Ackerson, G. A., and Fu, K. S. 1970. On state estimation in switching environments. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 15, 10–17. 108Google Scholar

Adanson, M. 1757. Histoire Naturelle du Sénégal. Coquillages. Avec la relation abregée d’un voyage fait en ce pays, pendant les années 1749, 50, 51, 52 et 53. Paris: Bauche. 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adanson, M. 1763. Familles de Plantes. Paris: Vincent. 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agresti, A. 2002. Categorical Data Analysis. 2nd edn. New York: Wiley. 163, 166, 185, 191Google Scholar

Ahlquist, J. S., and Breunig, C. 2012. Model-based clustering and typologies in the social sciences. Political Analysis, 20, 92–112. 77, 78Google Scholar

Airoldi, E. M., Blei, D. M., Fienberg, S. E., Goldberg, A., Xing, E. P., and Zheng, A. X. 2007. Statistical Network Analysis: Models, Issues and New Directions. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4503. Berlin: Springer. 294Google Scholar

Airoldi, E. M., Blei, D. M., Fienberg, S. E., and Xing, E. P. 2008. Mixed-membership stochastic blockmodels. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9, 1981–2014. 304, 306, 350Google Scholar

Aitchison, J., and Aitken, C. G. G. 1976. Multivariate binary discrimination by the kernel method. Biometrika, 63, 413–420. 123, 169Google Scholar

Akaike, H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723. 133CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allman, E. S., Matias, C., and Rhodes, J. A. 2009. Identifiability of parameters in latent structure models with many observed variables. The Annals of Statistics, 37(6A), 3099–3132. 167CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ambroise, C., Grasseau, G., Hoebeke, M., Latouche, P., Miele, V., Picard, F., and LAPACK authors. 2013. mixer: Random graph clustering. R package version 1.7. 297, 300, 301Google Scholar

Anderlucci, L. 2012. Comparing Different Approaches for Clustering Categorical Data. Ph.D. thesis, Università di Bologna. 172Google Scholar

Anderlucci, L., and Hennig, C. 2012. Comparing different approaches for clustering categorical data. Quaderni di Statistica, 14, 1–4. 167, 172Google Scholar

Anderson, E. 1935. The irises of the Gaspe peninsula. Bulletin of the American Iris Society, 59, 2–5. 5, 154Google Scholar

Anderson, T. W. 2003. An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis. 3rd edn. New York: Wiley. 110Google Scholar

Andrews, J. L., and McNicholas, P. D. 2011a. Extending mixtures of multivariate t-factor analyzers. Statistics and Computing, 21(3), 361–373. 257, 261Google Scholar

Andrews, J. L., and McNicholas, P. D. 2011b. Mixtures of modified t-factor analyzers for model-based clustering, classification, and discriminant analysis. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 141(4), 1479–1486. 261Google Scholar

Andrews, J. L., and McNicholas, P. D. 2012. Model-based clustering, classification, and discriminant analysis via mixtures of multivariate t-distributions: the tEIGEN family. Statistics and Computing, 22(5), 1021–1029. 261Google Scholar

Andrews, J. L., McNicholas, P. D., and Subedi, S. 2011. Model-based classification via mixtures of multivariate t-distributions. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 55(1), 520–529. 261CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews, J. L., Wickins, J. R., Boers, N. M., and McNicholas, P. D. 2015. teigen: Model-based clustering and classification with the multivariate t-distribution. R package version 2.1.0. 261Google Scholar

Andrews, J. L., Wickins, J. R., Boers, N. M., and McNicholas, P. D. 2018. teigen: An R package for model-based clustering and classification via the multivariate t distribution. Journal of Statistical Software, 83(7), 1–32. 261Google Scholar

Arellano-Valle, R. B., and Genton, M. G. 2005. On fundamental skew distributions. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 96, 93–116. 267Google Scholar

Arellano-Valle, R. B., and Genton, M. G. 2010. Multivariate extended skew-t distributions and related families. Metron, 68, 201–234. 271Google Scholar

Azzalini, A. 2014. The Skew-Normal and Related Families. Institute of Mathematical Statistics Monographs. Cambridge University Press. 267Google Scholar

Azzalini, A. 2015. The R package sn: The Skew-Normal and Skew-t distributions. R package version 1.3-0. 331Google Scholar

Azzalini, A., and Bowman, A. W. 1990. A look at some data on the Old Faithful geyser. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 39, 357–365. 7Google Scholar

Azzalini, A., and Capitanio, A. 1999. Statistical applications of the multivariate skew normal distribution. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Statistical Methodology), 61(3), 579–602. 267, 269Google Scholar

Azzalini, A., and Capitanio, A. 2003. Distributions generated by perturbation of symmetry with emphasis on a multivariate skew t distribution. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Statistical Methodology), 65, 367–389. 271Google Scholar

Azzalini, A., and Dalla Valle, A. 1996. The multivariate skew-normal distribution. Biometrika, 83(4), 715–726. 267, 269CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Azzalini, A., Browne, R. P., Genton, M. G., and McNicholas, P. D. 2016. On nomenclature for, and the relative merits of, two formulations of skew distributions. Statistics and Probability Letters, 110, 201–206. 267, 270Google Scholar

Baek, J., McLachlan, G. J., and Flack, L. 2009. Mixtures of factor analyzers with common factor loadings: Applications to the clustering and visualisation of high-dimensional data. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 32(7), 1298–1309. 238, 241, 246, 257Google Scholar

Banerjee, A., Dhillon, I., Ghosh, J., Merugu, S., and Modha, D. S. 2007. A generalized maximum entropy approach to Bregman co-clustering and matrix approximation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 8, 1919–1986. 374Google Scholar

Banfield, J. D., and Raftery, A. E. 1989. Model-based Gaussian and non-Gaussian clustering. Technical Report 186. Department of Statistics, University of Washington. 76Google Scholar

Banfield, J. D., and Raftery, A. E. 1992. Ice floe identification in satellite images using mathematical morphology and clustering about principal curves. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 8, 7–16. 382Google Scholar

Banfield, J. D., and Raftery, A. E. 1993. Model-based Gaussian and non-Gaussian clustering. Biometrics, 49, 803–821. 6, 20, 34, 76, 105, 237Google Scholar

Barker, M., and Rayens, W. 2003. Partial least squares for discrimination. Journal of Chemometrics, 17(3), 166–173. 233CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barndorff-Nielsen, O., Kent, J., and Sørensen, M. 1982. Normal variance-mean mixtures and z distributions. International Statistical Review, 50, 145–159. 283Google Scholar

Bashir, S., and Carter, E. 2005. High breakdown mixture discriminant analysis. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 93(1), 102–111. 161Google Scholar

Baudry, J. P., Raftery, A. E., Celeux, G., Lo, K., and Gottardo, R. 2010. Combining mixture components for clustering. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 19, 332–353. 100, 101, 103, 108Google Scholar

Baudry, J.-P., Maugis, C., and Michel, B. 2012. Slope heuristics: overview and implementation. Statistics and Computing, 22, 455–470. 194CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellman, R. 1957 . Dynamic Programming. Princeton University Press. 217, 221Google Scholar

Benaglia, T., Chauveau, D., Hunter, D. R., and Young, D. 2009. mixtools: An R package for analyzing finite mixture models. Journal of Statistical Software, 32(6), 1–29. 339, 340Google Scholar

Bensmail, H., and Celeux, G. 1996. Regularized Gaussian discriminant analysis through eigenvalue decomposition. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 1743–1748. 6, 115, 238Google Scholar

Bensmail, H., and Meulman, J. J. 2003. Model-based clustering with noise: Bayesian inference and estimation. Journal of Classification, 20, 49–76. 107Google Scholar

Bensmail, H., Celeux, G., Raftery, A. E., and Robert, C. P. 1997. Inference in model-based cluster analysis. Statistics and Computing, 7, 1–10. 24, 77, 107Google Scholar

Bensmail, H., Golek, J., Moody, M. M., Semmes, J. O., and Haoudi, A. 2005. A novel approach to clustering proteomics data using Bayesian fast Fourier transform. Bioinformatics, 21, 2210–2224. 107CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benzecri, J.-P. 1973. L’analyse des données. Paris: Dunod. 172Google Scholar

Bergé, L., Bouveyron, C., and Girard, S. 2016. HDclassif: High Dimensional Supervised Classification and Clustering. R package version 2.0.2. 12Google Scholar

Bergé, L., Bouveyron, C., Corneli, M., and Latouche, P. 2019. The latent topic block model for the co-clustering of textual interaction data. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, in press. 383Google Scholar

Bhattacharya, S., and McNicholas, P. D. 2014. A LASSO-penalized BIC for mixture model selection. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 8, 45–61. 107Google Scholar

Bickel, P. J., and Chen, A. 2009. A nonparametric view of network models and Newman-Girvan and other modularities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(50), 21068– 21073. 329CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bickel, P. J., and Doksum, K. A. 1981. An analysis of transformations revisited. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 296–311. 279CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bickel, P. J., Chen, A., and Levina, E. 2011. The method of moments and degree distributions for network models. Annals of Statistics, 39(5), 2280–2301. 329Google Scholar

