No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A note on stochastic domination and conditional thinning
Part of:
Stochastic processes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 July 2016
Abstract
This note investigates the simulation algorithm proposed by van Lieshout and van Zwet (2001). It is seen that this algorithm generally produces biased samples; the nature of this bias is further explored in a technical report by the author.
MSC classification
Primary:
60G55: Point processes
- Type
- Stochastic Geometry and Statistical Applications
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2003
References
[1]
Carter, D. S. and Prenter, P. M. (1972). Exponential spaces and counting processes. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitsth.
21, 1–19.Google Scholar
[2]
Kamae, T., Krengel, U. and O'Brien, G. L. (1977). Stochastic inequalities on partially ordered spaces. Ann. Prob.
5, 899–912.Google Scholar
[3]
Preston, C. J. (1977). Spatial birth-and-death processes. Bull. Internat. Statist. Inst.
46, 371–391.Google Scholar
[4]
Shah, S. R. (2003). Stochastic domination and conditional thinning in spatial point processes. Tech. Rep. 412, Department of Statistics, University of Warwick.Google Scholar
[5]
Shaked, M. and Shanthikumar, J. (1994). Stochastic Orders and Their Applications. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
[6]
Van Lieshout, M. N. M. (2000). Markov Point Processes and Their Applications. Imperial College Press, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]
Van Lieshout, M. N. M. and van Zwet, E. W. (2001). Exact sampling from conditional Boolean models with applications to maximum likelihood inference. Adv. Appl. Prob.
33, 339–353. Correction: 35 (2003), 362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar