Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T15:02:14.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

80 - Therapeutic approaches with antibodies to cell-surface receptors

from Part 4 - Pharmacologic targeting of oncogenic pathways

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

Antonio Gualberto
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
Edward P. Gelmann
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Charles L. Sawyers
Affiliation:
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York
Frank J. Rauscher, III
Affiliation:
The Wistar Institute Cancer Centre, Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

The development of hybridomas and the treatment of a non-Hodgkin lymphoma patient with antibody AB89 are commonly heralded as the landmarks of the monoclonal antibody therapy field (1,2). After three decades, over 600 of these agents have entered clinical development (3); however, only a few are currently approved for the treatment of cancer patients. Novel technologies, including phage display, recombinant-antibody engineering, and transgenic-animal generation, allow for the production of highly potent, fully human antibodies or antibody constructs that may facilitate the development of more effective and less toxic monoclonal antibody therapies.

On a structural basis, monoclonal antibodies can be classified into “naked” antibodies that relay direct effects on target antigens and immunoconjugates. Naked antibodies can be employed for serum clearance of growth factors, and the activation or blockade of cell-surface receptors. These effects are mediated by the antibody Fab (fragment antibody binding) portion, which contains the hypervariable complementarity-determining regions of the light and heavy chains that constitute the antigen binding site (Figure 80.1), while the Fc portion mediates immunological effects. Fc (fragment crystallizable) binding and activation of FcγRs on effector cells transduce activating or inhibitory signals. Fc-dependent stimulatory signals are mainly transduced by FcγRI, FcγRIIa, and FcγRIIIa, whereas FcγRIIb is inhibitory. Natural killer cells express almost exclusively FcγRIIIa that is responsible for mediating ADCC by these cells, whereas macrophages express FcγRI, FcγRIIa, and FcγRIIIa, with FcγRIIa being the key receptor responsible for the induction of phagocytosis (4). Variations in antibody isotype backbone determine their ability to bind FcγRs and to induce antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) and phagocytosis (ADCP). Naturally occurring human IgG2 antibodies weakly bind FcγRIIa and constitute ideal molecules when specific target inhibition or activation, without immunologically mediated effects, is the desired attribute (5). In contrast, murine IgG2a, and human IgG1 and IgG3 antibodies bind all activatory FcγRs and are effective inducers of ADCC and ADCP. IgG3 and IgM molecules are also strong inducers of complement fixation through the classical C1q pathway, driving complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). The IgG3 backbone, however, is not commonly used in therapeutic antibody development due to the short half-life (>7 days) of these molecules. Also, the large size of IgM pentamers, the functional IgM unit, limits its ability to reach the interstitial compartment, and IgM monoclonals are rarely employed in therapeutic antibody development.

Type
Chapter
Information
Molecular Oncology
Causes of Cancer and Targets for Treatment
, pp. 854 - 860
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kohler, G, Milstein, C. Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. Nature 1975;256:495–197.CrossRef
Nadler, LM, Stashenko, P, Hardy, R, et al. Serotherapy of a patient with a monoclonal antibody directed against a human lymphoma-associated antigen. Cancer Research 1980;40:3147–54.
Reichert, JM. Metrics for antibody therapeutics development. MAbs 2010;2:695–700.CrossRef
Weiner, LM, Surana, R, Wang, S. Monoclonal antibodies: versatile platforms for cancer immunotherapy. Nature Reviews Immunology 2010;10:317–27.CrossRef
Schroeder, HW, Cavacini, L. Structure and function of immunoglobulins. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2010;125:S41–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamane-Ohnuki, N, Satoh, M. Production of therapeutic antibodies with controlled fucosylation. MAbs 2009;1:230–6.CrossRef
de Cerio, AL, Zabalegui, N, Rodríguez-Calvillo, M, Inogés, S, Bendandi, M. Anti-idiotype antibodies in cancer treatment. Oncogene 2007;26:3594–602.CrossRef
Putnam, WS, Prabhu, S, Zheng, Y, Subramanyam, M, Wang, YM. Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and immunogenicity comparability assessment strategies for monoclonal antibodies. Trends in Biotechnology 2010;28:509–16.CrossRef
Bryson, CJ, Jones, TD, Baker, MP. Prediction of immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins: validity of computational tools. BioDrugs 2010;24:1–8.CrossRef
Drugs@FDA
Chames, P, Baty, D. Bispecific antibodies for cancer therapy: the light at the end of the tunnel? MAbs 2009;1:539–47.
Ruf, P, Gires, O, Jager, M, et al. Characterisation of the new EpCAM-specific antibody HO-3: implications for trifunctional antibody immunotherapy of cancer. British Journal of Cancer 2007;97:315–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
European Medicines Agency
Culver, ME, Gatesman, ML, Mancl, EE, Lowe, DK. Ipilimumab: a novel treatment for metastatic melanoma. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2011;45:510–19.CrossRef
Ramakrishnan, MS, Eswaraiah, A, Crombet, T, et al. Nimotuzumab, a promising therapeutic monoclonal for treatment of tumors of epithelial origin. MAbs 2009;1:41–8.CrossRef
Alley, SC, Okeley, NM, Senter, PD. Antibody-drug conjugates: targeted drug delivery for cancer. Current Opinion on Chemical Biology 2010;14:529–37.CrossRef
Ansell, SM. Brentuximab vedotin: delivering an antimitotic drug to activated lymphoma cells. Expert Opinion in Investigative Drugs 2011;20:99–105.CrossRef

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×