Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Figures and Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Secondary Cities: Introduction to a Research Agenda
- 2 Shedding Light or Casting Shadows? Relations between Primary and Secondary Cities
- 3 Small and Medium-Sized Towns as Secondary Cities: The Case of Switzerland
- 4 From Sleepy Hollow to Winning from Second: Identity, Autonomy and Borrowed Size in an Australian Urban Region
- 5 Metropolization Processes and Intra-Regional Contrasts: The Uneven Fortunes of English Secondary Cities
- 6 Situating the Secondary City: Uneven Development and Regional Gentrification in Tacoma, WA
- 7 Borrowed Social Performance: Labour and Community Organizations in Los Angeles and Long Beach, California
- 8 Intra-Regional Relationality and Green City-Regionalism: Placing the Role of ‘Secondary Cities’
- 9 Conclusion: Advancing the Secondary City Perspective
- Index
2 - Shedding Light or Casting Shadows? Relations between Primary and Secondary Cities
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2022
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Figures and Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Secondary Cities: Introduction to a Research Agenda
- 2 Shedding Light or Casting Shadows? Relations between Primary and Secondary Cities
- 3 Small and Medium-Sized Towns as Secondary Cities: The Case of Switzerland
- 4 From Sleepy Hollow to Winning from Second: Identity, Autonomy and Borrowed Size in an Australian Urban Region
- 5 Metropolization Processes and Intra-Regional Contrasts: The Uneven Fortunes of English Secondary Cities
- 6 Situating the Secondary City: Uneven Development and Regional Gentrification in Tacoma, WA
- 7 Borrowed Social Performance: Labour and Community Organizations in Los Angeles and Long Beach, California
- 8 Intra-Regional Relationality and Green City-Regionalism: Placing the Role of ‘Secondary Cities’
- 9 Conclusion: Advancing the Secondary City Perspective
- Index
Summary
Introduction
Until recently, it was rather common to perceive the hinterland of cities as ‘rural’, directing research to the study of linkages, relations and dependencies between ‘urban’ and ‘rural’ (for example, see Hoggart, 2005). This widespread traditional conception of cities having a predominantly rural hinterland needs to be challenged, as processes of spatial upscaling and expansion have made many cities find other cities in their hinterland, suggesting that a focus on regional urban–urban relations is just as valid as a focus on urban–rural relations. Put simply: many functional urban areas or metropolitan areas – terms traditionally used to denote a city and its surrounding commuting area – are nowadays composed of multiple cities. It makes sense to address these regions as multicentric urban areas or as ‘polycentric urban regions’ when these cities do not differ widely in terms of size or overall importance.
Champion (2001) has distinguished three modes through which such multicentric urban regions arise. First, he distinguished a ‘centrifugal mode’: some smaller cities in the sphere of influence of larger cities may have risen as satellite towns of the latter, as a result of core city expansion and redistribution. Second, an ‘incorporation mode’ is discerned when a larger city extends its sphere of influence to include a formerly rather selfsustaining surrounding town or small city, or a set of several such cities. Third, the ‘fusion mode’ denotes that previously distinct and independent cities of rather similar size become integrated due to the advancement of connective infrastructure and technology, and the spatial extension of activity and travel patterns of people and firms.
Basing our research on European Spatial Planning Observation Network (ESPON) data (projects 1.1.1 and 1.4.3 in particular; see ESPON, 2005, 2011), we can calculate that 1,001 out of the 1,967 European cities are actually located in a multicentric metropolitan area (meaning that they are located in the sphere of influence of another city and vice versa), whereas the others are the sole centre of their functional region. In terms of population, the share is even larger: out of the 265 million inhabitants of these 1,967 cities, almost 192 million people (72.4 per cent) live in a multicentric urban region, while only 73 million people live in cities that do not have other cities in their hinterland.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Secondary CitiesExploring Uneven Development in Dynamic Urban Regions of the Global North, pp. 25 - 54Publisher: Bristol University PressPrint publication year: 2021