Biernacki, C., Celeux, G., and Govaert, G. 1999. An improvement of the NEC criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. Pattern Recognition Letters, 20, 267– 272. 77CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biernacki, C., Celeux, G., and Govaert, G. 2000. Assessing a mixture model for clustering with the integrated complete likelihood. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22, 719–725. 54, 55, 172, 173Google Scholar

Biernacki, C., Celeux, G., and Govaert, G. 2003. Choosing starting values for the EM algorithm for getting the highest likelihood in multivariate Gaussian mixture models. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 41, 561–575. 31, 36, 37, 38, 175Google Scholar

Biernacki, C., Celeux, G., Govaert, G., and Langrognet, F. 2006. Model-based cluster and discriminant analysis with the Mixmod software. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 51, 587–600. 198Google Scholar

Biernacki, C., Celeux, G., and Govaert, G. 2010. Exact and Monte Carlo calculations of integrated likelihoods for the latent class model. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 140(11), 2991–3002. 174CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binder, D. A. 1978. Bayesian cluster analysis. Biometrika, 65, 31–38. 76Google Scholar

Bishop, C. M. 2006. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer. 111, 334, 336, 350Google Scholar

Blaesild, P., and Jensen, J. L. 1981. Multivariate distributions of hyperbolic type. Pages 45–66 of: Taillie, C., Patil, G. P., and Baldessari, B. A. (eds.), Statistical Distributions in Scientific Work: Volume 4 — Models, Structures, and Characterizations. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. 284Google Scholar

Blashfeld, R. K., and Aldenderfer, M. S. 1988. The methods and problems of cluster analysis. Chap. 14, pages 447–474 of: Nesselroade, J. R., and Cattell, R. B. (eds.), Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology. New York: Plenum Press. 3Google Scholar

Blei, D. M. 2012. Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55(4), 77–84. 365, 382Google Scholar

Blei, D. M., and Lafferty, J. D. 2005. Correlated topic models. Pages 147–154 of: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. NIPS’05. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press. 382Google Scholar

Blei, D. M., and Lafferty, J. D. 2006. Dynamic topic models. Pages 113–120 of: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning. ICML’06. New York, NY, USA: ACM. 382Google Scholar

Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., and Jordan, M. I. 2003. Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022. 304, 322, 364, 366Google Scholar

Bock, H.-H. 1986. Loglinear models and entropy clustering methods for qualitative data. Pages 18–26 of: Classification as a tool of research. Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation. North Holland. 166, 198Google Scholar

Boser, B., Guyon, I. M., and Vapnik, V. 1992. A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. Pages 144–152 of: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory. COLT’92. New York, NY, USA: ACM. 5Google Scholar

Bouchard, G., and Celeux, G. 2006. Selection of generative model in classification. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 28, 544–564. 133, 140, 141Google Scholar

Bouchard, G., and Triggs, B. 2004. The tradeoff between generative and discriminative classifiers. Pages 721–729 of: 16th IASC International Symposium on Computational Statistics (COMPSTAT’04). 111Google Scholar

Bouveyron, C. 2014. Adaptive mixture discriminant analysis for supervised learning with unobserved classes. Journal of Classification, 31(1), 49–84. 157, 158, 159, 160Google Scholar

Bouveyron, C., and Brunet, C. 2011. On the estimation of the latent discriminative subspace in the Fisher-EM algorithm. Journal de la Société Française de Statistique, 152(3), 98–115. 253Google Scholar

Bouveyron, C., and Brunet, C. 2012a. Discriminative variable selection for clustering with the sparse Fisher-EM algorithm. Tech. rept. Preprint HAL 00685183. Laboratoire SAMM, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne. 254, 255, 256Google Scholar

Bouveyron, C., and Brunet, C. 2012b. Simultaneous model-based clustering and visualization in the Fisher discriminative subspace. Statistics and Computing, 22(1), 301–324. 251, 252, 253CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouveyron, C., and Brunet, C. 2012c. Theoretical and practical considerations on the convergence properties of the Fisher-EM algorithm. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 109, 29–41. 253CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouveyron, C., and Brunet-Saumard, C. 2014. Model-based clustering of high-dimensional data: A review. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 71, 52–78. 257Google Scholar

Bouveyron, C., and Girard, S. 2009. Robust supervised classification with mixture models: Learning from data with uncertain labels. Pattern Recognition, 42(11), 2649–2658. 150, 151, 156Google Scholar

Bouveyron, C., and Jacques, J. 2011. Model-based clustering of time series in group-specific functional subspaces. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 5(4), 281–300. 353Google Scholar

Bouveyron, C., Girard, S., and Schmid, C. 2007a. High-dimensional data clustering. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 52(1), 502–519. 247, 249, 353, 362Google Scholar

Bouveyron, C., Girard, S., and Schmid, C. 2007b. High dimensional discriminant analysis. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 36(14), 2607–2623. 247, 362Google Scholar

Bouveyron, C., Celeux, G., and Girard, S. 2011. Intrinsic dimension estimation by maximum likelihood in isotropic probabilistic PCA. Pattern Recognition Letters, 32(14), 1706–1713. 249CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouveyron, C., Côme, E., and Jacques, J. 2015. The discriminative functional mixture model for a comparative analysis of bike sharing systems. Annals of Applied Statistics, 9(4), 1726–1760. 10, 165, 353, 356Google Scholar

Bouveyron, C., Bozzi, L., Jacques, J., and Jollois, F.-X. 2018a. The functional latent block model for the co-clustering of electricity consumption curves. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 897–915. 382, 383Google Scholar

Bouveyron, C., Latouche, P., and Zreik, R. 2018b. The stochastic topic block model for the clustering of networks with textual edges. Statistics and Computing, 28, 11–31. 321, 382CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Box, G. E. P., and Cox, D. R. 1964. An analysis of transformations. (with Discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 26, 211–252. 278Google Scholar

Boyles, R. A. 1983. On the convergence of the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 45, 47–50. 23Google Scholar

Branco, M. D., and Dey, D. K. 2001. A general class of multivariate skew-elliptical distributions. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 79(1), 99–113. 271Google Scholar

Brand, M. 1999. Structure discovery in conditional probability models via an entropic prior and parameter extinction. Neural Computation, 11, 1155–1182. 107Google Scholar

Brault, V., and Channarond, A. 2016. Fast and consistent algorithm for the latent block model. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.09005. 383Google Scholar

Brault, V., and Lomet, A. 2015. Methods for co-clustering: A review. Journal de la Société Française de Statistique, 156, 27–51. 374Google Scholar

Breiman, L. 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5–32. 109Google Scholar

Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Ohlsen, R., and Stone, C. 1984. Classification and Regression Trees. New York: Wadsworth. 109Google Scholar

Bretagnolle, V. 2007. Personal communication. Source: Museum. 123Google Scholar

Brinkman, R. R., Gasparetto, M., Lee, S.-J. J., Ribickas, A. J., Perkins, J., Janssen, W., Smiley, R., and Smith, C. 2007. High-content flow cytometry and temporal data analysis for defining a cellular signature of graft-versus-host disease. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 13, 691–700. 259Google Scholar

Brodley, C., and Friedl, M. 1999. Identifying mislabeled training data. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 11, 131–167. 146CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Browne, R. P., and McNicholas, P. D. 2015. A mixture of generalized hyperbolic distributions. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 43(2), 176–198. 283Google Scholar

Bruneau, P., Gelgon, M., and Picarougne, F. 2010. Parsimonious reduction of Gaussian mixture models with a variational-Bayes approach. Pattern Recognition, 43, 850–858. 108CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butts, C. T., Handcock, M. S., and Hunter, D. R. 2014. network: Classes for Relational Data. Irvine, CA. R package version 1.10.2. 292Google Scholar

Byar, D. P., and Green, S. B. 1980. The choice of treatment for cancer patients based on covariate information: application to prostate cancer. Bulletin du Cancer, 67, 477–490. 187Google Scholar

Byers, S. D., and Raftery, A. E. 1998. Nearest neighbor clutter removal for estimating features in spatial point processes. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93, 577–584. 82, 106Google Scholar

Campbell, J. G., Fraley, C., Murtagh, F., and Raftery, A. E. 1997. Linear flaw detection in woven textiles using model-based clustering. Pattern Recognition Letters, 18, 1539–1548. 53Google Scholar

Campbell, J. G., Fraley, C., Stanford, D. C., Murtagh, F., and Raftery, A. E. 1999. Model-based methods for real-time textile fault detection. International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, 10, 339–346. 53Google Scholar

Carreira-Perpiñán, M. Á., and Renals, S. 2000. Practical identifiability of finite mixtures of multivariate Bernoulli distributions. Neural Computation, 12(1), 141–152. 167Google Scholar

Carrington, P. J., Scott, J., and Wasserman, S. 2005. Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis. Cambridge University Press. 294Google Scholar

Carvalho, A. X., and Tanner, M. A. 2007. Modelling nonlinear count time series with local mixtures of Poisson autoregressions. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 51(11), 5266–5294. 350Google Scholar

Cattell, R. B. 1944. A note on correlation clusters and cluster search methods. Psychometrika, 9, 169–184. 2Google Scholar

Cattell, R. B. 1966. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 145–276. 249Google Scholar

Celeux, G., and Diebolt, J. 1985. Stochastic versions of the EM algorithm. Computational Statistics Quarterly, 2, 73–82. 377Google Scholar

Celeux, G., and Govaert, G. 1991. Clustering criteria for discrete data and latent class models. Journal of Classification, 8(2), 157–176. 168, 172Google Scholar

Celeux, G., and Govaert, G. 1992. A classification EM algorithm for clustering and two stochastic versions. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 14, 315–332. 34Google Scholar

Celeux, G., and Govaert, G. 1993. Comparison of the mixture and the classification maximum likelihood in cluster analysis. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 47, 127–146. 34Google Scholar

Celeux, G., and Govaert, G. 1995. Gaussian parsimonious clustering models. Pattern Recognition, 28, 781–793. 25, 76, 171, 237, 248Google Scholar

Celeux, G., and Mkhadri, A. 1992. Discrete regularized discriminant analysis. Statistics and Computing, 2(3), 143–151. 6Google Scholar

Celeux, G., and Robert, C. 1993. Une histoire de discrétisation (with discussion). Revue de Modulad, 11, 7–42. 186Google Scholar

Celeux, G., and Soromenho, G. 1996. An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. Journal of Classification, 13(2), 195–212. 77Google Scholar

Celeux, G., Hurn, M., and Robert, C. P. 2000. Computational and inferential difficulties with mixture posterior distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 957–970. 107, 183Google Scholar

Celeux, G., Chrétien, S., Forbes, F., and Mkhadri, A. 2001. A component-wise EM algorithm for mixtures. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 10, 697–712. 200Google Scholar

Celeux, G., Martin, O., and Lavergne, C. 2005. Mixture of linear mixed models for clustering gene expression profiles from repeated microarray experiments. Statistical Modelling, 5, 243– 267. 350Google Scholar

Celeux, G., Martin-Magniette, M.-L., Maugis-Rabusseau, C., and Raftery, A. E. 2011. Letter to the editor. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105, 383. 201Google Scholar

Celeux, G., Martin-Magniette, M. L., Maugis-Rabusseau, C., and Raftery, A. E. 2014. Comparing model selection and regularization approaches to variable selection in model-based clustering. Journal de la Société Française de Statistique, 155, 57–71. 77Google Scholar

Celeux, G., Frühwirth-Schnatter, S., and Robert, C. P. (eds.). 2018a. Handbook of Mixture Analysis. Chapman & Hall/CRC. 14Google Scholar

Celeux, G., Maugis, C., and Sedki, M. 2018b. Variable selection in model-based clustering and discriminant analysis with a regularization approach. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, To appear. 202, 209Google Scholar

Cerioli, A., Garcia-Escudero, L. A., Mayo-Iscar, A., and Riani, M. 2018 . Finding the number of normal groups in model-based clustering via constrained likelihoods. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 27(2), 404–416. 107Google Scholar

Chang, J. 2010. lda: Collapsed Gibbs sampling methods for topic models. R package version 1.2.1. 305Google Scholar

Chang, J., and Blei, D. M. 2009. Relational topic models for document networks. Pages 81–88 of: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, AISTATS 2009, Clearwater Beach, Florida, USA, April 16-18, 2009. 382Google Scholar

Chang, J., and Blei, D. M. 2010. Hierarchical relational models for document networks. Annals of Applied Statistics, 4(1), 124–150. 329Google Scholar

Chang, W. C. 1983. On using principal component before separating a mixture of two multivariate normal distributions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 32(3), 267–275. 230Google Scholar

Channarond, A. 2015. Random graph models: an overview of modeling approaches. Journal de la Société Française de Statistique, 156(3), 56–94. 294Google Scholar

Channarond, A., Daudin, J.-J., and Robin, S. 2012. Classification and estimation in the stochastic blockmodel based on the empirical degrees. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 6, 2574–2601. 300Google Scholar

Cheeseman, P., and Stutz, J. 1995. Bayesian classification (AutoClass): Theory and results. Pages 153–180 of: Fayyad, U., Piatesky-Shapiro, G., Smyth, P., and Uthurusamy, R. (eds.), Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. AAAI Press. 77Google Scholar

Chen, J., and Tan, X. 2009. Inference for multivariate normal mixtures. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 100, 1367–1383. 107CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, T., Zhang, N. L., Liu, T. F., Wang, Y., and Poon, L. K. M. 2012. Model-based multidimensional clustering of categorical data. Artificial Intelligence, 176, 2246–2279. 198Google Scholar

Chi, E. C., and Lange, K. 2014. Stable estimation of a covariance matrix guided by nuclear norm penalties. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 80, 117–128. 107Google Scholar

Chow, C. 1970. On optimum recognition error and reject tradeoff. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 16(1), 41–46. 161Google Scholar

Ciuperca, G., Ridolfi, A., and Idier, J. 2003. Penalized maximum likelihood estimator for normal mixtures. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 30, 45–59. 107Google Scholar

Collins, L. M., and Lanza, S. T. 2013. Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis: With Applications in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences. New York: Wiley. 197Google Scholar

Côme, E., and Oukhellou, L. 2014. Model-based count series clustering for bike sharing system usage mining: A case study with the Vélib system of Paris. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 5(3), 39:1–39:21. 194Google Scholar

Côme, E., Randriamanamihaga, A., Oukhellou, L., and Aknin, P. 2014. Spatio-temporal analysis of dynamic origin-destination data using latent Dirichlet allocation. Application to the Vélib bike sharing system of Paris. In: Proceedings of 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. 365Google Scholar

Cook, R. D., and Weisberg, S. 1994. An Introduction to Regression Graphics. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 331Google Scholar

Coretto, P., and Hennig, C. 2010. A simulation study to compare robust clustering methods based on mixtures. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 4, 111–135. 106Google Scholar

Coretto, P., and Hennig, C. 2011. Maximum likelihood estimation of heterogeneous mixtures of gaussian and uniform distributions. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 141, 462–473. 106Google Scholar

Corneli, M., Bouveyron, C., Latouche, P., and Rossi, F. 2018. The dynamic stochastic topic block model for dynamic networks with textual edges. Statistics and Computing, In press. 330Google Scholar

Cortes, C., and Vapnik, V. 1995. Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20(3), 273–297. 5Google Scholar

Cox, D. R. 1958. The regression analysis of binary sequences. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 215–242. 5Google Scholar

Czekanowski, J. 1909. Zur differential-diagnose der Neadertalgruppe. Korrespondenz-Blatt der Deutschen Geselleschaft für Anthropologie, Ethnologie, und Urgeschichte, 40, 44–47. 2Google Scholar

Czekanowski, J. 1911. Objectiv kriterien in der ethnologie. Korrespondenz-Blatt der Deutschen Geselleschaft für Anthropologie, Ethnologie, und Urgeschichte, 47, 1–5. 2Google Scholar

Dang, U. J, Punzo, A., McNicholas, P. D., Ingrassia, S., and Browne, R. P. 2017. Multivariate response and parsimony for Gaussian cluster-weighted models. Journal of Classification, 34(1), 4–34. 350Google Scholar

Das Gupta, S. 1973. Theories and methods in classification: a review. Pages 77–137 of: Cacoullos, T. (ed.), Discriminant Analysis and Applications. Elsevier. 6Google Scholar

Dasarathy, B. 1980. Nosing around the neighbourhood: a new system structure and classification rule for recognition in partially exposed environments. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2, 67–71. 161Google Scholar

Dasgupta, A., and Raftery, A. E. 1998. Detecting features in spatial point processes with clutter via model-based clustering. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93, 294–302. 53, 105Google Scholar

Dasgupta, D., and Nino, F. 2000. A comparison of negative and positive selection algorithms in novel pattern detection. Pages 125–130 of: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. 161Google Scholar

Daudin, J.-J., Picard, F., and Robin, S. 2008. A mixture model for random graphs. Statistics and Computing, 18, 173–183. 300Google Scholar

Day, N. E. 1969. Estimating the components of a mixture of two normal distributions. Biometrika, 56, 463–474. 76, 92, 106Google Scholar

Dean, N., and Raftery, A. E. 2005. Normal-uniform mixture differential gene expression detection for cDNA microarrays. BMC Bioinformatics, 6, article 173. 106CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dean, N., and Raftery, A. E. 2010. Latent class analysis variable selection. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 62, 11–35. 212, 214Google Scholar

Deerwester, S., Dumais, S., Furnas, G., Landauer, T., and Harshman, R. 1990. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 391. 364Google Scholar

Defays, D. 1978. An efficient algorithm for a complete link method. Computer Journal, 20, 364–366. 33Google Scholar

Dellaportas, P. 1998. Bayesian classification of neolithic tools. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 47, 279–297. 107Google Scholar

Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., and Rubin, D. B. 1977. Maximum likelihood for incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 1–38. 4, 23, 94, 337, 338Google Scholar

Devos, O., Ruckebusch, C., Durand, A., Duponchel, L., and Huvenne, J.-P. 2009. Support vector machines (SVM) in near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy: Focus on parameters optimization and model interpretation. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 96, 27–33. 11, 221Google Scholar

Diebolt, J., and Robert, C. P. 1994. Estimation of finite mixture distributions through Bayesian sampling. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 56(2), 363–375. 337Google Scholar

Donoho, D. 2000. High-dimensional data analysis: The curses and blessings of dimensionality. In: Math Challenges of the 21st Century. American Mathematical Society. 222Google Scholar

Dowe, D. L. 2008. Foreword re C. S. Wallace. The Computer Journal, 51(5), 523–560. 198Google Scholar

Driver, H. E., and Kroeber, A. L. 1932. Quantitative expression of cultural relationships. University of California Publications in Archaeology and Ethnology, 31, 211–216. 2Google Scholar

Duda, R., Hart, P., and Stork, D. 2000. Pattern Classification. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 233Google Scholar

Edwards, A. W. F., and Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. 1965. A method for cluster analysis. Biometrics, 21, 362–375. 76Google Scholar

Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R. 1997. Improvements on cross-validation: the .632+ bootstrap method. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92, 648–560. 119Google Scholar

Emerson, J. W., and Green, W. A. 2014. gpairs: The Generalized Pairs Plot. R package version 1.2. 332Google Scholar

Erosheva, E. A. 2002. Grade of membership and latent structure models with application to disability survey data. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University. 304Google Scholar

Erosheva, E. A. 2003. Bayesian estimation of the Grade of Membership model. Pages 501–510 of: Bernardo, J., Bayarri, M., Berger, J., Dawid, A., Heckerman, D., Smith, A., and West, M. (eds.), Bayesian Statistics, 7. UK: Oxford University Press. 304Google Scholar

Erosheva, E. A., Fienberg, S. E., and Joutard, C. 2007. Describing disability through individual-level mixture models for multivariate binary data. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 1(2), 502–537. 304Google Scholar

Escabias, M., Aguilera, A. M., and Valderrama, M. J. 2005. Modeling environmental data by functional principal component logistic regression. Environmetrics, 16, 95–107. 354Google Scholar

Evans, K., Love, T., and Thurston, S. W. 2015. Outlier identification in model-based cluster analysis. Journal of Classification, 32, 63–84. 106Google Scholar

Everitt, B. S. 1993. Cluster Analysis. 3rd edn. London: Edward Arnold. 14Google Scholar

Everitt, B. S., and Hand, D. J. 1981. Finite Mixture Distributions. London: Chapman & Hall. Monographs on Applied Probability and Statistics. 14Google Scholar

Fienberg, S. E., and Wasserman, S. 1981. Discussion of “An exponential family of probability distributions for directed graphs” by Holland and Leinhardt. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76(373), 54–57. 298Google Scholar

Figueiredo, M. A. T., and Jain, A. K. 2002. Unsupervised learning of finite mixture models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24, 381–396. 107Google Scholar

Fisher, R. A. 1936. The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Annals of Eugenics, 7, 179–188. 5, 6, 154, 231, 237, 252, 356Google Scholar

Fisher, R. A. 1938. The statistical utilization of multiple measurements. Annals of Human Genetics, 8(4), 376–386. 5Google Scholar

Foley, D. H., and Sammon, J. W. 1975. An optimal set of discriminant vectors. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 24, 281–289. 253Google Scholar

Fop, M., and Murphy, T. B. 2018. Variable selection methods for model-based clustering. Statistics Surveys, 12, 18–65. 216Google Scholar

Fop, M., Smart, K., and Murphy, T. B. 2017. Variable selection for latent class analysis with application to low back pain diagnosis. Annals of Applied Statistics, 11(4), 2080–2110. 213, 214Google Scholar

Fop, M., Scrucca, L., and Murphy, T. B. 2018. Model-based clustering with sparse covariance matrices. Statistics and Computing, To appear. 77Google Scholar

Forbes, F., and Wraith, D. 2014. A new family of multivariate heavy-tailed distributions with variable marginal amounts of tailweight: Application to robust clustering. Statistics and Computing, 24(6), 971–984. 291Google Scholar

Forbes, F., Peyrard, N., Fraley, C., Georgian-Smith, D., Goldhaber, D. M., and Raftery, A. E. 2006. Model-based region-of-interest selection in dynamic breast MRI. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 30, 675–687. 383Google Scholar

Forina, M., Armanino, C., Castino, M., and Ubigli, M. 1986. Multivariate data analysis as a discriminating method of the origin of wines. Vitis, 25, 189–201. 8, 60, 332Google Scholar

Fraiman, R., Justel, A., and Svarc, M. 2008. Selection of variables for cluster analysis and classification rules. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103, 1294–1303. 215Google Scholar

Fraley, C., and Raftery, A. E. 1998. How many clusters? Which clustering method? - Answers via model-based cluster analysis. Computer Journal, 41, 578–588. 53, 78, 105Google Scholar

Fraley, C., and Raftery, A. E. 1999. MCLUST: Software for model-based cluster analysis. Journal of Classification, 16, 297–306. 76Google Scholar

Fraley, C., and Raftery, A. E. 2002. Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis and density estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97, 611–631. 78, 105, 126, 248, 261Google Scholar

Fraley, C., and Raftery, A. E. 2003. Enhanced model-based clustering, density estimation and discriminant analysis software: MCLUST. Journal of Classification, 20, 263–286. 94, 106Google Scholar

Fraley, C., and Raftery, A. E. 2005. Bayesian Regularization for Normal Mixture Estimation and Model-based Clustering. Technical Report 486. Department of Statistics, University of Washington. 95Google Scholar

Fraley, C., and Raftery, A. E. 2006. Some applications of model-based clustering in chemistry. R News, 6, 17–23. 77, 382Google Scholar

Fraley, C., and Raftery, A. E. 2007a. Bayesian regularization for normal mixture estimation and model-based clustering. Journal of Classification, 24, 155–181. 94, 95, 107Google Scholar

Fraley, C., and Raftery, A. E. 2007b. Model-based methods of classification: Using the mclust software in chemometrics. Journal of Statistical Software, 18, paper i06. 76Google Scholar

Fraley, C., Raftery, A. E., and Wehrens, R. 2005. Incremental model-based clustering for large datasets with small clusters. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 14, 520–546. 383Google Scholar

Franczak, B. C., Browne, R. P., and McNicholas, P. D. 2014. Mixtures of shifted asymmetric Laplace distributions. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 36(6), 1149–1157. 291Google Scholar

Frénay, B., and Verleysen, M. 2014. Classification in the presence of label noise: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 25(5), 845–869. 160Google Scholar

Friedman, H. P., and Rubin, J. 1967. On some invariant criteria for grouping data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, 1159–1178. 76Google Scholar

Friedman, J. 1989. Regularized discriminant analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 165–175. 115, 233, 236Google Scholar

Friel, N., Rastelli, R., Wyse, J., and Raftery, A. E. 2016. Interlocking directorates in Irish companies using a latent space model for bipartite networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(24), 6629–6634. 330Google Scholar

Fritz, H., García-Escudero, , L. A, and Mayo-Iscar, A. 2012. tclust: An R package for a trimming approach to cluster analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 47(12), 1–26. 106Google Scholar

Fruchterman, T. M. J., and Reingold, E. M. 1991. Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software - Practice and Experience, 21(11), 1129–1164. 292Google Scholar

Frühwirth-Schnatter, S. 2006. Finite Mixture and Markov Switching Models. Springer Series in Statistics. New York: Springer-Verlag. 14, 174, 337, 378Google Scholar

Frühwirth-Schnatter, S. 2011a. Dealing with label switching under model uncertainty. Pages 213–240 of: Mengersen, K. L., Robert, C., and Titterington, D. M. (eds.), Mixtures: Estimation and Applications. Wiley. 181, 184, 185, 379Google Scholar

Frühwirth-Schnatter, S. 2011b. Panel data analysis: a survey on model-based clustering of time series. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 5(4), 251–280. 382Google Scholar

Frühwirth-Schnatter, S., and Kaufmann, S. 2008. Model-based clustering of multiple time series. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 26, 78–89. 353Google Scholar

Fu, W., Song, L., and Xing, E. P. 2009. Dynamic mixed membership blockmodel for evolving networks. Pages 329–336 of: Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning. ICML’09. New York, NY, USA: ACM. 330Google Scholar

Fukunaga, K. 1990. Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition. San Diego: Academic Press. 233, 252, 356Google Scholar

Fukunaga, K. 1999. Statistical pattern recognition. Pages 33–60 of: Chen, C. H., Pau, L. F., and Wang, P. S. P. (eds.), Handbook Of Pattern Recognition And Computer Vision. World Scientific. 6Google Scholar

Galimberti, G., Manisi, A., and Soffritti, G. 2017. Modelling the role of variable in model-based cluster analysis. Statistics and Computing, 28, 146–169. 216Google Scholar

Gallegos, M. T., and Ritter, G. 2005. A robust method for cluster analysis. Annals of Statistics, 347–380. 88, 90Google Scholar

Gallegos, M. T., and Ritter, G. 2009a. Trimmed ML estimation of contaminated mixtures. Sankhyā A, 71, 164–220. 106Google Scholar

Gallegos, M. T., and Ritter, G. 2009b. Trimming algorithms for clustering contaminated grouped data and their robustness. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 3, 135–167. 106Google Scholar

Gamberger, D., Lavrac, N., and Groselj, C. 1999. Experiments with noise filtering in a medical domain. Pages 143–151 of: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Machine Learning. ICML’99. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. 161Google Scholar

García-Escudero, L. A., Gordaliza, A., Matrán, C., and Mayo-Iscar, A. 2008. A general trimming approach to robust cluster analysis. Annals of Statistics, 36, 1324–1345. 88, 90, 91, 93, 106Google Scholar

García-Escudero, L. A., Gordaliza, A., Matrán, C., and Mayo-Iscar, A. 2010. A review of robust clustering methods. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 4, 89–109. 106Google Scholar

García-Escudero, L. A., Gordaliza, A., Matrán, C., and Mayo-Iscar, A. 2011. Exploring the number of groups in robust model-based clustering. Statistics and Computing, 21, 585–599. 106Google Scholar

García-Escudero, L. A., Gordaliza, A., Matrán, C., and Mayo-Iscar, A. 2015. Avoiding spurious local maximizers in mixture modeling. Statistics and Computing, 25, 619–633. 107Google Scholar

Gates, G. 1972. The reduced nearest neighbor rule. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 18(3), 431–433. 161Google Scholar

Gelfand, A. E., and Smith, A. F. M. 1990. Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85(410), 398–409. 300Google Scholar

Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A., and Rubin, D. B. 2013. Bayesian Data Analysis. 3rd edn. London: Chapman and Hall. 94Google Scholar

Gershenfeld, N. 1997. Nonlinear inference and cluster-weighted modeling. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 808(1), 18–24. 350Google Scholar

Geweke, J., and Keane, M. 2007. Smoothly mixing regressions. Journal of Econometrics, 136(1), 252–290. 350Google Scholar

Ghahramani, Z., and Hinton, G. E. 1997. The EM algorithm for factor analyzers. Tech. rept. University of Toronto. 238, 240, 244, 246, 257Google Scholar

Giacofci, M., Lambert-Lacroix, S., Marot, G., and Picard, F. 2013. Wavelet-based clustering for mixed-effects functional models in high dimension. Biometrics, 69, 31–40. 353Google Scholar

Goldenberg, A., Zheng, A. X., Fienberg, S. E., and Airoldi, E. M. 2010. A survey of statistical network models. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 2, 129–233. 294Google Scholar

Gollini, I. 2015. lvm4net: Latent Variable Models for Networks. R package version 0.2. 317Google Scholar

Gollini, I., and Murphy, T. B. 2014. Mixture of latent trait analyzers for model-based clustering of categorical data. Statistics and Computing, 24, 569–588. 166, 167, 198Google Scholar

Gollini, I., and Murphy, T. B. 2016. Joint modelling of multiple network views. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 25(1), 246–265. 314Google Scholar

Goodman, L. A. 1974. Exploratory latent structure models using both identifiable and unidentifiable models. Biometrika, 61, 215–231. 166, 167Google Scholar

Gopal, S. 2007. The evolving social geography of blogs. Pages 275–293 of: Miller, H. J. (ed.), Societies and Cities in the Age of Instant Access. The GeoJournal Library, vol. 88. Springer Netherlands. 296Google Scholar

Gordon, A. D. 1999. Classification. 2nd edn. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC. 14Google Scholar

Gormley, I. C., and Frühwirth-Schnatter, S. 2018. Mixtures of experts. Chap. 12, pages 279– 316 of: Frühwirth-Schnatter, S., Celeux, G., and Robert, C. P. (eds.), Handbook of Mixture Analysis. CRC Press. 350Google Scholar

Gormley, I. C., and Murphy, T. B. 2008. A mixture of experts model for rank data with applications in election studies. Annals of Applied Statistics, 2(4), 1452–1477. 350Google Scholar

Gormley, I. C., and Murphy, T. B. 2010a. Clustering ranked preference data using sociodemo-graphic covariates. Pages 543–569 of: Hess, S., and Daly, A. (eds.), Choice Modelling: The State-of-the-Art and the State-of-Practice. United Kingdom: Emerald. 315, 339, 350Google Scholar

Gormley, I. C., and Murphy, T. B. 2010b. A mixture of experts latent position cluster model for social network data. Statistical Methodology, 7(3), 385–405. 350Google Scholar

Gormley, I. C., and Murphy, T. B. 2011. Mixture of experts models with social science applications. Pages 91–110 of: Mengersen, K., Robert, C., and Titterington, D. M. (eds.), Mixture Estimation and Applications. Wiley. 334, 339, 350Google Scholar

Gormley, I. C., and Murphy, T. B. 2018. MEclustnet: Fits the Mixture of Experts Latent Position Cluster Model to Network Data. R package version 1.2.1. 317Google Scholar

Govaert, G. 1977. Algorithme de classification d’un tableau de contingence. Pages 487–500 of: First International Symposium on Data Analysis and Informatics. Versailles: INRIA. 374Google Scholar

Govaert, G. 1983. Classification croisée. Thèse d’État, Université Paris 6, France. 172Google Scholar

Govaert, G., and Nadif, M. 2008. Block clustering with Bernoulli mixture models: Comparison of different approaches. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 52, 3233–3245. 374, 377Google Scholar

Govaert, G., and Nadif, M. 2010. Latent block model for contingency table. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 39(3), 416–425. 383Google Scholar

Govaert, G., and Nadif, M. 2014. Co-clustering. London: ISTE and Wiley. 374Google Scholar

Grandvalet, Y., and Bengio, Y. 2004. Semi-supervised learning by entropy minimization. Pages 529–536 of: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. NIPS’04. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press. 134Google Scholar

Greenacre, M., and Blasius, J. (eds.). 2006. Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods. Chapman & Hall/CRC. 178Google Scholar

Greene, E. L. 1909. Landmarks of Botanical History: A Study of Certain Epochs in the Development of the Science of Botany. Part I. Prior to 1562 A.D. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution. 2Google Scholar

Grün, B., and Leisch, F. 2007. Fitting finite mixtures of generalized linear regressions in R. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 51(11), 5247–5252. 340Google Scholar

Grün, B., and Leisch, F. 2008. FlexMix Version 2: Finite mixtures with concomitant variables and varying and constant parameters. Journal of Statistical Software, 28(4), 1–35. 339, 340Google Scholar

Guo, J., Levina, E., Michailidis, G., and Zhu, J. 2010. Pairwise variable selection for high-dimensional model-based clustering. Biometrics, 66, 793–804. 208Google Scholar

Guyon, I., Matic, N., and Vapnik, V. 1996. Discovering informative patterns and data cleaning. Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 181–203. 161Google Scholar

Gyllenberg, M., Koski, T., Reilink, E., and Verlaan, M. 1994. Nonuniqueness in probabilistic numerical identification of bacteria. Journal of Applied Probability, 31(2), 542–548. 167Google Scholar

Habbema, J. D. F., Hermans, J., and van den Broek, K. 1974. A stepwise discriminant analysis program using density estimation. Pages 101–110 of: Bruckman, G. (ed.), Compstat 1974: Proceedings in Computational Statistics. Vienna: Physica-Verlag. 111Google Scholar

Hagenaars, J. A. 1988. Latent structure models with direct effects between indicators: Local dependence models. Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 379–405. 198Google Scholar

Halbe, Z., Bortman, M., and Aladjem, M. 2013. Regularized mixture density estimation with an analytical setting of shrinkage intensities. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 24, 460–470. 107Google Scholar

Hampel, F. R. 1971. A general qualitative definition of robustness. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 42, 1887–1896. 105Google Scholar

Handcock, M. S., Raftery, A. E., and Tantrum, J. M. 2007. Model-based clustering for social networks. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 170(2), 1–22. 312, 314, 316, 350Google Scholar

Hanneke, S., Fu, W., and Xing, E. P. 2010. Discrete temporal models of social networks. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 4, 585–605. 330Google Scholar

Hansen, L., Liisberg, C., and Salamon, P. 1997. The error-reject tradeoff. Open Systems and Information Dynamics, 4, 159–184. 161Google Scholar

Harrison, P. J., and Stevens, C. F. 1971. Bayesian approach to short-term forecasting. Operational Research Quarterly, 22, 341–362. 108Google Scholar

Hartigan, J. A. 1975. Clustering Algorithms. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 14Google Scholar

Hartigan, J. A., and Hartigan, P. M. 1985. The dip test of unimodality. Annals of Statistics, 13, 70–84. 101Google Scholar

Hasnat, M. A., Velcin, J., Bonnevoy, S., and Jacques, J. 2017. Evolutionary clustering for categorical data using parametric links among multinomial mixture models. Econometrics and Statistics, 3, 141–159. 198Google Scholar

Hastie, T., and Stuetzle, W. 1989. Principal curves. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 502–516. 229Google Scholar

Hastie, T., and Tibshirani, R. 1996. Discriminant analysis by Gaussian mixtures. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 155–176. 6, 126, 146, 152Google Scholar

Hastie, T., Buja, A., and Tibshirani, R. 1995. Penalized discriminant analysis. The Annals of Statistics, 23, 73–102. 233, 236Google Scholar

Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J. 2009. The Elements of Statistical Learning. 2nd edn. New York: Springer. 111, 131, 145Google Scholar

Hathaway, R. J. 1985. A constrained formulation of maximum likelihood estimation for normal mixture distributions. Annals of Statistics, 13, 795–800. 93, 106Google Scholar

Hathaway, R. J. 1986a. Another interpretation of the EM algorithm for mixture distributions. Statistics and Probability Letters, 4(2), 53–56. 326Google Scholar

Hathaway, R. J. 1986b. A constrained EM algorithm for univariate normal mixtures. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 23, 211–230. 93, 106Google Scholar

Haughton, D. 1988. On the choice of a model to fit data from an exponential family. Annals of Statistics, 16, 342–355. 51Google Scholar

Hawkins, D., and McLachlan, G. J. 1997. High-breakdown linear discriminant analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92(437), 136–143. 161Google Scholar

Heard, N. A., Holmes, C. C., and Stephens, D. A. 2006. A quantitative study of gene regulation involved in the immune response of anopheline mosquitoes: an application of Bayesian hierarchical clustering of curves. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101(473), 18–29. 353Google Scholar

Hellman, M. 1970. The nearest neighbour classification with a reject option. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, 6(3), 179–185. 161Google Scholar

Hennig, C. 2004. Breakdown points for maximum likelihood-estimators of location-scale mixtures. Annals of Statistics, 32, 1313–1340. 105, 106Google Scholar

Hennig, C. 2010. Methods for merging Gaussian mixture components. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 4, 3–34. 99, 101, 103Google Scholar

Hennig, C. 2013. Discussion of “Model-based clustering with non-normal mixture distributions” by Lee, S. X. and McLachlan, G. J.. Statistical Methods and Applications, 22, 455–458. 108Google Scholar

Hennig, C. 2015a. fpc: Flexible Procedures for Clustering. R package version 2.1-10. 12, 101, 340Google Scholar

Hennig, C. 2015b. What are the true clusters? Pattern Recognition, 64, 53–62. 108Google Scholar

Hennig, C., and Coretto, P. 2008. The noise component in model-based cluster analysis. Pages 127–138 of: Preisach, C., Burkhardt, H., Schmidt-Thieme, L., and Decker, R. (eds.), Data Analysis, Machine Learning and Applications. Berlin: Springer. 106Google Scholar

Hennig, C., and Hausdorf, B. 2015. prabclus: Functions for Clustering of Presence-Absence, Abundance and Multilocus Genetic Data. R package version 2.2-6. 12, 83Google Scholar

Hennig, C., and Liao, T. F. 2013. How to find an appropriate clustering for mixed type variables with application to socio-economic stratification (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 62, 309–369. 169, 188Google Scholar

Hennig, C., Meilă, M., Murtagh, F., and Rocci, R. (eds.). 2015. Handbook of Cluster Analysis. Chapman & Hall/CRC. 14Google Scholar

Henry, N. W. 1999. Latent Structure Analysis at Fifty. Paper presented at the 1999 Joint Statistical Meetings, Baltimore MD, August, 1999. www.people.vcu.edu/ñhenry/LSA50.htm. 72Google Scholar

Hoff, P. D., Raftery, A. E., and Handcock, M. S. 2002. Latent space approaches to social network analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97(460), 1090–1098. 312, 313Google Scholar

Hofmann, T. 1999. Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. Pages 50–57 of: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM. 364Google Scholar

Holland, P. W., and Leinhardt, S. 1981. An exponential family of probability distributions for directed graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76(373), 33–50. 329Google Scholar

Horaud, R., Forbes, F., Yguel, M., Dewaele, G., and Zhang, J. 2011. Rigid and articulated point registration with expectation conditional maximization. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 33, 587–602. 105Google Scholar

Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., and Sturdivant, R. X. 2013. Applied Logistic Regression. 3rd edn. New York: Wiley. 109Google Scholar

Hotelling, H. 1931. The generalization of “Student’s” ratio. Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 5Google Scholar

Hotelling, H. 1933. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 24, 417–441. 228Google Scholar

Houdard, A., Bouveyron, C., and Delon, J. 2019. High-dimensional mixture models for unsupervised image denoising (HDMI). SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, In press. 372Google Scholar

Howard, E., Meehan, M., and Parnell, A. 2018. Contrasting prediction methods for early warning systems at undergraduate level. The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 66–75. 78Google Scholar

Howells, W. W. 1973. Cranial variation in man: A study by multivariate analysis of patterns of difference among recent human populations. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, 67, 1–259. 65Google Scholar

Howells, W. W. 1989. Skull shapes and the map: Craniometric analyses in the dispersion of modern homo. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, 79. 65Google Scholar

Howells, W. W. 1995. Who’s who in skulls: Ethnic identification of crania from measurements. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, 82. 65Google Scholar

Howells, W. W. 1996. Howells’ craniometric data on the internet. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 101, 441–442. 65Google Scholar

Howland, P., and Park, H. 2004. Generalizing discriminant analysis using the generalized singular decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Learning. 233Google Scholar

Huber, P. 1985. Projection pursuit. Annals of Statistics, 13(2), 435–525. 226Google Scholar

Hubert, L., and Arabie, P. 1985. Comparing partitions. Journal of Classification, 2, 193–218. 41, 172Google Scholar

Hurn, M., Justel, A., and Robert, C. P. 2003. Estimating mixtures of regressions. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 12(1), 55–79. 331, 350Google Scholar

Ingrassia, S., and Rocci, R. 2007. Constrained monotone EM algorithms for finite mixture of multivariate Gaussians. Computational and Statistical Data Analysis, 51, 5339–5351. 106Google Scholar

Ingrassia, S., Minotti, S. C., and Vittadini, G. 2012. Local statistical modeling via the cluster-weighted approach with elliptical distributions. Journal of Classification, 29(3), 363–401. 350Google Scholar

Ingrassia, S., Punzo, A., Vittadini, G., and Minotti, S. C. 2015. The generalized linear mixed cluster-weighted model. Journal of Classification, 32(1), 85–113. 350Google Scholar

Iscar, A. M., Garcia-Escudero, L. A., and Fritz, H. 2017. tclust: Robust Trimmed Clustering. R package version 1.3-1. 12Google Scholar

Jacobs, R. A., Jordan, M. I., Nowlan, S. J., and Hinton, G. E. 1991. Adaptive mixture of local experts. Neural Computation, 3(1), 79–87. 333, 334Google Scholar

Jacques, J., and Biernacki, C. 2018. Model-based co-clustering for ordinal data. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 123, 101–115. 383Google Scholar

Jacques, J., and Preda, C. 2013. Funclust: a curves clustering method using functional random variable density approximation. Neurocomputing, 112, 164–171. 353Google Scholar

Jacques, J., and Preda, C. 2014a. Functional data clustering: A survey. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 8(3), 231–255. 353Google Scholar

Jacques, J., and Preda, C. 2014b. Model-based clustering of multivariate functional data. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 71, 92–106. 353, 359Google Scholar

James, G. M., and Sugar, C. A. 2003. Clustering for sparsely sampled functional data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 98(462), 397–408. 353, 354Google Scholar

Jeffreys, H. 1961. Theory of Probability. 3rd edn. Clarendon. 51Google Scholar

Jernite, Y., Latouche, P., Bouveyron, C., Rivera, P., Jegou, L., and Lamassé, S. 2014. The random subgraph model for the analysis of an ecclesiastical network in Merovingian Gaul. Annals of Applied Statistics, 8(1), 377–405. 329Google Scholar

Jin, Z., Yang, J-Y., Hu, Z. S., and Lou, Z. 2001. Face recognition based on the uncorrelated optimal discriminant vectors. Pattern Recognition, 10(34), 2041–2047. 233Google Scholar

Joachims, T. 1999. Transductive inference for text classification using support vector machines. Pages 200–209 of: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Machine Learning. ICML’99. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. 134Google Scholar

John, G. H. 1995. Robust decision trees: Removing outliers from databases. Pages 174–179 of: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. KDD’95. AAAI Press. 161Google Scholar

