Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:58:51.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Development of Static High-Pressure Techniques and the Study of the Earth’s Deep Interior in the Last 50 Years and Its Future

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2023

By
Takehiko Yagi
Edited by
Yingwei Fei  and
Michael J. Walter
Yingwei Fei
Affiliation:
Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington DC
Michael J. Walter
Affiliation:
Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

Development of static high-pressure techniques over the last 50 years is reviewed from the perspective of the study of the Earth’s deep interior. Fifty years ago, laboratory high-pressure and -temperature experiments were limited to the conditions corresponding to that of near the surface of the Earth. In high-pressure mineral physics, extension of the pressure range directly made possible the study of deeper parts of the Earth, and many scientists spent great effort to improve various experimental techniques. As a result, currently it is possible to do precise X-ray experiments at the conditions corresponding to the center of the Earth: 6,400 km depth from the surface, about 360 GPa, and more than 5,000 K. Two quite different types of high-pressure apparatus are widely used these days. One is the large-volume high-pressure apparatus, and the other is the diamond anvil cell. Although the latter has the advantage of covering wider pressure and temperature conditions together with optical access to the sample, the former has the advantage of much larger sample volume, and, using internal resistance heaters, very stable and uniform high-temperature conditions can be achieved. Many different types of experimental techniques are combined with these high-pressure devices, and rich information about various properties of minerals and melts can now be obtained. Advancement of synchrotron radiation played a key role for such studies, and our knowledge about the Earth’s deep interior has increased considerably. Further efforts are continuing to extend the pressure range beyond the limits of existing high-pressure devices.

Type
Chapter
Information
Static and Dynamic High Pressure Mineral Physics , pp. 17 - 41
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akimoto, S., Fujisawa, H. (1968). Olivine-spinel solid solution equilibria in the system Mg2SiO4-Fe2SiO4, Journal of Geophysical Research, 73, 1467–1479.Google Scholar
Andrault, D., Petitgirard, S., Lo Nigro, G., et al. (2012). Solid-liquid iron partitioning in Earth’s deep mantle. Nature, 487, 354–357.Google Scholar
Antonangeli, D., Krisch, M., Fiquet, G., et al. (2004). Elasticity of cobalt at high pressure studied by inelastic X-ray scattering, Physical Review Letters, 93, 215505.Google Scholar
Antonangeli, D., Morard, G., Paolasini, L., et al. (2018). Sound velocities and density measurements of solid hcp-Fe and hcp-Fe-Si (9 wt.%) alloy at high pressure: constraints on the Si abundance in the Earth’s inner core. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 482, 446–453.Google Scholar
Anzellini, S., Dewaele, A., Mezouar, M., Loubeyre, P. (2013). Melting of iron at Earth’s inner core boundary based on fast X-ray diffraction. Science, 340, 464–466.Google Scholar
Badro, J., Fiquet, G., Guyot, F., et al. (2003). Iron partitioning in Earth’s mantle: toward a deep lower mantle discontinuity. Science, 300, 789–791.Google Scholar
Badro, J., Rueff, J.-P., Vanko, G., Monaco, G., Fiquet, G.,Guyot, F. (2004). Electronic transitions in perovskite: possible nonconvecting layers in the lower mantle. Science, 305, 383–386.Google Scholar
Bassett, W. A. (2009). Diamond anvil cell, 50th birthday. High Pressure Research, 29, 163–186.Google Scholar
Bassett, W. A., Takahashi, T., Stock, P. W. (1967). X-ray diffraction and optical observations on crystalline solids up to 300 kbar. Review of Scientific Instruments, 38, 37–42.Google Scholar
Boehler, R., Bargen, N. V., Chopelas, A. (1990). Melting, thermal expansion, and phase transitions of iron at high pressures. Journal of Geophysical Research, 95, 21731–21736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bundy, F. P., Hall, H. T., Strong, H. M., Wentrof, R. H. (1955). Man-made diamonds. Nature, 176, 51–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewaele, A., Loubeyre, P., Occelli, F., Marie, O., Mezouar, M. (2018). Toroidal diamond anvil cell for detailed measurements under extreme static pressures. Nature Communications, 9, 2913.Google Scholar
Dubrovinsky, L. S., Dubrovinskaia, N. A., Prakapenka, V. B., Abakumov, A. M. (2012). Implementation of micro-ball nanodiamond anvils for high-pressure studies above 6 Mbar. Nature Communications, 3, 1163.Google Scholar
Dubrovinskaia, N. A., Dubrovinsky, L. S., Solopova, N. A., et al. (2016). Terapascal static pressure generation with ultrahigh yield strength nanodiamond. Science Advances, 2, e1600341, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duffy, T. S., Hemley, R. J., Mao, H. K. (1995). Equation of state and shear strength at multimegabar pressures: magnesium oxide to 227 GPa. Physical Review Letters, 74, 1371–1374.Google Scholar
Fiquet, G., Auzende, A. L., Siebert, J., et al. (2010). Melting of peridotite to 140 gigapascals. Science, 329, 1516–1518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiquet, G., Badro, J., Guyot, F., Requardt, H., Krisch, M. (2001). Sound velocities in iron to 110 gigapascals. Science, 291, 468–471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gao, L., Chen, B., Zhao, J., Alp, E. E., Sturhahn, W., Li, J. (2011). Effect of temperature on sound velocities of compressed Fe3C, a candidate component of the Earth’s inner core. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 309, 213–220.Google Scholar
Hall, H. T. (1958). Some high-pressure, high-temperature apparatus design considerations: equipment for use at 100 000 atmospheres and 3000 C. Review of Scientific Instruments, 29, 267–275.Google Scholar
Hall, H. T. (1960). Ultra-high-pressure, high-temperature apparatus: the “Belt.” Review of Scientific Instruments, 31, 125–131.Google Scholar
Hall, H. T. (1962). Anvil guide device for multiple-anvil high pressure apparatus. Review of Scientific Instruments. 33, 1278–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinz, D. L., Jeanloz, R. (1987). Temperature measurements in the laser heated diamond cell, in Manghnani, M. H., Syono, Y., eds., High Pressure Researches in Mineral Physics. AGU, pp. 113–127.Google Scholar
Hirose, K., Fei, Y., Ma, Y., Mao, H. K. (1999). The fate of subducted basaltic crust in the Earth’s lower mantle. Nature, 397, 53–56.Google Scholar
Ichinose, K., Wakatsuki, M., Aoki, T. (1975). A new sliding type cubic anvil high pressure apparatus. Journal of the High Pressure Institute of Japan, 13, 244–253.Google Scholar
Iitaka, T., Hirose, K., Kawamura, K., Murakami, M. (2004). The elasticity of the MgSiO3 post-perovskite phase in the Earth’s lowermost mantle. Nature, 430, 442–445.Google Scholar
Ishii, T., Yamazaki, D., Tsujino, N., et al. (2017). Pressure generation to 65 GPa in Kawai-type multi-anvil apparatus with tungsten carbide anvils. High Pressure Research, 37, 505–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ito, E. (1977). The absence of oxide mixture in high‐pressure phases of Mg‐silicates. Geophysical Research Letters, 4, 72–74.Google Scholar
Ito, E. (2009) Multianvil cells and high pressure experimental methods, in Price, G. D. ed., Treaties on Geophysics, Vol.2: Mineral Physics, Elsevier, pp. 197–230.Google Scholar
Ito, E., Weidner, D. J. (1986). Crystal growth of MgSiO3 perovskite. Geophysical Research Letters, 13, 464–466.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. M., Sturhahn, W., Shen, G. Y., et al. (2005). A synchrotron Mössbauer spectroscopy study of (Mg,Fe)SiO3 perovskite up to 120 GPa. American Mineralogist, 90, 199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenei, Z., O’Bannon, E. F., Weir, S. T., Cynn, H., Lipp, M. J., Evans, W. J. (2018). Single crystal toroidal diamond anvils for high pressure experiments beyond 5 megabar. Nature Communications, 9, 3563.Google Scholar
