Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:56:40.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Performance and carcass composition of docked and control fat-tailed Kellakui lambs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. B. O'Donovan
Affiliation:
Animal Husbandry Research Institute, Heydarabad, Karadj, Iran
M. B. Ghadaki
Affiliation:
Animal Husbandry Research Institute, Heydarabad, Karadj, Iran
R. D. Behesti
Affiliation:
Animal Husbandry Research Institute, Heydarabad, Karadj, Iran
B. A. Saleh
Affiliation:
Animal Husbandry Research Institute, Heydarabad, Karadj, Iran
D. H. L. Rollinson
Affiliation:
Animal Husbandry Research Institute, Heydarabad, Karadj, Iran
Get access

Summary

Ninety-three Kellakui fat-tailed single lambs were assigned after birth to a 2×2×2 factorial experiment; 46 were uncastrated males and 47 were females. About half the lambs of each sex were docked before they were 1 week old. Half the lambs had unrestricted milk from the ewes until 115 days of age (phase 1) and the other half received all the ewes' milk for the first 30 days and then about one-third of the milk until weaning at 60 days. Creep feed was avail-able to all lambs from about 3 weeks of age, in addition to 200 g of alfalfa dry matter per lamb daily. From 115 days of age, all lambs were fed on a standard fattening ration until slaughtered at weights of 46 to 49 kg for males and 35 to 38 kg for females (phase 2).

Lambs given unrestricted milk were 7·4 kg heavier than restricted lambs at the end of phase 1. Significantly better gains due to docking were observed only for females during phase 2. There was little indication that docking affected feed conversion efficiency. In docked lambs the fat normally deposited in the tail was partially (less than 50%) relocated as subcutaneous plus intermuscular and internal fat. Lean meat percentages of carcasses were similar for docked and control treatments. There is a need to standardize reporting of results from docking experiments to make valid comparisons.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Demjruren, A. S., Behesti, R. D., Salimi, H., Saleh, B. A. and Djaferi, A. 1971. Comparison of the reproductive and productive capacities of sheep of the Kellakui, Kizil, Bakhtiari and Baluchi breeds in Iran. Tech. Rep. Anim. Husb. Res. Inst., Heydarabad, No. 1.Google Scholar
Epstein, H. 1961. The development and body composition of docked and undocked fat-tailed Awasi lambs. Emp. J. exp. Agric. 29: 110118.Google Scholar
Joubert, D. M., Nel, J. W. and Steynberg, H. 1962. Influence of tail development on growth and carcass quality of Karakul ewes. Tydskr. Natuurwet. 2: 99104.Google Scholar
Joubert, D. M. and Ueckermann, L. 1971. A note on the effect of docking on fat deposition in fat-tailed sheep. Anim. Prod. 13: 191192.Google Scholar
Sefedbakht, N., Ghorban, K., Ghalambor, M. and Mostafavi, M. 1970. Changes arising from cutting the fat tail of Karakul sheep in feed lot performance, metabolism and feed efficiency. Progr. Rep. Coll. Agric. Pahlavi University, Shiraz, Iran, pp. 68.Google Scholar