Jordan, M. I., and Jacobs, R. A. 1994. Hierarchical mixtures of experts and the EM algorithm. Neural Computation, 6, 181–214. 336Google Scholar

Jöreskog, K. G. 1978. Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices. Psychometrika, 43, 443–477. 229Google Scholar

Jörnsten, R., and Keleş, S. 2008. Mixture models with multiple levels, with application to the analysis of multifactor gene expression data. Biostatistics, 9, 540–554. 108Google Scholar

Karlis, D. 2003. An EM algorithm for multivariate Poisson distribution and related models. Journal of Applied Statistics, 30, 63–77. 192Google Scholar

Karlis, D., and Santourian, A. 2009. Model-based clustering with non-elliptically contoured distributions. Statistics and Computing, 19(1), 73–83. 283Google Scholar

Kass, R. E., and Raftery, A. E. 1995. Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773–795. 47, 51Google Scholar

Kass, R. E., and Wasserman, L. 1995. A reference Bayesian test for nested hypotheses and its relationship to the Schwarz criterion. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 928–934. 51Google Scholar

Keribin, C. 1998. Consistent estimate of the order of mixture models. Comptes Rendues de l’Academie des Sciences, série I — Mathématiques, 326, 243–248. 53Google Scholar

Keribin, C., Brault, V., Celeux, G., and Govaert, G. 2015. Estimation and selection for the latent block model on categorical data. Statistics and Computing, 25, 1201–1216. 378, 379, 383Google Scholar

Kim, D., and Seo, B. 2014. Assessment of the number of components in Gaussian mixture models in the presence of multiple local maximizers. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 125, 100–120. 107Google Scholar

Kim, S., Song, D. K. H., and DeSarbo, W. S. 2012. Model-based segmentation featuring simultaneous segment-level variable selection. Journal of Marketing Research, 49, 725–736. 216Google Scholar

Kohonen, T. 1995. Self-Organizing Maps. New York: Springer-Verlag. 229Google Scholar

Kolaczyk, E. D. 2009. Statistical Analysis of Network Data: Methods and Models. New York: Springer. 294, 296Google Scholar

Krivitsky, P. N., and Handcock, M. S. 2008. Fitting latent cluster models for networks with latentnet. Journal of Statistical Software, 24(5), 1–23. 317Google Scholar

Krivitsky, P. N., and Handcock, M. S. 2010. latentnet: Latent position and cluster models for statistical networks. R package version 2.4-4. 317, 320Google Scholar

Krivitsky, P. N., Handcock, M. S., Raftery, A. E., and Hoff, P. D. 2009. Representing degree distributions, clustering, and homophily in social networks with latent cluster random effects models. Social Networks, 31(3), 204–213. 315Google Scholar

Krzanowski, W. 2003. Principles of Multivariate Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 233Google Scholar

Lance, G. N., and Williams, W. T. 1967. A general theory of classificatory sorting strategies. II. Clustering systems. Computer Journal, 10, 271–277. 34Google Scholar

Langrognet, F., Lebret, R., Poli, C., and Iovleff, S. 2016. Rmixmod: Supervised, Unsupervised, Semi-Supervised Classification with MIXture MODelling (Interface of MIXMOD Software). R package version 2.1-1. 12Google Scholar

Lasserre, J. A., Bishop, C. M., and Minka, T. P. 2006. Principled hybrids of generative and discriminative models. Pages 87–94 of: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’06), vol. 1. IEEE Conference Publications. 111Google Scholar

Latouche, P., Birmelé, E., and Ambroise, C. 2010. Bayesian methods for graph clustering. Pages 229–239 of: Fink, A., Lausen, B., Seidel, W., and Ultsch, A. (eds.), Advances in Data Analysis, Data Handling and Business Intelligence. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. 300Google Scholar

Latouche, P., Birmelé, E., and Ambroise, C. 2011. Overlapping stochastic block models with application to the French political blogosphere. Annals of Applied Statistics, 5(1), 309–336. 329Google Scholar

Latouche, P., Birmelé, E., and Ambroise, C. 2012. Variational Bayesian inference and complexity control for stochastic block models. Statistical Modelling, 12(1), 93–115. 302Google Scholar

Lavine, M., and West, M. 1992. A Bayesian method for classification and discrimination. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 20, 451–461. 76, 107Google Scholar

Law, M. H., Figueiredo, M. A. T., and Jain, A. K. 2004. Simultaneous feature selection and clustering using mixture models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 26, 1154–1166. 200, 203, 204, 216Google Scholar

Lawrence, N., and Schölkopf, B. 2001. Estimating a kernel Fisher discriminant in the presence of label noise. Pages 306–313 of: Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Machine Learning. ICML’01. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. 146, 147Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, P. F. 1950a. The logical and mathematical foundations of latent structure analysis. Chap. 10 of: Stouffer, S. A. (ed.), Measurement and Prediction, Volume IV of The American Soldier: Studies in Social Psychology in World War II. Princeton University Press. 3, 72, 73Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, P. F. 1950b. The logical and mathematical foundations of latent structure analysis. Pages 362–412 of: Stouffer, S. A. (ed.), Measurement and Prediction. Princeton University Press. 165Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, P. F. 1950c. Some latent structures. Chap. 11 of: Stouffer, S. A. (ed.), Measurement and Prediction, Volume IV of The American Soldier: Studies in Social Psychology in World War II. Princeton University Press. 3, 72, 73Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, P. F., and Henry, N. W. 1968. Latent Structure Analysis. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 197, 298Google Scholar

Lazebnik, S., Schmid, C., and Ponce, J. 2006. Beyond bags of features: Spatial pyramid matching for recognizing natural scene categories. Pages 2169–2178 of: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’06), vol. 2. IEEE. 364Google Scholar

Lazega, E. 2001. The Collegial Phenomenon: The Social Mechanisms of Cooperation Among Peers in a Corporate Law Partnership. Oxford University Press. 298, 299Google Scholar

LeCun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., and Haffner, P. 1998. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 86(11), 2278–2324. 5Google Scholar

Ledoit, O., and Wolf, M. 2003. Improved estimation of the covariance matrix of stock returns with an application to portfolio selection. Journal of Empirical Finance, 10, 603–621. 107Google Scholar

Ledoit, O., and Wolf, M. 2004. A well-conditioned estimator for large-dimensional covariance matrices. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 88, 365–411. 107Google Scholar

Ledoit, O., and Wolf, M. 2012. Nonlinear shrinkage estimation of large-dimensional covariance matrices. Annals of Statistics, 40, 1024–1060. 107Google Scholar

Lee, H., and Li, J. 2012. Variable selection for clustering by separability based on ridgelines. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 21, 315–337. 216Google Scholar

Lee, S. X., and McLachlan, G. J. 2013a. EMMIXuskew: An R package for fitting mixtures of multivariate skew t distributions via the EM algorithm. Journal of Statistical Software, 55(12), 1–22. 273, 275Google Scholar

Lee, S. X., and McLachlan, G. J. 2013b. EMMIXuskew: Fitting Unrestricted Multivariate Skew t Mixture Models. R package version 0.11-5. 275Google Scholar

Lee, S. X., and McLachlan, G. J. 2013c. Model-based clustering and classification with non-normal mixture distributions. Statistical Methods and Applications. Journal of the Italian Statistical Society, 22(4), 427–454. 290Google Scholar

Lee, S. X., and McLachlan, G. J. 2013d. On mixtures of skew normal and skew t-distributions. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 7(3), 241–266. 270, 290Google Scholar

Lee, S. X., and McLachlan, G. J. 2014. Finite mixtures of multivariate skew t-distributions: some recent and new results. Statistics and Computing, 24(2), 181–202. 268, 272, 290Google Scholar

Lee, S. X., and McLachlan, G. J. 2016. Finite mixtures of canonical fundamental skew t-distributions: the unification of the restricted and unrestricted skew t-mixture models. Statistics and Computing, 26, 573–589. 270, 291Google Scholar

Lee, S. X., and McLachlan, G. J. 2018. EMMIXcskew: an R package for the fitting of a mixture of canonical fundamental skew-t distributions. Journal of Statistical Software, 83(3), 1–32. 291Google Scholar

Leisch, F. 2004. FlexMix: A general framework for finite mixture models and latent class regression in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 11(8), 1–18. 12, 339, 340Google Scholar

Leroux, M. 1992. Consistent estimation of a mixing distribution. Annals of Statistics, 20, 1350–1360. 53Google Scholar

Li, J. 2005. Clustering based on a multilayer mixture model. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 14, 547–568. 108Google Scholar

Li, J., Ray, S., and Lindsay, B. G. 2007a. A nonparametric statistical approach to clustering via mode identification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 8, 1687–1723. 108Google Scholar

Li, J., Xia, Y., Shan, Z., and Liu, Y. 2015. Scalable constrained spectral clustering. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 27(2), 589–593. 160Google Scholar

Li, Q., Fraley, C., Bumgarner, R. E., Yeung, K. Y., and Raftery, A. E. 2005. Donuts, scratches and blanks: Robust model-based segmentation of microarray images. Bioinformatics, 21, 2875–2882. 383Google Scholar