Kawai, N., Endo, S. (1970). The generation of ultrahigh hydrostatic pressures by a split sphere apparatus. Review of Scientific Instruments, 41, 1178–1181.Google Scholar
Kawai, N., Togaya, M., Onodera, A. (1973). A new device for high pressure vessels. Proceedings of the Japan Academy, 49, 623–626.Google Scholar
Khvostantsev, T. G., Slesarev, V. N., Brazhkin, V. V. (2004). Toroid type high-pressure device: history and prospect. High Pressure Research, 24, 371–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kono, Y., Kenney-Benson, C., Ikuta, D., Shibazaki, Y., Wang, Y., Shen, G. (2016). Ultrahigh-pressure polyamorphism in GeO2 glass with coordination number> 6. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 3436–3441.Google Scholar
Kumazawa, M. (1977). A novel device to reach higher pressure in larger volume, in Manghnani, M. H., Akimoto, S., eds., High-Pressure Research: Applications in Geophysics, Academic Press, pp. 563–572.Google Scholar
Kung, J., Li, B., Weidner, D. J., Zhang, J., Liebermann, R. C. (2002). Elasticity of (Mg0.83,Fe0.17)O ferropericlase at high pressure: ultrasonic measurements in conjunction with X-radiation techniques. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 203, 557–566.Google Scholar
Lee, S. K., Eng, P. J., Mao, H. K. (2014). Probing of pressure-induced bonding transitions in crystalline and amorphous earth materials: insights from X-ray Raman scattering at high pressure. Review in Mineralogy & Geochemistry, 78, 139–174.Google Scholar
Li, B., Liebermann, R. C. (2014). Study of the Earth’s interior using measurements of sound velocities in minerals by ultrasonic interferometry. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 233, 135–153.Google Scholar
Li, B., Ji, C., Yang, W., et al. (2018). Diamond anvil cell behavior up to 4 Mbar. Proceeding of National Academy of Science, 115, 1713–1717.Google Scholar
Liebermann, R. C. (2011a). Multi-anvil, high pressure apparatus: a half-century of development and progress. High Pressure Research, 31, 493–532.Google Scholar
Liebermann, R. C. (2011b). Bob-san and high pressure science and technology in Japan: a 40-year history. Review of High Pressure Science and Technology, 21, 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, J. F., Fei, Y., Sturhahn, W., Zhao, J., Mao, H. K., Hemley, R. J. (2004). Magnetic transition and sound velocities of Fe3S at high pressure: implications for Earth and planetary cores. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 226, 33–40.Google Scholar
Liu, L. G. (1976). The post-spinel phase of forsterite. Nature, 262, 770–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mao, H. K., Bell, P. M. (1978). High pressure physics: sustained static generation of 1.36 to 1.72 megabars. Science, 200, 1145–1147.Google Scholar
Mao, H. K., Kao, C., Hemley, R. J. (2001b). Inelastic X-ray scattering at ultrahigh pressures. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 13, 7847.Google Scholar
Mao, H. K., Shen, G., Hemley, R. J., Duffy, T. S. (1998). X-ray diffraction with a double hot plate laser heated diamond cell, in Manghnani, M. H., Yagi, T., eds., Properties of Earth and Planetary Materials, AGU, pp. 27–34.Google Scholar
Mao, H. K., Takahashi, T., Bassett, W. A., Weaver, J. S., Akimoto, S. (1969). Effect of pressure and temperature on the molar volumes of wustite and of three (Fe,Mg)2SiO4 spinel solid solutions. Journal of Geophysical Research, 74, 1061–1069.Google Scholar
Mao, H. K., Wu, Y., Chen, L. C., Shu, J. F. Jephcoat, A. P. (1990). Static compression of iron to 300 GPa and Fe0.8Ni0.2 alloy to 260 GPa: implications for composition of the core. Journal of Geophysical Research, 95, 21737–21742.Google Scholar
Mao, H. K., Xu, J., Struzhkin, , et al. (2001a). Phonon density of states of iron up to 153 gigapascals. Science, 292, 914–916.Google Scholar
Mao, W. L., Sturhahn, W., Heinz, D. L., Mao, H. K., Shu, J., Hemley, R. J. (2004). Nuclear resonant X-ray scattering of iron hydride at high pressure. Geophysical Research Letters, 31, L15618.Google Scholar
Meng, Y., Shen, G., Mao, H. K. (2006). Double-sided laser heating system at HPCAT for in situ X-ray diffraction at high pressures and high temperatures. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 18, S1097–S1103.Google Scholar
Ming, L.C., Bassett, W. A. (1974). Laser heating in the diamond anvil press up to 2000°C sustained and 3000°C pulsed at pressures up to 260 kilobars. Review of Scientific Instruments, 45, 1115–1118.Google Scholar
Murakami, M., Asahara, Y., Ohishi, Y., Hirao, N., Hirose, K. (2009). Development of in situ Brillouin spectroscopy at high pressure and high temperature with synchrotron radiation and infrared laser heating system: application to the Earth’s deep interior. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 174, 282–291.Google Scholar
Murakami, M., Hirose, K., Kawamura, K., Sata, N., Ohishi, Y. (2004). Post-perovskite transition in MgSiO3. Science, 304, 855–858.Google Scholar
Nasu, S. (1996). High-pressure Mossbauer spectroscopy with nuclear forward scattering of synchrotron radiation. High Pressure Research, 14, 405–412.Google Scholar
Oganov, A. R., Ono, S. (2004). Theoretical and experimental evidence for a post-perovskite phase of MgSiO3 in Earth’s D” layer. Nature, 430, 445–448.Google Scholar
Ohishi, Y., Hirao, N., Sata, N., Hirose, K., Takata, M. (2008). Highly intense monochromatic X-ray diffraction facility for high-pressure research at SPring-8. High Pressure Research, 28, 163–173.Google Scholar
Osugi, J., Shimizu, K., Inoue, K., Yasunami, K. (1964). A compact cubic anvil high pressure apparatus. Review of Physics and Chemistry Japan, 34, 1–6.Google Scholar
Ozawa, H., Takahashi, F., Hirose, K., Ohishi, Y., Hirao, N. (2011). Phase transition of FeO and stratification in Earth’s outer core. Science, 334, 792–794.Google Scholar
Piermarini, G. J., Block, S., Barnett, J. D., Forman, R. A. (1975). Calibration of the pressure dependence of the R1 ruby fluorescence line to 195 kbar. Journal of Applied Physics, 46, 2774–2780.Google Scholar
Prakapenka, V. B., Kubo, A., Kuznetsov, A., et al. (2008). Advanced flat top laser heating system for high pressure research at GSECARS: application to the melting behavior of germanium. High Pressure Research, 28, 225–235.Google Scholar
Ricolleau, A., Fei, Y., Cottrell, E., et al. (2009). Density profile of pyrolite under the lower mantle conditions. Geophysical Research Letters, 36, L06302.Google Scholar
Ringwood, A. E. (1959). The olivine-spinel inversion in fayalite. American Mineralogist, 44, 659–661.Google Scholar
Rosa, A. D., Mathon, O., Torchio, R., et al. (2020). Nano-polycrystalline diamond anvils: key device for XAS at extreme conditions: their use, scientific impact, present status and future needs. High Pressure Research, 40, 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakai, T., Yagi, T., Irifune, T., et al. (2018). High pressure generation using double-stage diamond anvil technique: problems and equations of state of rhenium. High Pressure Research, 38, 107–119.Google Scholar
Sakai, T, Yagi, T., Takeda, R., et al. (2020). Conical support for double-stage diamond anvil apparatus. High Pressure Research, 40, 12–21.Google Scholar
Schultz, E., Mezouar, M., Crichton, W., et al. (2005). Double-sided laser heating system for in situ high pressure and high temperature monochromatic x-ray diffraction at the ESRF. High Pressure Research, 25, 71–83.Google Scholar
Shen, G., Lazor, P. (1995). Measurement of melting temperatures of some minerals under lower mantle pressures, Journal of Geophysical Research B, 100, 17699–17713.Google Scholar
Shen, G., Mao, H. K. (2017). High-pressure studies with X-rays using diamond anvil cells. Reports on Progress in Physics, 80, 1–53.Google Scholar
Shen, G, Mao, H. K., Hemley, R. J. (1996). Laser-heating diamond- anvil cell technique: double-sided heating with multimode Nd:YAG laser, Advanced Materials’96 – New Trends in High Pressure Research, NIRIM, pp. 149–152.Google Scholar
