Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:20:41.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Reinsurance on the Degree of Risk Associated with an Insurer's Portfolio

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2014

M. Andreadakis  and
H. R. Waters
M. Andreadakis
Affiliation:
Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh
H. R. Waters
Affiliation:
Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There are many reasons why an insurer may choose to reinsure a part of his portfolio (see, for example, Carter (1979, p. 5 ff.)) and many ways in which he can assess the effectiveness of the reinsurance arrangements he makes. In this paper we assume the insurer wishes to reinsure a part of his portfolio in order to reduce its “riskiness”. We take as given a portfolio consisting of n independent risks together with the total premium charged to insure these risks and we investigate the effect on the degree of risk associated with the portfolio (see §3 for a definition) of varying the excess of loss or proportional reinsurance limits for each risk.

We are given an insurance portfolio consisting of n independent risks. A risk may consist of a single policy or a group of policies: the essential points being that a reinsurance limit, either excess of loss or proportional, is the same for all claims arising from a particular risk, although reinsurance limits may vary from one risk to another. We assume the claims arising from each risk have a compound Poisson distribution. To be more precise, we assume the number of claims arising from the i-th risk is a Poisson process with mean Pi claims each year and the size of each claim has distribution function Fi. As usual, the size of a claim is independent of the time at which it occurs and of all other claims. We also assume that Fi(O) = O for each i, so that we consider only positive claims amounts. We take as given the total annual premium, P, charged by the insurer in respect of these risks. We make no assumption about the way in which P is calculated but we do assume that

Type
Research Article
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , December 1980 , pp. 119 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © International Actuarial Association 1980

References

REFERENCES

Andreadakis, M. (1980). The Insurer's Net Insolvency Constant and the Problem of Optimal Reinsurance Limits. M. Sc. Thesis presented to Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Beard, R. E., Pentikäinen, T. and Pesonen, E. (1977). Risk Theory. Chapman and Hall, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benktander, G. (1974). A Note on Optimal Reinsurance. Astin Bulletin, 8, 154–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berliner, B. (1977). Analytic Representation of Claim Distributions. Giro Bulletin, 15, 26–32.Google Scholar
Bühlmann, H. (1970). Mathematical Methods in Risk Theory. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Carter, R. L. (1979), Reinsurance. Kluwer, London.Google Scholar
Gerber, H. U. (1974). On Additive Premium Calculation Principles. Astin Bulletin, 7, 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, H. U. (1979). An Introduction to Mathematical Risk Theory. S. S. Huebner Foundation, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Waters, H. R. (1979). Excess of Loss Reinsurance Limits. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 1979, 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar