Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T01:01:31.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Devil Is in the Details: The Cascade Model of Invention Processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Michael Brian Schiffer*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, and Lemelson Center, National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution (Schiffer@u.arizona.edu)

Abstract

I propose that archaeologists, in pursuing a renewed interest in studying technological change, construct general theories and models of invention processes. As an example, this paper presents the “cascade” model for investigating invention processes in the context of “complex technological systems.” Building on the recognition that the vision of a new complex technological system is often obvious, the cascade model asserts that the hard work of invention takes place in a series of invention “cascades,” as people strive to achieve acceptable values of a new technology's core or critical performance characteristics during life-history processes (i.e., fashioning a prototype, replication or manufacture, use, and maintenance). The cascade model is illustrated by means of the nineteenth-century electromagnetic telegraph, and implications are drawn for studying invention processes in the complex technological systems of small-scale societies.

Résumé

Résumé

Propongo que los arqueólogos, en su renovado interés en el estudio del cambio tecnológico, construyen teorías generales y modelos de procesos de invención. Este artículo presenta un ejemplo del modelo de “cascada” aplicado a los procesos de invención en el contexto de los “sistemas tecnológicos complejos”. Basado en el reconocimiento de que la visión de un sistema tecnológico complejo es usualmente obvio, el modelo de “cascada” propone que el duro trabajo de invención se lleva a cabo en una serie de “cascadas,” durante las cuales el tecnológo intenta conseguir valores aceptables en las características críticas que forman el núcleo de una nueva tecnología y que afectan las trayectorias históricas de esta tecnología (por ejemplo, creación de un prototipo, manufactura de réplicas, uso y mantenimiento). Ilustro el modelo de cascada con el caso de la invención del telégrafo electromagnético durante el siglo XIX y discuto sus implicaciones para el estudio de los procesos tecnológicos complejos en sociedades de menor escala.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Ackerly, Neal W., Howard, Jerry B., and McGuire, Randall H. 1987 La Ciudad Canals : A Study of Hohokam Irrigation Systems at the Community Level. Arizona State University, Office of Cultural Resource Management, Anthropological Field Studies, No. 17, La Ciudad Monograph Series, Vol. 2. Tempe, Arizona.Google Scholar
Adams, Jenny 1999 Refocusing the Role of Food-Grinding Tools as Correlates for Subsistence Strategies in the U.S. Southwest. American Antiquity 64 : 475–498.Google Scholar
Anonymous 1862 Electric Fire Telegraphs on the Continent. The Engineer 14 : 185.Google Scholar
Arnold, Dean 1993 Ecology and Ceramic Production in an Andean Community. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Barlow, Peter 1825 On the Laws of Electro-Magnetic Action, as Depending on the Length and Dimensions of the Conducting Wire, and on the Question, Whether Electrical Phenomena are Due to the Transmission of a Single or Compound Fluid. Edinburgh Philosophical Journal 12 : 105114.Google Scholar
Basalla, George 1988 The Evolution of Technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, Kenneth 2001 History of Telegraphy. The Institution of Electrical Engineers, London.Google Scholar
Bijker, Wiebe E. 1995 Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs : Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Bleed, Peter 2001 Artifice Constrained : What Determines Technological Choice? In Anthropological Perspectives on Technology, edited by Michael B. Schiffer, pp. 151162. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D., Jr. 1977 The Visible Hand : The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Channing, William F. 1855 The American Fire-Alarm Telegraph. Smithsonian Institution, Ninth Annual Report, pp. 147155. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Cooper, Carolyn C. 1991 Shaping Invention : Thomas Blanchard's Machinery and Patent Management in Nineteenth-Century America. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Cordell, Linda 1997 Archaeology of the Southwest. 2nd ed. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Dart, Allen 1989 Prehistoric Irrigation in Arizona : a Context for Canals and Related Cultural Resources. Arizona State Historic Preservation Office, Phoenix.Google Scholar
Dethlefsen, Edwin, and Deetz, James 1966 Death's Heads, Cherubs and Willow Trees : Experimental Archaeology in Colonial Cemeteries. American Antiquity 31 : 502510.Google Scholar
Dibner, Bern 1959 The Atlantic Cable. Burndy Library, Publication No. 16. Norwalk, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Dibner, Bern 1961 Oersted and the Discovery of Electromagnetism. Burndy Library, Publication No. 18. Norwalk, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Dobres, Marcia-Anne 2000 Technology and Social Agency : Outlining a Practice Framework for Archaeology. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Dobres, Marcia-Anne, and Hoffman, Christopher R. (editors) 2000 The Social Dynamics of Technology : Practice, Politics, and World Views. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Eighmy, Jeffrey L., and Howard, Jerry B. 1991 Direct Dating of Prehistoric Canal Sediments Using Archaeomagnetism. American Antiquity 56 : 88102.Google Scholar
Fahie, John J. 1884 A History of Electric Telegraphy, to the Year 1837. E. & F.N. Spon, London.Google Scholar
Finn, Bernard S. 1973 Submarine Telegraphy : The Grand Victorian Technology. Science Museum, London.Google Scholar
Fitzhugh, Ben 2001 Risk and Invention in Human Technological Evolution. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 20 : 125167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galison, Peter 2003 Einstein's Clocks; Poincaré's Maps : Empires of Time. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
Gilman, Patricia A. 1987 Architecture as Artifact : Pit Structures and Pueblos in the American Southwest. American Antiquity 52 : 538564.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert B., and Killick, David 1993 Adaptation of Technology to Culture and Environment : Bloomery Iron Smelting in America and Africa. Technology and Culture 34 : 243270.Google Scholar
Gould, Richard A. 2001 From Sail to Steam in the Late Nineteenth Century. In Anthropological Perspectives on Technology, edited by Michael B. Schiffer, pp. 193213. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Great Britain Patent Office 1859 Patents for Inventions. Abridgments of Specifications Relating to Electricity and Magnetism, their Generation and Applications. Great Britain Patent Office, London.Google Scholar
Great Britain Patent Office 1874 Patents for Inventions. Abridgments of Specifications Relating to Electricity and Magnetism, their Generation and Application. Part II—A.D. 1858-1866. 2nd ed. Great Britain Patent Office, London.Google Scholar
Great Britain Patent Office 1882 Patents for Inventions. Abridgments of Specifications Relating to Electricity and Magnetism. Division II. Conducting and Insulating. Part II—A.D. 1867-1876. Great Britain Patent Office, London.Google Scholar
Gumerman, George (editor) 1991 Exploring the Hohokam : Prehistoric Desert Peoples of the American Southwest. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Haury, Emil W. 1976 Hohokam Desert Farmers and Craftsmen : Excavations at Snaketown, 1964-1965. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Hayden, Brian 1998 Practical and Prestige Technologies : the Evolution of Material Systems. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 5 : 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Headrick, Daniel R. 1981 The Tools of Empire : Technology and European Imperialism in the Nineteenth Century. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Henry, Joseph 1831 On the Application of the Principle of the Galvanic Multiplier to Electro-Magnetic Apparatus, and also to the Developement [sic] of Great Magnetic Power in Soft Iron. The American Journal of Science and Arts 19 : 400408.Google Scholar
Hiscox, Gardner D. 1900 Horseless Vehicles, Automobiles, Motorcycles Operated by Steam, Hydro-Carbon, Electric, and Pneumatic Motors. Munn, New York.Google Scholar
Huckleberry, Gary 1999 Assessing Hohokam Canal Stability Through Stratigraphy : Journal of Field Archaeology 26 : 118.Google Scholar
Hughes, Susan 1998 Getting to the Point : Evolutionary Change in Prehistoric Weaponry. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 5 : 345–403.Google Scholar
Hughes, Thomas 1983 Networks of Power : Electrification in Western Society 1980-1930. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Israel, Paul B. 1989 From the Machine Shop to the Industrial Laboratory : Telegraphy and the Changing Context of American Invention, 1830-1920. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
