control. International Journal of Multilingualism 1:17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bot, K., Broersma, M. & Isurin, L. (2009) Sources of triggering in code switching. In: Multidisciplinary approaches to code switching, ed. Isurin, L., Winford, D. & de Bot, K., pp. 85–102. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dell, G. S. & Chang, F. (2014) The P-chain: Relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369(1634):20120394.Google Scholar
Ferreira, V. S. (2003) The persistence of optional complementizer production: Why saying “that” is not saying “that” at all. Journal of Memory and Language 48:379–98. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00523-5.Google Scholar
Ferreira, V. S. & Bock, K. (2006) The functions of structural priming. Language and Cognitive Processes 21:1011–29.Google Scholar
Fricke, M. & Kootstra, G. J. (2016) Primed code switching in spontaneous bilingual dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language 91:181–201.Google Scholar
Green, D. W. & Abutalebi, J. (2013) Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 25:515–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grosjean, F. (2010) Bilingual: Life and reality. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J. & Pickering, M. J. (2008) Language integration in bilingual sentence production. Acta Psychologica 128:479–89.Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. F. & Snider, N. (2007) Implicit learning and syntactic persistence: Surprisal and cumulativity. University of Rochester working papers in the language sciences 3:26–44.Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. F. & Snider, N. E. (2013) Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime's prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition 127(1):57–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kootstra, G. J., van Hell, J. G. & Dijkstra, T. (2009) Two speakers, one dialogue: An interactive alignment perspective on code-switching in bilingual speakers. In: Multidisciplinary approaches to code switching, ed. Isurin, L., Winford, D. & de Bot, K., pp. 129–60. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kootstra, G. J., van Hell, J. G. & Dijkstra, T. (2010) Syntactic alignment and shared word order in code-switched sentence production: Evidence from bilingual monologue and dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language 63:210–31.Google Scholar
Kootstra, G. J., van Hell, J. G. & Dijkstra, T. (2012) Priming of code-switching in sentences: The role of lexical repetition, cognates, and proficiency. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15:797–819.Google Scholar
Kootstra, G. J., van Hell, J. G. & Dijkstra, T. (in revision). Interactive alignment drives lexical triggering of code-switching in bilingual dialogue.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C. & Wodniecka, Z. (2006) Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 9:119–35.Google Scholar
Rossi, E. (2013) Modulating the sensitivity to syntacticfactors in production: Evidence from syntactic priming in agrammatism. Applied Psycholinguistics 36:639–69.Google Scholar
Rossi, E., Prystauka, Y. & Diaz, M. (in revision) Investigating L1 attrition and language change: neuroimaging perspectives. In: Handbook of language attrition: Psycho- and neurolinguistic perspectives, ed. Köpke, B. & Keijzer, M.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S. (2011) Language attrition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar