Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T06:09:59.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Genetic population structure in desert bighorn sheep: implications for conservation in Arizona

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2010

Andrew G. Young
Affiliation:
Division of Plant Industry CSIRO, Canberra
Geoffrey M. Clarke
Affiliation:
Division of Entomology, CSIRO, Canberra
Get access

Summary

ABSTRACT

Bighorn sheep populations have been reduced in both distribution and abundance during the last 200 years, mainly due to the introduction of new infectious disease carried by domestic livestock. Translocation efforts to historical habitat have been quite successful, but the expense of such projects, and the importance of selecting appropriate source stock, make an understanding of genetic variation within and among populations very important. Two subspecies of desert bighorn sheep are currently recognized in Arizona: Ovis canadensis nelsoni in northern Arizona and O. c. mexicana in southern Arizona. From our study often microsatellite loci it was found that: (l) all populations have high amounts of genetic variation, (2) populations within northern Arizona and within southern Arizona are genetically similar, (3) northern Arizona populations are genetically different from southern Arizona populations and (4) genetic distance appears to be a function of geographic distance over short distances (< 300 km) in the south-western region of the United States.

INTRODUCTION

Over the past 200 years, bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis spp.) populations have been greatly reduced in both distribution and abundance. Buechner (1960) reviewed the status of this species throughout its range and reported a reduction of nearly 98% (approximately 25000 animals left). Disease transmission from livestock is considered the most important factor contributing to the population decrease although overhunting, habitat loss and other factors have also been implicated. To rebuild populations, there has been reintroduction into the historic range and augmentation of existing populations.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×