Israel, Paul B. 1998 Edison : A Life of Invention. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Joerges, Bernward 1988 Large Technical Systems : Concepts and Issues. In The Development of Large Technical Systems, edited by Renate Mayntz and Thomas P. Hughes, pp. 935. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Kelly, Robert L. 2000 Elements of a Behavioral Ecological Paradigm for the Study of Hunter-Gatherers. In Social Theory in Archaeology, edited by Michael B. Schiffer, pp. 6378. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Killick, David 2004 Social Constructionist Approaches to the Study of Technology. World Archaeology 36 : 571578.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Steven L., and Sarther, Catherine 2000 Food, Lies, and Paleoanthropology : Social Theory and the Evolution of Sharing in Humans. In Social Theory in Archaeology, edited by Schiffer, M. B., pp. 7996. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
LaMotta, Vincent M., and Schiffer, Michael B. 2001 Behavioral Archaeology : Towards a New Synthesis. In Archaeological Theory Today, edited by Ian Hodder, 14-64. Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Langdon, William E. 1877 The Application of Electricity to Railway Working. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Lemonnier, Pierre (editor) 1993 Technological Choices : Transformations in Material Cultures Since the Neolithic. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Leonard, Robert D., and Jones, George T. 1987 Elements of an Inclusive Evolutionary Model for Archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 6 : 199219.Google Scholar
McGuire, Randall H., and Schiffer, Michael B. 1983 A Theory of Architectural Design. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2 : 277303.Google Scholar
Meyer, Herbert W. 1972 A History of Electricity and Magnetism. Burndy Library, Norwalk, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Mills, Barbara, and Crown, Patricia (editors) 1995 Ceramic Production in the American Southwest. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Mithen, Steven (editor) 1998 Creativity in Human Evolution and Prehistory. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel 1990 The Lever of Riches : Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Mom, Gijs 2004 The Electric Vehicle : Technology and Expectations in the Automobile Age. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Morse, Edward L. (editor) 1973 Samuel F. B. Morse : His Letters and Journals. Da Capo Press, New York.Google Scholar
Neff, Hector 1992 Ceramics and Evolution. Archaeological Method and Theory 4 : 141193. The Study of Technological Organization. Archaeological Method and Theory 3 : 57100.Google Scholar
Nickles, David P. 2003 Under the Wire : How the Telegraph Changed Diplomacy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Michael J., Holland, Thomas D., Hoard, Robert J., and Fox, Gregory L. 1994 Evolutionary Implications of Design and Performance Characteristics of Prehistoric Pottery. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1 : 259304.Google Scholar
Oswalt, Wendell 1976 An Anthropological Analysis of Food-Getting Technology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Oudshoorn, Nelly, and Pinch, Trevor (editors) 2003 How Users Matter : The Co-construction of Users and Technology. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Post, Robert C. 1976 Physics, Patents, and Politics : A Biography of Charles Grafton Page. Science History Publications, New York.Google Scholar
Preece, William H., and Sivewright, James 1891 Telegraphy. 9th ed. Longmans, Green, and Co., London.Google Scholar
Prescott, George B. 1888 Electricity and the Electric Telegraph. 7th ed. D. Appleton, New York.Google Scholar
Reid, James D. 1879 The Telegraph in America. Its Founders Promoters and Noted Men. Derby Brothers, New York.Google Scholar
Reid, J. Jefferson, B. Schiffer, Michael, and L. Rathje, William 1975 Behavioral Archaeology : Four Strategies. American Anthropologist 77 : 864–869.Google Scholar
Rice, Prudence 1999 On the Origins of Pottery. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 6 : 154.Google Scholar
Roux, Valentine 2003 A Dynamic Systems Framework for Studying Technological Change : Application to the Emergence of the Potter's Wheel in the Southern Levant. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 10 : 130.Google Scholar
Sabine, Robert 1869 The History and Progress of the Electric Telegraph. 2nd ed. Van Nostrand, New York.Google Scholar
Sassaman, Kenneth E. 1993 Early Pottery in the Southeast : Tradition and Innovation in Cooking Technology. University of Alabama Press, Tucsaloosa.Google Scholar
