Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T01:12:24.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of soaking the meal ration of growing pigs in water or skim milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1962

R. S. Barber ,
R. Braude  and
K. G. Mitchell
R. S. Barber
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
R. Braude
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
K. G. Mitchell
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
Get access

Extract

1. Thirty-two individually-fed pigs were used to determine the effects of soaking their daily meal ration in either water or in liquid skim milk and water for approximately 24 hr. before feeding. The experimental period continued from about 10 weeks of age to bacon weight.

2. Neither soaking procedure had any significant effect on the rate of growth, efficiency of food utilisation, dressing percentage, carcass length, backfat thickness or commercial grading results of the pigs.

3. The growth rate and efficiency of food utilisation of the pigs given meal plus skim milk were significantly better than for those given the all meal diet. The dressing percentage of the former was also significantly higher than the latter, but there were no significant differences between the two groups in carcass length or backfat thickness.

4. Possible reasons for the difference in performance of the all meal and meal plus skim milk-fed pigs are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , October 1962 , pp. 313 - 318
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barber, R. S., Braude, R. & Mitchell, K. G., 1956. Formalin-treated skim milk for pigs. Agriculture (Lond.), 63: 111.Google Scholar
Barber, R. S., Braude, R., & Mitchell, K. G., 1957. Comparison of six different levels of feeding for fattening pigs. J. agric. Sci., 48: 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, R. S., Braude, R., & Mitchell, K. G., 1960. Studies on liquid skim milk for growing pigs. The effect of its abrupt removal from the diet and of supplementation with copper sulphate or amino acids. Anim. Prod., 2: 105.Google Scholar
Evans, R. E., 1960. Rations for livestock. Bull. Minist. Agric, Lond., No. 48.Google Scholar
Harrington, G., 1958. Pig carcass evaluation. Technical Communication No. 12, Commonwealth Bureau of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Jensen, L. S., 1959. Enzymes in animal feeds. Feedstuff's, May 9th.Google Scholar
Kon, S. K., & Thompson, S. Y., 1957. Measurement of vitamins in the control of milk processing. Milchwissenschaft, 12: 166.Google Scholar
Mitchell, K. G., & Sedgwick, P. H., 1960. Restricted and ad lib. feeding of liquid skim milk, with and without the addition of formalin, to fattening pigs. J. Dairy Res., 27: 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, F., 1933. The analysis of replicated experiments when the field results are incomplete. Emp. J. exp. Agric., 1: 129.Google Scholar