Shen, G., Rivers, M. L., Wang, Y., Sutton, S. R. (2001). A laser heated diamond cell system at the Advanced Photon Source for in situ x-ray measurements at high pressure and temperature. Review of Scientific Instruments, 72, 1273–1282.Google Scholar
Shimomura, O., Yamaoka, S., Yagi, T., et al. (1985). Multi-anvil type X-ray system for synchrotron radiation, in Minomura, S., ed., Solid State Physics under Pressure-Recent Advance with Anvil Devices, Terrapub, pp. 351–356.Google Scholar
Solomatova, N. V., Jackson, J. M., Sturhahn, W., et al. (2016). Equation of state and spin crossover of (Mg, Fe)O at high pressure, with implications for explaining topographic relief at the core–mantle boundary. American Mineralogist, 101, 1084–1093.Google Scholar
Struzhkin, V. V., Mao, H. K., Hu, J., et al. (2001). Nuclear inelastic X-ray scattering of FeO to 48 GPa. Physics Review Letters, 87, 255501.Google Scholar
Suzuki, A., Ohtani, E., Funakoshi, K., Terasaki, H., Kubo, T. (2002). Viscosity of albite melt at high pressure and high temperature. Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, 29, 159–165.Google Scholar
Tateno, S., Hirose, K., Ohishi, Y., Tatsumi, Y. (2010). The structure of iron in Earth’s inner core. Science, 330, 359–361.Google Scholar
Tsuchiya, T., Tsuchiya, J., Umemoto, K., Wentzcovitch, R. M. (2004). Phase transition in MgSiO3 perovskite in the earth’s lower mantle. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 224, 241–248.Google Scholar
Walker, D., Carpenter, M. A., Hitch, C. M. (1990). Some simplifications to multianvil devices for high pressure experiments. American Mineralogist, 75, 1020–1028.Google Scholar
Watanuki, T., Shimomura, O., Yagi, T., Kondo, T., Isshiki, M. (2001). Construction of laser-heated diamond anvil cell system for in situ X-ray diffraction study at SPring-8. Review of Scientific Instruments, 72, 1289–1292.Google Scholar
Wang, X., Chen, T., Qi, X. et al. (2015). Acoustic travel time gauges for in-situ determination of pressure and temperature in multi-anvil apparatus. Journal of Applied Physics, 118, 065901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, C. E., Lippincott, E. R., Valkenburg, A. V., Bunting, E. N. (1959). Infrared studies in the 1-to 15-micron region to 30,000 atmospheres. Journal of Research NBS, 63A, 55–62.Google Scholar
Williams, Q., Nittle, E., Jeanloz, R. (1991). The high-pressure melting curve of iron: a technical discussion. Journal of Geophysical Research, 96, 2171–2184.Google Scholar
Wolf, A. S., Jackson, J. M., Dera, P., Prakapenka, V. B. (2015). The thermal equation of state of (Mg, Fe)SiO3 bridgmanite (perovskite) and implications for lower mantle structures. Journal of Geophysical Research, 120, 7460–7489.Google Scholar
Yagi, T. (1988). MAX80: large-volume high-pressure apparatus combined with synchrotron radiation. EoS, 69, 18–19,27.Google Scholar
Yagi, T., Sakai, T., Kadobayashi, H., Irifune, T. (2020). Review: high pressure generation technique beyond the limit of conventional diamond anvils. High Pressure Research, 40, 148–161.Google Scholar
Yagi, T., Susaki, J, (1992). A laser heating system for diamond anvil using CO2 laser, in Syono, Y., Manghnani, M. H., eds., High-Pressure Research: Application to Earth and Planetary Sciences, Terrapub/AGU, pp. 51–54.Google Scholar
Yamazaki, D., Ito, E. (2020). High pressure generation in the Kawai-type multianvil apparatus equipped with sintered diamond anvils. High Pressure Research, 40, 3–11.Google Scholar
Yokoo, M., Kawai, N., Nakamura, K. G., Kondo, K., Tange, Y., Tsuchiya, T. (2009). Ultrahigh-pressure scales for gold and platinum at pressures up to 550 GPa. Physical Review B. 80, 104114.Google Scholar
Zerr, A., Boehler, R. (1994) Constraints on the melting temperature of the lower mantle from high-pressure experiments on MgO and magnesioüstite. Nature, 371, 506–508.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×