Schellen, Heinrich 1850 Der Electromagnetische Telegraph. Friedrich Bieweg and Son, Braunschweig.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B. 1991 The Portable Radio in American Life. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B. 1992 Technological Perspectives on Behavioral Change. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B. 1993 Cultural Imperatives and Product Development : The Case of the Shirt-Pocket Radio. Technology and Culture 34 : 98113.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B. 1996 Some Relationships Between Behavioral and Evolutionary Archaeologies. American Antiquity 61 : 643662.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B. 2002 Studying Technological Differentiation : The Case of 18,h-Century Electrical Technology. American Anthropologist 104 : 11481161.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B. (editor) 2001 Anthropological Perspectives on Technology. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B., Butts, Tamara C., and Grimm, Kimberly K. 1994 Taking Charge : The Electric Automobile in America. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C. Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B., Hollenback, Kacy L., and Bell, Carrie L. 2003 Draw the Lightning Down : Benjamin Franklin and Electrical Technology in the Age of Enlightenment. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B., and Miller, Andrea R. 1999 The Material Life of Human Beings : Artifacts, Behavior, and Communication. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B., and Skibo, James M. 1987 Theory and Experiment in the Study of Technological Change. Current Anthropology 28 : 595622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B., and Skibo, James M. 1997 The Explanation of Artifact Variability. American Antiquity 62 : 2750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B. Skibo, James M., Griffitts, Janet, Hollenback, Kacy, and Longacre, William 2001 Behavioral Archaeology and the Study of Technology. American Antiquity 66 : 729738.Google Scholar
Shackel, Paul 1996 Culture Change and the New Technology : An Archaeology of the Early Industrial Era. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Shaffner, Taliaferro P. 1859 The Telegraph Manual. Pudney & Russell, New York.Google Scholar
Shott, Michael J. 1997 Innovation and Selection in Prehistory : A Case Study from the American Bottom. In Stone Tools : Theoretical Insights into Human Prehistory, edited by George H. Odell, pp. 279314. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Sillar, Bill, and Tite, Michael S. 2000 The Challenge of ‘Technological Choices’ for Materials Science Approaches to Archeology. Archaeometry 42 : 220.Google Scholar
Skibo, James 1994 The Kalinga Cooking Pot : An Ethnoarchaeological and Experimental Study of Technological Change. In Kalinga Ethnoarchaeology : Expanding Archaeological Theory and Method, edited by Longacre, William and Skibo, James, pp. 113126. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Skibo, James, and Schiffer, Michael 2001 Understanding Artifact Variability and Change : A Behavioral Framework. In Anthropological Perspectives on Technology, edited by Schiffer, Michael, pp. 139149. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
South, Stanley 1977 Method and Theory in Historical Archeology. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Spencer-Wood, Suzanne M. (editor) 1987 Consumer Choice in Historical Archaeology. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Stark, Miriam T. 2003 Current Issues in Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology. Journal of Archaeological Research 11 : 193242.Google Scholar
Staudenmaier, John M. 1985 Technology's Storytellers : Reweaving the Human Fabric. Society for the History of Technology and MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Staudenmaier, John M. 2002 Rationality, Agency, Contingency : Recent Trends in the History of Technology. Reviews in American History 30 : 168181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, William B. 1879 An Historical Sketch of Henry's Contribution to the Electro-Magnetic Telegraph : With an Account of the Origin and Development of Prof. Morse's Invention. Annual Report of the Smithsonian Institution for 1878. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington DC.Google Scholar
United States Commissioner of Patents 1883 Subject-Matter Index of Patents for Inventions Granted in France from 1791 to 1876 Inclusive. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Vail, Alfred 1845 The American Electro Magnetic Telegraph. Lea & Blanchard, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Vail, J. Cummings (editor) 1914 Early History of the Electro-Magnetic Telegraph, from the Letters and Journals of Alfred Vail. Hine Brothers, New York.Google Scholar
Van der Leeuw, Sander, and Torrence, Robin (editors) 1989 What's New? A Closer Look at the Process of Innovation. Unwin Hyman, London. Archaeology. In Expanding Archaeology, edited by James M. Skibo, William H. Walker, and Axel E. Nielsen, pp. 112. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Whalen, Michael 1981 Cultural-Ecological Aspects of the Pithouse-to-Pueblo Transition in a Portion of the Southwest. American Antiquity 46 : 7592.Google Scholar