Li, Y., Wessels, L., de Ridder, D., and Reinders, M. 2007b. Classification in the presence of class noise using a probabilistic kernel Fisher method. Pattern Recognition, 40(12), 3349–3357. 147Google Scholar

Lin, T.-C., and Lin, T.-I. 2010. Supervised learning of multivariate skew normal mixture models with missing information. Computational Statistics, 25(2), 183–201. 290Google Scholar

Lin, T.-I. 2009. Maximum likelihood estimation for multivariate skew normal mixture models. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 100(2), 257–265. 268Google Scholar

Lin, T.-I. 2010. Robust mixture modeling using multivariate skew t distributions. Statistics and Computing, 20(3), 343–356. 272Google Scholar

Lin, T.-I. 2014. Learning from incomplete data via parameterized t mixture models through eigenvalue decomposition. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 71, 183–195. 289Google Scholar

Lin, T.-I., and Lin, T.-C. 2011. Robust statistical modelling using the multivariate skew t distribution with complete and incomplete data. Statistical Modelling, 11(3), 253–277. 290Google Scholar

Lin, T.-I., Ho, H. J., and Chen, C. L. 2009. Analysis of multivariate skew normal models with incomplete data. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 100(10), 2337–2351. 268Google Scholar

Lin, T.-I., McNicholas, P. D., and Ho, H. J. 2014. Capturing patterns via parsimonious t mixture models. Statistics and Probability Letters, 88, 80–87. 261Google Scholar

Lindsay, Bruce. 1995. Mixture Models: Theory, Geometry and Applications. Hayward, CA: Institute of Mathematical Statistics. 14Google Scholar

Linnaeus, C. 1735. Systema Naturae. 1st edn. Leiden, Netherlands: Theodorum Haak. 2Google Scholar

Linnaeus, C. 1753. Species Plantarum. 1st edn. Stockholm, Sweden: Laurentii Salvii. 2Google Scholar

Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema Naturae. 10th edn. Stockholm, Sweden: Laurentii Salvii. 2Google Scholar

Linzer, D. A., and Lewis, J. B. 2011. poLCA: An R package for polytomous variable latent class analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 42(10), 1–29. 340Google Scholar

Liu, C. 1997. ML estimation of the multivariate t distribution and the EM algorithm. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 63, 296–312. 260Google Scholar

Liu, J. S. 1994. The collapsed Gibbs sampler in Bayesian computations with applications to a gene regulation problem. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89(427), 958–966. 305Google Scholar

Lo, K., and Gottardo, R. 2012. Flexible mixture modeling via the multivariate t distribution with the Box-Cox transformation: An alternative to the skew t distribution. Statistics and Computing, 22(1), 33–52. 281Google Scholar

Lo, K., Brinkman, R. R., and Gottardo, R. 2008. Automated gating of flow cytometry data via robust model based clustering. Cytometry A, 73, 321–332. 279Google Scholar

Lo, K., Hahne, F., Brinkman, R. R., and Gottardo, R. 2009. flowClust: a Bioconductor package for automated gating of flow cytometry data. BMC Bioinformatics, 10, R145. 281Google Scholar

Lomet, A. 2012. Sélection de modèle pour la classification croisée de données continues. Ph.D. thesis, Compiègne. 383Google Scholar

Longford, N. T., and Bartošová, J. 2014. A confusion index for measuring separation and clustering. Statistical Modelling, 14, 229–255. 108Google Scholar

Lorrain, F., and White, H. C. 1971. Structural equivalence of individuals in social networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1(1), 49–80. 298Google Scholar

MacQueen, J. 1967. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. Pages 281–297 of: LeCam, L. M., and Neyman, J. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol. 1. Berkeley, California: University of California Press. 75Google Scholar

Madeira, S. C., and Oliveira, A. L. 2004. Biclustering algorithms for biological data analysis: A survey. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 1, 24–45. 374Google Scholar

Mahalanobis, P. C. 1930. On tests and measures of group divergence. Part I. Theoretical formulae. Journal and Proceedings of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 26, 541–588. 5Google Scholar

Mangasarian, O. L., Street, W. N., and Wolberg, W. H. 1995. Breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis via linear programming. Operations Research, 43, 570–577. 7Google Scholar

Manikopoulos, C., and Papavassiliou, S. 2002. Network intrusion and fault detection: a statistical anomaly approach. IEEE Communications Magazine, 40(10), 76–82. 161Google Scholar

Marbac, M., Biernacki, C., and Vandewalle, V. 2015. Model-based clustering for conditionally correlated categorical data. Journal of Classification, 32, 145–175. 198Google Scholar

Mariadassou, M., Robin, S., and Vacher, C. 2010. Uncovering latent structure in valued graphs: A variational approach. Annals of Applied Statistics, 4(2), 715–742. 329Google Scholar

Markou, M., and Singh, S. 2003a. Novelty detection: A review - part 1: Statistical approaches. Signal Processing, 83(12), 2481–2497. 161Google Scholar

Markou, M., and Singh, S. 2003b. Novelty detection: A review - part 2: Neural network based approaches. Signal Processing, 83(12), 2499–2521. 161Google Scholar

Marriott, F. H. C. 1975. Separating mixtures of normal distributions. Biometrics, 31, 767–769. 34Google Scholar

Masoudnia, S., and Ebrahimpour, R. 2014. Mixture of experts: A literature survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 42(2), 275–293. 350Google Scholar

Matias, C., and Miele, V. 2017. Statistical clustering of temporal networks through a dynamic stochastic block model. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 79, 1119–1141. 329Google Scholar

Maugis, C., Celeux, G., and Martin-Magniette, M.-L. 2009a. Variable selection for clustering with Gaussian mixture models. Biometrics, 65, 701–709. 200, 203, 212, 216Google Scholar

Maugis, C., Celeux, G., and Martin-Magniette, M.-L. 2009b. Variable selection in model-based clustering: A general variable role modeling. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 53, 3872–3882. 201, 210Google Scholar

Maugis, C., Celeux, G., and Martin-Magniette, M.-L. 2011. Variable selection in model-based discriminant analysis. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 102, 1374–1387. 210Google Scholar

Mazza, A., Punzo, A., and Ingrassia, S. 2018. flexCWM: A flexible framework for cluster-weighted models. Journal of Statistical Software, 86(2), 1–30. 350Google Scholar

McCullagh, P., and Nelder, J. A. 1983. Generalized Linear Models. London: Chapman and Hall. 334Google Scholar

McCutcheon, A. C. 1987. Latent Class Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications. 197Google Scholar

McDaid, A. F., and Hurley, N. J. 2010. Detecting highly overlapping communities with model-based overlapping seed expansion. Pages 112–119 of: Memon, N., and Alhajj, R. (eds.), International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM). IEEE Computer Society. 329Google Scholar

McDaid, A. F., Murphy, T. B., Friel, N., and Hurley, N. J. 2012. Model-based clustering in networks with Stochastic Community Finding. Pages 549–560 of: Colubi, A., Fokianos, K., Kontoghiorghes, E. J., and Gonzáles-Rodríguez, G. (eds.), Proceedings of COMPSTAT 2012: 20th International Conference on Computational Statistics. ISI-IASC. 300Google Scholar

McDaid, A. F., Murphy, T. B., Friel, N., and Hurley, N. J. 2013 . Improved Bayesian inference for the stochastic block model with application to large networks. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 60, 12–31. 300Google Scholar

McDaid, A. F., Hurley, N. J., and Murphy, T. B. 2014. Overlapping stochastic community finding. Pages 17–20 of: Wu, X., Ester, M., and Xu, G. (eds.), Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), 2014 IEEE/ACM International Conference on. IEEE. 329Google Scholar

McLachlan, G. J. 1976. A criterion for selecting variables for the linear discriminant function. Biometrics, 529–534. 6Google Scholar

McLachlan, G. J. 1992. Discriminant Analysis and Statistical Pattern Recognition. John Wiley & Sons. 6, 115, 146Google Scholar

McLachlan, G. J., and Basford, K. E. 1988. Mixture Models: Inference and Applications to Clustering. New York: Marcel Dekker. 14, 76Google Scholar

McLachlan, G. J., and Ganesalingam, S. 1982. Updating a discriminant function on the basis of unclassified data. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 11(6), 753–767. 6Google Scholar

McLachlan, G. J., and Krishnan, T. 1997. The EM Algorithm and Extensions. Wiley. 23, 377Google Scholar

McLachlan, G. J., and Lee, S. X. 2016. Comment on “On nomenclature, and the relative merits of two formulations of skew distributions” by Azzalini, A., Browne, R., Genton, M., and McNicholas, P.. Statistics and Probability Letters, 116, 1–5. 267, 270Google Scholar

McLachlan, G. J., and Peel, D. 1998. Robust cluster analysis via mixtures of multivariate t-distributions. Pages 658–666 of: Advances in pattern recognition (Sydney, 1998). Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci., vol. 1451. Springer, Berlin. 260Google Scholar